Author Topic: Navy rail gun breaches atmosphere  (Read 11191 times)


Offline Stowbridge

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 427
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Navy rail gun breaches atmosphere
« Reply #1 on: 01/17/2007 11:32 PM »
Now THAT'S what I'm talking about! Thanks very much for the link Bhankii. Awesome technology.
Veteran space reporter.

Offline Norm Hartnett

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2306
  • Liked: 56
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: Navy rail gun breaches atmosphere
« Reply #2 on: 01/17/2007 11:56 PM »
"When this thing leaves, it's [under] hundreds of thousands of g 's"

Very cool weapon system that I've been reading about for decades in SciFi. I wonder about the applications for shipboard anti-air, anti-missile?

Smaller projectiles fired at a high rate with that kind of speed could be more effective than the Vulcan system.
“You can’t take a traditional approach and expect anything but the traditional results, which has been broken budgets and not fielding any flight hardware.” Mike Gold - Apollo, STS, CxP; those that don't learn from history are condemned to repeat it: SLS.

Offline meiza

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3068
  • Where Be Dragons
  • Liked: 3
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Navy rail gun breaches atmosphere
« Reply #3 on: 01/18/2007 12:10 AM »
I wonder how good can their accuracy be, if the resulting projectile is almost as expensive as a missile...
If the launch energy used is 64 MJ and they use a 1 MW generator, the load up time is only about a minute. With 10 MW, a few secs. (Seems Aegis cruisers have 75 MW shaft horsepower so they can spare.)

Offline PurduesUSAFguy

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 209
  • Liked: 3
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Navy rail gun breaches atmosphere
« Reply #4 on: 01/18/2007 01:16 AM »
Once this technology has matured it will make cruise missiles obsolete. The next generation of US suface combatants, the DD(X) and CG(X) are going to be 'all electric' ship, that is to say their gas turbines and reactors generate electricity that is used to drive electric motors to drive the ship as opposed to generating steam to turn steam turbines for propulsion. This will allow ships power to spare for energy intensive weapons like rail guns.

From what I've read the rail guns envisioned by the navy for the potentially nuclear powered CG(X) they will be able to hit targets up to 600 miles inland with with minutes of travel time and since the projectile is simply a dart made of ferrous metal, the 'per shot' cost should be under $2000.

This will change the way the navy goes about power projection and once again put the gun carrying surface ship as the most important ships in the fleet.

Offline nacnud

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2381
  • Liked: 600
  • Likes Given: 237
Re: Navy rail gun breaches atmosphere
« Reply #5 on: 01/18/2007 02:08 AM »
Well there is still the small problem of stopping the rail gun melting with each shot, even at the current 8 MJ.

Offline stargazer777

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 338
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Navy rail gun breaches atmosphere
« Reply #6 on: 01/18/2007 02:47 AM »
I saw a show on the Discovery Channel (Future Weapons) about a new GPS steerable artillery round (Excalibur) with tremendous range and accuracy developed for the Army.  The reason I mention it is that they had to develop electronics and navigation foils that could withstand the enormous G forces encountered in being fired out of a high velosity cannon and still instantly deploy to permit it to guide the round to the target.  Not sure the G-forces encountered by this artillery round are comparable to those that would be encountered by a rail gun projectile.  It seemed to be nearly ready for deployment with the Army.

Offline TyMoore

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 482
  • Eureka, CA, USA
  • Liked: 2
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: Navy rail gun breaches atmosphere
« Reply #7 on: 01/18/2007 04:30 AM »

When I was in highschool (1985) I designed a fairly crude rail gun for a science fair project--but once the Principal got wind of what I had in mind, they squashed it as way too dangerous. Mine was just a teensy one: two meters long; stainless steel rails set for a 0.5 inch slug of solid copper; silver soldered copper pipe for bus bars; and fifteen salvaged car batteries (in parallel) for intermittent 5,000 to 10,000 amp pulses. I figured it might have a muzzle velocity of about 1 km/s. I guess it scared the bejeezes out of them.

I always wanted to build it though...

Later when I was in college studying undergraduate physics (1991), I had an interesting idea to build a three phase, 220vac electromagnetic coil gun that shot BB's. Again, something less than two meters long, firing BB's at a steady rate of 30-50 per second with a muzzle velocity close to 1 km/s. Using water cooled copper pipe for the windings and arcwelder triacs for switches triggered by photodiode / phototransistor arrays along the barrel to energize the coils sequentially, I figured the thing would dissipate just about 7kw when firing full auto.

Again never built the thing, but I always wanted too.

Naval rail guns will offer tremendous firepower in an economical package. Look for them in twenty years mounted on all electric tanks for the Army and Marine Corps. Small EM machine guns shooting almost solid streams of BB's would be an almost perfect close in weapons system--perfect for a replacement for aging Phalanx CIWS antimissile systems currently in use on US warships.
 

 


Offline SimonShuttle

  • Elite Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1777
  • Manchester, England
  • Liked: 35
  • Likes Given: 54
Re: Navy rail gun breaches atmosphere
« Reply #8 on: 01/18/2007 07:36 AM »
Rail Gun, will then have a BFG next? ;)

Offline stargazer777

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 338
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Navy rail gun breaches atmosphere
« Reply #9 on: 01/18/2007 08:16 AM »
Naval rail guns will offer tremendous firepower in an economical package. Look for them in twenty years mounted on all electric tanks for the Army and Marine Corps. Small EM machine guns shooting almost solid streams of BB's would be an almost perfect close in weapons system--perfect for a replacement for aging Phalanx CIWS antimissile systems currently in use on US warships.
Yes, but meanwhile other advanced weapons technologies are also advancing.  Directed energy and laser weapons for sea based, land based, airborne and space based applications are also rapidly being developed.  It will certainly make things interesting.

