Author Topic: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon : Polaris Dawn : KSC LC-39A : NET Late August 2024  (Read 204424 times)

Offline Lars-J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6809
  • California
  • Liked: 8487
  • Likes Given: 5385
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #140 on: 02/17/2022 03:58 pm »
I believe the term is an “IVA” if you suit up in a vacuum but don’t leave the vehicle - at least that is what it was called in the ISS program the few times it has happened. (Unless my memory deceived me - might have been Mir internal spacewalks)

Offline Sam Ho

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 822
  • Liked: 586
  • Likes Given: 71
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #141 on: 02/17/2022 05:25 pm »
I believe the term is an “IVA” if you suit up in a vacuum but don’t leave the vehicle - at least that is what it was called in the ISS program the few times it has happened. (Unless my memory deceived me - might have been Mir internal spacewalks)

From Walking to Olympus: An EVA Chronology (NASA SP-4507):
Quote
Russia and the U.S. define EVA differently. Russian cosmonauts are said to perform EVA any time they are in vacuum in a space suit. A U.S. astronaut must have at least his head outside his spacecraft before he is said to perform an EVA. The difference is based in differing spacecraft design philosophies. Russian and Soviet spacecraft have always had a specialized airlock through which the EVA cosmonaut egressed, leaving the main habitable volume of the spacecraft pressurized. The U.S. Gemini and Apollo vehicles, on the other hand, depressurized their entire habitable volume for egress.

In this document, we apply the Russian definition to Russian EVAs, and the U.S. definition to U.S. EVAs. Thus, for example, Gemini 4 Command Pilot James McDivitt does not share the honor of being first American spacewalker with Ed White, even though he was suited and in vacuum when White stepped out into space.
https://history.nasa.gov/monograph7.pdf

The Mir internal spacewalks (moving docking targets in the transfer compartment and repairs to Spektr) count as EVAs by the Russian definition.

The same document also distinguishes stand-up EVA from full-emergence EVA, but considers both to be EVA.

Offline eric z

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 560
  • Liked: 483
  • Likes Given: 2213
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #142 on: 02/17/2022 05:50 pm »
  On Apollo 9, Dave Scott "stood up" in the Command Module side hatch while Rusty went out and "stood" on the perch of the LM. Great classics photos of all this! On Apollo 15 Dave Scott "stood" and stuck his head out the top hatch of the LM, giving the ground teams an early peak at what they were in for geologically. I always wondered why this was not done on the last two missions - consumables issue, perhaps, or time-line clogging?
 On Apollo 15, 16 and 17 the Command Module pilots floated down the length of the Service Modules, while another crew mate stood in the side hatch to assist and photograph them. I have to go refresh the old noodle about Skylab EVA. :-[

Offline steveleach

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2405
  • Liked: 2957
  • Likes Given: 1014
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #143 on: 02/17/2022 06:12 pm »
I can imagine the two non-EVA crew unbuckling for a quick look outside (while the two EVAers look after the ship), then they strap back in to let the others get on with the actual spacewalk. Call it an "emergency contingency drill" or whatever. If I was going to have to sit in an EVA suite while the ship is depressurised anyway, I'd sure want to do that unless there was a damned good reason not to.

Offline launchwatcher

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 765
  • Liked: 729
  • Likes Given: 996
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #144 on: 02/17/2022 08:10 pm »
I always wondered why this was not done on the last two missions - consumables issue, perhaps, or time-line clogging?
Conventional wisdom (including in the Apollo 15 wikipedia pages) says was due to the arrival timing - they landed in late afternoon, Houston time so they didn't have sufficient time for a full EVA before it was time for sleep but they did have time for a popup survey before their first sleep period on the moon.

16 landed 6 hours behind schedule due to an anomaly in the CSM; astronauts went to sleep before any EVA's.

17 landed in early afternoon Houston time and went on a full EVA about 4 hours after landing.


... They will use an umbilical, so they don't need a life support backpack or a SAFER type system....

You'd think they'll need SOMETHING for attitude control, unless we see some kind of handhold arrangement appearing on the outside of Dragon?  Got to have something for the tethers to hang onto.

It's cooler view than the I4 cupola, but two heads out the hatch are going to bang into one another a lot without some positional management.

It will be interesting to hear about goals for the EVA.  Is it just to prove out a new suit and air management procedures?  Are they going to be able to reach the trunk?  The image of the patch looks like the trunk has something poking out of it?  A low-budget arm?

This is going to be fascinating to watch develop.

I would fully expect the Dragon and its trunk to be modified for this mission with handrails and / or other clip on points at strategic locations. One or both of them free-floating in front of the Dragon is unlikely, IMO, I would consider that artistic license (but if it happened they could use the umbilical to pull themselves back in). We don't know what the purpose of the EVA is yet, so beyond that it's harder to guess.


SpaceFlightNow has provided some details:


- Launch in November
- The EVA will be with two astronauts.


https://spaceflightnow.com/2022/02/14/billionaire-plans-three-more-flights-with-spacex-culminating-in-starship-mission/

It also mentions that the entire capsule will be depressurized, so the other two crew will wear the IVA suits and remain inside. So there won't be an EVA airlock that replaces the cupola/hatch, it seems.

