Author Topic: FAILURE: Relativity Terran 1 Test Flight : CCSFS SLC-16 : 23 Mar 2023 03:25 UTC  (Read 177682 times)

Offline edkyle99

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15502
    • Space Launch Report
  • Liked: 8788
  • Likes Given: 1386
The decision to skip a final static fire suggests Relativity may have reached the F---it, Fly-it mode. Almost all rocket startups reach the point where they've worked so damn hard, and so damn long on the first rocket that they just want the damn thing to fly.
The company did test fire the first stage on LC 16 last Fall.  The final test was 88 seconds long I believe.

 - Ed Kyle
« Last Edit: 02/23/2023 02:11 pm by edkyle99 »

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
https://twitter.com/relativityspace/status/1628888491861090308

Quote
Terran 1 has been on a journey from Long Beach, CA to Stennis, MS to Cape Canaveral, FL. Journey with us.  👇

Offline Foximus

What is Relativity using for flight termination?  Thrust termination? Command Destruct? AFSS?  Have they said anything publicly?  Just curious.

I know their PUG from 20202 says AFSS, but thats not always the case for the first missions

What is Relativity using for flight termination?  Thrust termination? Command Destruct? AFSS?  Have they said anything publicly?  Just curious.

I know their PUG from 20202 says AFSS, but thats not always the case for the first missions

I kinda went over it in the Terran R topic

it's traditional command destruct right now from what I've gathered. they will have to retailor their  versions of RCC-319/324 when they move to AFSS which is yet another "fun" process

https://twitter.com/thetimellis/status/1606037221693263872

Quote
Today, all Aeon R active valves have actuated! These are designed and manufactured in-house. Several designs coming together and making progress.
Almost wonder if they'll be trying to do traditional explosive FTS or if they'll try to qualify their main engine valves for thrust termination to meet RCC-319 requirements

Their terran 1 looks like it already has thrust termination at least according to its PUG (pg 10), so I'm almost doubting they'd want to invest money into the traditional FTS architecture.

edit/note: now I have no idea if their PUG is accurate anymore and if they even use thrust term and AFTS on Terran 1, since their FCC license states that they use radar transponder units from Curtis wright (which should only be used for manual flight termination, data sheet for the units found here: https://www.curtisswrightds.com/products/flight-test/radio-frequency/xpdr2150 )

Offline edzieba

  • Virtual Realist
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6494
  • United Kingdom
  • Liked: 9936
  • Likes Given: 43
What is Relativity using for flight termination?  Thrust termination? Command Destruct? AFSS?  Have they said anything publicly?  Just curious.

I know their PUG from 20202 says AFSS, but thats not always the case for the first missions

I kinda went over it in the Terran R topic

it's traditional command destruct right now from what I've gathered. they will have to retailor their  versions of RCC-319/324 when they move to AFSS which is yet another "fun" process

https://twitter.com/thetimellis/status/1606037221693263872

Quote
Today, all Aeon R active valves have actuated! These are designed and manufactured in-house. Several designs coming together and making progress.
Almost wonder if they'll be trying to do traditional explosive FTS or if they'll try to qualify their main engine valves for thrust termination to meet RCC-319 requirements

Their terran 1 looks like it already has thrust termination at least according to its PUG (pg 10), so I'm almost doubting they'd want to invest money into the traditional FTS architecture.

edit/note: now I have no idea if their PUG is accurate anymore and if they even use thrust term and AFTS on Terran 1, since their FCC license states that they use radar transponder units from Curtis wright (which should only be used for manual flight termination, data sheet for the units found here: https://www.curtisswrightds.com/products/flight-test/radio-frequency/xpdr2150 )
Command-destruct and thrust-termination FTS are not mutually exclusive, or even related. Command-termination and AFTS are the initiation method, and explosive tank unzipping or thrust termination is the mechanism of action. For example, Rocketlab's Electron flight 1 was command-terminated using thrust-termination, Falcon 9 employs AFTS and explosive tank unzipping, Atlas V employs command-termination and explosive tank unzipping, and todays Electron uses AFTS and thrust-termination.

What is Relativity using for flight termination?  Thrust termination? Command Destruct? AFSS?  Have they said anything publicly?  Just curious.

