Author Topic: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon : Polaris Dawn : KSC LC-39A : NET Late August 2024  (Read 204445 times)

Offline Comga

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6503
  • Liked: 4623
  • Likes Given: 5353
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #120 on: 02/16/2022 10:00 pm »

People were complaining about the "clueless" New York Times using the "tourist" label.

And the "Most Dismissive Award" for Clueless Media goes to the New York Times for the clickbait headline, "SpaceX Tourists Will Make Attempt at Spacewalk During Flight".

The characterization of Jared Isaacman and crew as tourists is less accurate here than for any previous commercial spaceflight. My own take is that Isaacman is so onboard with the future of spaceflight he has virtually partnered with SpaceX to help advance their capabilities. It's like a private commercial Gemini program. (snip)

I agree. The "tourist" label does not apply here at all.

Gillis and Menon, as SpaceX personnel, are space industry professionals (snip)
Isaacman and Poteet are aviation professionals who are both well qualified (snip)

I absolutely agree with these points.
So what's Manley's excuse for using the "tourist" label in the title?
He doesn't use it when discussing Polaris.

Now Bezos and Branson qualify as tourists, using their money (or ability to raise money and run with it) to get their "flights into space". 
We couldn't hope for a better volunteer than Issacman to pay for and personally test new crew space technology.
« Last Edit: 02/16/2022 10:02 pm by Comga »
What kind of wastrels would dump a perfectly good booster in the ocean after just one use?

Offline whitelancer64

• If it's just an upgraded IVA suit, it will probably become like an inflated balloon, or a car tyre, making it hard and very tiresome to move your arms and legs, and even your fingers.  Again, perfectly fine for its intended purpose, but you would not want to work for several hours in it.


On the Everyday Astronaut with Isaccman they say all the 4 members are going to use the suit with improved mobility and more capability on fingers movement so seems are not going to be inflated balloons.

Modifying the gloves to increase dexterity in the fingers is a direct engineering response to the suit being inflated like a balloon.... The ability to more easily move at the shoulder and elbow when the suit is pressurized will also be required for a spacewalk of any utility.
"One bit of advice: it is important to view knowledge as sort of a semantic tree -- make sure you understand the fundamental principles, ie the trunk and big branches, before you get into the leaves/details or there is nothing for them to hang on to." - Elon Musk
"There are lies, damned lies, and launch schedules." - Larry J

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39359
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25388
  • Likes Given: 12164
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #122 on: 02/16/2022 10:19 pm »
• If it's just an upgraded IVA suit, it will probably become like an inflated balloon, or a car tyre, making it hard and very tiresome to move your arms and legs, and even your fingers.  Again, perfectly fine for its intended purpose, but you would not want to work for several hours in it.


On the Everyday Astronaut with Isaccman they say all the 4 members are going to use the suit with improved mobility and more capability on fingers movement so seems are not going to be inflated balloons.

Modifying the gloves to increase dexterity in the fingers is a direct engineering response to the suit being inflated like a balloon.... The ability to more easily move at the shoulder and elbow when the suit is pressurized will also be required for a spacewalk of any utility.
Huh?? Every EVA suit needs gloves with improved dexterity versus pure IVA suit designs.

And yea, they already mentioned improved joint mobility.

Actually listen to the interview. This is going to be an EVA suit that uses an umbilical instead of a backpack.

What is the point of this continued minimization? There’s no evidence that SpaceX isn’t serious about tackling the challenges of making an EVA suit.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline whitelancer64

• If it's just an upgraded IVA suit, it will probably become like an inflated balloon, or a car tyre, making it hard and very tiresome to move your arms and legs, and even your fingers.  Again, perfectly fine for its intended purpose, but you would not want to work for several hours in it.


On the Everyday Astronaut with Isaccman they say all the 4 members are going to use the suit with improved mobility and more capability on fingers movement so seems are not going to be inflated balloons.

Modifying the gloves to increase dexterity in the fingers is a direct engineering response to the suit being inflated like a balloon.... The ability to more easily move at the shoulder and elbow when the suit is pressurized will also be required for a spacewalk of any utility.
Huh?? Every EVA suit needs gloves with improved dexterity versus pure IVA suit designs.

And yea, they already mentioned improved joint mobility.

Actually listen to the interview. This is going to be an EVA suit that uses an umbilical instead of a backpack.

What is the point of this continued minimization? There’s no evidence that SpaceX isn’t serious about tackling the challenges of making an EVA suit.

Modify your post to remove the "huh??" part. You repeat what I said after your "huh" so you obviously understand what I wrote.

You pretending to not understand what I've written is deliberately insulting.

I'm not minimizing anything. Calm down.
« Last Edit: 02/16/2022 11:06 pm by whitelancer64 »
"One bit of advice: it is important to view knowledge as sort of a semantic tree -- make sure you understand the fundamental principles, ie the trunk and big branches, before you get into the leaves/details or there is nothing for them to hang on to." - Elon Musk
"There are lies, damned lies, and launch schedules." - Larry J

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39359
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25388
  • Likes Given: 12164
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #124 on: 02/16/2022 11:34 pm »

People were complaining about the "clueless" New York Times using the "tourist" label.

And the "Most Dismissive Award" for Clueless Media goes to the New York Times for the clickbait headline, "SpaceX Tourists Will Make Attempt at Spacewalk During Flight".

The characterization of Jared Isaacman and crew as tourists is less accurate here than for any previous commercial spaceflight. My own take is that Isaacman is so onboard with the future of spaceflight he has virtually partnered with SpaceX to help advance their capabilities. It's like a private commercial Gemini program. (snip)

I agree. The "tourist" label does not apply here at all.

Gillis and Menon, as SpaceX personnel, are space industry professionals (snip)
Isaacman and Poteet are aviation professionals who are both well qualified (snip)

I absolutely agree with these points.
So what's Manley's excuse for using the "tourist" label in the title?
He doesn't use it when discussing Polaris.

Now Bezos and Branson qualify as tourists, using their money (or ability to raise money and run with it) to get their "flights into space". 
We couldn't hope for a better volunteer than Issacman to pay for and personally test new crew space technology.
I think it’s fine to draw a distinction between professional astronauts and folks like Jared, but…


“tourist” might be appropriate if spaceflight weren’t insanely dangerous. “Adventurer” I think is more fitting. (Adventurer doesn’t imply the mission is Jared’s day job.)

I mean, even though Branson isn’t doing anything really technical on his little jaunt, it’s hard to call anyone a tourist if what they’re doing has a super high chance of death and is functioning as a kind of early shakedown flight.

Both Jared and Branson can be characterized as adventurers, although Jared is definitely more actively involved in leading the mission. Doing a shakedown test of EVA capability and some of the other stuff they’re doing is legitimate work that professional astronauts might do.
« Last Edit: 02/16/2022 11:46 pm by Robotbeat »
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39359
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25388
  • Likes Given: 12164
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #125 on: 02/16/2022 11:39 pm »
• If it's just an upgraded IVA suit, it will probably become like an inflated balloon, or a car tyre, making it hard and very tiresome to move your arms and legs, and even your fingers.  Again, perfectly fine for its intended purpose, but you would not want to work for several hours in it.


On the Everyday Astronaut with Isaccman they say all the 4 members are going to use the suit with improved mobility and more capability on fingers movement so seems are not going to be inflated balloons.

Modifying the gloves to increase dexterity in the fingers is a direct engineering response to the suit being inflated like a balloon.... The ability to more easily move at the shoulder and elbow when the suit is pressurized will also be required for a spacewalk of any utility.
Huh?? Every EVA suit needs gloves with improved dexterity versus pure IVA suit designs.

And yea, they already mentioned improved joint mobility.

Actually listen to the interview. This is going to be an EVA suit that uses an umbilical instead of a backpack.

What is the point of this continued minimization? There’s no evidence that SpaceX isn’t serious about tackling the challenges of making an EVA suit.

Modify your post to remove the "huh??" part. You repeat what I said after your "huh" so you obviously understand what I wrote.

You pretending to not understand what I've written is deliberately insulting.

I'm not minimizing anything. Calm down.
Okay, but you  responded to Ponja taking issue with tbellman’s implication that REAL EVA suits don’t inflate like a balloon. It sure sounds like you were agreeing with tbellman’s characterization. Were you?
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline whitelancer64

• If it's just an upgraded IVA suit, it will probably become like an inflated balloon, or a car tyre, making it hard and very tiresome to move your arms and legs, and even your fingers.  Again, perfectly fine for its intended purpose, but you would not want to work for several hours in it.


