Author Topic: SpaceX F9 : Starlink v1.0 L22 : CCSFS SLC-40 : 24 March 2021 (0828 UTC)  (Read 42943 times)

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50722
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85246
  • Likes Given: 38179

Offline scr00chy

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1196
  • Czechia
    • ElonX.net
  • Liked: 1694
  • Likes Given: 1690
Visual mission profile with a cute little Shelia Bordelon

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2235
  • Likes Given: 373
Quote
SpaceX is targeting Wednesday, March 24 for launch of 60 Starlink satellites from Space Launch Complex 40 (SLC-40) at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida. The instantaneous window is at 4:28 a.m. EDT, or 8:28 UTC, and a backup opportunity is available on Thursday, March 25 at 4:06 a.m. EDT, or 8:06 UTC.

The Falcon 9 first stage rocket booster supporting this mission previously supported launch of the GPS-III Space Vehicle 03 and Turksat 5A missions in addition to three Starlink missions. Following stage separation, SpaceX will land Falcon 9’s first stage on the “Of Course I Still Love You” droneship, which will be located in the Atlantic Ocean. One half of Falcon 9’s fairing supported the Sentinel-6A mission and the other supported a previous Starlink mission.

Offline scdavis

  • Member
  • Posts: 84
  • Liked: 177
  • Likes Given: 37
{... counts missions listed...} Huh, only 5 missions so far - it hasn't been used much yet, it's almost new.

... That was actually my internal thought process. Then I stopped and considered what a strange response that was! Did anyone else respond that way?

Online ZachS09

  • Space Savant
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8496
  • Roanoke, TX
  • Liked: 2416
  • Likes Given: 2104
Having subtracted T.S. Kelso's estimated Starlink deployment time (09:32:22 UTC) by the total mission duration (1 hour, 3 minutes, 52 seconds), the launch time should be at 08:28:30 UTC (4:28:30 AM Eastern).
Liftoff for St. Jude's! Go Dragon, Go Falcon, Godspeed Inspiration4!

Offline soltasto

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 636
  • Italy, Earth
  • Liked: 1119
  • Likes Given: 40
"Press kit" capture with OCR

Offline Everything Space

  • Member
  • Posts: 94
  • Space Editor
  • Liked: 158
  • Likes Given: 22
Avid Starship and all space stuff fan

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2235
  • Likes Given: 373

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2235
  • Likes Given: 373


Coverage starts at 3:45am EDT/0745 UTC

Offline Nomadd

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8894
  • Lower 48
  • Liked: 60677
  • Likes Given: 1333
Some stats via https://www.boostertracker.com/
What's the difference between "flight with a flight proven booster" and "re-flight of a booster"?
Those who danced were thought to be quite insane by those who couldn't hear the music.

Offline tgio

  • Member
  • Posts: 8
  • Arizona
  • Liked: 26
  • Likes Given: 45
Some stats via https://www.boostertracker.com/
What's the difference between "flight with a flight proven booster" and "re-flight of a booster"?

The difference might be that "flight with a flight proven booster" specifies Falcon 9. The Falcon Heavy test flight and STP-2 missions both had previously-flown side boosters, which would count as booster reflights but not as "Falcon 9 flights with a flight proven booster," and so would account for the difference between the numbers.
« Last Edit: 03/24/2021 03:07 am by tgio »

Online Nevyn72

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 826
  • Australia
  • Liked: 1039
  • Likes Given: 123
Some stats via https://www.boostertracker.com/
What's the difference between "flight with a flight proven booster" and "re-flight of a booster"?

One is overall, the other is this year, otherwise the same thing.

Offline Comga

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6503
  • Liked: 4623
  • Likes Given: 5353
Some stats via https://www.boostertracker.com/
What's the difference between "flight with a flight proven booster" and "re-flight of a booster"?

The difference might be that "flight with a flight proven booster" specifies Falcon 9. The Falcon Heavy test flight and STP-2 missions both had previously-flown side boosters, which would count as booster reflights but not as "Falcon 9 flights with a flight proven booster," and so would account for the difference between the numbers.

IOW
A Falcon Heavy launch with previous flown boosters increases the "flight with a flight proven booster" count by one but increases the "re-flight of a booster" count by two.
The difference of 2 in the counts means two Heavy launches have 2 re-flown boosters each, as tgio said.
« Last Edit: 03/24/2021 04:25 am by Comga »
What kind of wastrels would dump a perfectly good booster in the ocean after just one use?

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50722
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85246
  • Likes Given: 38179

Online vaporcobra

Go for prop load.

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50722
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85246
  • Likes Given: 38179
NSF is live

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50722
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85246
  • Likes Given: 38179
https://twitter.com/spacex/status/1374631757014654978

Quote
T-30 minutes until launch of Starlink. Webcast will go live ~15 minutes before liftoff spacex.com/launches

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50722
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85246
  • Likes Given: 38179
T-20 vent

Online Chris Bergin

Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2235
  • Likes Given: 373
Preparing OCISLY

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0