Author Topic: Firefly Alpha FLTA005 : ELaNa 43 : VSFB SLC-2W : 04 July 2024 (04:03 UTC)  (Read 36802 times)

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157

Online catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12418
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 10138
  • Likes Given: 8481
Firefly Aerospace Alpha FLTA005 Noise of Summer Rocket Launch - Combo View

Side-by-side views of tonight's launch using a VSFB Infered camera and a land base camera located in Santa Barbara

Video Credits:
Firefly and NSF (VSFB)
Olivervision (Santa Barbara)


« Last Edit: 07/04/2024 07:20 am by catdlr »
It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Offline edkyle99

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15502
    • Space Launch Report
  • Liked: 8788
  • Likes Given: 1386
https://twitter.com/firefly_space/status/1808750140947124327
Quote
AND the Firefly team successfully completed a second stage relight and nominal plane change following deployment. Congratulations to the entire mission team!
Maybe the most important good news of this mission. 

 - Ed Kyle
« Last Edit: 07/04/2024 03:24 pm by edkyle99 »

Offline D_Dom

  • Global Moderator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 659
  • Liked: 487
  • Likes Given: 152
From Glendale Arizona

https://twitter.com/rebilasphoto/status/1808720555807285688

Nice photo! Saw the same view, fireworks with Firefly in the background. This was a big event in La Puente CA and the timing was amazing. Firefly transit across the whole sky was directly behind the fireworks. I was confused by how bright the first stage was, it remained visible after separation as the gap continued to grow. I should have realized that sunlight, reflecting off the stages provided illumination. Also the first stage burn back firing is short, I had convinced myself it must have been a SpaceX launch. One of the people I was talking to said, no, it was Firefly. Phone was in my vehicle at the time so I couldn't confirm, should have believed him.
Space is not merely a matter of life or death, it is considerably more important than that!

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
https://twitter.com/firefly_space/status/1808897345788260550

Quote
We were honored to provide a rocket light show to kick off the Fourth of July - Happy Independence Day from our Firefly family to yours. #NoiseOfSummer

Photo Credit: Shawn McCormick I Phoenix, Arizona
« Last Edit: 07/04/2024 04:16 pm by FutureSpaceTourist »

Online gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10435
  • US
  • Liked: 14349
  • Likes Given: 6148
https://twitter.com/TSKelso/status/1808933496918061267

97.3 deg, around 490x520km

TLE from Celestrak:
OBJECT B               
1 60204U 24125B   24186.55798365 -.00000069  00000+0  00000+0 0  9999
2 60204  97.3219  39.4368 0020659 251.3829 199.4310 15.20834757    54

An online converter for RAAN to LTAN gave me 07:40 LTAN, not sure if that's correct?
« Last Edit: 07/04/2024 08:26 pm by FutureSpaceTourist »

Online gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10435
  • US
  • Liked: 14349
  • Likes Given: 6148
https://twitter.com/planet4589/status/1808923446409134247
Quote
8 of 9 expected objects from the Firefly launch cataloged by SpaceTrack in a 490 x 525 km x 97.3 deg sun-synchronous orbit with 19:45 local time orbit plane
« Last Edit: 07/04/2024 08:26 pm by FutureSpaceTourist »

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
https://twitter.com/w00ki33/status/1808960117284687927

Quote
Firefly's Alpha rocket engines roar to life! Ignition illuminated the surrounding fog on SLC-2 and continued through a stunning California sunset carrying a NASA CubeSat payload. Congratulations to the @Firefly_Space team on this Independence Day!

Offline Ken the Bin

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3095
  • US Pacific Time Zone
    • @kenthebin@spacey.space
  • Liked: 5669
  • Likes Given: 6280
Firefly press release: https://fireflyspace.com/news/firefly-aerospace-successfully-launches-alpha-flta005-noise-of-summer-mission-for-nasa/

Quote from: Firefly
Firefly Aerospace Successfully Launches Alpha FLTA005 Noise of Summer Mission for NASA

Firefly team completed orbital insertion, payload deployment, second stage relight, and orbital plane change

VANDENBERG SPACE FORCE BASE, Calif., – July 4, 2024 – Firefly Aerospace, an end-to-end space transportation company, today announced it successfully launched its Alpha Flight 5 (FLTA005) rocket and completed the payload deployment sequence as part of the company’s Venture-Class Launch Services Demonstration 2 (VCLS Demo 2) contract with NASA.

