-
Electron - Fl 18 Another 1 Leaves the Crust - LC1 - 20 Jan 2021 (0726Z)
by
zubenelgenubi
on 17 Dec, 2020 19:01
-
-
#1
by
FutureSpaceTourist
on 05 Jan, 2021 19:26
-
-
#2
by
Skyrocket
on 05 Jan, 2021 21:19
-
-
#3
by
Steven Pietrobon
on 06 Jan, 2021 07:27
-
Does anyone know the name of the payload?
The mission patch says "OHB Cosmos", but that seems to be referring to the launch service procurer "OHB Cosmos International Launch Service GmbH". Cosmos might be used for the satellite name, but that's only a guess.
https://www.rocketlabusa.com/missions/next-mission/"The mission will launch a single communication microsatellite for OHB Group that will enable specific frequencies to support future services from orbit. The launch will be Rocket Lab’s 18th Electron mission and was procured for OHB Group through OHB Cosmos International Launch Service GmbH, the launch service division of OHB Group. OHB Cosmos is responsible for launching the spacecraft built by the Group's satellite manufacturers based in Germany, Sweden, and Czech Republic."
-
#4
by
SMS
on 07 Jan, 2021 21:34
-
-
#5
by
otter
on 08 Jan, 2021 05:47
-
B0082/21 NOTAMN
Q) NZZO/QRDCA/IV/BO /W /000/999/5719S17400E542
A) NZZO B) 2101160700 C) 2101160825
E) TEMPO DANGER AREA NZD093 (SOUTH AUCKLAND OCEANIC FIR) IS PRESCRIBED AS FLW:
ALL THAT AIRSPACE BOUNDED BY A LINE JOINING
50 06 00 S 177 18 00 E
66 00 00 S 178 00 00 E
66 00 00 S 170 00 00 E
48 30 00 S 172 24 00 E
50 06 00 S 177 18 00 E
ACTIVITY: ROCKET LAUNCH AND SPACE DEBRIS RETURN USING AGENCY: ROCKET LAB RANGE CONTROL CENTRE, TEL +64 28 255 11638
PRESCRIBED PURSUANT TO CIVIL AVIATION RULE PART 71 UNDER A DELEGATED AUTHORITY ISSUED BY THE DIRECTOR OF CIVIL AVIATION
F) SFC G) FL999
-
#6
by
FutureSpaceTourist
on 10 Jan, 2021 23:14
-
https://twitter.com/rocketlab/status/1348422826244521986Payload integration is complete at LC-1! Next up is wet dress rehearsal, one of the last steps before we go to space again.
Launch window for #AnotherOneLeavesTheCrust:
NZT: 20:38 - 20:45 (16 Jan)
UTC: 07:38 - 07:45 (16 Jan)
ET: 02:38 - 02:45 (16 Jan)
PT: 23:38 - 23:45 (15 Jan)
-
#7
by
russianhalo117
on 10 Jan, 2021 23:29
-
https://twitter.com/rocketlab/status/1348422826244521986
Payload integration is complete at LC-1! Next up is wet dress rehearsal, one of the last steps before we go to space again.
Launch window for #AnotherOneLeavesTheCrust:
NZT: 20:38 - 20:45 (16 Jan)
UTC: 07:38 - 07:45 (16 Jan)
ET: 02:38 - 02:45 (16 Jan)
PT: 23:38 - 23:45 (15 Jan)
Payload is GMS-T (possibly bus name)
-
#8
by
Ken the Bin
on 11 Jan, 2021 13:05
-
I received these notices from the NGA:
111012Z JAN 21
HYDROPAC 129/21(76).
WESTERN SOUTH PACIFIC.
NEW ZEALAND.
DNC 06.
1. HAZARDOUS OPERATIONS, ROCKET LAUNCHING
0530Z TO 0820Z DAILY 16 THRU 25 JAN
IN AREAS BOUND BY:
A. 39-13.20S 177-50.80E, 39-13.02S 177-58.32E,
39-19.15S 178-02.93E, 39-40.01S 177-52.01E,
39-40.00S 177-43.00E, 39-14.50S 177-48.50E.
B. 43-30.00S 176-18.00E, 43-30.00S 177-30.00E,
47-30.00S 177-30.00E, 47-30.00S 175-00.00E.
2. CANCEL THIS MSG 250920Z JAN 21.
111006Z JAN 21
HYDROPAC 128/21(29,76).
WESTERN SOUTH PACIFIC.
DNC 06, DNC 29.
1. HAZARDOUS OPERATIONS, SPACE DEBRIS
0530Z TO 0820Z DAILY 16 THRU 25 JAN
IN AREA BOUND BY
57-00S 174-30E, 57-00S 175-54E,
61-30S 176-00E, 61-30S 174-00E.
2. CANCEL THIS MSG 250920Z JAN 21.
-
#9
by
FutureSpaceTourist
on 12 Jan, 2021 01:02
-
https://twitter.com/rocketlab/status/1348812224983310338The first icy Electron of 2021 on the pad for wet dress rehearsal ahead of the #AnotherOneLeavesTheCrust mission for OHB Group.
