Author Topic: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)  (Read 265157 times)

Offline Jeff Bingham

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1592
  • aka "51-D Mascot"
  • Liked: 42
  • Likes Given: 56
RE: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #280 on: 03/21/2007 12:24 am »
Looked to me like nozzle was possibly overheating...saw some precessing movement but no spinning then lost feed here.
Offering only my own views and experience as a long-time "Space Cadet."

Offline LaunchOps

  • Member
  • Member
  • Posts: 7
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
RE: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #281 on: 03/21/2007 12:24 am »
I doubt it hit the kestral engine nozzle.  It's made from niobium and from expericence with similar nozzles they are somewhat flimsy, if the first stage had hit it there would have been a nice dent.

Offline just-nick

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 238
  • Liked: 16
  • Likes Given: 5
RE: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #282 on: 03/21/2007 12:25 am »
Quote
Zachstar - 20/3/2007  6:19 PM

I saw the nozzle starting to act weird and then it started spinning wildly

It looked like the stage was starting to oscilate more and more dramatically and the nozzle gimballing more and more to try and compensate.  My first thought was some sort of ugly coupling where the guidance system was actually inducing or exacerbating the oscilation.  That can't last long until you run out to gimbal limits or overload the stage...

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37818
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 22048
  • Likes Given: 430
RE: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #283 on: 03/21/2007 12:26 am »
Quote
wannamoonbase - 20/3/2007  9:21 PM

I noticed that too and was expecting immediate problems but it kept on going.  I also noticed what looked like a ring come off the bottom of the nozzle, but its possible it was something from the fairing jettison.    The steady increasing glow had me wondering how long that could last, hopefully that wasn't it.
 Glowing is normal for radiation cooled nozzles (see Delta II second stage)

Offline simonbp

  • Science Guy
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7138
  • Liked: 314
  • Likes Given: 183
RE: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #284 on: 03/21/2007 12:26 am »
Remember that this is a very thin niobium nozzle; I'd be surprised if it didn't glow...

Simon ;)

Online Lee Jay

  • Elite Veteran
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8625
  • Liked: 3702
  • Likes Given: 334
RE: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #285 on: 03/21/2007 12:26 am »
It had the *appearance* of a control system oscillation.

Offline braddock

  • NSF Private Space Flight Editor
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 991
  • Liked: 16
  • Likes Given: 8
RE: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #286 on: 03/21/2007 12:27 am »
We are awaiting further information from the press call.  They are attempting to contact Kwaj (in between sips of champagne).

Please don't hit refresh more than once every minute.  The load makes it difficult to get updates posted.

Offline WHAP

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 795
  • Liked: 105
  • Likes Given: 8
RE: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #287 on: 03/21/2007 12:27 am »
RL-10 nozzle glows during flight - I think this was visible during the Delta IV DMSP launch last year.
ULA employee.  My opinions do not necessarily reflect those of my employer.

Offline Flometrics

  • Member
  • Posts: 24
  • Carlsbad, CA
  • Liked: 2
  • Likes Given: 0
RE: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #288 on: 03/21/2007 12:27 am »
Looks like propellant slosh coupling to the second stage attitude control system, hopefully the propellants will drain out faster than it amplifies.
Steve
Flometrics
Steve Harrington Ph. D
President, Flometrics, Inc.
Lecturer, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UCSD
5900 Sea Lion Place,
Suite 150
760-476-2770

www.flometrics.com
www.rocketfuelpump.com

Offline just-nick

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 238
  • Liked: 16
  • Likes Given: 5
RE: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #289 on: 03/21/2007 12:28 am »
Quote
wannamoonbase - 20/3/2007  6:21 PM
I also noticed what looked like a ring come off the bottom of the nozzle, but its possible it was something from the fairing jettison.  

Looked like a stiffener ring or some sort to me -- doesn't the Delta IV jetteson some similar bit just after 2nd stage ignition?

Offline ilia25

  • Member
  • Member
  • Posts: 44
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
RE: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #290 on: 03/21/2007 12:29 am »
Quote
LaunchOps - 20/3/2007  8:24 PM

I doubt it hit the kestral engine nozzle.  It's made from niobium and from expericence with similar nozzles they are somewhat flimsy, if the first stage had hit it there would have been a nice dent.

And I doubt the glowing was an issue. I saw rl-10 glowing pretty much the same.