The mission, called Noise of Summer, lifted off from Firefly’s SLC-2 launch site at the Vandenberg Space Force Base at 9:04 p.m. PDT on July 3, 2024. Following payload deployment, Firefly successfully performed a second stage relight and plane change maneuver to further test and validate Alpha’s on-orbit capabilities.

“The Firefly team knocked it out of the park,” said Bill Weber, CEO of Firefly Aerospace. “As a NASA vendor for both launch and lunar services, we look forward to continuing this partnership and supporting the agency’s larger space exploration goals from Earth to the Moon and beyond.”

As a NASA VCLS Demo 2 task order, the successful mission further validates Alpha’s capabilities to provide small satellite launches for NASA on a recurring basis. The mission’s CubeSats were selected through NASA’s CubeSat Launch Initiative (CSLI) that provides U.S. educational institutions and nonprofits with low-cost access to space.

“The launch of Firefly Aerospace’s demonstration mission marks one more way NASA is innovating for the benefit of humanity,” said Hamilton Fernandez, mission manager for NASA’s Launch Services Program. “NASA is using CubeSat missions to demonstrate the capability of small rockets and build relationships with this new part of the U.S. launch vehicle industry.”

At the time of this release, ongoing activities are underway by NASA and the CubeSat teams as they work to acquire signals for all satellites. Additional updates will be posted to the mission webpage.

Looking ahead, Firefly is in the final testing phase for its next Alpha launch, FLTA006, in support of a dedicated commercial mission for Lockheed Martin. The Firefly team is concurrently ramping up for a responsive on-orbit Elytra mission that will launch on Alpha FLTA007 later this year while also working to complete the final readiness milestones for its first Blue Ghost mission to the Moon launching in Q4 2024.

Online cpushack

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 395
  • Klamath Falls, Oregon
  • Liked: 471
  • Likes Given: 132
Quote
completed the payload deployment sequence

Completed the sequence, very carefully worded, as one sat did not deploy, dispenser failure or something.

Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39463
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 33123
  • Likes Given: 8901
8 of 9 expected objects from the Firefly launch cataloged by SpaceTrack in a 490 x 525 km x 97.3 deg sun-synchronous orbit with 19:45 local time orbit plane

From the attached picture we see seven objects in a 490x520 km orbit and one object in a 450x520 km orbit. Presumably, the former are seven cubesats and the latter is the second stage after the plane change. The cubesat that is missing could be CatSat, which was not confirmed as having been released during the webcast.
« Last Edit: 07/05/2024 05:10 am by Steven Pietrobon »
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Online jcm

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3700
  • Jonathan McDowell
  • Somerville, Massachusetts, USA
    • Jonathan's Space Report
  • Liked: 1397
  • Likes Given: 816
8 of 9 expected objects from the Firefly launch cataloged by SpaceTrack in a 490 x 525 km x 97.3 deg sun-synchronous orbit with 19:45 local time orbit plane

From the attached picture we see seven objects in a 490x520 km orbit and one object in a 450x520 km orbit. Presumably, the former are seven cubesats and the latter is the second stage after the plane change. The cubesat that is missing could be CatSat, which was not confirmed as having been released during the webcast.

All 8 objects are in the same plane more or less. I think it is equally likely that Catsat did deploy and that the missing object is stage 2, which they are having trouble finding because of the plane change.
Presumably that will become clearer in a few days.
-----------------------------

Jonathan McDowell
http://planet4589.org

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
https://twitter.com/voyagerspace_/status/1809236105620762933

Quote
Congrats to @Firefly_Space on their 5th successful launch "Noise of Summer"! Voyager's Exploration team proudly led the satellite integration for all 8 cubesats on board, supporting @NASA's mission. Excited for the data these incredible payloads will bring!
Read more:

https://voyagerspace.com/insights/voyager-satellite-rideshare-noise-of-summer/

Quote
5 Jul, 2024
Exploration
Voyager & Satellite Rideshare: Noise of Summer

Congratulations to our friends at Firefly Aerospace for the company’s fifth launch (dubbed “Noise of Summer”)! Voyager’s Exploration team proudly led the satellite integration for all eight cubesats on board on behalf of the mission’s primary customer, NASA. Firefly’s Alpha vehicle lifted off at 9:04 p.m. PDT on July 3, 2024 and all eight satellites were successfully deployed.

