-
#160
by
Nicolas PILLET
on 12 Jan, 2008 14:02
-
-
#161
by
DarthVader
on 12 Jan, 2008 15:13
-
Good catch Nicolas, thanks.
-
#162
by
Nicolas PILLET
on 04 Feb, 2008 11:51
-
Dear forumers,
I have just acquired from a source a picture of the launch of Progress-1, in january 1978. But on this picture, an escape system is visible above the Soyouz launcher...
Could someone tell me if this is normal ?
Thank you !
-
#163
by
Skyrocket
on 04 Feb, 2008 12:00
-
Nicolas PILLET - 4/2/2008 1:51 PM
Dear forumers,
I have just acquired from a source a picture of the launch of Progress-1, in january 1978. But on this picture, an escape system is visible above the Soyouz launcher...
Could someone tell me if this is normal ?
Thank you !
Yes, the early Progress launches used the same Fairing as the Souyz launches. To keep the same aerodynamic properties, a dummy launch escape system was carried on top. The only difference is, that the rectangular stabilzers are absent from the fairing:
-
#164
by
Jester
on 04 Feb, 2008 15:07
-
DarthVader - 9/1/2008 9:56 PM
Howdy,
It's me again with my Soyuz related question(s). This time, I'm wondering if someone could help me (yes, again) identify the purpose of a device visible in (at least) 4 locations on the Soyuz' boosters. In the attached image, I have marked the "device" with a pink arrow and added in an insert, a picture showing a similar area with a "remove before flight" cover.
Thanks in advance for any tips/hints.
Cheers,
maybe check here:
http://www.sondasespaciales.com/public/imagenes/zemiorka5.jpgor maybe its a pressure release valve, I'm going there in about 3 weeks, i'll ask around....
-
#165
by
Nicolas PILLET
on 05 Feb, 2008 14:19
-
Skyrocket - 4/2/2008 2:00 PM
Yes, the early Progress launches used the same Fairing as the Souyz launches. To keep the same aerodynamic properties, a dummy launch escape system was carried on top. The only difference is, that the rectangular stabilzers are absent from the fairing:
OK, thank you very much Skyrocket ! The picture of Progress-1 is here :
http://www.kosmonavtika.com/lancements/1978/20011978/20011978.html
-
#166
by
Nicolas PILLET
on 09 Mar, 2008 11:07
-
Hello,
Somebody know when this picture of Mir was taken ? Since there is no Soyouz docked, it should be during a fly-around and/or a spacecraft relocation...
Thank you very much for help !
-
#167
by
anik
on 09 Mar, 2008 13:18
-
Nicolas PILLET - 9/3/2008 3:07 PM
Somebody know when this picture of Mir was taken?
There is the truss base for future installation of drive for the solar array on Kvant module, so it was after January 26, 1991. There is no Sofora truss on Kvant module, so it was before July 27, 1991.
So there are two variants: Soyuz TM-11 relocation on March 26, 1991 or Soyuz TM-12 relocation on May 28, 1991.
-
#168
by
Nicolas PILLET
on 09 Mar, 2008 16:08
-
Thank you Anik,
I have a very similar picture with the caption "A view of Mir from Soyuz TM-11 during a fly around"...
So I imagine that both pictures were taken on 26th March 1991...
-
#169
by
Nicolas PILLET
on 30 Mar, 2008 13:42
-
-
#170
by
Nicolas PILLET
on 30 Mar, 2008 14:00
-
That's OK, I have found the answer myself !
In the picture below, Karass is the third, starting from the left. Despite poor quality, it is clear that the "good" photograph is the one of cosmoworld.ru.
-
#171
by
Nicolas PILLET
on 13 Apr, 2008 12:39
-
Hello,
I have a little question concerning the organisation of Baïkonour.
Do someone know if there is any difference between "Kosmodrom Baikonour" and "Federalnoye Kosmitcheskii Tsentr Baikonour" ?
I know that Roskosmos and Space Forces are both owners of the center, but do they share the same facilities, or is the center separated into two parts (one for FKA and one for KS) ?
Thank you very much for help !
-
#172
by
anik
on 13 Apr, 2008 15:24
-
Nicolas PILLET - 13/4/2008 4:39 PM
Do someone know if there is any difference between "Kosmodrom Baikonour" and "Federalnoye Kosmitcheskii Tsentr Baikonour"?
"Kosmodrom Baikonur" is the name of cosmodrome. "Federal'niy Kosmicheskiy Tsentr "Baikonur"" is the name of main enterprise, which maintains objects of Baikonur cosmodrome and organizes works on preparation and performing of launches.
Nicolas PILLET - 13/4/2008 4:39 PM
I know that Roskosmos and Space Forces are both owners of the center, but do they share the same facilities, or is the center separated into two parts (one for FKA and one for KS)?
Since 2007 all objects of Baikonur cosmodrome belong to Roskosmos.
-
#173
by
Nicolas PILLET
on 13 Apr, 2008 16:17
-
Mmmmh... Almost three hours between question and answer !
Are you tired today Anik ? :laugh: :laugh:
Thank you very much for clarification !
-
#174
by
whitewatcher
on 17 Apr, 2008 17:39
-
I would like to know how a sojus is flown at docking time. As far as I know they have two sticks, but ...
- how many axis' per stick?
- which stick axis is linked to which one of the 6 DOF?
-
#175
by
Jorge
on 17 Apr, 2008 18:13
-
whitewatcher - 17/4/2008 12:39 PM
I would like to know how a sojus is flown at docking time. As far as I know they have two sticks, but ...
- how many axis' per stick?
- which stick axis is linked to which one of the 6 DOF?
The rotational hand controller has three axes, and controls all three corresponding rotational degrees of freedom.
The translational hand controller has two axes and a toggle switch. The toggle switch controls translation in the longitudinal (X) axis) and the two-axis stick controls the other two.
-
#176
by
Satori
on 17 Apr, 2008 18:14
-
Is it possible to know when the orginal PU-1 launch platform was renamed PU-5 and the original PU-2 was renamed PU-6?
Thanks!
-
#177
by
Satori
on 17 Apr, 2008 18:19
-
anik - 13/4/2008 10:24 AM
(...)
Since 2007 all objects of Baikonur cosmodrome belong to Roskosmos.
So, the Assembly and Fueling Complex (MZK) at Site 112A and the Vibration and Test Building also belong to Roskosmos? I thought it was Kazakhstan that owned the two buildings?!
-
#178
by
anik
on 17 Apr, 2008 18:35
-
Satori - 17/4/2008 10:19 PM
So, the Assembly and Fueling Complex (MZK) at Site 112A and the Vibration and Test Building also belong to Roskosmos? I thought it was Kazakhstan that owned the two buildings?!
Rui, thanks for this question. I should correct my sentence. I wanted to say that "Since 2007 all objects
(rented by Russia) of Baikonur cosmodrome belong to Roskosmos".
-
#179
by
whitewatcher
on 17 Apr, 2008 20:02
-
Jorge - 17/4/2008 8:13 PM
whitewatcher - 17/4/2008 12:39 PM
I would like to know how a sojus is flown at docking time. As far as I know they have two sticks, but ...
- how many axis' per stick?
- which stick axis is linked to which one of the 6 DOF?
The rotational hand controller has three axes, and controls all three corresponding rotational degrees of freedom.
The translational hand controller has two axes and a toggle switch. The toggle switch controls translation in the longitudinal (X) axis) and the two-axis stick controls the other two.
Thank you!
Which one is the left/right hand stick?
Is there a "low thrust" mode for small adjustments?