Author Topic: SpaceX F9 : Starlink group 6-51 : KSC LC-39A : 17 April 2024 (21:26 UTC)  (Read 11657 times)

Offline Galactic Penguin SST

Thread for the Starlink 6-51 group launch.

NSF Threads for Starlink 6-51: Discussion

Launch 17 April 2024, at NET 21:26:00 UTC (5:26 pm EDT), from KSC LC-39A, on booster 1077-12.  The first stage will land aboard Just Read the Instructions.

Payload 23 Starlink V2 Mini satellites to 43 degree inclination orbit on a southeastern trajectory.  Initial orbit 285 x 294 km.

Please use the Starlink Discussion Thread for all general discussion on Starlink.

Check the Starlink Index Thread for links to more Starlink information.



L2 SpaceX: https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?board=60.0
« Last Edit: 04/17/2024 03:11 am by zubenelgenubi »
Astronomy & spaceflight geek penguin. In a relationship w/ Space Shuttle Discovery.

Offline Galactic Penguin SST

NET late April 17 UTC per these NOTAMs:

A1244/24 NOTAMN
Q) FAJO/QWMLW/IV/BO/W/000/999/4142S02856E999
A) FAJO B) 2404172314 C) 2404240137
D) 17-18 APR 2314-0408, 18-19 APR 2249-0343, 19-20 APR 2224-0318,
20-21 APR 2158-0252, 21-22 APR 2133-0227, 22-23 APR 2108-0202, 23-24
APR 2043-0137
E) AREA BOUNDED BY (4256S 00224W, 4045S 00221W, 3210S 05700E, 3515S
05700E): SPACEX STARLINK 6-51 ROCKET RE-ENTRY OPS TAKING PLACE.
APPLICABLE AIRSPACE DOWNGRADED TO CLASS G.
F) SFC G) UNL


F1372/24 NOTAMN
Q) YMMM/QWMLW/IV/BO/W/000/999/1611S08231E800
A) YMMM
B) 2404172314 C) 2404240137
D) 2404172314 TO 2404180408
   2404182249 TO 2404190343
   2404192224 TO 2404200318
   2404202158 TO 2404210252
   2404212133 TO 2404220227
   2404222108 TO 2404230202
   2404232043 TO 2404240137
E) ROCKET LAUNCH WILL TAKE PLACE
FLW RECEIVED FROM GOVERNMENT OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
HAZARDOUS OPS WILL BE CONDUCTED FOR ATMOSPHERIC RE-ENTRY AND
SPLASHDOWN OF LAUNCH VEHICLE FALCON-9 STARLINK 6-51
WI THE FLW AREAS:
2033S07500E, 0746S08927E, 0853S09228E, 2422S07500E TO BEGINNING
F) SFC G) UNL
Astronomy & spaceflight geek penguin. In a relationship w/ Space Shuttle Discovery.

Offline Salo

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12099
  • Odessa, Ukraine
  • Liked: 4663
  • Likes Given: 3794
https://spaceflightnow.com/launch-schedule/
Quote
April 17 Falcon 9 • Starlink 6-51
Launch time: Window opens at 5:24 p.m. EDT (2124 UTC)
Launch site: LC-39A, Kennedy Space Center, Florida

A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket will launch another batch of second-generation Starlink V2 Mini internet satellites. The Falcon 9’s first stage booster will return to a droneship in the Atlantic Ocean about 8.5 minutes after liftoff.

https://www.launchphotography.com/Launch_Viewing_Guide.html
Quote
UPDATED APRIL 9, 2024
...
FALCON 9

The next SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket will launch a Starlink batch from pad 40 on April 13 at 9:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. EDT. A Falcon 9 will launch a Starlink batch from pad 39A on April 17 at 5:24-9:24 p.m. EDT. Upcoming launches include more Starlink batches. A Falcon 9 will launch two Galileo navigation system satellites for Europe on late April. Upcoming launches include more Starlink batches.