Launch window
🚀NZT: 20:38 - 20:45 (16 Jan)
🚀UTC: 07:38 - 07:45 (16 Jan)
🚀ET: 02:38 - 02:45 (16 Jan)
🚀PT: 23:38 - 23:45 (15 Jan)
-
#10
by
FutureSpaceTourist
on 12 Jan, 2021 02:14
-
-
#11
by
FutureSpaceTourist
on 12 Jan, 2021 19:34
-
-
#12
by
gongora
on 14 Jan, 2021 01:59
-
-
#13
by
russianhalo117
on 14 Jan, 2021 02:45
-
https://twitter.com/AlexNajjarEC/status/1348547034861756422
I think i have ID-ed the mystery OHB payload! Seems to be a GMS Zhaopin aka Kleo Connect prototype for LEO broadband. Probably secret due to Germany-China relations (see Mynaric for example)
It is further firmed up in a newer update on Gunter's page. GMS-T is a bus name.
-
#14
by
Ken the Bin
on 14 Jan, 2021 04:18
-
-
#15
by
Ken the Bin
on 15 Jan, 2021 04:25
-
Webcast:
-
#16
by
pb2000
on 15 Jan, 2021 22:21
-
-
#17
by
Sam Ho
on 16 Jan, 2021 04:53
-
-
#18
by
Galactic Penguin SST
on 16 Jan, 2021 06:26
-
-
#19
by
dawei
on 16 Jan, 2021 06:40
-
Standing down for today.
Rocket Lab
@RocketLab
·
3m
We are standing down from today’s mission to review sensor data. Fortunately we have a 10-day window for this mission, so we have plenty of backup opportunities in the days to come. Stay tuned for a new target launch date soon.
https://twitter.com/RocketLab/status/1350346005795901440?s=20
-
#20
by
Galactic Penguin SST
on 16 Jan, 2021 06:52
-
-
#21
by
Danirode
on 16 Jan, 2021 08:42
-
Did he mean "inclinometer"?
-
#22
by
PM3
on 16 Jan, 2021 08:52
-
-
#23
by
Satori
on 17 Jan, 2021 13:24
-
-
#24
by
FutureSpaceTourist
on 18 Jan, 2021 02:17
-
https://twitter.com/rocketlab/status/1351008366777278473After standing down over the weekend Electron is ready to leave the crust! With the weather less than ideal tomorrow, we're targeting January 20th NZT/UTC for lift-off.
Launch window:
🚀19:45 - 21:15 NZDT
🚀06:45 - 08:15 UTC
🚀01:45 - 03:15 EST
🚀22:45 - 00:15 PST (19/20 Jan)
-
#25
by
FutureSpaceTourist
on 19 Jan, 2021 20:01
-
https://twitter.com/rocketlab/status/1351635760307343360The launch team is on station, Electron is on the pad, and we're preparing to go to space! We're monitoring wind levels at LC-1, but we're proceeding with the count.
Launch window:
🚀19:45 - 21:15 NZDT
🚀06:45 - 08:15 UTC
🚀01:45 - 03:15 EST
🚀22:45 - 00:15 PST (19/20 Jan)
-
#26
by
FutureSpaceTourist
on 19 Jan, 2021 21:21
-
-
#27
by
FutureSpaceTourist
on 19 Jan, 2021 23:20
-
https://twitter.com/rocketlab/status/1351685101415931905 Ground winds at LC-1 are putting up a bit of a fight today, but should hopefully ease for T-0 so we can leave the crust.
Lift-off is currently targeted for:
19:58 NZDT
06:58 UTC
01:58 EST
22:58 PST
Webcast available from T-15 mins rocketlabusa.com/live-stream
-
#28
by
Ken the Bin
on 20 Jan, 2021 02:43
-
Webcast:
-
#29
by
Sam Ho
on 20 Jan, 2021 03:03
-
Kerosene fill operations and vertical checks are complete. We are go for LOx load and Electron is enjoying a brief shower courtesy of today's weather
Spot Pad B there in the background? The launch mount is installed and we've just got the strongback to go now. One Electron on the pad is nice, but two will be 
https://twitter.com/RocketLab/status/1351737191232282624
-
#30
by
Ken the Bin
on 20 Jan, 2021 04:24
-
-
#31
by
Sam Ho
on 20 Jan, 2021 05:01
-
-
#32
by
cpushack
on 20 Jan, 2021 05:49
-
Quite windy still, T-12 minutes and holding for a break in the weather
-
#33
by
cpushack
on 20 Jan, 2021 05:53
-
LOX tank temperature is rising, can't hold for too much longer before it will exceed launch limits.
-
#34
by
cpushack
on 20 Jan, 2021 06:14
-
Countdown has resumed
T-13:30 and counting again
-
#35
by
cpushack
on 20 Jan, 2021 06:16
-
Launch Poll all Green, except weather is in violation with 50% chance of violating at T-0
Continuing count
-
#36
by
cpushack
on 20 Jan, 2021 06:18
-
Payload deployment will not be shown
-
#37
by
jcm
on 20 Jan, 2021 06:22
-
Launch Poll all Green, except weather is in violation with 50% chance of violating at T-0
Continuing count
I think they said "greater than 50%"? Which of course could mean 99% :-)
-
#38
by
cpushack
on 20 Jan, 2021 06:27
-
Lift Off!