Offline meiza

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3068
  • Where Be Dragons
  • Liked: 3
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Navy rail gun breaches atmosphere
« Reply #10 on: 01/18/2007 11:40 AM »
What I'm saying is, the projectile can't be cheap and accurate at the same time! If it has to maneuver with airfoils, it is going to be expensive. And a solid slug is just very inaccurate at those distances.

And for the other things, ball ammo sucks for accuracy.

Offline kevin-rf

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8654
  • Overlooking the path Mary's little Lamb took..
  • Liked: 1125
  • Likes Given: 245
Re: Navy rail gun breaches atmosphere
« Reply #11 on: 01/18/2007 12:41 PM »
Nor are you going to launch complex payloads, like cluster munitions with them. There will stll be a need for cruise missiles.
If you're happy and you know it,
It's your med's!

  • Guest
Re: Navy rail gun breaches atmosphere
« Reply #12 on: 01/18/2007 01:24 PM »
Quote
meiza - 18/1/2007  6:40 AM

What I'm saying is, the projectile can't be cheap and accurate at the same time! If it has to maneuver with airfoils, it is going to be expensive. And a solid slug is just very inaccurate at those distances.

And for the other things, ball ammo sucks for accuracy.

You could put some fins on the back to get some spin - that would improve the accuracy.  At $1000 a pop you can fire 1000 for the cost of a cruise missile.  Surely you'll hit something.

Offline simonbp

Re: Navy rail gun breaches atmosphere
« Reply #13 on: 01/18/2007 01:30 PM »
This actually could work as an anti-satellite weapon, especially with the seeker head already developed for missile defense; timely considering that the Chinese just tested their first kinetic asat...

Simon ;)

Offline kevin-rf

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8654
  • Overlooking the path Mary's little Lamb took..
  • Liked: 1125
  • Likes Given: 245
Re: Navy rail gun breaches atmosphere
« Reply #14 on: 01/18/2007 01:35 PM »
Quote
bhankiii - 18/1/2007  8:24 AM
You could put some fins on the back to get some spin - that would improve the accuracy.  At $1000 a pop you can fire 1000 for the cost of a cruise missile.  Surely you'll hit something.

A fin will behave how at those speeds? You could groove the projectile body to cause it to spin. The sad part mentioned in the article is the acceleration is to high for current electronics. So no terminal guidance...

There was some interesting news on ultra capacitors from eestore over at hobby space this morning. http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/HSblog.php?itemid=3186

It would help with the energy storage for these devices.
If you're happy and you know it,
It's your med's!

Offline edkyle99

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12986
    • Space Launch Report
  • Liked: 4088
  • Likes Given: 769
Re: Navy rail gun breaches atmosphere
« Reply #15 on: 01/18/2007 02:27 PM »
Quote
PurduesUSAFguy - 17/1/2007  8:16 PM

This will change the way the navy goes about power projection and once again put the gun carrying surface ship as the most important ships in the fleet.

Submarines are today's capital ships.  Surface ships are just targets.  ;)

 - Ed Kyle

  • Guest
Re: Navy rail gun breaches atmosphere
« Reply #16 on: 01/18/2007 02:59 PM »
Quote
kevin-rf - 18/1/2007  8:35 AM

Quote
bhankiii - 18/1/2007  8:24 AM
You could put some fins on the back to get some spin - that would improve the accuracy.  At $1000 a pop you can fire 1000 for the cost of a cruise missile.  Surely you'll hit something.

A fin will behave how at those speeds? You could groove the projectile body to cause it to spin. The sad part mentioned in the article is the acceleration is to high for current electronics. So no terminal guidance...

There was some interesting news on ultra capacitors from eestore over at hobby space this morning. http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/HSblog.php?itemid=3186

It would help with the energy storage for these devices.

I'm sure there's some appropriate hypersonic solution to make the things spin.  The electronics solution is being worked - gotta have those smart cannon shells.  

There's also a discussion of ultra caps going on at cr4:

http://cr4.globalspec.com/

which, BTW, is where I got this news article.


Online Chris Bergin

Re: Navy rail gun breaches atmosphere
« Reply #17 on: 01/18/2007 10:15 PM »
Quote
stargazer777 - 18/1/2007  9:16 AM
Yes, but meanwhile other advanced weapons technologies are also advancing.  Directed energy and laser weapons for sea based, land based, airborne and space based applications are also rapidly being developed.  It will certainly make things interesting.

Interesting attachments - very much appreciated.


Offline simonbp

Re: Navy rail gun breaches atmosphere
« Reply #19 on: 01/19/2007 04:48 PM »
Quote
edkyle99 - 18/1/2007  9:27 AM

Submarines are today's capital ships.  Surface ships are just targets.  ;)

But what do you mean by capital ships? Nuclear missile subs are one-shot surface bombardment platforms, and most likely targets in any ship-to-ship engagement. Attack subs can be effective against other subs or a lone surface ship, but useless against a properly organised surface fleet or convoy.

A DDX-style dreadnought (and they are about as big a WWI dreadnought) with massive railguns and a swarm of UAVs can physically command a swath of open sea, able to detect and instantaneously attack any ship (surface or not) within its sphere. That is a capital ship...

Simon ;)

Tags: