Author Topic: LIVE: STS-116 Landing Weather  (Read 60374 times)

Offline psloss

  • Veteran armchair spectator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17992
  • Liked: 4065
  • Likes Given: 2111
Re: LIVE: STS-116 Landing Weather
« Reply #20 on: 12/20/2006 02:10 pm »
Quote
Gary - 20/12/2006  9:42 AM

True, But STS-51D landed at KSC and used differential braking thanks to crosswinds and it resulted in a tire blow out and brake damage. All landings used Edwards as primary until the nose gear steering was certified.
http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/51-d/mission-51-d.html
All landings after 51-D.  KSC was primary as early as STS-7; and as previously noted landings on the concrete runway at Edwards began before nose-wheel steering was available.

Offline rdale

  • Assistant to the Chief Meteorologist
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10402
  • Lansing MI
  • Liked: 1458
  • Likes Given: 175
Re: LIVE: STS-116 Landing Weather
« Reply #21 on: 12/20/2006 03:50 pm »
Edwards AFB forecasters have now gone with the worse forecast on today's update, WNW 18G25. http://www.edwards.af.mil/text/fiveday.htm

The computer that had been saying NE winds at 20+mph now says WNW 20-25mph.

When I said I 'voted' for White Sands, I meant that was where I believe the shuttle will land - not registering a preference ;>

Offline Fred Clausen

  • Regular
  • Member
  • Posts: 72
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: LIVE: STS-116 Landing Weather
« Reply #22 on: 12/20/2006 03:55 pm »
Quote
rdale - 20/12/2006  9:33 AM

When I said I 'voted' for White Sands, I meant that was where I believe the shuttle will land - not registering a preference ;>

While I have nothing significant to add, I live about 20 minutes from the White Sands area and would love to see a landing here.
Fred Clausen

Offline mkirk

  • International Man Of Mystery
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1754
  • Florida/Texas
  • Liked: 123
  • Likes Given: 6
Re: LIVE: STS-116 Landing Weather
« Reply #23 on: 12/20/2006 04:18 pm »
Quote
Fred Clausen - 20/12/2006  10:38 AM

Quote
rdale - 20/12/2006  9:33 AM

When I said I 'voted' for White Sands, I meant that was where I believe the shuttle will land - not registering a preference ;>

While I have nothing significant to add, I live about 20 minutes from the White Sands area and would love to see a landing here.

Obviously it is still too early to get a good handle on the Friday weather but I really hope NOR does not happen.  That will be a major turnaround hassle.  I am glad the MMT recognizes that such a concern can not factor into the landing decision on Friday.  If NOR is the only option then so be it...

The SMG forecast from about 3 hours ago showed EDW on Friday with winds of 310 at 12 peak 18 as the concern.  Maybe we will get lucky and the winds will improve.

Mark Kirkman
Mark Kirkman

Offline lsullivan411

  • NASASpaceflight KSC Photographer
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1399
  • Liked: 77
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: LIVE: STS-116 Landing Weather
« Reply #24 on: 12/20/2006 04:39 pm »

Quote
rdale - 20/12/2006 11:33 AM Edwards AFB forecasters have now gone with the worse forecast on today's update, WNW 18G25. http://www.edwards.af.mil/text/fiveday.htm The computer that had been saying NE winds at 20+mph now says WNW 20-25mph. When I said I 'voted' for White Sands, I meant that was where I believe the shuttle will land - not registering a preference ;>

Any difference in the crosswind constraint at Edwards? Is it same as KSC which I think is 15knts?


Offline lsullivan411

  • NASASpaceflight KSC Photographer
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1399
  • Liked: 77
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: LIVE: STS-116 Landing Weather
« Reply #25 on: 12/20/2006 04:39 pm »

Quote
rdale - 20/12/2006 11:33 AM Edwards AFB forecasters have now gone with the worse forecast on today's update, WNW 18G25. http://www.edwards.af.mil/text/fiveday.htm The computer that had been saying NE winds at 20+mph now says WNW 20-25mph. When I said I 'voted' for White Sands, I meant that was where I believe the shuttle will land - not registering a preference ;>

Any difference in the crosswind constraint at Edwards? Is it same as KSC which I think is 15knts?

Sorry about the double post, not sure what I did and don't have the usual delete button.


