-
#140
by
Steven Pietrobon
on 09 Feb, 2024 23:40
-
-
#141
by
Steven Pietrobon
on 09 Feb, 2024 23:41
-
-
#142
by
Steven Pietrobon
on 09 Feb, 2024 23:42
-
-
#143
by
Steven Pietrobon
on 09 Feb, 2024 23:43
-
Landing burn.
Touchdown!
Cutoff.
Nominal orbit insertion.
-
#144
by
Steven Pietrobon
on 09 Feb, 2024 23:45
-
Upcoming events.
00:53:28 2nd stage engine starts (SES-2)
00:53:29 2nd stage engine cutoff (SECO-2)
01:02:22 01:02:22
-
#145
by
catdlr
on 09 Feb, 2024 23:45
-
-
#146
by
catdlr
on 09 Feb, 2024 23:46
-
-
#147
by
catdlr
on 09 Feb, 2024 23:51
-
-
#148
by
Steven Pietrobon
on 10 Feb, 2024 00:27
-
T+53 minutes and 28 seconds. Expected ignition for one second.
-
#149
by
Steven Pietrobon
on 10 Feb, 2024 00:36
-
T+1 hour 2 minutes and 22 seconds. Expected separation.
-
#150
by
catdlr
on 10 Feb, 2024 00:43
-
-
#151
by
catdlr
on 10 Feb, 2024 01:08
-
-
#152
by
catdlr
on 10 Feb, 2024 01:09
-
As always Steven, Thanks for the coverage, have a great weekend.
-
#153
by
catdlr
on 10 Feb, 2024 01:13
-
-
#154
by
Galactic Penguin SST
on 10 Feb, 2024 01:19
-
The 2nd stage this time went with an even lower orbit insertion altitude than usual SL 7-x launches (147 km and dropping at webcast ends, it's usually ~163), they did call nominal orbit insertion but I actually got worried a bit when the S/C separation tweet came late.
Perhaps this was a tweaked ascent profile?
-
#155
by
edkyle99
on 10 Feb, 2024 01:56
-
The 2nd stage this time went with an even lower orbit insertion altitude than usual SL 7-x launches (147 km and dropping at webcast ends, it's usually ~163), they did call nominal orbit insertion but I actually got worried a bit when the S/C separation tweet came late.
Perhaps this was a tweaked ascent profile?
Did not look normal, but then again it had orbital velocity above (barely) the atmosphere and, apparently, the apogee kick burn put the thing where it was supposed to go - but we'll have to see the final orbit parameters to know.
- Ed Kyle
-
#156
by
catdlr
on 10 Feb, 2024 04:04
-
-
#157
by
FutureSpaceTourist
on 10 Feb, 2024 05:08
-
-
#158
by
shiro
on 10 Feb, 2024 05:28
-
Some reusability stats for this launch (Starlink Group 7-13):
Booster B1071.14 turnaround time:
63 days 16 hours 31 minutes(its previous mission was Starlink Group 7-8 on Dec 8, 2023 UTC).
FYI: median turnaround time for Falcon 9 / Heavy boosters is currently 50.16 days *
* – based on the last 30 launches, excluding new first stages.
Launchpad SLC-4E turnaround time:
11 days 18 hours 37 minutes(the previous launch from this pad was Starlink Group 7-12 on Jan 29, 2024 UTC).
FYI: median turnaround time for SLC-4E is currently 12.16 days *
* – based on the last 30 launches.
The same type of stats for previous SpaceX launches may be found on
this spreadsheet online.
P.S. According to the pre-launch SupGP data on CelesTrak, this launch could happen as early as February 6 at 02:08 UTC, but it was delayed (probably because of unfavorable weather conditions). If the launch wasn't delayed on February 6, the turnaround times would be:
- 59 days 18 hours 5 minutes for B1071.14;
- 7 days 20 hours 11 minutes for SLC-4E.
-
#159
by
catdlr
on 10 Feb, 2024 16:39
-