Author Topic: ARCA Stabilo News  (Read 24331 times)

Offline bolun

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3604
  • Europe
  • Liked: 1030
  • Likes Given: 113
Re: ARCA Stabilo News
« Reply #40 on: 01/23/2013 07:34 pm »

Offline RanulfC

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4595
  • Heus tu Omnis! Vigilate Hoc!
  • Liked: 900
  • Likes Given: 32
Re: ARCA Stabilo News
« Reply #41 on: 01/23/2013 09:23 pm »
My "major" (but by far not the ONLY one mind you :) ) question would be: "If you're going to make it a sea-plane carrier aircraft why NOT put the payload/Upper-stage ontop instead?"

It would make the hydro/aerodynamics so much easier as well as reducing your second-stage/payload water-logging issues :)

Then again... it does LOOK cool :)

Randy
From The Amazing Catstronaut on the Black Arrow LV:
British physics, old chap. It's undignified to belch flames and effluvia all over the pad, what. A true gentlemen's orbital conveyance lifts itself into the air unostentatiously, with the minimum of spectacle and a modicum of grace. Not like our American cousins' launch vehicles, eh?

Offline RanulfC

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4595
  • Heus tu Omnis! Vigilate Hoc!
  • Liked: 900
  • Likes Given: 32
Re: ARCA Stabilo News
« Reply #42 on: 01/23/2013 09:25 pm »
OMG: YF-23 and SS1 had a love child!  ;D
You forgot one: The YF2Y-1 had a genetic "hand" in there somewhere :)
http://www.fiddlersgreen.net/models/aircraft/Convair-SeaDart.html

Randy
From The Amazing Catstronaut on the Black Arrow LV:
British physics, old chap. It's undignified to belch flames and effluvia all over the pad, what. A true gentlemen's orbital conveyance lifts itself into the air unostentatiously, with the minimum of spectacle and a modicum of grace. Not like our American cousins' launch vehicles, eh?

Offline kevin-rf

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8823
  • Overlooking the path Mary's little Lamb took..
  • Liked: 1318
  • Likes Given: 306
Re: ARCA Stabilo News
« Reply #43 on: 01/23/2013 09:57 pm »
My "major" (but by far not the ONLY one mind you :) ) question would be: "If you're going to make it a sea-plane carrier aircraft why NOT put the payload/Upper-stage ontop instead?"

But Randy, this would way it would be more fun than delivering a Nuke using a LABS profile in a SkyRaider.

Knowing this groups history, the SkyRaider mission might be a tad safer ;)
If you're happy and you know it,
It's your med's!

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0