I know their PUG from 20202 says AFSS, but thats not always the case for the first missions

I kinda went over it in the Terran R topic

it's traditional command destruct right now from what I've gathered. they will have to retailor their  versions of RCC-319/324 when they move to AFSS which is yet another "fun" process

https://twitter.com/thetimellis/status/1606037221693263872

Quote
Today, all Aeon R active valves have actuated! These are designed and manufactured in-house. Several designs coming together and making progress.
Almost wonder if they'll be trying to do traditional explosive FTS or if they'll try to qualify their main engine valves for thrust termination to meet RCC-319 requirements

Their terran 1 looks like it already has thrust termination at least according to its PUG (pg 10), so I'm almost doubting they'd want to invest money into the traditional FTS architecture.

edit/note: now I have no idea if their PUG is accurate anymore and if they even use thrust term and AFTS on Terran 1, since their FCC license states that they use radar transponder units from Curtis wright (which should only be used for manual flight termination, data sheet for the units found here: https://www.curtisswrightds.com/products/flight-test/radio-frequency/xpdr2150 )
Command-destruct and thrust-termination FTS are not mutually exclusive, or even related. Command-termination and AFTS are the initiation method, and explosive tank unzipping or thrust termination is the mechanism of action. For example, Rocketlab's Electron flight 1 was command-terminated using thrust-termination, Falcon 9 employs AFTS and explosive tank unzipping, Atlas V employs command-termination and explosive tank unzipping, and todays Electron uses AFTS and thrust-termination.

Exactly, all I meant by talking about the radar transceiver indicated in the FCC license was that it was not an automated system. If it was an automated system it would need at least 2 methods of tracking independent of ground resources like the large and powerful 5 GHz radar dishes used for ranging. RCC-324 isn't exactly specific as to what kind of redundant tracking is absolutely needed, but from what I've read from sagrad NAFTU (used on sounding and RL rockets) and other NASA papers on AFSS, it's typically 2 independent GPS systems.

I don't think we'd be able to tell if it was exclusively thrust term or explosive term. I'm betting the use of their fuel  or in essence some kind of public safety argument could determine whether they should explode or thrust term, but even from what we've seen from starship with similar fuel is that explosive term is still needed. https://www.spaceflightinsider.com/organizations/space-exploration-technologies/emergency-flight-termination-system-for-sn10-is-in-place-starship-test-flight-imminent/
And with the public safety side, the range and FAA determines what is safer for the public. Heck Terran 1 is larger than Alpha and Alpha has an explosive detonation system as shown by that FLTA001.

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
https://twitter.com/trevormahlmann/status/1629308554929750019

Quote
Terran 1 under the stars; heading there March 8th, 2023 @ 1 p.m. EST🌌🚀❤️‍🔥

Offline TrevorMonty


https://twitter.com/sciguyspace/status/1628755042361569281

Quote
Here are a few thoughts on Relativity Space's plans to launch its Terran 1 rocket on March 8, without a final, all-up static fire test. First, kudos to the company for streaming it all live. Not everyone does this:

twitter.com/sciguyspace/status/1628755677148504068

Quote
Two, you should set your expectations low. No company has ever launched its first, independently developed, liquid fueled rocket and had it reach orbit on the first try. And Relativity is pushing a lot of boundaries with its methane-fueled booster.



RL was looking like succeeding with Electron maiden flight until complications with 3rd party flight termination systems comms. So failure for Terran 1 isn't given and I bet FTS comms will be one thing they double check.
« Last Edit: 02/26/2023 07:09 pm by zubenelgenubi »

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
https://twitter.com/trevormahlmann/status/1630993282204422145

Quote
7 moonlit nights until Terran 1—the world’s first, entirely 3D-printed rocket—takes to the skies🌕🚀

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157


Quote
Relativity is scheduled for its first launch of Terran 1, called "GLHF" (Good Luck, Have Fun), from Launch Complex 16 in Cape Canaveral, Florida. Our launch window opens at 1300ET on March 8, 2023. This launch of Terran 1 is the first orbital attempt by Relativity and will not include a customer payload.

Standing 110 ft. tall and 7.5 ft. wide, Terran 1 is the largest 3D printed object to attempt orbital flight. As a two-stage, expendable rocket, Terran 1 has nine 3D printed Aeon engines on its first stage and one Aeon Vac on its second stage.   

Like its structure, all Relativity engines are entirely 3D printed, and use liquid oxygen (LOX) and liquid natural gas (LNG), which are not only the best for rocket propulsion, but also for reusability, and the easiest to eventually transition to methane on Mars. 

