Author Topic: Firefly Alpha Flight 3: VICTUS NOX (TacRS-3) : VSFB SLC-2W : 15 Sep 23 02:28 UTC  (Read 46144 times)

Offline Conexion Espacial

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2081
  • Liked: 3166
  • Likes Given: 2275
Discussion thread for Firefly Aerospace's fourth third mission with its Alpha rocket "FLT003".

Mission: VICTUS NOX (TacRS-3)

The launch was scheduled for February, but according to the FCC license, it looks like it will be in April at the earliest.
https://twitter.com/FccSpace/status/1618678961029931008


Press Relase:
https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220930005668/en/U.S.-Space-Force-Selects-Firefly-Aerospace-for-%E2%80%98Rapid-Space%E2%80%99-VICTUS-NOX-Mission
« Last Edit: 09/15/2023 07:10 am by Galactic Penguin SST »
I publish information in Spanish about space and rockets.
www.x.com/conexionspacial

Offline Skyrocket

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2641
  • Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • Liked: 953
  • Likes Given: 172
Re: Firefly Alpha Flight 3: FLTA003 : VSFB SLC-2W : 2023
« Reply #1 on: 01/26/2023 06:47 pm »
Discussion thread for Firefly Aerospace's third mission with its Alpha rocket "FLT003".


The launch was scheduled for February, but according to the FCC license, it looks like it will be in April at the earliest.
https://twitter.com/FccSpace/status/1618678961029931008

This license mentions both FLTA003 and FLTA004. Looks like an mistake.

Perhaps FLTA003 is still in February and FLTA004 (with TacRS mission) is NET April.

Offline Bean Kenobi

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 590
  • Liked: 383
  • Likes Given: 258
Problem with this tweet : purpose of this FCC licence is said to be FLTA003 but "Explanation" is about FLTA004 ;)

Offline Conexion Espacial

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2081
  • Liked: 3166
  • Likes Given: 2275
Yes, checking the website, the license is for FLT004, although it also mentions FLT003:
Quote
Purpose of Operation
Please explain the purpose of operation: Launch vehicle communication for Firefly Alpha rocket FLTA003.

EDIT:

For FLT004:
https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/els/reports/STA_Print.cfm?mode=current&application_seq=119834&RequestTimeout=1000
https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/els/reports/STA_Print.cfm?mode=current&application_seq=120946&RequestTimeout=1000
« Last Edit: 01/26/2023 07:11 pm by Conexion Espacial »
I publish information in Spanish about space and rockets.
www.x.com/conexionspacial

Offline Conexion Espacial

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2081
  • Liked: 3166
  • Likes Given: 2275
It looks like VICTUS NOX will be the third flight and not ElaNA 43.https://twitter.com/Firefly_Space/status/1637887066200481806
Quote
Launch update: Our next launch, FLTA003, will support the @SpaceForceDoD responsive space mission, VICTUS NOX. We’re in the final integration of our Alpha rocket and will soon stand ready for the 24-hour call-up. We’re honored to work with this incredible team! #PartnersInSpace
« Last Edit: 06/19/2023 01:31 am by zubenelgenubi »
I publish information in Spanish about space and rockets.
www.x.com/conexionspacial

Offline Conexion Espacial

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2081
  • Liked: 3166
  • Likes Given: 2275
A brief summary of this mission where Firefly Aerospace's quick response will be tested.
https://twitter.com/samsung0804_2/status/1637890269444972564
https://twitter.com/samsung0804_2/status/1637890639583911957
https://twitter.com/samsung0804_2/status/1637892399639699461
Quote
YOOOO! Seems FLTA003 & 4 swapped places; VICTUS NOX 1st, ELaNa 43 2nd.

Recap of the mission profile:

After finishing integration, the vehicle will sit & wait for a notice to alert, at which point they have 60 hours to get the rocket from the HIF to ready on the pad.

(1/?)

Quote
There it can sit for up to a month. At some point during that time, Firefly will get a notice to launch, and they have just 24 HOURS (!!) to get VICTUS NOX into LEO.

This is a super demanding rapid response launch test for the US military. Overall a very exciting mission.

(2/?)

Quote
Currently NET mid-April TMK, this mission has a somewhat wide timeframe given its purposely unpredictable nature.

Day/night launch, weekday/end, etc. pretty much isn't going to be known until the day before.

Sorry to those who want to see it in person...

(3/3)
« Last Edit: 06/19/2023 01:34 am by zubenelgenubi »
I publish information in Spanish about space and rockets.
www.x.com/conexionspacial

Online gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10437
  • US
  • Liked: 14349
  • Likes Given: 6148
Ground station filing lists the satellite as "Victus Nox / USMIG-8", with a contact at Millenium Space.

Orbit 550km circular at 97.7 degrees.
« Last Edit: 03/24/2023 01:26 pm by gongora »

Offline Conexion Espacial

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2081
  • Liked: 3166
  • Likes Given: 2275
https://twitter.com/firefly_space/status/1640855097650315266
Quote
Launch Update: Things are rockin' in Vandenberg! The team has moved Alpha to the pad ahead of final system testing and a full-duration static fire for the @SpaceForceDoD VICTUS NOX responsive space mission.
« Last Edit: 06/19/2023 01:35 am by zubenelgenubi »
I publish information in Spanish about space and rockets.
www.x.com/conexionspacial

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85176
  • Likes Given: 38157
https://twitter.com/firefly_space/status/1643328895997861888

Quote
FLTA003 Update: Last week was incredibly productive as we continued to prep for the @SpaceForceDoD #VICTUSNOX mission. The team nailed a dry-run of mating the payload fairing to Alpha on the launch pad – a first for us and a key capability to enable responsive space missions.

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85176
  • Likes Given: 38157
https://twitter.com/firefly_space/status/1646340377484439552

Quote
FLTA003 Update: Big congrats to the Firefly team for completing a full-duration static fire on the first attempt for the @SpaceForceDoD #VICTUSNOX mission. Our “test before you fly” approach confirms all systems and components are operating within flight parameters before launch.

Offline zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11925
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 7953
  • Likes Given: 77596
There will be NOTAMs, NOTMARs, etc.?
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Offline trimeta

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1785
  • Kansas City, MO
  • Liked: 2252
  • Likes Given: 57
There will be NOTAMs, NOTMARs, etc.?
Since the whole point of this launch is "Firefly is only told the exact launch time when it's 24 hours away," I'd imagine they can't be too specific beforehand.

Although I guess they could issue multi-day notices and not tell Firefly that the "true" launch time is actually the third day or whatever.

Offline zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11925
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 7953
  • Likes Given: 77596
Could Falcon 9 and Alpha both launch on the same day (March 25)?  Are there any technical reasons that prevent this?