Online zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11943
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 7963
  • Likes Given: 77669
Cross-post:
More Starlinks from Florida
0550-EX-ST-2024  Mission 1946 Starlink Group 6-51
[Launch NET April 15]
<snip>
ASDS       
North  25  51  24   West  75  20  18



Ben Cooper's Launch Photography Viewing Guide; updated April 11; my bold:
Quote
The next SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket will launch a Starlink batch from pad 40 on April 12 very earliest at 9:22 p.m. to 12:48 a.m. EDT. A Falcon 9 will launch a Starlink batch from pad 39A on April 17 at 5:24-9:24 p.m. EDT. Upcoming launches include more Starlink batches. A Falcon 9 will launch two Galileo navigation system satellites for Europe on late April. Upcoming launches include more Starlink batches.
« Last Edit: 04/15/2024 02:06 am by zubenelgenubi »
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Offline Ken the Bin

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3098
  • US Pacific Time Zone
    • @kenthebin@spacey.space
  • Liked: 5672
  • Likes Given: 6287
NGA Rocket Launching notice.

Quote from: NGA
120928Z APR 24
NAVAREA IV 415/24(11,26).
WESTERN NORTH ATLANTIC.
BAHAMAS.
FLORIDA.
1. HAZARDOUS OPERATIONS, ROCKET LAUNCHING
   172124Z TO 180155Z APR, ALTERNATE
   182059Z TO 190130Z, 192034Z TO 200105Z,
   202008Z TO 210039Z, 211943Z TO 220014Z,
   221918Z TO 222349Z AND
   231853Z TO 232324Z APR IN AREAS BOUND BY:
   A. 28-39.00N 080-37.69W, 28-39.00N 080-28.00W
      28-30.00N 080-10.00W, 28-24.00N 080-09.00W,
      28-21.00N 080-11.00W, 28-23.00N 080-19.00W,
      28-29.35N 080-32.49W.
   B. 26-15.00N 076-00.00W, 26-06.00N 074-58.00W
      25-36.00N 074-03.00W, 25-23.00N 073-53.00W
      25-09.00N 074-01.00W, 25-06.00N 074-16.00W
      25-08.00N 074-38.00W, 25-18.00N 075-00.00W
      25-58.00N 075-59.00W.
2. CANCEL THIS MSG 240024Z APR 24.//

Online zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11943
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 7963
  • Likes Given: 77669
Which first stage will be used for this launch?
(semi-rhetorical question)

Falcon 9 first stages are now apparently cleared for use up to twenty times for non-crewed launches, although that number is apparently more restricted for Cargo Dragon or Cygnus than these other payloads.

1064.6 and 1065.6 are the Falcon Heavy side boosters for Europa Clipper.  1072.1 and 1086.1 are assigned as the Falcon Heavy side boosters for GOES-U.

1073.15 and 1076.13 may undergo modifications to become Falcon Heavy side boosters for a future launch, but both are currently available for "single-stick" launches.

Available first stages, with UTC date of most recent recovery:
1077.12  Mar 10
1080.7    Mar 21
1060.20  Mar 24
1078.9    Mar 25
1076.13  Mar 30 (maybe)
1067.19  Mar 31 (maybe)

Edit April 16: It's B1077.12.
« Last Edit: 04/19/2024 09:34 pm by zubenelgenubi »
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Offline Ken the Bin

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3098
  • US Pacific Time Zone
    • @kenthebin@spacey.space
  • Liked: 5672
  • Likes Given: 6287
Here are two pairs of NGA Space Debris notices (each pair has the same notice for two different Navigational Areas). Neither one exactly matches this launch.

The NGA Rocket Launching notice is for April 17 to April 23, as are the S2 NOTAMs posted by Galactic Penguin SST.

One pair of the Space Debris notices is for April 16 to April 24; the other pair is for April 17 to April 26.

