Author Topic: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)  (Read 265151 times)

Offline yinzer

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1509
  • Liked: 3
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #700 on: 03/23/2007 09:18 pm »
That is almost certainly false - in order to be space debris, it would have had to reach orbital velocity.  It looked to be in serious trouble when control was lost, and still had four minutes left to burn.
California 2008 - taking rights from people and giving rights to chickens.

Online DaveS

  • Shuttle program observer
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8548
  • Sweden
  • Liked: 1240
  • Likes Given: 65
Re: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #701 on: 03/23/2007 09:44 pm »
Quote
yinzer - 23/3/2007  11:18 PM

That is almost certainly false - in order to be space debris, it would have had to reach orbital velocity.  It looked to be in serious trouble when control was lost, and still had four minutes left to burn.
It's false alright. Elon did state that it at most travelled half an orbit before falling back to Earth and disintegrated.
"For Sardines, space is no problem!"
-1996 Astronaut class slogan

"We're rolling in the wrong direction but for the right reasons"
-USA engineer about the rollback of Discovery prior to the STS-114 Return To Flight mission

Offline Avron

  • Canadian Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4930
  • Liked: 156
  • Likes Given: 160
Re: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #702 on: 03/23/2007 09:53 pm »
Quote
JonSBerndt - 23/3/2007  1:23 PM

The point remains: was there a pitch or yaw acceleration at sep, and if so, what caused it?

Jon


And that John is one of the questions I would love to have answered, at first I was thinking that something jammed on sep.. but then there is always the question if  the Helium system failed open and accelerated the 2nd stage in an unballanced way as to cause the Yaw..

Two other questions,  maybe Jim has the answers.

How do you prevent fuel from sloshing in the tanks?
What must be done to the control system to prevent the motion we saw before video cutoff.. is it a simple gain control in the system?

Offline Avron

  • Canadian Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4930
  • Liked: 156
  • Likes Given: 160
Re: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #703 on: 03/23/2007 09:55 pm »
Quote
DaveS - 23/3/2007  6:44 PM

Quote
yinzer - 23/3/2007  11:18 PM

That is almost certainly false - in order to be space debris, it would have had to reach orbital velocity.  It looked to be in serious trouble when control was lost, and still had four minutes left to burn.
It's false alright. Elon did state that it at most travelled half an orbit before falling back to Earth and disintegrated.

If it got 1000 miles downrange, it would have been doing well, looked balistic to me

Offline Antares

  • ABO^2
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5181
  • Done arguing with amateurs
  • Liked: 371
  • Likes Given: 228
Re: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #704 on: 03/23/2007 10:15 pm »
Quote
Avron - 23/3/2007  6:53 PM
How do you prevent fuel from sloshing in the tanks?
What must be done to the control system to prevent the motion we saw before video cutoff.. is it a simple gain control in the system?
Google slosh baffles.  They are metal plates or rings inside rocket tanks (on the r-theta plane) that damp liquid motion.  Slosh modeling is one of the most complicated aspects of flight control and propellant management.  Recall it delayed the Delta IV L-22 launch, though that was more thermal than flight control.  Modeling fidelity is key.  Subtle changes in input can cause huge changes in output.
If I like something on NSF, it's probably because I know it to be accurate.  Every once in a while, it's just something I agree with.  Facts generally receive the former.

Offline Avron

  • Canadian Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4930
  • Liked: 156
  • Likes Given: 160
Re: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #705 on: 03/23/2007 10:24 pm »
Quote
Antares - 23/3/2007  7:15 PM

Quote
Avron - 23/3/2007  6:53 PM
How do you prevent fuel from sloshing in the tanks?
What must be done to the control system to prevent the motion we saw before video cutoff.. is it a simple gain control in the system?
Google slosh baffles.  They are metal plates or rings inside rocket tanks (on the r-theta plane) that damp liquid motion.  Slosh modeling is one of the most complicated aspects of flight control and propellant management.  Recall it delayed the Delta IV L-22 launch, though that was more thermal than flight control.  Modeling fidelity is key.  Subtle changes in input can cause huge changes in output.

Would Spacex have no baffles, that would be crazy .. yes? or did the existing baffles not have enought "area" to control the slosh that must have been created from the "interesting" stage event?

Offline JonSBerndt

  • Aerospace Engineer
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 399
  • Westminster, CO
    • JSBSim Open Source Flight Dynamics Software Library
  • Liked: 4
  • Likes Given: 61
Re: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #706 on: 03/23/2007 11:53 pm »
Quote
Avron - 23/3/2007  6:24 PM
Would Spacex have no baffles, that would be crazy .. yes? or did the existing baffles not have enought "area" to control the slosh that must have been created from the "interesting" stage event?

Here's an illustration of the ET, where you can see slosh baffles:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9e/Sts_et_cutaway.jpg

The tank also has vortex baffles at the bottom where it drains.

Jon

Offline meiza

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3067
  • Where Be Dragons
  • Liked: 5
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #707 on: 03/24/2007 05:54 pm »
Quote
Jim - 23/3/2007  7:05 PM

Quote
JonSBerndt - 23/3/2007  1:23 PM

It does have them, in a fashion (see: http://www.spacex.com/falcon1.php#second_stage):

"Helium pressurization is again provided by composite over wrapped inconel tanks from Arde. However, in this case the helium is also used in cold gas thrusters for attitude control and propellant settling when a restart is needed."