Edit/add March 27: It didn't happen; only Starlink launched on April 27.
« Last Edit: 04/27/2023 03:18 pm by zubenelgenubi »
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Offline Tomness

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 673
  • Into the abyss will I run
  • Liked: 298
  • Likes Given: 744
Could Falcon 9 and Alpha both launch on the same day (March 25)?  Are there any technical reasons that prevent this?
I'm curious, there's now two Starlink missions planned, both from Florida, and both for May 8.

Although they say the best way to ensure two launches won't conflict is to schedule them for the same day, these two ended up falling together relatively close to launch day. And SpaceX HAS two pads.

Would it be possible for SpaceX to do "2 for the price of 1" by handling 2 launch campaigns simultaneously from the same firing room?

If so, what would be the temporal spacing required? I assume ideally flight 1 should have landed/reached at least parking orbit before flight 2 enters terminal count. That way if someone yells "HOLD HOLD HOLD" on the net it's always clear which vehicle is meant ;)

But they could also be 20+h apart in which case everyone actually gets a good nights sleep in between and we'd see nothing really groundbreaking new.

But I'm kinda rooting for a launch webcast with 2 successive launches one right after the other.

What does Starlink orbital mechanics say? Would launching two batches so close after each other even make sense? What planes do these birds need to go to?

SpaceX can launch from both LC39A and SLC-40 on the same day, but they need approximately 16-18 hours between launches for the 45th Space Wing to reset common range assets.  I speculate that they might be able to shave that time down if the two launches are flying on similar trajectories.

"Brig. Gen. Monteith stated that this new AFTS combined with two operational SpaceX pads at Kennedy and the CCAFS will allow the company to launch two Falcon 9 rockets – one from 39A and one from SLC-40 – within 16 to 18 hours of each other.

“When pad 40 is up and operating, [it will] give us the capability of launching a Falcon from both pad 39A and pad 40 on the same day,” stated the Brig. Gen."

https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2017/03/air-force-reveals-48-launches-year-cape/

Article from March 20, 2017

I think that clear it up,  hopefully they dialed it in to 3-5hrs now.

Offline zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11925
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 7953
  • Likes Given: 77596
Bump: Will launch occur in the remaining days this month?
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Offline russianhalo117

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8818
  • Liked: 4748
  • Likes Given: 768
Bump: Will launch occur in the remaining days this month?
Launch readiness will occur within 60 hours advance notice to rollout the launch vehicle and within 24 hours notice once vertical after the space vehicle payload stack mate with the launch vehicle. This timeline can be started anytime during the contract duration of NET 04/01/2023 to NLT 09/28/2023 as stated upthread.
« Last Edit: 04/28/2023 03:37 pm by russianhalo117 »

Offline zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11925
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 7953
  • Likes Given: 77596
NextSpaceflight, updated April 29:
NET May 2023
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Offline Conexion Espacial

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2081
  • Liked: 3166
  • Likes Given: 2275
NextSpaceflight, updated April 29:
NET May 2023

I'm a little late but with some information, I waited until the last minute to move the launch to May since the launch notice comes a day earlier literally, it seems that Firefly has not yet received either of the two notices (T-60 hrs and T-24 hrs alerts) from Space Force, so there is a small chance that the launch will be delayed one more month.

We'll see how the preparations progress and the notices that will be a day earlier.

In addition, Everyday Astronaut will not be broadcasting live and the media will not have access for this mission.
« Last Edit: 05/05/2023 05:14 pm by Conexion Espacial »
I publish information in Spanish about space and rockets.
www.x.com/conexionspacial

Offline russianhalo117

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8818
  • Liked: 4748
  • Likes Given: 768
NextSpaceflight, updated April 29:
NET May 2023

I'm a little late but with some information, I waited until the last minute to move the launch to May since the launch notice comes a day earlier literally, it seems that Firefly has not yet received either of the two notices (T-60 hrs and T-24 hrs alerts) from Space Force, so there is a small chance that the launch will be delayed one more month.

We'll see how the preparations progress and the notices that will be a day earlier.

In addition, Everyday Astronaut will not be broadcasting live and the media will not have access for this mission.
Per the contract the launch will occur with short notice  sometime during NET 04/01/2023 to NLT 09/28/2023.

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85176
  • Likes Given: 38157
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/05/06/firefly-launching-space-force-high-speed-victus-nox-mission.html

twitter.com/thesheetztweetz/status/1654850821652201476

Quote
"Conquer the night"

@Firefly_Space is about to launch its third Alpha rocket, while Millennium is preparing for the Space Force call to ship the “Victus Nox” satellite to Vandenberg.

More about the 24-hour notice mission, and its crucial opportunity:

https://twitter.com/thesheetztweetz/status/1654851801173094400

Quote
.@USSF_SSC's Space Safari Lt. Col. MacKenzie Birchenough:

“They don’t know when they’re going to get the call to launch."

“From their perspective, the things that normally happen over weeks or months are now crunched down to basically minutes and days.”

twitter.com/thesheetztweetz/status/1654852170531913733

Quote
Firefly CEO Bill Weber: "When Victus Nox launches, our intention is to go two months after that and on in succession. Alpha will be that predictable schedule, of a one metric ton rocket [flying] every two months.”

https://twitter.com/thesheetztweetz/status/1654852332708937729

Quote
Millennium CEO Jason Kim: “The idea there is if you take something that’s off the production line, you don’t have to start from scratch to rapidly deploy a tactically responsive space capability to meet an urgent need..."

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85176
  • Likes Given: 38157
twitter.com/firefly_space/status/1658559459751280643

Quote
Alpha FLTA003 Update: Built in under 4 months, our new payload processing facility in Vandenberg is lookin’ good.

https://twitter.com/firefly_space/status/1658559463094210571

Quote
Equipped w/ a cleanroom & the ability to fuel hypergolic spacecraft, this facility will be used to process, integrate and encapsulate the Millennium Space Systems payload in a matter of HOURS for the upcoming @SpaceForceDoD  #VICTUSNOX launch - that’s how we do responsive launch!

Offline russianhalo117

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8818
  • Liked: 4748
  • Likes Given: 768
« Last Edit: 05/18/2023 09:11 pm by zubenelgenubi »

Offline trimeta

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1785
  • Kansas City, MO
  • Liked: 2252
  • Likes Given: 57
US Space Force to attempt to replace a damaged satellite in less than 24 hours
The sentence "this attempt, known officially as Tactically Responsive Launch-3, will be the first to have a ground-based rocket deliver a satellite payload into space directly" is kind of hiding that "ground-based" is the unique part here: the previous TacRL-2 launch used Pegasus XL. (Perhaps more notably, TacRL-2 had a 21-day callup, while TacRS-3 is down to a 24-hour callup; in my opinion, that's more significant than ground-launch vs. air-launch.)