Quote from: NGA
121914Z APR 24
HYDROLANT 777/24(57,61,71).
EASTERN SOUTH ATLANTIC.
INDIAN OCEAN.
DNC 01, DNC 02, DNC 03.
1. HAZARDOUS OPERATIONS, SPACE DEBRIS
   2048Z TO 0413Z DAILY 16 THRU 24 APR
   IN AREA BOUND BY
   08-53.00S 092-28.00E, 07-46.00S 089-27.00E,
   30-12.00S 061-09.00E, 40-45.00S 002-21.00W,
   42-56.00S 002-24.00W, 32-16.00S 063-10.00E.
2. CANCEL THIS MSG 250513Z APR 24.
Quote from: NGA
121914Z APR 24
HYDROPAC 1201/24(57,61,71).
EASTERN SOUTH ATLANTIC.
INDIAN OCEAN.
DNC 01, DNC 02, DNC 03.
1. HAZARDOUS OPERATIONS, SPACE DEBRIS
   2048Z TO 0413Z DAILY 16 THRU 24 APR
   IN AREA BOUND BY
   08-53.00S 092-28.00E, 07-46.00S 089-27.00E,
   30-12.00S 061-09.00E, 40-45.00S 002-21.00W,
   42-56.00S 002-24.00W, 32-16.00S 063-10.00E.
2. CANCEL THIS MSG 250513Z APR 24.

Quote from: NGA
121937Z APR 24
HYDROLANT 778/24(57,61,71).
EASTERN SOUTH ATLANTIC.
INDIAN OCEAN.
DNC 01, DNC 02, DNC 03.
1. HAZARDOUS OPERATIONS, SPACE DEBRIS
   2203Z TO 0529Z DAILY 17 THRU 26 APR
   IN AREA BOUND BY
   08-53.00S 092-28.00E, 07-46.00S 089-27.00E,
   30-12.00S 061-09.00E, 40-45.00S 002-21.00W,
   42-56.00S 002-24.00W, 32-16.00S 063-10.00E.
2. CANCEL THIS MSG 270629Z APR 24.
Quote from: NGA
121937Z APR 24
HYDROPAC 1202/24(57,61,71).
EASTERN SOUTH ATLANTIC.
INDIAN OCEAN.
DNC 01, DNC 02, DNC 03.
1. HAZARDOUS OPERATIONS, SPACE DEBRIS
   2203Z TO 0529Z DAILY 17 THRU 26 APR
   IN AREA BOUND BY
   08-53.00S 092-28.00E, 07-46.00S 089-27.00E,
   30-12.00S 061-09.00E, 40-45.00S 002-21.00W,
   42-56.00S 002-24.00W, 32-16.00S 063-10.00E.
2. CANCEL THIS MSG 270629Z APR 24.

Offline OneSpeed

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1655
  • Liked: 5119
  • Likes Given: 2171
NGA Rocket Launching notice.

Maps from the NGA notices. ASDS 604km downrange.

Online zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11943
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 7963
  • Likes Given: 77669
Possibility B1060.20?
Edit April 16: No, not Starlink 6-51.
Another F9 (either 1060 or 1061) will fly for the 20th time next week.
https://twitter.com/edwards345/status/1779004912720081170
Quote
May there be many boosters hitting 20 or 30 or 50, with an unbroken success streak. Kudos to the team!
Quote
Another one next week!
« Last Edit: 04/17/2024 12:41 am by zubenelgenubi »
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Offline catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12418
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 10145
  • Likes Given: 8482
https://twitter.com/SpaceOffshore/status/1779566612590350833

Quote
Gav Cornwell
@SpaceOffshore
Departure! SpaceX's Bob support ship and Just Read the Instructions droneship head to sea to support Starlink 6-51! 📸 http://nsf.live/spacecoast
It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Bob + JRTI departed PC on Apr 14 @ 1:42pm ET

Offline Ken the Bin

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3098
  • US Pacific Time Zone
    • @kenthebin@spacey.space
  • Liked: 5672
  • Likes Given: 6287
L-1 weather forecast. 90% 'Go' for both April 17 and April 18. All Additional Risk Criteria are Low.

