martynwilliams - 22/12/2006 12:55 PMQuotechksix - 22/12/2006 6:51 PMIs there a layout map of the MCC somewhere where the console functions are shown? I think the girl is moving around to avoid back pains. She might be supervising a non critical system also....http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/shuttle/reference/mcc/mcc.html
chksix - 22/12/2006 6:51 PMIs there a layout map of the MCC somewhere where the console functions are shown? I think the girl is moving around to avoid back pains. She might be supervising a non critical system also....
nathan.moeller - 22/12/2006 11:04 PMNevermind. Here comes the B-Roll of Reiter on NTV right now
nathan.moeller - 22/12/2006 8:22 PMQuotejcopella - 22/12/2006 7:18 PMBest. Administrator. Ever."...and happiness is not a requirement."Griffin is very professional. He's there to get the job done and he doesn't care whether he makes the media happy or not because he understands that NASA isn't about pleasing people. It's about exploration. He believes in the direction NASA is headed and will not be deterred by public opinion in the form of various mainstream news media who wish to make the programs look bad. I can't help but have a huge amount of respect for him. I can't see anyone else in his position at this point.
jcopella - 22/12/2006 7:18 PMBest. Administrator. Ever."...and happiness is not a requirement."
Jim - 23/12/2006 12:08 AMThis is only one point of view. Most in the non manned space part of NASA (aeronautics and science) don't have the same opinion.I can go either way, having worked both shuttle and science missions. But I see the NASA of the late 70's, where the manned program (STS) sucking up all the money and yet not flying anything for years. It is starting to show up in 'Announcements of Opportunities" AO's.Not all congress people are aligned with him neither.
Jim - 23/12/2006 12:08 AMQuotenathan.moeller - 22/12/2006 8:22 PMQuotejcopella - 22/12/2006 7:18 PMBest. Administrator. Ever."...and happiness is not a requirement."Griffin is very professional. He's there to get the job done and he doesn't care whether he makes the media happy or not because he understands that NASA isn't about pleasing people. It's about exploration. He believes in the direction NASA is headed and will not be deterred by public opinion in the form of various mainstream news media who wish to make the programs look bad. I can't help but have a huge amount of respect for him. I can't see anyone else in his position at this point.This is only one point of view. Most in the non manned space part of NASA (aeronautics and science) don't have the same opinion.I can go either way, having worked both shuttle and science missions. But I see the NASA of the late 70's, where the manned program (STS) sucking up all the money and yet not flying anything for years. It is starting to show up in 'Announcements of Opportunities" AO's.Not all congress people are aligned with him neither.