Offline russianhalo117

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8818
  • Liked: 4748
  • Likes Given: 768
US Space Force to attempt to replace a damaged satellite in less than 24 hours
The sentence "this attempt, known officially as Tactically Responsive Launch-3, will be the first to have a ground-based rocket deliver a satellite payload into space directly" is kind of hiding that "ground-based" is the unique part here: the previous TacRL-2 launch used Pegasus XL. (Perhaps more notably, TacRL-2 had a 21-day callup, while TacRS-3 is down to a 24-hour callup; in my opinion, that's more significant than ground-launch vs. air-launch.)
Original programme was TacRL a d follow on programme is TacRS. Per contacts they are classed financially as separate projects with TacRL office winding down as TacRS office started up. The original programme started out of the ORS programme. It has had many names over the years. TacRS is the first iteration fully under the USSF rather than gambling handed over.

Offline trimeta

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1785
  • Kansas City, MO
  • Liked: 2252
  • Likes Given: 57
US Space Force to attempt to replace a damaged satellite in less than 24 hours
The sentence "this attempt, known officially as Tactically Responsive Launch-3, will be the first to have a ground-based rocket deliver a satellite payload into space directly" is kind of hiding that "ground-based" is the unique part here: the previous TacRL-2 launch used Pegasus XL. (Perhaps more notably, TacRL-2 had a 21-day callup, while TacRS-3 is down to a 24-hour callup; in my opinion, that's more significant than ground-launch vs. air-launch.)
Original programme was TacRL a d follow on programme is TacRS. Per contacts they are classed financially as separate projects with TacRL office winding down as TacRS office started up. The original programme started out of the ORS programme. It has had many names over the years. TacRS is the first iteration fully under the USSF rather than gambling handed over.
I did notice how the original TacRS-3 announcement commented on the shift from TacRL to TacRS. I guess a history of name changes may also explain why I had difficulty finding the original TacRL contract (hence why I couldn't say "both TacRL and TacRL-2 used Pegasus XL;" I couldn't even find proof that "TacRL" without a number existed at all).

Offline zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11925
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 7953
  • Likes Given: 77596
Cross-post:
NextSpaceflight, updated May 24:
Quote
VICTUS NOX (TacRS-3)
Launch Time
NET June 2023
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Offline IanO

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 165
  • Portland, OR
    • Portland State Aerospace Society
  • Liked: 60
  • Likes Given: 284
US Space Force to attempt to replace a damaged satellite in less than 24 hours
The sentence "this attempt, known officially as Tactically Responsive Launch-3, will be the first to have a ground-based rocket deliver a satellite payload into space directly" is kind of hiding that "ground-based" is the unique part here: the previous TacRL-2 launch used Pegasus XL. (Perhaps more notably, TacRL-2 had a 21-day callup, while TacRS-3 is down to a 24-hour callup; in my opinion, that's more significant than ground-launch vs. air-launch.)
Considering that the most common launch delays are due to weather, do we know if Firefly has any means to mitigate that factor? Pegasus had the advantage of being able to both launch from multiple sites and fly above any inclement weather.
psas.pdx.edu

Offline Asteroza

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2910
  • Liked: 1126
  • Likes Given: 33
US Space Force to attempt to replace a damaged satellite in less than 24 hours
The sentence "this attempt, known officially as Tactically Responsive Launch-3, will be the first to have a ground-based rocket deliver a satellite payload into space directly" is kind of hiding that "ground-based" is the unique part here: the previous TacRL-2 launch used Pegasus XL. (Perhaps more notably, TacRL-2 had a 21-day callup, while TacRS-3 is down to a 24-hour callup; in my opinion, that's more significant than ground-launch vs. air-launch.)
Considering that the most common launch delays are due to weather, do we know if Firefly has any means to mitigate that factor? Pegasus had the advantage of being able to both launch from multiple sites and fly above any inclement weather.

Wait, was Pegasus really that immune to upper level winds?

Offline edzieba

  • Virtual Realist
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6494
  • United Kingdom
  • Liked: 9936
  • Likes Given: 43
US Space Force to attempt to replace a damaged satellite in less than 24 hours
The sentence "this attempt, known officially as Tactically Responsive Launch-3, will be the first to have a ground-based rocket deliver a satellite payload into space directly" is kind of hiding that "ground-based" is the unique part here: the previous TacRL-2 launch used Pegasus XL. (Perhaps more notably, TacRL-2 had a 21-day callup, while TacRS-3 is down to a 24-hour callup; in my opinion, that's more significant than ground-launch vs. air-launch.)
Considering that the most common launch delays are due to weather, do we know if Firefly has any means to mitigate that factor? Pegasus had the advantage of being able to both launch from multiple sites and fly above any inclement weather.

Wait, was Pegasus really that immune to upper level winds?
As a compact all-solid vehicle, it almost certainly has a similarly high tolerance to wind shear as other small all-solid vehicles. Still limited by weather at the drop zone (and the airport) due to the need to fly Balls 8 / Stargazer, but there is the potential to have multiple contingency drop zones if a payload absolutely positively needs to launch on time.

Offline Galactic Penguin SST

Any news on this one?
(I have seen some rumors elsewhere but I would want to see if there are public news since late May)
Astronomy & spaceflight geek penguin. In a relationship w/ Space Shuttle Discovery.

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85176
  • Likes Given: 38157
https://twitter.com/harry__stranger/status/1672318639968772097

Quote
High resolution satellite imagery shows what appears to be @Firefly_Space's Alpha rocket (minus the payload fairing) at SLC-2W, as preparations continue for the upcoming VICTUS NOX (TacRS-3) mission.

Image capture time: 2023-06-21 19:02:45 UTC

Offline GewoonLukas_

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1509
  • Lukas C. H.
  • Netherlands
  • Liked: 3637
  • Likes Given: 1806
Quote
Launch Roundup: SpaceX to launch Euclid; Virgin Galactic to fly crewed suborbital mission

June 26, 2023

[...]

The launch time and date are not yet known, and Firefly has 24 hours to launch the satellite after the US Space Force gives the order to launch the payload. The launch is expected to happen sometime this week. The satellite’s purpose is listed as “space domain awareness,” and the flight is meant to test a rapid launch capability for the DoD.

[...]
Lukas C. H. • Hobbyist Mission Patch Artist 🎨 • May the force be with you my friend, Ad Astra Per Aspera ✨️

Offline Timux

  • Member
  • Posts: 2
  • Germany
  • Liked: 1
  • Likes Given: 27
Do we expect to get an exact time from Firefly, after the Space Force gives the go?