It's not clear by the wording above if second stage ignition (the first time) uses the thrusters for propellant settling. This is the part where I am not clear on whether or not they are needed for the initial ignition.

The point remains: was there a pitch or yaw acceleration at sep, and if so, what caused it?

Jon


They don't have ullage MOTORS, i.e. not solids.   All upperstages have aft facing thrusters for ullage control for restarts.  But these and most RCS systems are not used during staging since the other forces present (aero, ordnance, spring, etc) are much larger and overwhelm them.  LV's rely on the upperstage engine TVC to correct the errors.  Much like what was seen on this launch

So, Falcon I staging goes like this?:
1. main engine shutdown
2. mechanical unlock of second stage, springs push it forwards and the engine bell comes out of the interstage
3. the second stage is now separate and practically weightless, it's ullage thrusters fire (the helium ones) to settle the propellant
4. the second stage engine lights and aligns the stage right by gimballing the main engine

-roll control is achieved by cold gas thrusters too. It is unclear at what point roll control starts to function, probably at 4.

Offline WHAP

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 795
  • Liked: 105
  • Likes Given: 8
Re: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #708 on: 03/24/2007 06:14 pm »
Quote
meiza - 24/3/2007  12:54 PM
So, Falcon I staging goes like this?:
1. main engine shutdown
2. mechanical unlock of second stage, springs push it forwards and the engine bell comes out of the interstage
3. the second stage is now separate and practically weightless, it's ullage thrusters fire (the helium ones) to settle the propellant
4. the second stage engine lights and aligns the stage right by gimballing the main engine

-roll control is achieved by cold gas thrusters too. It is unclear at what point roll control starts to function, probably at 4.

#3 probably doesn't happen.  As was stated previously, there likely isn't enough time for the low thrust of the cold gas thrusters to have any effect on the propellant.
ULA employee.  My opinions do not necessarily reflect those of my employer.

Offline Chris Bergin

Been speaking to Elon and there's an article coming in about an hour with the latest (lots of new info - lots of positives).
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline JonSBerndt

  • Aerospace Engineer
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 399
  • Westminster, CO
    • JSBSim Open Source Flight Dynamics Software Library
  • Liked: 4
  • Likes Given: 61
RE: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #710 on: 03/25/2007 03:21 am »
Quote
Chris Bergin - 24/3/2007  9:58 PM

Been speaking to Elon and there's an article coming in about an hour with the latest (lots of new info - lots of positives).

Excellent. That's worth waiting up for.

Jon

Offline halkey

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 100
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
RE: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #711 on: 03/25/2007 03:46 am »
Will that be L2 exclusive info or will us moochers on the free site be able to read it also?

Offline Chris Bergin

Quote
halkey - 25/3/2007  3:46 AM

Will that be L2 exclusive info or will us moochers on the free site be able to read it also?

L2 isn't used for news articles, L2's for pure documentation, memos, pdfs, special unreleased videos like the camcorder through re-entry on the flight deck of STS-115 etc. etc. Ironically, most of our articles come from L2 documentation, but this is a pure interview - immediate turnaround into article.

This is for a news article, on the front of the site, not L2.
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline Chris Bergin

Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline Jackson

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 289
  • Liked: 18
  • Likes Given: 7
Re: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #714 on: 03/25/2007 04:32 am »
Do you ever sleep?? :o

Elon, what a guy. How transparent are those comments? Really is good news and the flight went a lot better than some of the doom monger media claimed.

Offline Rob in KC

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 748
  • Liked: 69
  • Likes Given: 99
Re: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #715 on: 03/25/2007 04:47 am »
Ring seperation is good news! I wonder if SpaceX will release this extra video.

Offline Pete at Edwards

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 222
  • Liked: 444
  • Likes Given: 2
RE: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #716 on: 03/25/2007 04:50 am »
Quote
Chris Bergin - 24/3/2007  11:20 PM

On site: http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/content/?cid=5056

There's a good point there. This was the debut flight in space and the problems seem like easy fixes. Also didn't know about the ring seperation. Seems very close to a perfect launch.

Offline JIS

  • Elite Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1097
  • Liked: 7
  • Likes Given: 6
Re: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #717 on: 03/25/2007 07:22 am »
Quote
JonSBerndt - 23/3/2007  6:23 PM

The point remains: was there a pitch or yaw acceleration at sep, and if so, what caused it?

Jon

Merlin
'Old age and treachery will overcome youth and skill' - Old Greek experience

Offline JIS

  • Elite Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1097
  • Liked: 7
  • Likes Given: 6
Re: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #718 on: 03/25/2007 07:35 am »
As I understand that matter RCS worked just right but the problem is bad sloshing baffles design and over/under-reacting TVC. The separation collision was caused by the forces acting during Merlin shutdown which wasn't predicted correctly.
The problem is again in Space X procedures which don't take this into an account. But again, it could be cheaper to loose few Falcons than doing a proper risk assesment. NASA can't afford mishaps - Space X can (for now).
That is the reason the can't fly Dragon to ISS anytime soon.
'Old age and treachery will overcome youth and skill' - Old Greek experience

Offline Thomas ESA

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 211
  • Liked: 89
  • Likes Given: 5
Re: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #719 on: 03/25/2007 01:04 pm »
I'm impressed by Mr Musk.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1