Online zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11943
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 7963
  • Likes Given: 77669
https://www.fly.faa.gov/adv/adv_spt.jsp
Quote
SPACEX STARLINK 6-51, KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, FL
PRIMARY:       04/17/24   2124Z-0155Z
BACKUP(S):   04/18/24   2059Z-0130Z
      04/19/24   2034Z-0105Z
      04/20/24   2008Z-0039Z
      04/21/24   1943Z-0014Z
      04/22/24   1918Z-2349Z
      04/23/24   1853Z-2324Z
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Offline GewoonLukas_

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1510
  • Lukas C. H.
  • Netherlands
  • Liked: 3643
  • Likes Given: 1806
Targeting NET 21:26 UTC
Booster B1077-12

Quote
SpaceX is targeting Wednesday, April 17 for a Falcon 9 launch of 23 Starlink satellites to low-Earth orbit from Launch Complex 39A (LC-39A) at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida. Liftoff is targeted for 5:26 p.m. ET, with backup opportunities available until 9:24 p.m. ET. If needed, additional opportunities are also available on Thursday, April 18 starting at 5:05 p.m. ET.

A live webcast of this mission will begin on X @SpaceX about five minutes prior to liftoff. Watch live.

This is the 12th flight for the first stage booster supporting this mission, which previously launched Crew-5, GPS III Space Vehicle 06, Inmarsat I6-F2, CRS-28, Intelsat G-37, NG-20, and five Starlink missions. Following stage separation, the first stage will land on the Just Read the Instructions droneship, which will be stationed in the Atlantic Ocean.

https://www.spacex.com/launches/mission/?missionId=sl-6-51

Twitter/X Webcast: https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1djxXNdmNBLGZ

https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1780327198190432330
Quote
Targeting Wednesday, April 17 for a Falcon 9 launch of 23 @Starlink satellites to low-Earth orbit from Florida → http://spacex.com/launches
« Last Edit: 04/16/2024 10:35 pm by zubenelgenubi »
Lukas C. H. • Hobbyist Mission Patch Artist 🎨 • May the force be with you my friend, Ad Astra Per Aspera ✨️

Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39463
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 33125
  • Likes Given: 8906
PDF of online press kit.
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Online zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11943
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 7963
  • Likes Given: 77669
NSF Launch Roundup: SpaceX to reach its 40th Falcon 9 flight of 2024, April 15, by Martin Smith

https://twitter.com/NASASpaceflight/status/1779985718690893850
Quote
Upcoming launches, including SpaceX set to pass 40 launches in 2024 milestone...in April.

Overview by Martin Smith.
« Last Edit: 04/17/2024 12:59 am by zubenelgenubi »
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Offline Ken the Bin

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3098
  • US Pacific Time Zone
    • @kenthebin@spacey.space
  • Liked: 5672
  • Likes Given: 6287
Primary launch opportunity = 2024-04-17 21:26:00 UTC per CelesTrak.

https://twitter.com/TSKelso/status/1780397690050027812

Quote from: T.S. Kelso
CelesTrak has pre-launch SupGP data for the @Starlink Group 6-51 launch from Cape Canaveral on 2024-04-17 at 21:26:00 UTC: https://celestrak.org/NORAD/elements/supplemental/table.php?FILE=starlink-g6-51. Deployment of 23 satellites at 22:31:22.740 UTC. Data for 10 backup launch opportunities is also provided: https://celestrak.org/NORAD/elements/supplemental/.

https://celestrak.org/NORAD/elements/supplemental/

Launch: 2024-04-17 21:26:00 UTC. Deploy: 2024-04-17 22:31:22.740 UTC.
Launch: 2024-04-17 21:34:00 UTC. Deploy: 2024-04-17 22:39:22.740 UTC.
Launch: 2024-04-17 22:16:00 UTC. Deploy: 2024-04-17 23:21:22.740 UTC.
Launch: 2024-04-17 22:36:00 UTC. Deploy: 2024-04-17 23:41:22.740 UTC.
Launch: 2024-04-17 23:10:00 UTC. Deploy: 2024-04-18 00:15:22.740 UTC.
Launch: 2024-04-17 23:20:00 UTC. Deploy: 2024-04-18 00:25:22.740 UTC.
Launch: 2024-04-17 23:40:00 UTC. Deploy: 2024-04-18 00:45:22.740 UTC.
Launch: 2024-04-18 00:10:00 UTC. Deploy: 2024-04-18 01:15:22.740 UTC.
Launch: 2024-04-18 00:32:00 UTC. Deploy: 2024-04-18 01:37:22.740 UTC.
Launch: 2024-04-18 01:14:00 UTC. Deploy: 2024-04-18 02:19:22.740 UTC.
Launch: 2024-04-18 01:24:00 UTC. Deploy: 2024-04-18 02:29:22.740 UTC.

