-
#100 by DaveS on 21 Jun, 2007 16:51
-
1651 UTC view of the SLF from the VAB:
-
#101 by DaveS on 21 Jun, 2007 17:06
-
1706 UTC:
-
#102 by Chris Bergin on 21 Jun, 2007 17:11
-
STA observing cloud down to 8,000 ft. Thunderstorms moving within 30 miles heading east.
All sounding pretty close to this being waved off for the day. -
#103 by ApolloLee on 21 Jun, 2007 17:12
-
Quote
dabella - 21/6/2007 9:15 AM
Moving for the next one to come
(if this isn't the place please delete)
Something funny should we land today about the shuttle's wheels moving on the landing strip and the pad it launched from moving at the same time. -
#104 by Chris Bergin on 21 Jun, 2007 17:17
-
STA - Lindsey with more negative news:
"SLF -Tops in low teens out to west. Top on some at 10k with moisture in them. Descending to get bottoms.
"8k tops. Moisture and turbulence in them." -
#105 by Rocket Ronnie on 21 Jun, 2007 17:20
-
Quote
Chris Bergin - 21/6/2007 12:17 PM
STA - Lindsey with more negative news:
"SLF -Tops in low teens out to west. Top on some at 10k with moisture in them. Descending to get bottoms.
"8k tops. Moisture and turbulence in them."
How are you managing to hear what he's saying. Do you have a link? -
#106 by Chris Bergin on 21 Jun, 2007 17:20
-
Quote
Rocket Ronnie - 21/6/2007 6:20 PM
QuoteChris Bergin - 21/6/2007 12:17 PM
STA - Lindsey with more negative news:
"SLF -Tops in low teens out to west. Top on some at 10k with moisture in them. Descending to get bottoms.
"8k tops. Moisture and turbulence in them."
How are you managing to hear what he's saying. Do you have a link?
No link. I have my sources
Holding off on the fluid loading again. -
#107 by Ankle-bone12 on 21 Jun, 2007 17:21
-
CNN said that landing at Edwards would cost an extra million$. is this true?
-
#108 by Kel on 21 Jun, 2007 17:22
-
I believe CAPCOM said they'd know about fluid loading in about 15 min, so we should know soon.....
-
#109 by punkboi on 21 Jun, 2007 17:23
-
Quote
Ankle-bone12 - 21/6/2007 10:21 AM CNN said that landing at Edwards would cost an extra million$. is this true?
Yes (because of the extra cost of the 747 transporting the orbiter back to Florida). Plus a one week delay in getting back to KSC.
-
#110 by Chris Bergin on 21 Jun, 2007 17:24
-
Yes on the $1m to transport her back from Edwards.
STA: "Tops over field 12,500. Bases over field about 2600ft. Ceiling broken to overcast." -
#111 by MKremer on 21 Jun, 2007 17:25
-
A week if everything goes according to plan, with no delays (including weather there and along the return route).
-
#112 by mkirk on 21 Jun, 2007 17:27
-
Quote
Chris Bergin - 21/6/2007 12:24 PM
Yes on the $1m to transport her back from Edwards.
STA: "Tops over field 12,500. Bases over field about 2600ft. Ceiling broken to overcast."
Just a reminder - ceiling needs to be 8,000 feet with 5 miles visibility for a go to be given.
Mark Kirkman -
#113 by DaveS on 21 Jun, 2007 17:27
-
Image from VAB at 1727 UTC:
-
#114 by DaveS on 21 Jun, 2007 17:30
-
Wx briefing underway in the FCR:
-
#115 by DaveS on 21 Jun, 2007 17:33
-
WAVE-OFF! No landing today!
-
#116 by Chris Bergin on 21 Jun, 2007 17:33
-
And they are waving off for the day.
-
#117 by William Graham on 21 Jun, 2007 17:34
-
How much longer can it stay in orbit?
-
#118 by jackyg on 21 Jun, 2007 17:35
-
Does anybody know the time schedules for tomorrows landing?
-
#119 by Ford Mustang on 21 Jun, 2007 17:35
-
The last day to land is Sunday, but that is for a 'systems day', if anything were to happen. Should land tomorrow or Saturday for sure. Tomorrow adds Edwards as well as KSC. Not quite sure about White Sands for tomorrow..