Offline russianhalo117

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8818
  • Liked: 4748
  • Likes Given: 768
Do we expect to get an exact time from Firefly, after the Space Force gives the go?
The coverage and information provided will be the same as predecessor missions i.e. TacRL-2 etal. See:
Pegasus XL – TacRL-2 – Vandenberg –13 June 2021 (08:11 UTC)

Quote
The company is under contract to launch a Space Force mission called “Victus Nox” sometime this summer . . .
https://spacenews.com/firefly-to-launch-lockheed-martin-small-satellite-experiment/ [Jun 29]
« Last Edit: 07/02/2023 01:32 pm by zubenelgenubi »

Offline Zed_Noir

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5490
  • Canada
  • Liked: 1811
  • Likes Given: 1302
Maybe someone at the USSF scheduled the VICTUS NOX launch for July 4th. :)

Offline zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11925
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 7953
  • Likes Given: 77596
« Last Edit: 08/04/2023 05:50 pm by zubenelgenubi »
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Offline zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11925
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 7953
  • Likes Given: 77596
Bump/any new news?
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Offline zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11925
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 7953
  • Likes Given: 77596
NextSpaceflight, updated August 25:
Launch NET September 2023

The wait is mildly annoying.
« Last Edit: 08/26/2023 03:36 am by zubenelgenubi »
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Offline TrevorMonty

NextSpaceflight, updated August 25:
Launch NET September 2023

The wait is mildly annoying.
Why don't they launch a different payload in meantime. Their other customers must be getting sick of waiting.
« Last Edit: 08/26/2023 10:35 pm by zubenelgenubi »

Offline Zed_Noir

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5490
  • Canada
  • Liked: 1811
  • Likes Given: 1302
NextSpaceflight, updated August 25:
Launch NET September 2023

The wait is mildly annoying.
Why don't they launch a different payload in meantime. Their other customers must be getting sick of waiting.
Think they only have one set of launch hardware, which is currently occupied by the flight 3 Alpha standing by for launch.

« Last Edit: 08/27/2023 04:05 pm by Zed_Noir »

Offline edkyle99

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15502
    • Space Launch Report
  • Liked: 8788
  • Likes Given: 1386
NextSpaceflight, updated August 25:
Launch NET September 2023

The wait is mildly annoying.
Why don't they launch a different payload in meantime. Their other customers must be getting sick of waiting.
Think they only have one set of launch hardware, which is currently occupied by the flight 3 Alpha standing by for launch.
Is the rocket waiting for the payload/mission, or is it the other way around?

 - Ed Kyle

Offline GewoonLukas_

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1509
  • Lukas C. H.
  • Netherlands
  • Liked: 3637
  • Likes Given: 1806
NextSpaceflight, updated August 25:
Launch NET September 2023

The wait is mildly annoying.
Why don't they launch a different payload in meantime. Their other customers must be getting sick of waiting.
Think they only have one set of launch hardware, which is currently occupied by the flight 3 Alpha standing by for launch.
Is the rocket waiting for the payload/mission, or is it the other way around?

 - Ed Kyle

Rocket and Payload are both ready, but they are waiting for the US Space Force to give them the go-ahead to proceed with a launch attempt.
Lukas C. H. • Hobbyist Mission Patch Artist 🎨 • May the force be with you my friend, Ad Astra Per Aspera ✨️

Offline Asteroza

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2910
  • Liked: 1126
  • Likes Given: 33
NextSpaceflight, updated August 25:
Launch NET September 2023

The wait is mildly annoying.
Why don't they launch a different payload in meantime. Their other customers must be getting sick of waiting.
Think they only have one set of launch hardware, which is currently occupied by the flight 3 Alpha standing by for launch.
Is the rocket waiting for the payload/mission, or is it the other way around?

 - Ed Kyle

Rocket and Payload are both ready, but they are waiting for the US Space Force to give them the go-ahead to proceed with a launch attempt.

Sounds like they need western range FTS services then, thus the scheduling holdup?

Offline russianhalo117

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8818
  • Liked: 4748
  • Likes Given: 768
NextSpaceflight, updated August 25:
Launch NET September 2023

The wait is mildly annoying.
Why don't they launch a different payload in meantime. Their other customers must be getting sick of waiting.
Think they only have one set of launch hardware, which is currently occupied by the flight 3 Alpha standing by for launch.
Is the rocket waiting for the payload/mission, or is it the other way around?

 - Ed Kyle

Rocket and Payload are both ready, but they are waiting for the US Space Force to give them the go-ahead to proceed with a launch attempt.
No. The mission authority which is the customer(s) in simplistic terms.

Getting closer.

Quote
The Firefly team now stands ready for the 24-hour callup for the SpaceForceDoD VICTUSNOX responsive space mission. We've officially entered the "hot standby phase" and wait to receive the notice to launch and final orbit requirements.

https://twitter.com/Firefly_Space/status/1696940763765203326?s=20
« Last Edit: 08/30/2023 06:08 pm by spacenuance »

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85176
  • Likes Given: 38157
https://fireflyspace.com/news/firefly-aerospace-and-millennium-space-systems-stand-ready-for-responsive-u-s-space-force-mission/

Quote
August 30, 2023

Firefly Aerospace and Millennium Space Systems Stand Ready for Responsive U.S. Space Force Mission

VANDENBERG SPACE FORCE BASE, Calif, August 30, 2023 – Firefly Aerospace, Inc., an end-to-end space transportation company, and Millennium Space Systems, a Boeing Company (NYSE: BA) small satellite constellation prime, have entered the hot standby phase for VICTUS NOX, a Tactically Responsive Space mission led by Space Systems Command’s (SSC) Space Safari Program Office. The team stands ready for the 24-hour callup and orbit requirements to complete final operations and launch at the first available window.

“Challenging missions like this is where Firefly excels, and we are extremely humbled and proud to provide the U.S. Space Force and the nation with the critical capability to launch on-demand in support of national security,” said Bill Weber, CEO of Firefly Aerospace. “Together with our mission partners, we’ll be setting a new standard, proving nominal launch operations can be completed in a matter of hours rather than weeks to months.”

Millennium and Firefly have entered a six-month hot standby phase and will wait for activation at an intentionally unknown time. During this phase, the U.S. Space Force will give the mission team an alert notification, kicking off a 60-hour window to transport the payload to Vandenberg Space Force Base, conduct fueling operations, and integrate it with Firefly’s Alpha payload adaptor.

Space Force officials will then issue Firefly a launch notice with the final orbit requirements. The Firefly team will have 24 hours to update the trajectory and guidance software, encapsulate the payload, transport it to the pad, mate to Alpha, and stand ready to launch at the first available window. Once the payload is deployed in low Earth orbit, Millennium will attempt to fully initialize the space vehicle in less than 48 hours and then begin operations for its Space Domain Awareness (SDA) mission.

“What we’re doing with VICTUS NOX has never been done before, and I attribute our success to the dedication and teamwork of our collective team – Millennium, Firefly, and SSC’s Space Safari and Rocket Systems Launch Program (RSLP) offices,” said Jason Kim, CEO of Millennium Space Systems. “You need to have the willingness to know that there will be changes – whether requirements or processes. That’s where the teamwork and close partnerships really came into play. It’s about what help is needed to address a challenge – on all sides – and everyone pitching in to support that.”

In preparation for the mission, Firefly manufactured and acceptance tested each critical component, engine, and vehicle stage for its Alpha rocket in addition to conducting a static fire to verify all systems operate within flight parameters. Firefly and Millennium also completed multiple rehearsals in preparation for launch, which included packing and delivering a satellite mockup to Firefly’s integration facility at Vandenberg Space Force Base to practice all launch operations within the prescribed 24 hours.