Offline catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12418
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 10145
  • Likes Given: 8482
https://twitter.com/RoughRidersShow/status/1780580790029463596

Quote
Rough Riders Show
@RoughRidersShow
Falcon 9 rolled out to LC-39A this morning ahead of Starlink 6-51! Here's a little time-lapse
@NASASpaceflight
 http://nsf.live/spacecoast
It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Offline edkyle99

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15502
    • Space Launch Report
  • Liked: 8788
  • Likes Given: 1386
SpaceX feed cut off after staging.  Hmmm.

 - Ed Kyle

Online Comga

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6503
  • Liked: 4623
  • Likes Given: 5354
Landing confirmed (tentatively)


Ed: Don't Hmm at us.  Both first and second stage video cut out after separation.  It is unlikely something happened to them rather than the video being interrupted after being broadcast.
« Last Edit: 04/17/2024 09:36 pm by Comga »
What kind of wastrels would dump a perfectly good booster in the ocean after just one use?

Offline Perchlorate

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 483
  • 2 miles from the site of the first successful powered flight.
  • Liked: 1071
  • Likes Given: 1493
Landing and orbital insertion appear to have been successful.  Reloading feed shows current, but frozen, frame.

To be clear, I saw a landed booster and Stage 2 velocity static at 27,000±.  Sorry, didn't get screen cap.
« Last Edit: 04/17/2024 09:39 pm by Perchlorate »
Pete B, a Civil Engineer, in an age of incivility.

Offline edkyle99

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15502
    • Space Launch Report
  • Liked: 8788
  • Likes Given: 1386
Landing and orbital insertion appear to have been successful.  Reloading feed shows current, but frozen, frame.
Shows landed booster, but Stage 2 still short of orbital velocity, but seemed to be well on its way at the time of the capture.  EDIT.  If later update showed 27,000 km/hr, then seems good orbit.  My Hmmm wasn't at this thread, but at X for its failed SpaceX webcast.  Again.  It cut off at T+3:00 it seems.
EDIT 2:  SpaceX now confirms good initial orbit.  Second burn coming.

NSF had some great shots of ascent.

 - Ed Kyle
« Last Edit: 04/17/2024 10:01 pm by edkyle99 »

Offline wannamoonbase

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5519
  • Denver, CO
    • U.S. Metric Association
  • Liked: 3222
  • Likes Given: 3986
Landing confirmed (tentatively)


Ed: Don't Hmm at us.  Both first and second stage video cut out after separation.  It is unlikely something happened to them rather than the video being interrupted after being broadcast.

I find it easier to believe that Twitter is horrid at streaming and it just failed, not that SpaceX did anything wrong.
Starship, Vulcan and Ariane 6 have all reached orbit.  New Glenn, well we are waiting!

Offline Perchlorate

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 483
  • 2 miles from the site of the first successful powered flight.
  • Liked: 1071
  • Likes Given: 1493
American Airlines flight 1914 from Dallas-Fort Worth just landed successfully at Norfolk International Airport.  Saw that on FlightAware.

No news coverage of that routine event.

Are we getting to the point that Starlink 6-51 is so routine that it is worthy of no live coverage?

(Rhetorical...and I'll show myself out.)
Pete B, a Civil Engineer, in an age of incivility.

Offline RedLineTrain

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2599
  • Liked: 2506
  • Likes Given: 10525
Landing confirmed (tentatively)


Ed: Don't Hmm at us.  Both first and second stage video cut out after separation.  It is unlikely something happened to them rather than the video being interrupted after being broadcast.

I find it easier to believe that Twitter is horrid at streaming and it just failed, not that SpaceX did anything wrong.