Offline psloss

  • Veteran armchair spectator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17992
  • Liked: 4065
  • Likes Given: 2111
Re: LIVE: STS-116 Landing Weather
« Reply #26 on: 12/20/2006 06:04 pm »
Bill Harwood's latest status report ("SR-95 (12/20/06): Hale discusses late inspection vs landing day issue; says flight safety the deciding factor, not schedule risk") has some additional words on White Sands status:
http://www.cbsnews.com/network/news/space/current.html

Excerpt:
Quote
The only pre-positioned equipment at White Sands is a shuttle tow bar, a tractor for towing the orbiter to a servicing area, a set of stairs to position by the ship's side hatch and a motor home to serve as an "astrovan."

After landing on the gypsum runway, the crew would power down the shuttle's electrical systems, exit and depart the area. Discovery would be towed to a concrete pad that is somewhat out of the wind to minimize damage cause by blowing gypsum dust.

And then the shuttle would simply sit, awaiting equipment and personnel from Kennedy and Edwards. With no power or heated purge air, Discovery would be exposed to sub-freezing temperatures for two days, possibly causing thruster seals to rupture. That would require time-consuming repairs back at Kennedy should that actually occur.

Once power and purge air are available, engineers would service the shuttle's hydraulic system and rocket engine valves and position the ship's three main engines for attachment of an aerodynamic cone required for the ferry flight back to Florida. The cone itself would have to be disassembled at Edwards, shipped to White Sands and then re-assembled.

Likewise, engineers would have to move and re-assemble a huge harness-like device to eventually pick the shuttle up for attachment to its 747 transport jet. The huge cranes required to do the heavy lifting would have to be shipped in and assembled on site.

Offline hutchel

  • Overzealous Enthusiast
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 107
  • Washington, DC
  • Liked: 18
  • Likes Given: 38
Re: LIVE: STS-116 Landing Weather
« Reply #27 on: 12/20/2006 06:47 pm »
The term UGLY comes to mind - so much for the CY2007 Schedule if White Sands is where Discovery comes to a stop.

Safety is Safety though.

Offline Fred Clausen

  • Regular
  • Member
  • Posts: 72
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: LIVE: STS-116 Landing Weather
« Reply #28 on: 12/20/2006 07:13 pm »
Quote
hutchel - 20/12/2006  12:30 PM

The term UGLY comes to mind - so much for the CY2007 Schedule if White Sands is where Discovery comes to a stop.

Safety is Safety though.

Very ugly.  I'm curious as to why NASA doesn't have more prepositioned equipment at White Sands?
Fred Clausen

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37811
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 22031
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: LIVE: STS-116 Landing Weather
« Reply #29 on: 12/20/2006 07:20 pm »
Money.   3 sets of equipment (WSSH, EAFB and KSC) would be required.   The equipment needs periodic O&M.   This would only be the 2nd time in 25 years that WSSH would  (might) be used.  The other time, NASA knew further in advance (weeks) and moved the equipment via train.

Online Chris Bergin

RE: LIVE: STS-116 Landing Weather
« Reply #30 on: 12/20/2006 07:23 pm »
Going to be writing an article of my own on White Sands as this is coming across as very possible on the several MMT docs we've put on L2.
Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline RedSky

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 511
  • Liked: 109
  • Likes Given: 2
RE: LIVE: STS-116 Landing Weather
« Reply #31 on: 12/20/2006 07:56 pm »
I don't understand the issue of having an orbiter out in the cold (possibly freezing temps) at White Sands.  Is there no spare hanger it could be towed into after safing?  Couldn't  they rig forced air heaters to pump in dry warm air?  They make it sound like she'll be stranded out in the open in the wilderness.  They must have electricity there... no?

Offline psloss

  • Veteran armchair spectator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17992
  • Liked: 4065
  • Likes Given: 2111
RE: LIVE: STS-116 Landing Weather
« Reply #32 on: 12/20/2006 08:11 pm »
Quote
RedSky - 20/12/2006  3:39 PM

I don't understand the issue of having an orbiter out in the cold (possibly freezing temps) at White Sands.  Is there no spare hanger it could be towed into after safing?  Couldn't  they rig forced air heaters to pump in dry warm air?  They make it sound like she'll be stranded out in the open in the wilderness.  They must have electricity there... no?
At least one issue is that the vehicle will still have hazardous chemicals in it -- the hypergolics, for example.

Same thing at Edwards -- the orbiter is towed to and stays at the mate-demate facility, which is exposed.  (Edwards has the facilities for the orbiter, but the low temp this morning was in the teens, I believe, so pretty cold there, too.)

