Author Topic: Landing at White Sands, very bad idea!  (Read 35788 times)

Offline Gary

Re: Landing at White Sands, very bad idea!
« Reply #80 on: 12/22/2006 12:52 pm »
Quote
JimO - 22/12/2006  1:22 PM

There's also a strong possibility that the crosswind constraints can be modified for EDW, because the Discovery has improved tires and brakes that actually ARE certified to higher standards.

All of that would have been taken into account at the MMT.

Offline ETEE

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 233
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Landing at White Sands, very bad idea!
« Reply #81 on: 12/22/2006 01:09 pm »
Quote
JimO - 22/12/2006  1:22 PM

There's also a strong possibility that the crosswind constraints can be modified for EDW, because the Discovery has improved tires and brakes that actually ARE certified to higher standards.
Would the improved tyres help with HIGH crosswinds?
Echo Tango Echo Echo

Offline rdale

  • Assistant to the Chief Meteorologist
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10402
  • Lansing MI
  • Liked: 1458
  • Likes Given: 175
Re: Landing at White Sands, very bad idea!
« Reply #82 on: 12/22/2006 01:11 pm »
The new tires are good up to crosswinds of 20 per last night's press conference.

Offline psloss

  • Veteran armchair spectator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17992
  • Liked: 4065
  • Likes Given: 2111
Re: Landing at White Sands, very bad idea!
« Reply #83 on: 12/22/2006 01:17 pm »
Quote
ETEE - 22/12/2006  8:52 AM

Would the improved tyres help with HIGH crosswinds?
To add to Rob's post, the existing flight rule limits -- 15 knots daytime, 12 knots darkness -- ARE high crosswinds for the orbiter.  I don't believe they've landed an orbiter with sustained winds at the limits -- crosswind landings are an ongoing detailed test objective (DTO).

Offline ETEE

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 233
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Landing at White Sands, very bad idea!
« Reply #84 on: 12/22/2006 01:24 pm »
So as the tires only appear just before landing, surely their crosswind performance only applies to runway level crosswinds and not HIGH altitude.
Echo Tango Echo Echo

Offline psloss

  • Veteran armchair spectator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17992
  • Liked: 4065
  • Likes Given: 2111
Re: Landing at White Sands, very bad idea!
« Reply #85 on: 12/22/2006 01:25 pm »
Quote
ETEE - 22/12/2006  9:07 AM

So as the tires only appear just before landing, surely their crosswind performance only applies to runway level crosswinds and not HIGH altitude.
Yup -- high crosswinds refer to speed, not altitude, in this context.

Offline ETEE

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 233
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Landing at White Sands, very bad idea!
« Reply #86 on: 12/22/2006 01:37 pm »
Sorry I had heard reference to strong jet stream in approach; maybe strong instead of high would be better adjective for crosswinds at runway level?
Echo Tango Echo Echo

Offline rdale

  • Assistant to the Chief Meteorologist
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10402
  • Lansing MI
  • Liked: 1458
  • Likes Given: 175
Re: Landing at White Sands, very bad idea!
« Reply #87 on: 12/22/2006 01:40 pm »
Not sure what you are asking... The crosswind limit is over concern when the wheels touch the ground. The jet stream is not an issue.

Offline ETEE

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 233
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Landing at White Sands, very bad idea!
« Reply #88 on: 12/22/2006 01:52 pm »
Well as a question then, what are the landing constraints on strong high altitude cross winds as Discovery is only a glider and its landing track is determined by the physical locations of its deorbit rev and the designated landing strip?  Do I assume from the previous replies that crosswinds are only an issue when landing gear is extended?
Echo Tango Echo Echo

Offline Gary

Re: Landing at White Sands, very bad idea!
« Reply #89 on: 12/22/2006 01:58 pm »
Crosswinds are constraints for landing. At high altitude ENERGY is the key.

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37811
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 22030
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: Landing at White Sands, very bad idea!
« Reply #90 on: 12/22/2006 01:59 pm »
Quote
ETEE - 22/12/2006  9:35 AM

Well as a question then, what are the landing constraints on strong high altitude cross winds as Discovery is only a glider and its landing track is determined by the physical locations of its deorbit rev and the designated landing strip?  Do I assume from the previous replies that crosswinds are only an issue when landing gear is extended?

Crosswind affects the orbiter when the tires hit the ground, not when they are deployed.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0