How would you get out of the capsule if the cupola is there? Through the door? David Naggy speculated on Twitter that there might be a third type of attachment with a door for EVA purposes.

Obviously there will be an EVA hatch instead of a cupola on this flight, sorry for the poor phrasing. We already know that a dragon can be equipped with either 1) a docking hatch, or 2) a cupola. I was just wondering if the 3rd option might have been an EVA hatch or some sort of EVA airlock (maybe inflatable). But it appears to be an EVA hatch.

EDIT: Another neat option might have been an airlock module in the trunk (attached to the 2nd stage for stability?), so just like an Apollo mission the Dragon would rotate and dock with it. But the mass of such an airlock module would preclude them from a higher LEO orbit.

Obviously, there wouldn't be a cupola. Just depressurize the capsule and open the forward hatch. There is no special EVA hatch.

The image shows someone in what looks like an IVA suit with an umbilical, so there would be no airlock.
i have an idea we can create an airlock in the forward hatch. i mean to say that the cupola had supported 2 persons at a time we can shield the interior after a person with eva suit  goes into airlock. then open the cupola from divider like this in sealed hatch.(nessesarily not a glass cupola needed). but in this manner only one eva person at a time. put someone in cupola, seal inner hatch open cupola, do eva , return back close cupola, open inner hatch, his eva complete. in this mode we only need a single eva sute for whole crew
they will ride in ivas use eva suit turn by turn. i see this eva from cupola is the best option for crew dragon. and no harm to live support system inside the dragon. btw in this case you only need to pressurize depressurize the cupola section only and if one by one eva is bad worth to note that there are 4 persons for 5 days, one will do eva for nominal 6 hours a day. and the cupola will open and close once a day. from my point in this way you can do an eva on free flier dragon easily, sans the cupola must be air tight not leaking as dragon has faced a leaking toilet and zvezda iss control service module is leaking now also so minimal requirement.

may spacex implement this idea

Offline darkenfast

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1564
  • Liked: 1858
  • Likes Given: 9085
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #146 on: 02/20/2022 08:54 am »

... They will use an umbilical, so they don't need a life support backpack or a SAFER type system....

You'd think they'll need SOMETHING for attitude control, unless we see some kind of handhold arrangement appearing on the outside of Dragon?  Got to have something for the tethers to hang onto.

It's cooler view than the I4 cupola, but two heads out the hatch are going to bang into one another a lot without some positional management.

It will be interesting to hear about goals for the EVA.  Is it just to prove out a new suit and air management procedures?  Are they going to be able to reach the trunk?  The image of the patch looks like the trunk has something poking out of it?  A low-budget arm?

This is going to be fascinating to watch develop.

I would fully expect the Dragon and its trunk to be modified for this mission with handrails and / or other clip on points at strategic locations. One or both of them free-floating in front of the Dragon is unlikely, IMO, I would consider that artistic license (but if it happened they could use the umbilical to pull themselves back in). We don't know what the purpose of the EVA is yet, so beyond that it's harder to guess.


SpaceFlightNow has provided some details:


- Launch in November
- The EVA will be with two astronauts.


https://spaceflightnow.com/2022/02/14/billionaire-plans-three-more-flights-with-spacex-culminating-in-starship-mission/

It also mentions that the entire capsule will be depressurized, so the other two crew will wear the IVA suits and remain inside. So there won't be an EVA airlock that replaces the cupola/hatch, it seems.

How would you get out of the capsule if the cupola is there? Through the door? David Naggy speculated on Twitter that there might be a third type of attachment with a door for EVA purposes.

Obviously there will be an EVA hatch instead of a cupola on this flight, sorry for the poor phrasing. We already know that a dragon can be equipped with either 1) a docking hatch, or 2) a cupola. I was just wondering if the 3rd option might have been an EVA hatch or some sort of EVA airlock (maybe inflatable). But it appears to be an EVA hatch.

EDIT: Another neat option might have been an airlock module in the trunk (attached to the 2nd stage for stability?), so just like an Apollo mission the Dragon would rotate and dock with it. But the mass of such an airlock module would preclude them from a higher LEO orbit.

Obviously, there wouldn't be a cupola. Just depressurize the capsule and open the forward hatch. There is no special EVA hatch.

The image shows someone in what looks like an IVA suit with an umbilical, so there would be no airlock.
i have an idea we can create an airlock in the forward hatch. i mean to say that the cupola had supported 2 persons at a time we can shield the interior after a person with eva suit  goes into airlock. then open the cupola from divider like this in sealed hatch.(nessesarily not a glass cupola needed). but in this manner only one eva person at a time. put someone in cupola, seal inner hatch open cupola, do eva , return back close cupola, open inner hatch, his eva complete. in this mode we only need a single eva sute for whole crew
they will ride in ivas use eva suit turn by turn. i see this eva from cupola is the best option for crew dragon. and no harm to live support system inside the dragon. btw in this case you only need to pressurize depressurize the cupola section only and if one by one eva is bad worth to note that there are 4 persons for 5 days, one will do eva for nominal 6 hours a day. and the cupola will open and close once a day. from my point in this way you can do an eva on free flier dragon easily, sans the cupola must be air tight not leaking as dragon has faced a leaking toilet and zvezda iss control service module is leaking now also so minimal requirement.

