Author Topic: SpaceX F9 : Starlink v1.0 L26 : KSC LC-39A : 15 May 2021 (2256 UTC)  (Read 71560 times)

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2235
  • Likes Given: 373
Good orbit, coverage resumes in 45 mins
« Last Edit: 05/15/2021 11:07 pm by Jansen »

Offline Zardar

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 176
  • Limerick, Ireland
  • Liked: 131
  • Likes Given: 354
Just spotted passing over Limerick, Ireland. Shining bright and steady through patchy thin cloud.

Offline thirtyone

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 256
  • Liked: 431
  • Likes Given: 354
I noticed the last few F9 landings have had pretty good coverage during landing. I know many reentering vehicles have to contend with reentry plasma blocking out communications, and that often there's some hole off the rear of the reentry plasma where RF can sneak out. Is it possible that they're using Starlink (which is likely to have pretty good coverage looking from the top of the vehicle during reentry) to provide full telemetry and video through the whole launch/landing sequence? Or maybe they've even mentioned it on one of these broadcasts?

I know shuttle used TDRSS, guessing it would not be easy to get enough bandwidth from the government for a non-critical commercial launch and maybe with Starlink it'd be a much more obvious thing to do.

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2235
  • Likes Given: 373
I noticed the last few F9 landings have had pretty good coverage during landing. I know many reentering vehicles have to contend with reentry plasma blocking out communications, and that often there's some hole off the rear of the reentry plasma where RF can sneak out.

By the time you’re into the landing burn, any RF interference from plasma should be negligible.

Prob just upgraded comms gear for more bandwidth.
« Last Edit: 05/15/2021 11:24 pm by Jansen »

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50709
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85223
  • Likes Given: 38177
https://twitter.com/kate_tice/status/1393707702786740226

Quote
Probably our most picturesque landing to date. Holy moly 🤩

Edit to add:

twitter.com/djsnm/status/1393705677680373761

Quote
I fixed the camera angle.

https://twitter.com/kate_tice/status/1393708725060337670

Quote
Whoa, this orientation made my stomach flip 😆
« Last Edit: 05/15/2021 11:36 pm by FutureSpaceTourist »

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50709
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85223
  • Likes Given: 38177
https://twitter.com/spacecoast_stve/status/1393709531243421700

Quote
Falcon 9 clears the tower for the 8th time with today’s Starlink mission, which is also carrying 2 rideshare payloads (Capella Whitney 4 and Tyvak-0130). This is the 3rd Falcon 9 to fly in just 11 days! It’s busy out here, y’all!

Mission overview: https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2021/05/spacex-starlink-rideshare-milestone-nears/

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2235
  • Likes Given: 373
4 second burn, good orbit
« Last Edit: 05/15/2021 11:52 pm by Jansen »

Offline thirtyone

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 256
  • Liked: 431
  • Likes Given: 354
I noticed the last few F9 landings have had pretty good coverage during landing. I know many reentering vehicles have to contend with reentry plasma blocking out communications, and that often there's some hole off the rear of the reentry plasma where RF can sneak out.

By the time you’re into the landing burn, any RF interference from plasma should be negligible.

Prob just upgraded comms gear for more bandwidth.

Whatever it was, awesome. Is it me or was this the most complete landing video to date? Just have to figure out how to get the droneship side video a little more real-time...

I took a quick look at the FCC filings and unless I'm mistaken they don't have any approvals to operate a Starlink antenna on the booster anyway. I don't know enough about the FCC rules to know if they need one for this though.

Offline jcm

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3701
  • Jonathan McDowell
  • Somerville, Massachusetts, USA
    • Jonathan's Space Report
  • Liked: 1403
  • Likes Given: 816
Capella off first, in contrast to the prelaunch press info
-----------------------------

Jonathan McDowell
http://planet4589.org

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2235
  • Likes Given: 373
Capella-6 deployment confirmed, not visible on video
« Last Edit: 05/15/2021 11:59 pm by Jansen »

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2235
  • Likes Given: 373
Tyvek-0130  confirmed deployment but not visible on video
« Last Edit: 05/15/2021 11:58 pm by Jansen »

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2235
  • Likes Given: 373
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1393717504346714120

Quote
Deployment of Tyvak-0130 and a Capella Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) satellite confirmed
« Last Edit: 05/16/2021 12:01 am by Jansen »

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2235
  • Likes Given: 373
[Just have to figure out how to get the droneship side video a little more real-time...

Vibration induced LOS is a pain

Offline Elthiryel

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 434
  • Kraków, Poland
  • Liked: 1009
  • Likes Given: 13037
https://twitter.com/capellaspace/status/1393717613696520192
Quote
Thank you @SpaceX for another smooth ride to Low Earth Orbit. Another Capella #SAR satellite has been deployed and our satellite operations team is working hard to establish contact and initiate calibration. Stay tuned for more updates.
GO for launch, GO for age of reflight

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2235
  • Likes Given: 373
Capella off first, in contrast to the prelaunch press info

It could also be that the production team got it reversed. Don’t think the payload names were called out on the mission control feed.
« Last Edit: 05/16/2021 12:10 am by Jansen »

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2235
  • Likes Given: 373
Quote
Original ITU filing for Tyvak-0130 had 37deg 500km
Quote
Capella  6  will  be  launched  in  May  2021,  on  a  53deg  orbit  at  an altitude between 550km and 600km.

It seems logical that Tyvak-0130 would deploy first into a lower orbit, but I’m not an expert on orbital mechanics.
« Last Edit: 05/16/2021 12:19 am by Jansen »

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8560
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3628
  • Likes Given: 775
Quote
Original ITU filing for Tyvak-0130 had 37deg 500km
Quote
Capella  6  will  be  launched  in  May  2021,  on  a  53deg  orbit  at  an altitude between 550km and 600km.

It seems logical that Tyvak-0130 would deploy first into a lower orbit, but I’m not an expert on orbital mechanics.

They end up in the same orbit regardless since there are no propulsive maneuvers by the 2nd stage between deployments.

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2235
  • Likes Given: 373
Quote
Original ITU filing for Tyvak-0130 had 37deg 500km
Quote
Capella  6  will  be  launched  in  May  2021,  on  a  53deg  orbit  at  an altitude between 550km and 600km.

It seems logical that Tyvak-0130 would deploy first into a lower orbit, but I’m not an expert on orbital mechanics.

They end up in the same orbit regardless since there are no propulsive maneuvers by the 2nd stage between deployments.

The orbit is 581.1 by 569.2 km, not quite circular.

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2235
  • Likes Given: 373
Starlink deployment confirmed

Kate Tice wants you to have a good evening
« Last Edit: 05/16/2021 12:42 am by Jansen »

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2235
  • Likes Given: 373

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0