-
Irritating Tsiklon launch photo
by
Skyrocket
on 30 Jul, 2007 15:52
-
Hi,
i stumbled recently upon this photo of a Tsiklon launch:
http://www.yuzhmash.com/ksm/p_ksm_en_1_2.htmIt is title "Tsiklon-3", but looks like a "Tsiklon-2". But Tsiklon-2 were only launched from Baikonur, but the trees is the background clearly indicate a Plesetsk launch - but there only Tsiklon-3 were launched.
Can anyone shed a little light on this riddle?
-
#1
by
Jester
on 30 Jul, 2007 17:15
-
I'll add to the confusion:
The picture indeed seems to be a Tsyklon 2 from Plesetsk
however, from the shape of the upper stage it looks like a Tsyklon M which is also sometimes refered to as Tsyklon 3
-
#2
by
Jester
on 30 Jul, 2007 17:55
-
-
#3
by
Skyrocket
on 30 Jul, 2007 21:13
-
Might it be either a Tsiklon-2 or a Tsiklon-M (which i think is the same as the Tsiklon-2), the problem is to find a payload, which could be launched by a two stage Tsiklon from Plesetsk.
-
#4
by
Jester
on 30 Jul, 2007 21:28
-
-
#5
by
Skyrocket
on 31 Jul, 2007 08:23
-
Concerning the "Tsiklon-M" there is some confusion, as it is attiributed to both the Tsiklon-2 and Tsiklon-3 lauchers
There are three versions of the Tsiklon rocket (or four, if we count the R-36-O FOBS launcher):
8K69 = R-36-O
11K67 = Tsiklon-2A
11K68 = Tsiklon-3
11K69 = Tsiklon-2
As in all lists Tsiklon-3 launches are the only, which took place from Plesetsk, at least one of these is a Tsiklon-2 version.
Tsiklon-3 list:
http://www.skyrocket.de/space/doc_lau_det/tsiklon-3.htmBut none of the payloads is in an orbit, which could be reached by a two stage version.
Perhaps the image is indeed a Tsiklon-3 with a smaller diameter fairing. Does anyone know the diameter of the S5M upper stage of the Tsiklon-3 upper stage.
-
#6
by
Skyrocket
on 31 Jul, 2007 08:48
-
-
#7
by
Jester
on 01 Aug, 2007 13:40
-
-
#8
by
Skyrocket
on 01 Aug, 2007 13:48
-
Jester - 1/8/2007 3:40 PM
Could be, but to add the to confusion, the M version appartently was declassified at a later time then the other, could it be some sort of test launch ?
As far as i know, there is no Tsiklon-M designation. There are only the 8K69, 11K67, 11K68 and
11K69 versions. The Tsiklon name was assigned much later (iirc in the 80ies). In case of the 11K67, which got the designation Tsiklon-2A it was long after the version has been retired.
Jester - 1/8/2007 3:40 PM
have you tried to contact yuzhmash and ask them about the picture ? (i know it's a long shot, but you never know)
Yes, but unfortunately without replies.
-
#9
by
Jester
on 01 Aug, 2007 14:26
-
uhmm, i think we are at a dead end here, we know for sure that the image is Plesetsk.
so either, the image is photoshopped (which i hightly doubt) or somebody isn't telling the truth about what has been launched from Plesetsk
maybe ask anik if there is another source of a Plesetsk launch log and compair with what you have ?
-
#10
by
edkyle99
on 01 Aug, 2007 15:11
-
The first two or three Tsyklon 3 launches reportedly carried "dummy" payloads, and one or two were thought to have reached improper orbits. I wonder if, maybe, some of these initial test flights, in 1977, might have flown without a full-up three-stage launch vehicle, or were at least performed by an interim version of the final Tsyklon 3 launch vehicle.
I also wonder if we might be seeing an optical illusion here, since we are used to seeing Tsyklon 3 in a more colorful form.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/23/Cyclone-3_rocket_launching_Meteor-3_satellite.gif - Ed Kyle
-
#11
by
edkyle99
on 01 Aug, 2007 15:44
-
Another possibility is that our old Soviet friends played a trick during the early Tsyklon 3 era by doing a bit of airbrushing. Consider the original image shown at:
http://www.esa.int/images/tsyclon_4_l.jpgHere is a blow up of the payload fairing area. I find it interesting that the base of the hammerhead section is *wider* than the rest!
Since Tsyklon 3 was a new launcher for classified sigints, it wouldn't surprise me to learn that the Soviets had tried to obfuscate the payload fairing width during the early years.
- Ed Kyle
-
#12
by
Skyrocket
on 01 Aug, 2007 15:45
-
-
#13
by
Skyrocket
on 01 Aug, 2007 15:49
-
-
#14
by
publiusr
on 10 Aug, 2007 16:39
-
Did the FOBs carry a smaller warhead?
I would think the big 18-25 MT "City Buster" nuke was so heavy that it would demand a standard trajectory.
-
#15
by
Danderman
on 12 Aug, 2007 15:14
-
No FOBS vehicle was ever launched from Plesetsk, so the photo isn't of FOBS.
-
#16
by
Skyrocket
on 16 Aug, 2007 08:20
-
Danderman - 12/8/2007 5:14 PM
No FOBS vehicle was ever launched from Plesetsk, so the photo isn't of FOBS.
By the way, the R-36-O, which launched the "FOBS" (OGCh) satellite-warheads looked completly different:
http://space.skyrocket.de/doc_lau_det/r-36-o.htm
-
#17
by
Nicolas PILLET
on 02 Nov, 2008 09:26
-
Excuse me for being a little late in this discussion !
In my opinion, this picture shows a Tsiklone-3 rocket with a different fairing. It wouldn't be the first time the Russians do that (example : Cosmos-3M with Sar Lupe fairings)...
-
#18
by
yaroslav
on 07 Nov, 2008 09:32
-
i don't think so, fairing covers 3rd stage too, so it should be bigger anyway
Головной обтекатель == fairing
Космический аппарат == spacecraft
Приборный отсек, Топливный отсек, Маршевый двигатель РД-251 == avionics, fuel tanks, engine == 3rd stage
-
#19
by
Nicolas PILLET
on 14 Nov, 2008 17:06
-
PROBLEM RESOLVED !!!!!!!!!!
This picture is Photoshopped !!
Look at this picture of the Intercosmos 25 launch, in december 1991.