“The U.S.’s ability to rapidly respond to on-orbit needs is critical to our national defense, particularly in today’s evolving space environment,” said Lt. Col. MacKenzie Birchenough, Materiel Leader for Space Safari. “The accelerated build time the team demonstrated for VICTUS NOX, combined with the demanding launch and on-orbit goals, exemplifies our strong commitment to preserving our nation’s dominance and ability to freely operate in the space domain.”

Photo caption:

Quote
Alpha launch provider, Firefly, and payload provider, Millennium, moved into the hot standby phase and wait for the VICTUS NOX callup
« Last Edit: 08/30/2023 05:47 pm by FutureSpaceTourist »

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85176
  • Likes Given: 38157

Offline edkyle99

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15502
    • Space Launch Report
  • Liked: 8788
  • Likes Given: 1386
Minuteman III launch performed this morning.  Perhaps VSFB attention will now shift to Alpha Flight 3.

 - Ed Kyle
« Last Edit: 09/06/2023 02:25 pm by edkyle99 »

Online AndrewM

  • Global Moderator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 280
  • United States
  • Liked: 321
  • Likes Given: 841
A new FCC filing was submitted starting 9/29/2023 and running until 3/25/2024. The previous filing runs until 9/28.

Quote
Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
This STA is necessary to authorize launch vehicle communications for Firefly FLTA003 from Vandenberg Space Force Base SLC-2W. FLTA003 supports a DoD TacRS mission, meaning the launch and flight requirements will not be provided to Firefly until closer to launch dates. Firefly operations include a suborbital first stage and an orbital second stage. All downrange Earth stations are receive-only.

Quote
Requested Period of Operation
Operation Start Date:   09/29/2023
Operation End Date:   03/25/2024

https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/els/reports/STA_Print.cfm?mode=current&application_seq=127756&RequestTimeout=1000

Offline VLN

  • Member
  • Posts: 87
  • Los Angeles
  • Liked: 171
  • Likes Given: 154
Launch hazard notices from NGA and FAA:
Quote from: FAA NOTAM 09/239 (KZLA-A3090/23)
!CARF 09/239 ZLA AIRSPACE DCC FLETCHER 23-1 AREA A STNR ALT RESERVATION WI AN AREA DEFINED AS
334800N1221500W TO 345300N1204500W TO 345300N1203200W TO 345500N1202700W TO 345600N1202100W TO 345400N1201500W TO 345000N1201500W TO 344200N1201800W TO 342200N1204500W TO 331000N1214700W TO 295100N1235100W TO 270000N1250900W TO 270000N1255700W TO 313100N1233600W
TO POINT OF ORIGIN, SFC-UNL 2309150227-2309150314
Quote from: NGA
140310Z SEP 23
NAVAREA XII 631/23(17,18,19).
EASTERN NORTH PACIFIC.
1. HAZARDOUS OPERATIONS:
   A. 150157Z TO 150319Z SEP, ALTERNATE
      160157Z TO 160319Z SEP IN AREA BOUND BY
      25-50.00N 126-00.00W, 26-00.00N 126-35.00W,
      25-28.00N 126-51.00W, 24-59.00N 125-50.00W,
      25-31.00N 125-33.00W.
   B. 150406Z TO 150413Z SEP, ALTERNATE
      160406Z TO 160413Z SEP IN AREA BOUND BY
      46-21.00N 143-08.00W, 28-18.00N 147-24.00W,
      27-54.00N 146-22.00W, 46-06.00N 141-21.00W.
2. CANCEL THIS MSG 160513Z SEP 23.//

I think that this is VICTUS NOX, for several reasons. At the end of the long narrow blob in the lower right is a little pentagon which is probably where the first stage falls into the sea (700 miles downrange). The long wide rectangle in the upper left, nearly parallel and further north and west, must be where the second stage reenters almost one orbit later.

A rough estimate of launch heading is 209-210 deg, indicating an orbit inclination of 119-120 deg, roughly in family with Firefly's 1st and 2nd launches. The first launch window begins about 23 hr after the time I received the NGA email which is consistent with the customer's demand for <24 hr response time. (I'll guess that the second window is so that the customer can see a launch even if Firefly doesn't make it to orbit in the first window.)

Offline Ken the Bin

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3095
  • US Pacific Time Zone
    • @kenthebin@spacey.space
  • Liked: 5669
  • Likes Given: 6280
A cancel-and-replace NGA Hazardous Operations notice for the one that VLN posted above.

Note: Launches from Vandy normally include "CALIFORNIA." in the header information, which these notices do not.

Quote from: NGA
141526Z SEP 23
NAVAREA XII 634/23(17,18,19).
EASTERN NORTH PACIFIC.
1. HAZARDOUS OPERATIONS:
    A. 150157Z TO 150319Z SEP, ALTERNATE
      160157Z TO 160319Z SEP IN AREAS BOUND BY:
      25-50.00N 126-00.00W, 26-00.00N 126-35.00W,
      25-28.00N 126-51.00W, 24-59.00N 125-50.00W,
      25-31.00N 125-33.00W.
   B. 150406Z TO 150440Z SEP, ALTERNATE
      160406Z TO 160440Z SEP IN AREA BOUND BY
      46-06.00N 141-21.00W, 46-21.00N 143-08.00W,
      28-18.00N 147-24.00W, 27-54.00N 146-22.00W.
2. CANCEL NAVAREA XII 631/23.
3. CANCEL THIS MSG 160440Z SEP 23.

Offline 4353

  • Member
  • Posts: 36
  • Tracking the Dark Side
  • Leiden, Netherlands
  • Liked: 44
  • Likes Given: 0

A rough estimate of launch heading is 209-210 deg, indicating an orbit inclination of 119-120 deg, roughly in family with Firefly's 1st and 2nd launches.

The location and extend of Area B from Navigational Warning NAVAREA XII 631 is consistent with launch into a ~97.8 degree inclined sun-synchronous orbit. The upper stage does a dog-leg after first stage separation.
Marco Langbroek - SatTrackCam
http://sattrackcam.blogspot.com

Offline Ken the Bin

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3095
  • US Pacific Time Zone
    • @kenthebin@spacey.space
  • Liked: 5669
  • Likes Given: 6280
Yet another cancel-and-replace NGA Hazardous Operations notice.

Quote from: NGA
141808Z SEP 23
NAVAREA XII 635/23(17,18,19).
EASTERN NORTH PACIFIC.
1. HAZARDOUS OPERATIONS:
    A. 150157Z TO 150318Z SEP, ALTERNATE
      160157Z TO 160318Z SEP IN AREAS BOUND BY:
      25-50.00N 126-00.00W, 26-00.00N 126-35.00W,
      25-28.00N 126-51.00W, 24-59.00N 125-50.00W,
      25-31.00N 125-33.00W.
   B. 150406Z TO 150416Z SEP, ALTERNATE
      160406Z TO 160416Z SEP IN AREA BOUND BY
      46-06.00N 141-21.00W, 46-21.00N 143-08.00W,
      28-18.00N 147-24.00W, 27-54.00N 146-22.00W.
2. CANCEL NAVAREA XII 634/23.
3. CANCEL THIS MSG 160516Z SEP 23.