On the Everyday Astronaut with Isaccman they say all the 4 members are going to use the suit with improved mobility and more capability on fingers movement so seems are not going to be inflated balloons.

Modifying the gloves to increase dexterity in the fingers is a direct engineering response to the suit being inflated like a balloon.... The ability to more easily move at the shoulder and elbow when the suit is pressurized will also be required for a spacewalk of any utility.
Huh?? Every EVA suit needs gloves with improved dexterity versus pure IVA suit designs.

And yea, they already mentioned improved joint mobility.

Actually listen to the interview. This is going to be an EVA suit that uses an umbilical instead of a backpack.

What is the point of this continued minimization? There’s no evidence that SpaceX isn’t serious about tackling the challenges of making an EVA suit.

Modify your post to remove the "huh??" part. You repeat what I said after your "huh" so you obviously understand what I wrote.

You pretending to not understand what I've written is deliberately insulting.

I'm not minimizing anything. Calm down.
Okay, but you  responded to Ponja taking issue with tbellman’s implication that REAL EVA suits don’t inflate like a balloon. It sure sounds like you were agreeing with tbellman’s characterization. Were you?


Obviously not. Try reading what I wrote.
"One bit of advice: it is important to view knowledge as sort of a semantic tree -- make sure you understand the fundamental principles, ie the trunk and big branches, before you get into the leaves/details or there is nothing for them to hang on to." - Elon Musk
"There are lies, damned lies, and launch schedules." - Larry J

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39359
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25388
  • Likes Given: 12164
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #127 on: 02/17/2022 12:38 am »
Okay, so you disagree with tbellman’s point, like ThePonjaX does?
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline whitelancer64

Okay, so you disagree with tbellman’s point, like ThePonjaX does?

Maybe if you had read what I wrote instead of blindly jumping down my metaphorical throat, you would have figured that out sooner......
« Last Edit: 02/17/2022 01:03 am by whitelancer64 »
"One bit of advice: it is important to view knowledge as sort of a semantic tree -- make sure you understand the fundamental principles, ie the trunk and big branches, before you get into the leaves/details or there is nothing for them to hang on to." - Elon Musk
"There are lies, damned lies, and launch schedules." - Larry J

Offline oldAtlas_Eguy

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5308
  • Florida
  • Liked: 5010
  • Likes Given: 1511
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #129 on: 02/17/2022 02:07 am »
Enough of that both of you. You both know better. More civility please.

Now to what I wanted to say about the mission likelihood of actually occurring in the Q4 2022 time frame that is identified. Inspiration 4 did not move at all at 6 moths out from the actual date of launch. So likely somewhere around April or May we may see an actual day and month NET specified. Or at least a month as well as whether it will be possible to do it in this year or not. There are a lot of logistic things that have to come together to pick a date. And so that work is likely yet to be finished although has identified so far a possible quarter and year.

Additionally. Isaacman is operating these missions like a business from the standpoint of an upfront expenditure that would generate a much greater return. The return being the induced donations in the name of the mission to his favorite charity. SpaceX also gains what it is after which is the early in space testing of EVA suits to iron them out into a reliable and capable suit for use in space and on planetary surfaces. SpaceX have other hardware to test such as the ISL terminal that connects to Starlink for broadband communications that could eventually give D2 24/7 broadband communication for its subsequent flights of crew and cargo missions.

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50726
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85246
  • Likes Given: 38179
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #130 on: 02/17/2022 06:32 am »
twitter.com/polarisprogram/status/1494055495266668544

Quote
Take a look at our first mission patch, summing up the key elements of the first mission of the Polaris Program — Polaris Dawn.

Edit to add:

https://twitter.com/polarisprogram/status/1494055502384451595

Quote
exploratio simul — "exploration together"

Thank you to Morgan Denman for your beautiful design work! ❤️🚀

Morgan is @NASAdesigner
« Last Edit: 02/17/2022 06:52 am by FutureSpaceTourist »

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50726
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85246
  • Likes Given: 38179
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #131 on: 02/17/2022 06:48 am »
I'm curious -- does anyone know how this set of upcoming missions was conceived? Were they purely Isaacman's idea, or were they conceived from discussions between himself and SpaceX, or what?