may spacex implement this idea

The cabin of the Dragon Spacecraft is far too small for an airlock. Although they could get one or two heads into the dome during the Inspiration 4 mission, the rest of their bodies were down inside the main cabin and extended past the control panel. An airlock inside a pressurized cabin must be rigid to withstand the air pressure of the cabin when the airlock is depressurized. The shape that that pressure differential requires will simply not fit inside the cabin with everything else. Additionally, each of the SpaceX suits is custom built for the person wearing it. They can't swap the suits if they wish to either fit in them or move in them.

The SpaceX engineers know their spacecraft. They have already worked this out and have made their decisions.   
Writer of Book and Lyrics for musicals "SCAR", "Cinderella!", and "Aladdin!". Retired Naval Security Group. "I think SCAR is a winner. Great score, [and] the writing is up there with the very best!"
-- Phil Henderson, Composer of the West End musical "The Far Pavilions".

OK thanks for explanation BTW I just recommended . We know isaacman told Tim dodd of no cupola in this mission

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50726
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85246
  • Likes Given: 38179
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #148 on: 02/20/2022 12:30 pm »
NSF live today:



Separate thread for the show: https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=55848.0

Offline Dalhousie

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2783
  • Liked: 804
  • Likes Given: 1187
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #149 on: 02/21/2022 07:09 am »
Keep in mind that and EVA using a modified IVA suit is little more than a stunt with limited value other than dragging rights.

Apollo's suit was capable of IVA, EVA, and lunar surface.  CXP Orion was originally supposed to do the same. There are advantages to having separate EVA and IVA when there is enough volume for both(Shuttle, ISS) but doing an EVA with a suit that can also perform the role of IVA can be useful.

Indeed.  But this is not an EVA suit that can do IVA, this is a modified IVA suit that can do limited EVA.  Emphasis on limited if you look up the history of such suits (e.g. Gemini).
« Last Edit: 02/21/2022 07:12 am by Dalhousie »
Apologies in advance for any lack of civility - it's unintended

Offline Dalhousie

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2783
  • Liked: 804
  • Likes Given: 1187
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #150 on: 02/21/2022 07:13 am »
SpaceX and Isaacman aren't just pushing the envelope. They're positively running it through the paper shredder!

Hardly pushing the envelope
Apologies in advance for any lack of civility - it's unintended

Offline woods170

  • IRAS fan
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12192
  • IRAS fan
  • The Netherlands
  • Liked: 18491
  • Likes Given: 12560
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #151 on: 02/21/2022 07:42 am »
SpaceX and Isaacman aren't just pushing the envelope. They're positively running it through the paper shredder!

Hardly pushing the envelope

Wrong.

No private entity - as in a non-government spaceflight organization - has ever performed an EVA. Let alone develop the means  to carry out said EVA.

It is not so much pushing the envelope in a technical sense. But it is pushing the envelope in the sense of development and expansion of commercial spaceflight capabilities and operations.
« Last Edit: 02/21/2022 07:44 am by woods170 »

Offline ThePonjaX

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 164
  • BsAs. - Argentina
  • Liked: 245
  • Likes Given: 995
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #152 on: 02/21/2022 03:44 pm »
SpaceX and Isaacman aren't just pushing the envelope. They're positively running it through the paper shredder!

Hardly pushing the envelope

Wrong.

No private entity - as in a non-government spaceflight organization - has ever performed an EVA. Let alone develop the means  to carry out said EVA.

It is not so much pushing the envelope in a technical sense. But it is pushing the envelope in the sense of development and expansion of commercial spaceflight capabilities and operations.

Exists the common misconception that because someone did it already it's "easy". That's far beyond reality even when you have the "expertise".
As example from another industry you can see any automotive car maker trying to catch Tesla, and in Space we have a great example with Boeing Starliner. A capsule to go ISS and back , a piece of cake for the an company with all the expertise, well that didn't go so well. 
As woods170 this has never been done for a private company and more: A private company looking for do it in an affordable way because they want' to produce hundreds of them not like NASA where each one cost a lot of money.
I remember a report sometime ago about the "lost expertise" to create that suits was a big problem.


Offline hektor

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2755
  • Liked: 1234
  • Likes Given: 55
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #153 on: 03/03/2022 07:14 am »

Offline ddspaceman

This post is not really mission related but it shows the character of Jared Issacman and Kidd Poteet

Everyone should be following them on Twitter

https://twitter.com/rookisaacman/status/1500611933946322944


Offline Oersted

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2951
  • Liked: 4192
  • Likes Given: 2803
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #155 on: 03/07/2022 10:26 am »
Well done, Jared!

Did he fly into Ukraine? - Or where is the photo taken?

Offline hektor

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2755
  • Liked: 1234
  • Likes Given: 55
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #156 on: 03/07/2022 10:55 am »
I do not think it would be wise to fly into Ukraine these days.



Offline ddspaceman


Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0