Offline Vahe231991

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1689
  • 11 Canyon Terrace
  • Liked: 463
  • Likes Given: 199
Quote
Texas-based small launch company Firefly Aerospace is preparing to jumpstart its 2023 campaign with the launch of FLTA003 — the third flight of its Alpha launch vehicle — as part of a dedicated mission for the U.S. Space Force (USSF). Liftoff from Space Launch Complex 2 West (SLC-2W) at Vandenberg Space Force Base in California is currently scheduled to occur no earlier than Thursday, Sept. 14 at 6:57 PM PDT (01:57 UTC on Friday, Sept. 15).

The mission — colloquially known as VICTUS NOX, which translates to “conquer the night” in Latin — will serve as a demonstration of the United States’ capability to quickly place a satellite in orbit in response to a national security threat, if the need ever arises. Firefly was awarded the mission in October 2022 under the Orbital Services Program 4 contract.

https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2023/09/firefly-victus-nox/
[Sep 14]
« Last Edit: 09/15/2023 04:04 am by zubenelgenubi »

Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39463
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 33124
  • Likes Given: 8901
PDF of online press kit.
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Online catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12418
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 10139
  • Likes Given: 8481
Firefly doesn't have a "Live Videos" tab set up on YouTube. It may be broadcast on "X". In my opinion, we will either see a full launch video or a summary/highlight video post-launch.
It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Offline Ken the Bin

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3095
  • US Pacific Time Zone
    • @kenthebin@spacey.space
  • Liked: 5669
  • Likes Given: 6280
Firefly doesn't have a "Live Videos" tab set up on YouTube. It may be broadcast on "X". In my opinion, we will either see a full launch video or a summary/highlight video post-launch.

In the past, Everyday Astronaut (Tim Dodd) has done the official Firefly livestreams (like NSF with Astra). There's nothing showing on his channel though.

Online catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12418
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 10139
  • Likes Given: 8481
Firefly doesn't have a "Live Videos" tab set up on YouTube. It may be broadcast on "X". In my opinion, we will either see a full launch video or a summary/highlight video post-launch.

In the past, Everyday Astronaut (Tim Dodd) has done the official Firefly livestreams (like NSF with Astra). There's nothing showing on his channel, though.

Ken the Bin
Thanks for bringing that up. He probably didn't have time to fly out and set up for this launch in time.  The launch Hazardous notice for this didn't appear until this morning. It's part of this call and launch project.
Tony
« Last Edit: 09/14/2023 11:39 pm by catdlr »
It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Offline zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11925
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 7953
  • Likes Given: 77596
Any new news?  Launch NET this hour.
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Offline zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11925
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 7953
  • Likes Given: 77596
NextSpaceflight, updated September 15 UTC:
Launch 15 September 02:27 UTC = 14 Sep 7:27 pm PDT

Edit: Fixed typo.
« Last Edit: 09/15/2023 02:36 am by zubenelgenubi »
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39463
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 33124
  • Likes Given: 8901
NextSpaceFlight is showing 02:27 UTC for me!
« Last Edit: 09/15/2023 01:53 am by Steven Pietrobon »
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39463
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 33124
  • Likes Given: 8901
Launch should be happening about now.
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.


Offline AStick

I’m at Vandenberg - foggy, of course, but definitely heard a rocket roar. 

Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39463
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 33124
  • Likes Given: 8901
Its about T+13 minutes, so should be in orbit.
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.


Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39463
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 33124
  • Likes Given: 8901
Image from the tweet.
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Offline AstroWare

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 296
  • Arizona
  • Liked: 226
  • Likes Given: 0
From family in So Cal.

Offline HMXHMX

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1724
  • Liked: 2257
  • Likes Given: 672
Saw it in La Jolla, CA.

Offline LuMaxQ

I watched it from Agoura Hills, CA.

Beautiful view from here. Had a few marine layer clouds beginning to coalesce, but saw most of it. Exhaust was brightly lit by the sun, a vivid blue-white plume!

Stage separation, and payload fairing halves sepa. were completely visible.
Fairing halves were shiny, and so reflected the sunlight and providing a 'sparkle' effect as they tumbled.

Pic does not do it justice, I was watching it thru my binoculars.

Online catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12418
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 10139
  • Likes Given: 8481
to:  LuMaxQ,  HMXHMX, AstroWare, Steven Pietrobon, Yellowstone10

Thank you to all the contributors who furnished tweets and their own personal pictures. This reminds me of the years before where the only way we knew what was going on was from visual sightings.
« Last Edit: 09/15/2023 03:07 am by catdlr »
It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Online catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12418
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 10139
  • Likes Given: 8481
It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Online catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12418
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 10139
  • Likes Given: 8481
It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

A friend spotted it out in Tucson AZ.
« Last Edit: 09/15/2023 03:17 am by Jrcraft »
AE/ME
6 Suborbital spaceflight payloads. 14.55 minutes of in-space time.

Online catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12418
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 10139
  • Likes Given: 8481
This one was taken near Long Beach, listen to his commentary....it's funny.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/v_hYNFGzZEg
It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Online catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12418
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 10139
  • Likes Given: 8481
The best ones come from people far away.  This one from Desert Hot Springs.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/cHV_tnogyE8
It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Online catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12418
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 10139
  • Likes Given: 8481
There's a boatload of video coming into YT.  Use the following search to locate them:

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=rocket+launch&sp=EgIIAQ%253D%253D
It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Online catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12418
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 10139
  • Likes Given: 8481
While we await official confirmation, my contact for VSFB missile launch notices was unaware of this launch. He knows all the schedules for the peacekeeper missile launches, but not this one. I pointed out to him that he should join NSF.
« Last Edit: 09/15/2023 04:16 am by catdlr »
It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Offline Robert_the_Doll

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 911
  • Florida
  • Liked: 1542
  • Likes Given: 466
https://twitter.com/Erdayastronaut/status/1702518241208496131

Quote
They did it! @Firefly_Space
 did it! They had only 24 hours to launch their Alpha rocket to demonstrate rapid response capabilities! Really an impressive feat for only their third launch ever!!!

Offline Robert_the_Doll

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 911
  • Florida
  • Liked: 1542
  • Likes Given: 466
https://twitter.com/thesheetztweetz/status/1702536387407339824

Quote
Looks like Firefly’s Alpha rocket launched the Space Force’s VICTUS NOX mission last night:

Offline Robert_the_Doll

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 911
  • Florida
  • Liked: 1542
  • Likes Given: 466
https://twitter.com/Fox10Ellen/status/1702520107136954613

Quote
Our @FOX10Phoenix tower camera captured the #USSpaceForce launch from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California. #VictusNox #Firefly #Phoenix #Launch 🚀

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85176
  • Likes Given: 38157
https://twitter.com/124970mev/status/1702449580594348472

Quote
Firefly's Alpha rocket is set to launch for the first time in 2023, carrying the VICTUS NOX rapid response mission to low-Earth orbit. Launch is currently scheduled for 01:57 UTC.