Offline gordo

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 687
  • Liked: 26
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: LIVE: STS-116 Landing Weather
« Reply #33 on: 12/20/2006 08:55 pm »
I'm sure a few C5's will be enroute to whatever site is ruled def no go PDQ to get the core kit to New Mexico

Offline STS-500Cmdr

  • Regular
  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 136
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: LIVE: STS-116 Landing Weather
« Reply #34 on: 12/20/2006 08:57 pm »
Landing at WSSH/NOR you got a lakebed, sand or gypsum--and when you talk of the stairs being rolled up to the side and the RV--sounds to me like the good ol' days of the shuttle era--like it was in the '80's.
I was going to ask-i know i ran a similiar q by Jim in the Q&A 2 yesterday but i was going to ask if the lakebed rwys at Edwards were being tossed around with the wind direction and such and when you need to get on the ground like they do on Friday. but as i was typing a question-Phil Engelhauf just answered it for me--EDW lakebed is for emergencies.

Forgive me i was much younger and kinda missed the 80's good ol' days of shuttle.
Three Engines onboard Endeavour have now throttled back to 2/3rds throttle to prepare the spacecraft to pass through the area of maximum dynamic pressure and to go supersonic

Offline psloss

  • Veteran armchair spectator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17992
  • Liked: 4065
  • Likes Given: 2111
Re: LIVE: STS-116 Landing Weather
« Reply #35 on: 12/20/2006 09:01 pm »
Quote
STS-500Cmdr - 20/12/2006  4:40 PM

Landing at WSSH/NOR you got a lakebed, sand or gypsum--and when you talk of the stairs being rolled up to the side and the RV--sounds to me like the good ol' days of the shuttle era--like it was in the '80's.
I was going to ask-i know i ran a similiar q by Jim in the Q&A 2 yesterday but i was going to ask if the lakebed rwys at Edwards were being tossed around with the wind direction and such and when you need to get on the ground like they do on Friday. but as i was typing a question-Phil Engelhauf just answered it for me--EDW lakebed is for emergencies.

Forgive me i was much younger and kinda missed the 80's good ol' days of shuttle.
Lakebed is wet -- there was a note of that in one of the execute packages a few days back that the Edwards lakebed runways were red.  (Probably still are.)

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37811
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 22031
  • Likes Given: 430
RE: LIVE: STS-116 Landing Weather
« Reply #36 on: 12/20/2006 11:53 pm »
Quote
psloss - 20/12/2006  3:54 PM

Quote
RedSky - 20/12/2006  3:39 PM

I don't understand the issue of having an orbiter out in the cold (possibly freezing temps) at White Sands.  Is there no spare hanger it could be towed into after safing?  Couldn't  they rig forced air heaters to pump in dry warm air?  They make it sound like she'll be stranded out in the open in the wilderness.  They must have electricity there... no?
At least one issue is that the vehicle will still have hazardous chemicals in it -- the hypergolics, for example.

Same thing at Edwards -- the orbiter is towed to and stays at the mate-demate facility, which is exposed.  (Edwards has the facilities for the orbiter, but the low temp this morning was in the teens, I believe, so pretty cold there, too.)

No hangArs at WSSH.  
Rigged air heaters usually use hydrocarbon fuels, which mean exhaust products blown into the orbiter, a definite no no.   The systems at EAFB and KSC are electrical.

Offline psloss

  • Veteran armchair spectator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17992
  • Liked: 4065
  • Likes Given: 2111
Re: LIVE: STS-116 Landing Weather
« Reply #37 on: 12/21/2006 12:41 am »
Latest forecast out from SMG:
http://www.srh.noaa.gov/smg/landfcsts_conus_pg1.html

Still not much change in the Friday forecasts; slight change in direction of the winds at Edwards, but still high and still a concern.

Offline RedSky

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 511
  • Liked: 109
  • Likes Given: 2
RE: LIVE: STS-116 Landing Weather
« Reply #38 on: 12/21/2006 01:07 am »
Quote
Jim - 20/12/2006  6:36 PM

No hangArs at WSSH.  

So what is there that qualifies it as a "space harbor"?

They should just land at the Groom Lake runway.  They're sure to have big climate controlled hangars there...   ;)   (No TV, though)

Offline Jim

  • Night Gator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37811
  • Cape Canaveral Spaceport
  • Liked: 22031
  • Likes Given: 430
RE: LIVE: STS-116 Landing Weather
« Reply #39 on: 12/21/2006 01:14 am »
Quote
RedSky - 20/12/2006  8:50 PM

Quote
Jim - 20/12/2006  6:36 PM

No hangArs at WSSH.  

So what is there that qualifies it as a "space harbor"?


Nothing there does.

It is just the one landing that did

Also the orbiter is larger than any hangar for a fighter.  


Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1