They appeared to be testing streaming where you could rewind or come back to live, just as with YouTube.  Looks like that new feature glitched.

Offline edkyle99

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15502
    • Space Launch Report
  • Liked: 8788
  • Likes Given: 1386
Should have completed second burn and payload deployment by now.  I'm watching X, but no update just yet.

And now, from SpaceX moments ago (around 2248 UTC):  Payload deploy confirmed.
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1780729972161982761
 - Ed Kyle
« Last Edit: 04/17/2024 10:53 pm by edkyle99 »

Offline Galactic Penguin SST

https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1780731281183273448

Quote
Falcon 9 launches from Florida, carrying 23 @Starlink satellites to low-Earth orbit

And it looks like whatever problem with the live stream was resolved and it's now available at the original link, or here:

Astronomy & spaceflight geek penguin. In a relationship w/ Space Shuttle Discovery.

Offline raptorx2

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 229
  • san diego, ca
  • Liked: 126
  • Likes Given: 5
Perhaps this is part of the reason that the Launch Communications cut out????  There was none licensed?
Tomorrows flight of 6-52 also shows >>>Pending<<<<

0550-EX-ST-2024   WG9XHP   Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX)   03/27/2024   >>>>Pending<<<<   03/27/2024

This application uses information from previous application 0161-EX-ST-2024. This STA is necessary to authorize launch vehicle communications for Mission 1946 Starlink Group 6-51 from Cape Canaveral FL at LC-40 CCAFS or LC-39a at KSC, and the experimental recovery operation following the Falcon 9 launch. Includes sub-orbital first stage, and orbital second stage.

https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/els/reports/STA_Print.cfm?mode=current&application_seq=132838&RequestTimeout=1000

Offline catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12418
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 10145
  • Likes Given: 8482
« Last Edit: 04/18/2024 01:49 am by catdlr »
It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Offline catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12418
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 10145
  • Likes Given: 8482
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1780731281183273448


SpaceX
@SpaceXFalcon 9 launches from Florida, carrying 23 @Starlink satellites to low-Earth orbit
It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Offline catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12418
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 10145
  • Likes Given: 8482
https://twitter.com/TylerG1998/status/1780736905090351402

https://twitter.com/TylerG1998/status/1780737177745297866

Quote
Tyler Gray
@TylerG1998
Updated orbital launch count as of Apr. 17:

Earth 🌎 — 73/74

USA 🇺🇸 — 45/45
China 🇨🇳 — 16/16* (1 partial failure)
Russia 🇷🇺 — 6/6
Japan 🇯🇵 — 2/3
Iran 🇮🇷 — 2/2
India 🇮🇳 — 2/2

1/3

Orbital launches by organization:

🇺🇸 — 39 SpaceX, 4 Rocket Lab, 2 ULA
🇨🇳 — 12 CASC (1 partial failure), 2 CASIC, 1 OrienSpace, 1 CAS Space
🇷🇺 — 5 RKTs-Progress, 1 Khrunichev
🇯🇵 — 2 MHI, 1 Space One ❌
🇮🇳 — 2 ISRO
🇮🇷 — 1 IRGC, 1 ISA

2/3

Launches by spaceport:

🇺🇸 — 19 CCSFS, 13 Vandy, 9 KSC, 1 Wallops
🇨🇳 — 5 Xichang, 5 Jiuquan, 3 Wenchang, 2 offshore, 1 Taiyuan
🇳🇿 — 3 Māhia
🇷🇺 — 3 Baikonur, 2 Vostochny, 1 Plesetsk
🇯🇵 — 2 Tanegashima, 1 Space Port Kii
🇮🇳 — 2 Satish Dhawan
🇮🇷 — 1 Shahrud, 1 Semnan

3/3
It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Offline catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12418
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 10145
  • Likes Given: 8482
https://twitter.com/NASASpaceflight/status/1780741818830709033

Quote
Chris Bergin - NSF
@NASASpaceflight
Here's SpaceX's Falcon 9 B1077 landing for a 12th time, which wasn't shown live due to X's technical problems.
It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Offline Kasponaut