The “Noise of Summer” payloads were sponsored by the NASA Cubesat Launch Initiative (CSLI) Launch Services Program (LSP), a team that Voyager proudly works closely with to support the launch and deployment of university satellites from the International Space Station, and now on rideshare missions. Customers on this mission included:

CatSat (University of Arizona): CatSat is a technology demonstration of an inflatable antenna for high-speed communications.

KUbeSat-1 (University of Kansas): The main payload on KUbeSat-1 is the Primary Cosmic Ray Detector which will use a new method to measure the energy and species of primary cosmic rays hitting the Earth.

MESAT1 (University of Maine): The science payloads are climate focused and include ALBEDO, IMAGER, and HAB. These will identify urban heat islands, determine concentration of phytoplankton in water bodies, and help predict harmful algal blooms.

R5-S4 and R5-S2.2.0 (NASA Johnson Space Center): R5-S4 and R5-S2 are the first in a line of R5 spacecrafts launched to orbit that will be tests of a new, lean process for building a spacecraft bus.

Serenity (Teachers in Space): Serenity 3 offers low-cost opportunities to test educational experiments in space. It has a suite of data sensors and a camera that will send data back to Earth. Licensed as an amateur radio broadcaster, Serenity can communicate with radios on the ground.

SOC-i (University of Washington):  SOC-I is a tech demo mission of attitude control technology. One of the payloads is a guidance and control system called SOAR, or SOC-i’s Optimal Attitude Reorientation. The second payload, CMOS, is a camera that serves as an instrument to demonstrate SOC-i’s pointing abilities.

TechEdSat-11 (TES-11) (NASA Ames Research Center): TES-11 contains several technology demonstrations, including advanced communications, radiation sensor suite, experimental solar panels, an exo-brake, and BrainStack-3

Voyager has successfully integrated and supported the launch of over 350 satellites and we’re proud to be part of this momentous launch for Firefly. Our team provided end-to-end support for NASA and the educational customers on board – working closely with Firefly – ensuring they were ready for flight. This included everything from mission planning, safety reviews, fit checks, vibration tests, and eventually integration onto the launch vehicle itself.

Congratulations again to Firefly and all of the customers on board as they begin collecting data. We can’t wait for the next mission.

Online gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10435
  • US
  • Liked: 14349
  • Likes Given: 6148
I had to look up Voyager to remember they bought Nanoracks, who I assume had that integration contract.

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
https://twitter.com/w00ki33/status/1809382338499158348

Quote
Another liftoff image from @Firefly_Space’s fifth Alpha mission from Vandenberg Space Force Base. Eight CubeSats were chosen through @NASA’s CubeSat Launch Initiative (CSLI) which gives satellite developers low-cost access to research in space. #NoiseofSummer

Offline Steven

  • Member
  • Posts: 3
  • Sint-Truiden, Limburg, Vlaanderen
  • Liked: 5
  • Likes Given: 0
I surely enjoyed watching this launch. I have two remaining questions however. During the launch broadcast it was announced that Alpha's stage 2 Lightning engine would relight to conduct a two-burn orbit insertion ahead of payload deployment [see first screenshot]. The Lightning engine never performed a second burn however, and the payloads were deployed in the orbit the initial stage 2 burn achieved. Why was the initial flight plan changed?

My second question has to do with payload deployment. After the planned deployment of CatSat - which was not shown live because it was supposed to occur during loss of signal - we got video showing a black cube (with a white top featuring a round hole) loosely bungling over one of the already opened payload dispensers while seemingly still being attached to it [see second screenshot]. I immediately thought this black cube was a cubesat that failed to deploy, which seemed even more likely given that their never was confirmation of the deployment of CatSat. The commentators never clarified what this object was, and since none of the deployments was actually shown during the broadcast it was difficult to gauge what really happened. What you can see in my screenshot is that a a similar payload dispenser right next to it was also already opened, but did not have this strange cube above it. So was this object the CatSat, and if not, what was it?