Follow along for updates on our lead up to launch: https://twitter.com/relativityspace 

#GLHF

https://www.relativityspace.com/glhf
« Last Edit: 03/02/2023 04:47 pm by FutureSpaceTourist »

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
https://twitter.com/relativityspace/status/1631410489770278912

Quote
What’s inside Terran 1’s nose cone? 👀 

Check out one of our very first metal 3D prints, that’s catching a ride aboard Terran 1.🚀 

Printed by the 1st gen of our Stargate metal 3D printers, this print pays homage to the journey behind Terran 1’s first launch.👇 #GLHF

twitter.com/relativityspace/status/1631410725158809601

Quote
This 6.5” diameter, 3.3lb aluminum alloy ring captures our humble beginnings on the road to launching the world’s first 3D printed rocket.

https://twitter.com/relativityspace/status/1631411068659699712

Quote
Relativity first started out as an idea on a Starbucks receipt, where our founders sketched a plan to eventually build humanity’s industrial base on Mars. Now, we’re on the eve of our first launch. 🚀

Offline Ken the Bin

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3095
  • US Pacific Time Zone
    • @kenthebin@spacey.space
  • Liked: 5669
  • Likes Given: 6280
NGA notice.

Quote from: NGA
031831Z MAR 23
NAVAREA IV 232/23(11,26).
WESTERN NORTH ATLANTIC.
FLORIDA.
1. HAZARDOUS OPERATIONS, ROCKET LAUNCHING
   081800Z TO 082122Z MAR, ALTERNATE
   091800Z TO 092122Z MAR IN AREAS BOUND BY:
   A. 28-34.38N 080-34.27W, 29-17.00N 078-11.00W,
      28-35.00N 077-54.00W, 28-22.00N 074-01.00W,
      28-28.00N 073-39.00W, 28-26.00N 073-13.00W,
      28-14.00N 072-56.00W, 28-08.00N 071-49.00W,
      28-01.00N 071-49.00W, 28-06.00N 072-57.00W,
      27-57.00N 073-11.00W, 27-57.00N 073-43.00W,
      28-09.00N 074-01.00W, 28-20.00N 077-57.00W,
      27-49.00N 078-38.00W, 28-27.00N 080-33.00W.
   B. 28-01.00N 074-36.00W, 28-29.00N 074-36.00W,
      28-43.00N 074-00.00W, 28-43.00N 073-20.00W,
      28-24.00N 072-52.00W, 28-04.00N 072-52.00W,
      27-46.00N 073-20.00W, 27-44.00N 074-05.00W.
2. CANCEL THIS MSG 092222Z MAR 23.

Online Galactic Penguin SST

Astronomy & spaceflight geek penguin. In a relationship w/ Space Shuttle Discovery.

Offline Ken the Bin

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3095
  • US Pacific Time Zone
    • @kenthebin@spacey.space
  • Liked: 5669
  • Likes Given: 6280
L-3 weather forecast. 90% 'Go' for March 8. 95% 'Go' for March 9.

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
https://twitter.com/brasileight/status/1632144663049060354

Quote
Can’t wait to see this one fly on 3/8/23 launch window 1-4 PM @relativityspace #terran1 @CanonUSApro

Offline Ken the Bin

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3095
  • US Pacific Time Zone
    • @kenthebin@spacey.space
  • Liked: 5669
  • Likes Given: 6280
L-2 weather forecast. 90% 'Go' for March 8. 95% 'Go' for March 9.

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
https://twitter.com/trevormahlmann/status/1632827963619045376

Quote
2 days left ‘til Good Luck, Have Fun👾

Catch the livestream on Wednesday, March 8th starting at Noon ET🚀
➡️youtube.com/live/_YAlOGZM3…

Offline Conexion Espacial

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2081
  • Liked: 3166
  • Likes Given: 2275
I publish information in Spanish about space and rockets.
www.x.com/conexionspacial

Offline Conexion Espacial

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2081
  • Liked: 3166
  • Likes Given: 2275
I publish information in Spanish about space and rockets.
www.x.com/conexionspacial

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
https://twitter.com/relativityspace/status/1632897575920566275

Quote
Passing Max-Q would be a big inflection point. Why? Because it's the phase of flight where the structural loads on the vehicle are the highest, passing this point in flight proves our hypothesis: 3D printed rockets are structurally viable!

twitter.com/relativityspace/status/1632897890929504258

Quote
If we make it even further in flight to stage separation, we’ll have achieved a full first stage flight. That's another big accomplishment for the team. From there, we will attempt to light the second stage and get Terran 1 to orbit. ✨

https://twitter.com/relativityspace/status/1632898107825422336

Quote
#GLHF is years of hard work come to fruition. We’re proud of our team's dedication and grateful to our customers, investors and partners for sharing our belief that just because it hasn’t been done this way before, doesn’t mean it can’t be! Time to write #newhistory 🚀

bit.ly/3xIWv7C

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1