Quote from: Tomness on 06/03/2023 03:39 pmQuote from: Blackstar on 06/03/2023 02:17 pm[Snip[That's awesome, I am going to have to read both of her books one of these days.His* books are great. I liked Berger’s book about the Falcon 1 as well. Eccentric Orbits, about Iridium, is in a similar vein and probably essential reading for anyone hoping to understand the satellite industry, but the book itself seemed to drag on and on (being kind of repetitive) and I found myself playing it extra fast on Audible. Same is not true for Eric Berger’s book and either of Ashlee Vance’s books so far.* https://twitter.com/ashleevance/status/1657030222422630408?s=46
Quote from: Blackstar on 06/03/2023 02:17 pm[Snip[That's awesome, I am going to have to read both of her books one of these days.
[Snip[
...I don't know what other companies there are in this industry besides Relativity Space. I find them rather puzzling. After achieving a mostly-successful test launch, they announced that they're going to stop launching for years and instead develop a bigger rocket. Almost all the other companies are talking about bigger rockets too, so there seems to be a consensus that small is out and bigger is better. But I don't know if that's a response to Rocket Lab's success, or if they just think that the small payload market doesn't have a future? (It could be both--Rocket Lab could keep a foot in small launches and try for larger ones as well.)I'd add that these are not the first small launchers to come along. There have been others, like LLV, Pegasus, and even before that Scout. You could argue that their problem was they were too expensive and new companies came along thinking they could do it cheaper. That's what innovation is, right? But it's an interesting question to ask why these companies are then leaving this segment of the market? Did the market change, were they wrong from the start, or is this a case of bootstrapping with something small to develop something bigger?
That'd have been a lot of launches (ignoring price elasticity now).
Quote from: JayWee on 06/03/2023 08:57 pmThat'd have been a lot of launches (ignoring price elasticity now).It would have been if those customers could afford a (more) dedicated launch. I think the key thing about Falcon (large) rideshares is to hugely lower the cost for individual cubesats, significantly expanding the market.Rocket Lab has done a number of rideshare missions too. Unlike SpaceX, I don’t think Rocket Lab prices are public? I imagine SpaceX economies of scale and re-use mean they could price smaller launchers out of the cheap(er) end of the market?
Halfway through Vance's book. It is a good read, but I must say I am more excited about Berger's F9 book. Purely because of the subject matter.
Quote from: Oersted on 06/04/2023 03:40 pmHalfway through Vance's book. It is a good read, but I must say I am more excited about Berger's F9 book. Purely because of the subject matter.Berger's F9 is online or paper book?
Quote from: FutureSpaceTourist on 06/04/2023 07:01 amQuote from: JayWee on 06/03/2023 08:57 pmThat'd have been a lot of launches (ignoring price elasticity now).It would have been if those customers could afford a (more) dedicated launch. I think the key thing about Falcon (large) rideshares is to hugely lower the cost for individual cubesats, significantly expanding the market.Rocket Lab has done a number of rideshare missions too. Unlike SpaceX, I don’t think Rocket Lab prices are public? I imagine SpaceX economies of scale and re-use mean they could price smaller launchers out of the cheap(er) end of the market?According to the GAO in a 2017 report. The Electron can lift 150 kg to SSO for about $4.9M or $32667 per kg. So guessing that each Electron flight will cost around $5.16M today with inflation.
Nearly finished with @ashleevance latest book. So good. Some classic quotes in there!
Like this banger from Markusic about SpaceX on Omelek island when he was at NASA. So what did he do? he joined us"They were putting the rocket up. It was cutting them. It was disappointing them. Things were going wrong. There were people drinking. People were teabagging* each other. I mean, very unprofessional”
With this footnote😂* For those who are unfamiliar with the term, teabagging in this context refers to the practice of placing one's testicles onto the face of an unsuspecting victim in a manner meant to cause general amusement for others in the vicinity. Though such an act would not be condoned under NASA protocols, SpaceX had no protocols.
Reminder for DC folks. My upcoming HBO documentary on the rise of the commercial space industry will premiere next weekend, the 15th. (Produced this alongside Spielberg's Amblin and Adam McKay's Hyperobject and ZPZ) If you're around, I'm doing a talk after the screening with the Oscar winner and director Ross Kauffman and @IgnatiusPost. Come one, come all.
Spent six years making this sucker. Hope you guys enjoy. Coming to HBO on July 17
The most candid behind-the-scenes look at Rocket Lab’s founding and the fierce race to open access to space for small sats.Streaming July 17th, #WildWildSpace is an @HBO Original Documentary by Academy Award winning director Ross Kauffman and based on @ashleevance’s NYT best-selling book.Enjoy it. It’s a wild ride.
There's very much of an arrogant tech-bro vibe in that promo.
Quote from: Blackstar on 07/09/2024 11:17 amThere's very much of an arrogant tech-bro vibe in that promo. There's some amazing Kemp tech-bro-isms and anecdotes in the book. It's going to interesting to see what was filmed and makes it to the documentary.
In reading that book, my impression was that Kemp at Astra was going to bring in more money than Beck at Rocketlabs, but that Rocketlabs would ultimately be more successful.