Don’t think there’s been an explicit explanation of this. The impression I get from Isaacman’s interviews is that he personally wants to meaningfully advance crewed spaceflight. So my guess is that he went to SpaceX with that and they jointly conceived the Polaris program.

I’m really excited to see this happening. Still a long way to get people to Mars, but step by step the various hurdles are being tackled. SpaceX have a significant human spaceflight program that is not government funded  8)

Offline hektor

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2755
  • Liked: 1234
  • Likes Given: 55
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #132 on: 02/17/2022 06:49 am »
Regarding the EVA, given the fact that the cabin will be depressurized and the hatch open, who is considered doing EVA ? All four astronauts or only the ones crossing the hatch threshold ?

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50726
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85246
  • Likes Given: 38179
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #133 on: 02/17/2022 06:55 am »
Regarding the EVA, given the fact that the cabin will be depressurized and the hatch open, who is considered doing EVA ? All four astronauts or only the ones crossing the hatch threshold ?

The latter. You’re not ‘extra vehicular’ (outside or beyond the vehicle) if you’re still in it. It was the same for Gemini spacewalks.

Offline steveleach

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2405
  • Liked: 2957
  • Likes Given: 1014
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #134 on: 02/17/2022 07:17 am »
Regarding the EVA, given the fact that the cabin will be depressurized and the hatch open, who is considered doing EVA ? All four astronauts or only the ones crossing the hatch threshold ?

The latter. You’re not ‘extra vehicular’ (outside or beyond the vehicle) if you’re still in it. It was the same for Gemini spacewalks.
I'm sure they'll be able to find a grey area in that somewhere. Will the crew who aren't scheduled for full EVA have an opportunity to stick their heads out of the hatch for a look around?

Offline Hamish.Student

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 389
  • Liked: 427
  • Likes Given: 464
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #135 on: 02/17/2022 09:02 am »
Regarding the EVA, given the fact that the cabin will be depressurized and the hatch open, who is considered doing EVA ? All four astronauts or only the ones crossing the hatch threshold ?

The latter. You’re not ‘extra vehicular’ (outside or beyond the vehicle) if you’re still in it. It was the same for Gemini spacewalks.
I'm sure they'll be able to find a grey area in that somewhere. Will the crew who aren't scheduled for full EVA have an opportunity to stick their heads out of the hatch for a look around?
 
 
No, it was stated in one of the interviews (I cant remember which sorry) that the other two will remain buckled in their seats, (My guess following) likely in the commander/pilot* seats to manage an emergency if there is one. 
 
*Not necessarily the commander and pilot themselves though. The 2 people EVAing have not been decided, and will be worked out during training based on merit.
« Last Edit: 02/17/2022 12:37 pm by Hamish.Student »

Offline hektor

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2755
  • Liked: 1234
  • Likes Given: 55
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #136 on: 02/17/2022 09:12 am »
So EVA is Gillis / Menon ?

Offline envy887

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8166
  • Liked: 6836
  • Likes Given: 2972
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #137 on: 02/17/2022 12:25 pm »
So EVA is Gillis / Menon ?

Isaacman is almost certainly going to EVA. This mission is largely on his dime, and I can't imagine him not wanting to do that.

Offline Hamish.Student

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 389
  • Liked: 427
  • Likes Given: 464
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #138 on: 02/17/2022 12:36 pm »
So EVA is Gillis / Menon ?

Isaacman is almost certainly going to EVA. This mission is largely on his dime, and I can't imagine him not wanting to do that.
 
 
Once again, in the interviews he said that they have not chosen who will EVA, and that will be decided based on merit during the training.

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39359
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25388
  • Likes Given: 12164
Re: SpaceX F9/Crew Dragon: Polaris Dawn : KSC 39a : NET Q4 2022
« Reply #139 on: 02/17/2022 12:44 pm »
Regarding the EVA, given the fact that the cabin will be depressurized and the hatch open, who is considered doing EVA ? All four astronauts or only the ones crossing the hatch threshold ?

The latter. You’re not ‘extra vehicular’ (outside or beyond the vehicle) if you’re still in it. It was the same for Gemini spacewalks.
I'm sure they'll be able to find a grey area in that somewhere. Will the crew who aren't scheduled for full EVA have an opportunity to stick their heads out of the hatch for a look around?
That in-between is called a “standup EVA” and it was done on at least one of the Apollo missions.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1