This new image fresh from the @northropgrumman cleanroom shows #NASAWebb nearly fully packed up into the same formation it will have for launch. Few tests remain before the team transitions into shipment operations. More on Webb’s recent progress: go.nasa.gov/3BvxLQM
https://twitter.com/nasawebb/status/1418262128344150017QuoteThis new image fresh from the @northropgrumman cleanroom shows #NASAWebb nearly fully packed up into the same formation it will have for launch. Few tests remain before the team transitions into shipment operations. More on Webb’s recent progress: go.nasa.gov/3BvxLQM
<snip>That's odd: just behind the uppermost bronze crossmember (below the cherrypicker basket) a set of components on the underside of the sunshield have been deliberately blurred (not just out of focus, all the shot-noise bas been smoothed out). That areas has been previous picuted unobscured (e.g. here or here), so not sure why NG would go to the trouble now.
Quote from: edzieba on 07/22/2021 07:39 pm<snip>That's odd: just behind the uppermost bronze crossmember (below the cherrypicker basket) a set of components on the underside of the sunshield have been deliberately blurred (not just out of focus, all the shot-noise bas been smoothed out). That areas has been previous picuted unobscured (e.g. here or here), so not sure why NG would go to the trouble now.Sharp eye spotting the blurred region in the image!Most likely explanation is that there are some (potentially) ITAR related components. NASA also has a "notech" JWST photo, which seems to be cropped to avoid showing the region with the components:https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2021/james-webb-space-telescope-testing-progress-continues
For most missions, launch contributes the majority of mission risk – if the spacecraft is in space, most risk is behind us. There are few types of missions that are very much different with most risk coming *after* launch....The second such mission this year is Webb. Like a transformer in the movies, about 50 deployments need to occur after launch to set up the huge system. With nearly 350 so-called single point failures – individual steps that have to work for the mission to be a success – this deployment after launch will keep us on edge for 3 weeks or so. For comparison, this exceeds single point failures for landing on Mars by a factor of 3, and that landing lasted only 7 minutes.Those who are not worried or even terrified about this are not understanding what we are trying to do.
So poor it got its own thread:Arianespace VA254 30 July 2021 launch webcast - discussionhttps://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=54416.0
The European Space Agency says the James Webb Space Telescope has successfully completed its final tests and is being prepared for shipment to the launch site in French Guiana. https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Webb/Webb_completes_testing_and_prepares_for_trip_to_Europe_s_Spaceport
JWST has an official launch date: December 18, 2021. Happy Holidays!
Thought they would've flown it to Guiana. Lets hope the ship doesn't run into any hurricanes.
Quote from: TrevorMonty on 09/09/2021 05:19 pmThought they would've flown it to Guiana. Lets hope the ship doesn't run into any hurricanes.I think it's too big to fit in a plane now.I'm trying to remember, and maybe somebody has better information, but there's an issue with the road from the airport to the launch site. I think that the road from the port to the launch site is smoother. So even if they could have flown it, they might have chosen sea transport anyway. But I could be in error about this and somebody may have better info.
Quote from: Blackstar on 09/09/2021 05:40 pmQuote from: TrevorMonty on 09/09/2021 05:19 pmThought they would've flown it to Guiana. Lets hope the ship doesn't run into any hurricanes.I think it's too big to fit in a plane now.I'm trying to remember, and maybe somebody has better information, but there's an issue with the road from the airport to the launch site. I think that the road from the port to the launch site is smoother. So even if they could have flown it, they might have chosen sea transport anyway. But I could be in error about this and somebody may have better info.They increased the size of the container so that it no longer fits in the C-5.Port is 8 km to processing facility vs 70 from airport