Learn all about the mission, by Tyler Gray (@TylerG1998)

https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2023/09/firefly-victus-nox/

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85176
  • Likes Given: 38157
https://twitter.com/billmeco/status/1702528492368502896

Quote
#FireFly #Alpha Launches VICTUS NOX, which translates to “conquer the night” in Latin —           will serve as a demonstration of the United States’ capability  to quickly place a satellite in orbit in response to a  national security threat. #vsfb  @Firefly_Space

https://twitter.com/billmeco/status/1702534349500076247

Quote
#FireFly #Alpha Launches VICTUS NOX, which translates to “conquer the night” in Latin —           will serve as a demonstration of the United States’ capability  to quickly place a satellite in orbit in response to a  national security threat. #vsfb
@Firefly_Space

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85176
  • Likes Given: 38157
https://twitter.com/hochdotco/status/1702517472497443021

Quote
Nothing like seeing a @Firefly_Space launch from 40,000 feet.

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85176
  • Likes Given: 38157
https://twitter.com/harry__stranger/status/1702520055832195176

Quote
As we wait for confirmation on Firefly's VICTUS NOX mission, here's a satellite image showing Alpha laying horizontal at the pad on August 18th.

Offline VLN

  • Member
  • Posts: 87
  • Los Angeles
  • Liked: 171
  • Likes Given: 154
Pasadena CA

Offline otter

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 626
  • Belarus
  • Liked: 581
  • Likes Given: 48
https://twitter.com/Firefly_Space/status/1702573114306015418

Quote
We did it y’all! Today was an incredible success for the Space Force, the Firefly team, and our nation after nailing the #VICTUSNOX responsive space mission. We launched our #AlphaRocket and deployed the satellite at the target destination following a 24-hour notice.

Congratulations to the entire team! And thank you to our mission partners at @SpaceForceDoD, @USSF_SSC, @SLDelta30, and Millennium Space Systems for your continued support. #PartnersinSpace

Learn more here: https://fireflyspace.com/news/firefly-aerospace-successfully-launches-victus-nox-with-24-hour-notice/

Offline otter

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 626
  • Belarus
  • Liked: 581
  • Likes Given: 48

Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39463
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 33124
  • Likes Given: 8901
Photo of payload deployment.

https://fireflyspace.com/news/firefly-aerospace-successfully-launches-victus-nox-with-24-hour-notice/

September 14, 2023
Firefly Aerospace Successfully Launches U.S. Space Force VICTUS NOX Responsive Space Mission with 24-Hour Notice
Firefly Alpha FLTA003 VICTUS NOX Launch

Ground-breaking operation showcases Firefly’s capability to rapidly launch and deploy a satellite, supporting critical national security missions

VANDENBERG SPACE FORCE BASE, Calif, – September 14, 2023 – Firefly Aerospace, an end-to-end space transportation company, today announced the company successfully launched its Alpha rocket and deployed the VICTUS NOX spacecraft following a 24-hour notice to complete final payload operations and mission preparations. Led by U.S. Space Force Space Systems Command’s (SSC) Space Safari Program Office and in close partnership with the Rocket Systems Launch Program, the mission advances the nation’s capability to rapidly respond to on-orbit needs during a conflict or in response to a national security threat.

“Today was an incredible success for the Space Force, the Firefly team, and our nation after nailing this complex responsive space mission,” said Bill Weber, CEO of Firefly Aerospace. “Our combined commercial and government team executed the mission with record speed, agility, and flexibility, adding a critical capability to address national security needs.”

Upon receiving the notice to launch and orbit requirements from the U.S. Space Force, Firefly completed all final launch preparations, including trajectory software updates, payload encapsulation, transport to the launch pad, mating to Alpha, and fueling, within 24 hours. Alpha then launched at the first available window, 27 hours after receipt of launch orders.

The flight began with a nominal countdown and liftoff at 7:28 p.m. PDT on September 14 and progressed seamlessly through each stage of flight, including stage one main engine cutoff (MECO), stage separation, and stage two ignition. Alpha then deployed the Millennium Space Systems satellite at the target destination in low Earth orbit. Firefly also successfully tested an Alpha stage two relight and targeted re-entry.

“I’m incredibly proud of this team for completing these critical mission milestones and successfully launching in a matter of hours rather than weeks or months in a typical operation,” said Adam Oakes, VP of Launch Vehicles at Firefly Aerospace. “As our third flight, this mission further validates Firefly’s technology rigor, passion, and dedication that’s required to prevail as the leading responsive launch provider for both government and commercial customers.”

“The success of the VICTUS NOX mission not only proves a key aspect of the United States’ TacRS capability but provides true utility to the warfighter,” said Col. Bryon McClain, Program Executive Officer for the Space Domain Awareness and Combat Power directorate, which oversees SSC’s Space Safari program office. “Working closely with our Assured Access to Space team and industry partners, the Space Safari team continues to demonstrate how TacRS enables us to quickly respond to urgent on-orbit needs.”

Building on today’s success, Firefly is ramping up Alpha production and testing for multiple upcoming launches, including missions in support of Lockheed Martin, NASA, the NRO, and more.
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Offline TrevorMonty

Congratulations on job well done. The industry needs an operational LV in this class.

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85176
  • Likes Given: 38157
https://www.ssc.spaceforce.mil/Portals/3/Documents/PRESS%20RELEASES/Space%20Systems%20Command%20successfully%20launches%20VICTUS%20NOX%20for%20US%20Space%20Force%20Sets%20new%20Tactically%20Responsive%20Space%20record.pdf?ver=-g7LxAUdycc7u-WHkaMdCw%3d%3d

Quote
Space Systems Command successfully launches VICTUS NOX for U.S Space Force: Sets new Tactically Responsive Space record

SPACE SYSTEMS COMMAND
Office of Public Affairs (SSC/PA) 483 N. Aviation Blvd.
El Segundo, Calif. 90245-2808
Date: Sept. 14, 2023
Contact: Media Relations Division Telephone: (310) 653-3145 [email protected]

SUMMARY: With the successful encapsulation and launch of VICTUS NOX, Space Systems Command achieves its goal of reaching launch-ready status within 24 hours of notice.

EL SEGUNDO, Calif. – In a major advancement of Tactically Responsive Space (TacRS) capabilities, Space Systems Command (SSC) and Firefly Aerospace successfully encapsulated a Millennium Space Systems-built space vehicle, mated it to Firefly’s Alpha launch vehicle, and completed all final launch preparations in 24 hours.