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 196
  • Denmark
  • Liked: 13
  • Likes Given: 82
https://twitter.com/TylerG1998/status/1780736905090351402

https://twitter.com/TylerG1998/status/1780737177745297866

Quote
Tyler Gray
@TylerG1998
Updated orbital launch count as of Apr. 17:

Earth 🌎 — 73/74

USA 🇺🇸 — 45/45
China 🇨🇳 — 16/16* (1 partial failure)
Russia 🇷🇺 — 6/6
Japan 🇯🇵 — 2/3
Iran 🇮🇷 — 2/2
India 🇮🇳 — 2/2

1/3

Orbital launches by organization:

🇺🇸 — 39 SpaceX, 4 Rocket Lab, 2 ULA
🇨🇳 — 12 CASC (1 partial failure), 2 CASIC, 1 OrienSpace, 1 CAS Space
🇷🇺 — 5 RKTs-Progress, 1 Khrunichev
🇯🇵 — 2 MHI, 1 Space One ❌
🇮🇳 — 2 ISRO
🇮🇷 — 1 IRGC, 1 ISA

2/3

Launches by spaceport:

🇺🇸 — 19 CCSFS, 13 Vandy, 9 KSC, 1 Wallops
🇨🇳 — 5 Xichang, 5 Jiuquan, 3 Wenchang, 2 offshore, 1 Taiyuan
🇳🇿 — 3 Māhia
🇷🇺 — 3 Baikonur, 2 Vostochny, 1 Plesetsk
🇯🇵 — 2 Tanegashima, 1 Space Port Kii
🇮🇳 — 2 Satish Dhawan
🇮🇷 — 1 Shahrud, 1 Semnan

3/3

Can someone tell Tyler that he is still missing one US launch this year? 😊 Starship IFT-3 should also be included.
« Last Edit: 04/18/2024 06:05 am by Kasponaut »

Offline FLHerne

  • Member
  • Posts: 30
  • UK
  • Liked: 45
  • Likes Given: 97
Quote
Tyler Gray
@TylerG1998
Updated orbital launch count as of Apr. 17:
Can someone tell Tyler that he is still missing one US launch this year? 😊 Starship IFT-3 should also be included.

Not technically orbital?

Offline daedalus1

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 945
  • uk
  • Liked: 489
  • Likes Given: 0
Quote
Tyler Gray
@TylerG1998
Updated orbital launch count as of Apr. 17:
Can someone tell Tyler that he is still missing one US launch this year? 😊 Starship IFT-3 should also be included.

Not technically orbital?

It's in the orbital section of Jonathan's space report and it achieved orbital velocity.  So that is well good enough for me.

Online Vettedrmr

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1682
  • Hot Springs, AR
  • Liked: 2282
  • Likes Given: 3420
https://twitter.com/NASASpaceflight/status/1780741818830709033

Quote
Chris Bergin - NSF
@NASASpaceflight
Here's SpaceX's Falcon 9 B1077 landing for a 12th time, which wasn't shown live due to X's technical problems.

Boy, the control system looks like it got saturated there for a minute a low altitude.  One fin went to full deflection and stayed there for a couple of seconds, plus the RCS got into the act to help out.  I'm guessing some low level winds needed to be countered.
Aviation/space enthusiast, retired control system SW engineer, doesn't know anything!

Offline edkyle99

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15502
    • Space Launch Report
  • Liked: 8788
  • Likes Given: 1386
It's in the orbital section of Jonathan's space report and it achieved orbital velocity.  So that is well good enough for me.
If it was orbital, if it achieved orbital velocity at orbital altitude above the atmosphere, it wouldn't have reentered.   You would also be able to find it on Space Track with an International Designation, etc., but you can't.  Also, if it was an orbital attempt, it failed.

Unlike Starlink 6-51, which was a successful orbital launch!

