Terry Rocket - 28/11/2005 2:28 PMChris, maybe when Steve is settled in and gets used to us all, we could make life simpler for him by having this as a Steve thread for his stories. It's in the perfect section for it.Also not to waste his time, we could have a "Advanced" Shuttle Q and A. As I think the current Q and A which I set up is pretty easy for the likes of Flight, Ben, Chris etc etc to answer as its designed for people just getting into asking how things work.http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=625&start=1I'm just thinking that we don't want to overload Steve and waste his time on questions about why Shuttles have a roll program when he's an absolute expert and save him having to browse through a load of pages.I'll wait to see what Chris and Steve think about that.
Steve_the_Deev - 28/11/2005 12:13 PMI will say we were really getting good at processing and launching the Shuttles until the idiots at NASA high level mngmnt basically forced us to launch on that Ice cold day when the O-rings had lost their sealing ability.
Steve_the_Deev - 28/11/2005 5:44 AM Also the broken Lox Temp Probe that made its way down towards the engines on again a Columbia Mission. Luckily we scrubbed that day and found that we had a problem. Folks if we had launched we would have been ok until MECO then when the LOX Prevalves close, in this case it wouldn't have, we could have blown an engine Turbopump, it would not have been pretty.
Orbiter Obvious - 29/11/2005 1:42 AMThis is going to be required reading when Steve posts. That's for sure.QuoteSteve_the_Deev - 28/11/2005 5:44 AM Also the broken Lox Temp Probe that made its way down towards the engines on again a Columbia Mission. Luckily we scrubbed that day and found that we had a problem. Folks if we had launched we would have been ok until MECO then when the LOX Prevalves close, in this case it wouldn't have, we could have blown an engine Turbopump, it would not have been pretty.Where have I heard that before, but on STS-114?