Offline NotGncDude

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
  • V
  • Liked: 1
  • Likes Given: 0
RE: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #291 on: 03/21/2007 12:30 am »
Quote
jimvela - 20/3/2007  9:23 PM

Quote
ianmga - 20/3/2007  7:17 PM
Staging was a bit off alright. It bumped the engine. And now it's oscillating a little. So coooool.

Definately NOT cool.  You never want to see ANYTHING bump the engine during flight, in particular the lower stage!

Regardless of what else happens, SpaceX just got a vehicle exoatomoshperic, and no doubt they've added a few lessons learned to make the next one better...

Hahaha. LOL!

Of course the bump is NOT cool. It's cool to WATCH it in real time. Damn, I lost the feed before the ending. Looking forward to watch it from L2 or wherever.

Offline JWag

My hat's off to SpaceX for a great flight through staging.

 

My hat's also off to the folks who designed that second-stage guidance.  The whack from staging required an aggressive course-correction which the stage managed without rolling or oscillation.  Whatever the oscillation was that came on later, I hope it's not serious (maybe a feedback loop modification?).


Great job, SpaceX!


Offline charlieb

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 618
  • King of Prussia, PA, USA
  • Liked: 3
  • Likes Given: 10
RE: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #293 on: 03/21/2007 12:31 am »
me and another engineer clearly saw the 1st stage skirt rub against the nozzle.  Didn't note any damages to the nozzle - and did note the radiation of the combustion turning the nozzle red (common - nbd). The nozzle did move a bit during the first moments after ignition - but it became stable.  Then - yes - one sees the 'coning' effect which is not a great thing.  I'm betting the control loops got saturated trying to control things and the vehicle would go out of control and spin out of control and forces would break it apart.  Maybe the impact caused a hydraulic leak?
Former Shuttle Mission Ops Eng  (In them days DF24 - INCO GROUP/COMMS, Now DS231-AVIONICS BRANCH).

Offline Nick L.

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3857
  • A unique little aerospace company
  • Liked: 6
  • Likes Given: 4
RE: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #294 on: 03/21/2007 12:31 am »
Yes, the RL10 extending nozzle glows, but it glows from the bottom of the bell up, not throughout the bell itself. I hope there wasn't a burnthrough of the nozzle!  :o
"Now you may leave here for four days in space, but when you return it's the same old place..."

Offline ilia25

  • Member
  • Member
  • Posts: 44
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
RE: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #295 on: 03/21/2007 12:32 am »
Quote
Flometrics - 20/3/2007  8:27 PM

Looks like propellant slosh coupling to the second stage attitude control system, hopefully the propellants will drain out faster than it amplifies.
Steve
Flometrics

Yes, I would imagine the slosh would look exactly like that.

Offline rsnellenberger

  • Amateur wood butcher
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 855
  • Harbor Springs, Michigan
  • Liked: 385
  • Likes Given: 55
RE: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #296 on: 03/21/2007 12:33 am »
If the control system actuators were damaged when the 1st stage contacted the 2nd stage engine bell, they might not have bee able to respond properly to control inputs -- it'd look like a control system problem (controls would lag), but only because the control model was based on control authority X but only had some fraction of X...

Offline otisbow

  • Regular
  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 201
  • Little Rock, Ar.
  • Liked: 6
  • Likes Given: 0
RE: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #297 on: 03/21/2007 12:33 am »
I watch the launch video, the 1st stage hit the 2nd stage engine bell hard!!!

Offline Avron

  • Canadian Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4930
  • Liked: 156
  • Likes Given: 160
RE: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #298 on: 03/21/2007 12:34 am »
Quote
Lee Jay - 20/3/2007  9:26 PM

It had the *appearance* of a control system oscillation.

Agreed

Great job Spacex... very well done...

ONe man and a dream...  wow

Offline ringshot

  • Member
  • Member
  • Posts: 23
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
RE: LIVE: SpaceX - Falcon I (Mk.II) NET March 20 (Attempt 2)
« Reply #299 on: 03/21/2007 12:34 am »
Delta IV US engines ablate, and occasionally various support rings fall away (though I don't know if they plan that).

...I don't know if the nozzle was supposed to ablate like that.

But I DO know the first stage was not supposed to impact the nozzle!

I agree that it looked like it didn't affect it, but if it input an initial tip rate and they set their autopilot filters tight, it could have been the cause of the oscillation (and eventual loss of control?) we saw.

I don't think the glow is something to be concerned about.

...just my 2 bits

G'Day...Ron
G'Day...Ron

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1