I hope someone has some answers. Thanks in advance.
« Last Edit: 07/09/2024 12:48 am by Steven »

Offline edkyle99

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15502
    • Space Launch Report
  • Liked: 8788
  • Likes Given: 1386
I surely enjoyed watching this launch. I have two remaining questions however. During the launch broadcast it was announced that Alpha's stage 2 Lightning engine would relight to conduct a two-burn orbit insertion ahead of payload deployment [see first screenshot]. The Lightning engine never performed a second burn however, and the payloads were deployed in the orbit the initial stage 2 burn achieved. Why was the initial flight plan changed?

My second question has to do with payload deployment. After the planned deployment of CatSat - which was not shown live because it was supposed to occur during loss of signal - we got video showing a black cube (with a white top featuring a round hole) loosely bungling over one of the already opened payload dispensers while seemingly still being attached to it [see second screenshot]. I immediately thought this black cube was a cubesat that failed to deploy, which seemed even more likely given that their never was confirmation of the deployment of CatSat. The commentators never clarified what this object was, and since none of the deployments was actually shown during the broadcast it was difficult to gauge what really happened. What you can see in my screenshot is that a a similar payload dispenser right next to it was also already opened, but did not have this strange cube above it. So was this object the CatSat, and if not, what was it?

I hope someone has some answers. Thanks in advance.
The successful restart test took place *after* satellite deployment.  The payload was light (eight CubeSats), allowing a direct insertion.  The restart test was an important milestone that checked fixes after the FLT0004 failure.  Basically, the webcast caption was incorrect.  Read the Firefly message below.
https://twitter.com/firefly_space/status/1808750140947124327
Quote
That's a wrap for tonight's coverage of Alpha #FLTA005 #NoiseOfSummer. After expected deployment, @NASA's CubeSat teams are now awaiting acquisition of signal....AND the Firefly team successfully completed a second stage relight and nominal plane change following deployment. Congratulations to the entire mission team!

Photo Credit: Firefly Aerospace/
@seanparkerphoto

 - Ed Kyle
« Last Edit: 07/09/2024 04:48 pm by zubenelgenubi »

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157

Online gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10435
  • US
  • Liked: 14349
  • Likes Given: 6148
The cube sticking out was most likely a spacer for the slot holding a 2U CubeSat, that has been seen on previous launches.

Offline mn

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1116
  • United States
  • Liked: 1006
  • Likes Given: 367
I surely enjoyed watching this launch. I have two remaining questions however. During the launch broadcast it was announced that Alpha's stage 2 Lightning engine would relight to conduct a two-burn orbit insertion ahead of payload deployment [see first screenshot]. The Lightning engine never performed a second burn however, and the payloads were deployed in the orbit the initial stage 2 burn achieved. Why was the initial flight plan changed?

My second question has to do with payload deployment. After the planned deployment of CatSat - which was not shown live because it was supposed to occur during loss of signal - we got video showing a black cube (with a white top featuring a round hole) loosely bungling over one of the already opened payload dispensers while seemingly still being attached to it [see second screenshot]. I immediately thought this black cube was a cubesat that failed to deploy, which seemed even more likely given that their never was confirmation of the deployment of CatSat. The commentators never clarified what this object was, and since none of the deployments was actually shown during the broadcast it was difficult to gauge what really happened. What you can see in my screenshot is that a a similar payload dispenser right next to it was also already opened, but did not have this strange cube above it. So was this object the CatSat, and if not, what was it?

I hope someone has some answers. Thanks in advance.
The successful restart test took place *after* satellite deployment.  The payload was light (eight CubeSats), allowing a direct insertion.  The restart test was an important milestone that checked fixes after the FLT0004 failure.  Basically, the webcast caption was incorrect.  Read the Firefly message below.
https://x.com/firefly_space/status/1808750140947124327

 - Ed Kyle

Yes we know if happened AFTER, and therefore steven asked a question: Why did it happen AFTER if they very clearly said it will happen BEFORE.

Quote
stage 2 Lightning engine would relight to conduct a two-burn orbit insertion ahead of payload deployment

It could simply be misworded and they meant to write that it will perform two burns ahead of a simulated orbit insertion. (as part of their test)
« Last Edit: 07/09/2024 03:46 pm by mn »

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1