-
#20
by
Chris Bergin
on 10 Jun, 2007 14:56
-
-
#21
by
Chris Bergin
on 10 Jun, 2007 15:12
-
-
#22
by
Chris Bergin
on 10 Jun, 2007 15:13
-
15 minutes from next burn NC4.
-
#23
by
Chris Bergin
on 10 Jun, 2007 15:18
-
More photos being taken of the port OMS Pod with a 400mm camera for evaluations on the ground.
-
#24
by
eeergo
on 10 Jun, 2007 15:25
-
4 minutes from NC4 burn. I wonder if they'll show downlink of the pods...
-
#25
by
psloss
on 10 Jun, 2007 15:25
-
From the execute package, approx. NC-4 burn (2-engine OMS) numbers:
Delta-V: 80.3 fps
Duration: 51 seconds
-
#26
by
DaveS
on 10 Jun, 2007 15:27
-
eeergo - 10/6/2007 5:25 PM
4 minutes from NC4 burn. I wonder if they'll show downlink of the pods...
It's just still-imagery, no video.
-
#27
by
psloss
on 10 Jun, 2007 15:28
-
NC-4 burn started, two good engines.
-
#28
by
psloss
on 10 Jun, 2007 15:28
-
Good burn, no trim required.
-
#29
by
eeergo
on 10 Jun, 2007 15:30
-
Atlantis 40 nm from the Station. She will execute the TI burn when she's 8 nm away, aprox. 1 hour and a half from now.
-
#30
by
Ford Mustang
on 10 Jun, 2007 15:31
-
Picture 2: Atlantis seen from ISS.
-
#31
by
psloss
on 10 Jun, 2007 15:32
-
Now seeing the orbiter from the ISS...
-
#32
by
psloss
on 10 Jun, 2007 15:35
-
FYI...from the execute package, the TIG on the Ti burn was at MET 01/17:22:33, which works out to 17:00:37 GMT...when they get closer to the burn, we should hear an updated maneuver pad read up to the crew...
-
#33
by
kneecaps
on 10 Jun, 2007 15:38
-
PLT and CDR currently working the Rendezvous timeline. They are currently performing procedures to incorporate data from the onboard Star Trackers into the rendezvous guidance.
(RNDZ C/L, 4-10)
-
#34
by
Chris Bergin
on 10 Jun, 2007 15:38
-
Four hours to docking.
-
#35
by
Ford Mustang
on 10 Jun, 2007 15:41
-
Diagram of RPM and Docking pictures:
-
#36
by
Ford Mustang
on 10 Jun, 2007 15:41
-
-
#37
by
kneecaps
on 10 Jun, 2007 15:49
-
Anybody catch a TIG for the NCC?
-
#38
by
JimO
on 10 Jun, 2007 15:52
-
"Ti" -- you might be amused to learn that when I documented rendezvous crew procedures for the mission operations handbook back in the mid-1980s, people had already forgotten what "TI" stood for, and we had to make up a new meaning for it. "NC" and "NPC" and "NCC" -- those were easy. "Ti" was actually a puzzler, but we invented something that sounded credible.
-
#39
by
Thomas ESA
on 10 Jun, 2007 16:00
-
Did anyone at NASA become concerned about RPM? It must have seemed risky in simulations with the orbiter losing sight of its target?