 - Ed Kyle
« Last Edit: 04/18/2024 01:46 pm by edkyle99 »

Offline catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12418
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 10145
  • Likes Given: 8482
It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Offline catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12418
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 10145
  • Likes Given: 8482
https://twitter.com/_rykllan/status/1780877787517075662

Quote
rykllan
@_rykllan
Recent 26th #Starlink launch of this year via #SpaceX's #Falcon9 vehicle
It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Offline catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12418
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 10145
  • Likes Given: 8482
It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Offline catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12418
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 10145
  • Likes Given: 8482
https://twitter.com/SpaceOffshore/status/1781438292329980223

Quote
Gav Cornwell
@SpaceOffshore
Bob delivers both fairing halves from Starlink 6-51! 🤑
It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Bob returned to PC on Apr 19 @ 5:38pm ET

Offline shiro

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 182
  • Liked: 456
  • Likes Given: 587
Some reusability stats for this launch (Starlink Group 6-51):

Booster B1077.12 turnaround time:
37 days 22 hours 21 minutes
(its previous mission was Starlink Group 6-43 on Mar 10, 2024 UTC).

FYI: median turnaround time for Falcon 9 / Heavy boosters is currently 43.90 days *
* – based on the last 30 launches, excluding new first stages.

Launchpad LC-39A turnaround time:
9 days 22 hours 10 minutes
(the previous launch from this pad was Bandwagon-1 on Apr 7, 2024 UTC).

FYI: median turnaround time for LC-39A is currently 17.64 days *
* – based on the last 30 launches.

The same type of stats for previous SpaceX launches may be found on this spreadsheet online.

Online Comga

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6503
  • Liked: 4623
  • Likes Given: 5354
It's in the orbital section of Jonathan's space report and it achieved orbital velocity.  So that is well good enough for me.
If it was orbital, if it achieved orbital velocity at orbital altitude above the atmosphere, it wouldn't have reentered.   You would also be able to find it on Space Track with an International Designation, etc., but you can't.  Also, if it was an orbital attempt, it failed.

Unlike Starlink 6-51, which was a successful orbital launch!

 - Ed Kyle

Your OPINION is noted
JCM’s CALCULATION shows that the semimajor axis of IFT-3’s exceeded Rearth plus some margin like our favorite 100km, making it a successful orbital launch as designed.
To do otherwise is to call OFT-1 and -2, and the upcoming CFT and all Starliner launches orbital failures by design.

Yeah, it’s Tyler’s list and he can put what he wants in it, but my sincere suggestion is that we take this argument, and all the record keeping, launch, landing, and reuse, OUT of the launch specific threads and give it their own.  Some of those already exist and don’t need replicating elsewhere.
What kind of wastrels would dump a perfectly good booster in the ocean after just one use?

Offline edkyle99

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15502
    • Space Launch Report
  • Liked: 8788
  • Likes Given: 1386
It's in the orbital section of Jonathan's space report and it achieved orbital velocity.  So that is well good enough for me.
If it was orbital, if it achieved orbital velocity at orbital altitude above the atmosphere, it wouldn't have reentered.   You would also be able to find it on Space Track with an International Designation, etc., but you can't.  Also, if it was an orbital attempt, it failed.

Unlike Starlink 6-51, which was a successful orbital launch!

 - Ed Kyle

Your OPINION is noted
JCM’s CALCULATION shows that the semimajor axis of IFT-3’s exceeded Rearth plus some margin like our favorite 100km, making it a successful orbital launch as designed.
To do otherwise is to call OFT-1 and -2, and the upcoming CFT and all Starliner launches orbital failures by design.
JCM wrote in his Space Report that the "orbit" achieved had a negative perigee:  -50 x 234 km x 26.5 deg. He also wrote that "[t]he Ship flight was not fully in orbit and so did not receive a US Space Force catalog number
or an international launch designation.

 - Ed Kyle

Signet Warhorse III + JRTI + B1077 returned to PC on Apr 20 @ ~2am

Quote
Gav Cornwell
@SpaceOffshore
JRTI departs for Starlink 6-53!  - A super rapid turnaround.

Not certain what the record is for the time between delivering a F9 and departing for the next but 8 hrs and 15 mins must be close!

https://twitter.com/SpaceOffshore/status/1781764723710525538
« Last Edit: 04/22/2024 03:27 am by realnouns »

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1