The mission, known as VICTUS NOX, successfully lifted off Sept. 14 at 7:28 p.m. PDT from Space Launch Complex 2 West (SLC-2W) at Vandenberg Space Force Base. Liftoff took place at the first available launch window, 27 hours after receipt of launch orders, setting a new record for responsive space launch.

“The success of VICTUX NOX marks a culture shift in our nation’s ability to deter adversary aggression and, when required, respond with the operational speed necessary to deliver decisive capabilities to our warfighters,” said Lt. Gen. Michael Guetlein, commander of Space Systems Command. “This exercise is part of an end-to-end Tactically Responsive Space demonstration which proves the United States Space Force can rapidly integrate capabilities and will respond to aggression when called to do so on tactically relevant timelines.”

Led by SSC’s Space Safari Program Office and in partnership with SSC’s Rocket Systems Launch Program, VICTUS NOX aims to reduce timelines throughout every aspect of a space mission, from acquisition through on-orbit operations.
Less than a year after awarding contracts to Millenium Space Systems and Firefly Aerospace, the teams entered a “hot standby” phase, awaiting notification from Space Force leadership to proceed. Upon activation, the space vehicle was transported 165 miles from Millenium’s El Segundo facility to Vandenberg Space Force Base where it was tested, fueled, and mated to the launch adapter in just under 58 hours, significantly faster than the typical timeline of weeks or months. With the launch time, date and final orbital parameters unknown, the team then stood on alert, awaiting the call to launch.

Now on orbit, the next objective is to initialize the space vehicle and begin operations in under 48 hours.

“We are thrilled with tonight’s successful launch. This mission highlights significant progress towards meeting emerging challenges in space,” said Lt. Col. MacKenzie Birchenough, Space Safari materiel leader. “While space has been viewed as a strategic theater for a long time, the advancement of TacRS capabilities represents a paradigm shift for the National Security Space enterprise. We are incredibly proud of the entire VICTUS NOX team for this huge accomplishment.”

The previous responsive space launch record was 21 days, set on June 13, 2021, with SSC’s launch of TacRL-2. VICTUS NOX and TacRL-2 are the first two operational demonstrations led by SSC’s Space Safari Program Office, which is responsible for responding to urgent on-orbit needs, to include acquiring, integrating, and executing TacRS capabilities.

Space Systems Command is the U.S. Space Force’s field command responsible for acquiring and delivering resilient war fighting capabilities to protect our nation’s strategic advantage in and from space. SSC manages a $15 billion space acquisition budget for the DoD and works in partnership with joint forces, industry, government agencies, academic and allied organizations to accelerate innovation and outpace emerging threats. Our actions today are making the world a better space for tomorrow.

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85176
  • Likes Given: 38157
https://twitter.com/marco_langbroek/status/1702614820015526191

Quote
6/x
An object has now been catalogued as nr 57861 in a 97.32 deg inclined, 476 x 531  km sun-synchronous orbit.
« Last Edit: 09/15/2023 10:38 am by FutureSpaceTourist »

Offline edkyle99

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15502
    • Space Launch Report
  • Liked: 8788
  • Likes Given: 1386
As we wait for confirmation on Firefly's VICTUS NOX mission, here's a satellite image showing Alpha laying horizontal at the pad on August 18th.
That image makes me wish they still had the old Thor sliding hangar (missile shelter) to cover the horizontal rocket while it is on hot standby!

Congratulations to Firefly on what was the first complete Alpha success.

 - Ed Kyle
« Last Edit: 09/15/2023 01:15 pm by edkyle99 »

Offline zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11925
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 7953
  • Likes Given: 77596
Any indication of launch time to the second, or fraction thereof? ⏲️
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Offline Vahe231991

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1689
  • 11 Canyon Terrace
  • Liked: 463
  • Likes Given: 199
Independent confirmation from Jonathan McDowell of a successful launch:
https://twitter.com/planet4589/status/1702671783445356645

Offline GewoonLukas_

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1509
  • Lukas C. H.
  • Netherlands
  • Liked: 3637
  • Likes Given: 1806
Quote
CelesTrak has GP data for 1 object from the launch (2023-142) of Victus Nox atop an Alpha rocket from Vandenberg SFB on Sep 15 at 0228 UTC: https://spacenews.com/firefly-launches-space-force-victus-nox-mission/. Data for the launch can be found at: https://celestrak.org/NORAD/elements/table.php?INTDES=2023-142.

https://twitter.com/TSKelso/status/1702729268541923796

Edit to add:

Satellite now named "MILLENNIUM"
« Last Edit: 09/16/2023 06:34 am by GewoonLukas_ »
Lukas C. H. • Hobbyist Mission Patch Artist 🎨 • May the force be with you my friend, Ad Astra Per Aspera ✨️

Offline Robert_the_Doll

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 911
  • Florida
  • Liked: 1542
  • Likes Given: 466
https://twitter.com/Firefly_Space/status/1702782757741502842

Quote
As images of Firefly’s Alpha rocket soaring through the night sky were captured  across the southwest United States, a team of passionate Fireflies flawlessly executed a mission that has never been done before — launching after a 24-hour notice.

Here’s how the U.S. Space Force’s #VICTUSNOX team partnered with Firefly and Millennium to make it happen @SpaceForceDoD
 @SLDelta30
 #SpaceMicDrop

Offline edkyle99

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15502
    • Space Launch Report
  • Liked: 8788
  • Likes Given: 1386
Some stills from the Firefly X video, for those of us old-school types.  ;)  Set up on the pad is reminiscent of the old Thor-Agena Corona days!

 - Ed Kyle
« Last Edit: 09/16/2023 02:14 pm by edkyle99 »

Offline edkyle99

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15502
    • Space Launch Report
  • Liked: 8788
  • Likes Given: 1386
A couple of images of FLTA003 from Firefly's web site.

 - Ed Kyle
« Last Edit: 09/19/2023 03:05 am by edkyle99 »

Offline zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11925
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 7953
  • Likes Given: 77596
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85176
  • Likes Given: 38157
https://twitter.com/firefly_space/status/1711757511731093729

Quote
Proud to see our Alpha rocket light up the night sky in our home state of Texas. This stunning photo of the #VICTUSNOX mission was captured near the McDonald Observatory in Fort Davis, Texas on September 14.

Offline Galactic Penguin SST

Astronomy & spaceflight geek penguin. In a relationship w/ Space Shuttle Discovery.

It was nice of the Space Force to ask them to launch at the most visually appealing time.
Wait, ∆V? This site will accept the ∆ symbol? How many times have I written out the word "delta" for no reason?

Online catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12418
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 10139
  • Likes Given: 8481
https://twitter.com/USSF_SSC/status/1760413028644782431

Quote
The U.S. Space Force’s VICTUS NOX on-orbit mission has successfully concluded. From the time the mission was conceived, the VICTUS NOX team seamlessly executed each phase of the effort.
It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Offline russianhalo117

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8818
  • Liked: 4748
  • Likes Given: 768

 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0