-
#39
by
Chris Bergin
on 20 Jan, 2021 06:28
-
-
#40
by
jcm
on 20 Jan, 2021 06:28
-
Well there's a surprise, it actually went - at 0726 UTC
-
#41
by
cpushack
on 20 Jan, 2021 06:31
-
Stage Sep and Fairing Sep confirmed
-
#42
by
cpushack
on 20 Jan, 2021 06:33
-
Battery Hot Swap and Ejection confirmed
-
#43
by
cpushack
on 20 Jan, 2021 06:36
-
SECO and 2nd stage separation - Nominal orbit confirmed
Next up is Kick Stage ignition (in 40 minutes)
That concludes the webcast
-
#44
by
Chris Bergin
on 20 Jan, 2021 06:40
-
-
#45
by
FutureSpaceTourist
on 20 Jan, 2021 07:09
-
-
#46
by
Skyrocket
on 20 Jan, 2021 07:26
-
-
#47
by
FutureSpaceTourist
on 20 Jan, 2021 07:42
-
-
#48
by
FutureSpaceTourist
on 20 Jan, 2021 07:51
-
-
#49
by
FutureSpaceTourist
on 20 Jan, 2021 08:16
-
-
#50
by
SMS
on 20 Jan, 2021 16:48
-
-
#51
by
OneSpeed
on 20 Jan, 2021 20:48
-
Here's a comparison with the last flight to a similar insertion altitude, Flight 8 - Look Ma No Hands. The main differences are reduced throttle back for MaxQ, and increased thrust up until the booster terminal guidance phase.
-
#52
by
TrevorMonty
on 20 Jan, 2021 21:27
-
-
#53
by
FutureSpaceTourist
on 20 Jan, 2021 23:20
-
-
#54
by
Steven Pietrobon
on 21 Jan, 2021 04:44
-
Here's a grab of the reflection from the back window of the control room of what looks like live views from the rocket (I used 1080 resolution). The left screen might be of the payload. Hard to tell what the right screen is. Better views might be obtained by averaging multiple frames from the video, but I don't have the time to do that.
-
#55
by
FutureSpaceTourist
on 25 Jan, 2021 03:33
-
Some photos posted by RocketLab
-
#56
by
FutureSpaceTourist
on 25 Jan, 2021 18:48
-
https://twitter.com/rocketlab/status/1353786953334808576 ICYMI: We kicked this year off with a beautiful sunset mission for @OHB_SE. Launched just 6 months after contract signing, it was a great example of how Electron is helping small sats get to orbit faster and on their terms.
-
#57
by
FutureSpaceTourist
on 26 Jan, 2021 00:43
-
-
#58
by
gongora
on 27 Jan, 2021 01:53
-
ROCKET LAB TO OHB TO THALES ALENIA SPACE TO THE ITU TO… A KA-/KU- BAND LEO SATELLITE CONSTELLATIONPosted by Peter B. de Selding | Jan 26, 2021 | Broadband, Launch Segment, Mobility, News, Satellite Operators
PARIS — A 50-kilogram satellite built by OHB SE of Germany and launched into low Earth orbit Jan. 20 aboard a Rocket Lab Electron vehicle has salvaged — in extremis — a radio frequency reservation by Thales Alenia Space that was filed seven years ago and was set to expire on Jan. 29, according to industry officials and regulatory documents.
These are the same Thales Alenia Space-registered frequencies that the now-scrapped LeoSat constellation project had been slated to use.
-
#59
by
gongora
on 27 Jan, 2021 01:54
-
[Rocket Lab] Rocket Lab Demonstrates New Orbital Maneuvering Capability with Most Complex Kick Stage Mission YetRocket Lab Demonstrates New Orbital Maneuvering Capability with Most Complex Kick Stage Mission Yet
Launched just six months after contract signing, Rocket Lab’s ‘Another One Leaves The Crust’ mission demonstrated the longest on-orbit burn to date for the Kick Stage’s Curie engine
Long Beach, California. 26 January 2021 – Rocket Lab, the global leader in dedicated small satellite launch, demonstrated the increased maneuvering capability of the Kick Stage during the company’s 18th Electron launch, successfully burning the Curie engine for more than twice the standard mission duration and delivering more than 1,700 km of perigee change.
On January 20, 2021, Rocket Lab successfully launched a communications satellite for European space technology company, OHB Group, deploying the 50 kg class GMS-T satellite to a 1,200 km circular orbit - around 700 km higher than most Electron missions to date. It’s an orbit increasingly in demand for a growing number of constellations, but the unique altitude isn’t a common target orbit for most rideshare missions, leaving satellites facing a long delay to find a ride going to their preferred orbit. Electron eliminates the wait time by delivering a dedicated service to orbit on a timeline that meets our customers’ diverse needs.
After separating from Electron’s second stage into an elliptical transfer orbit, the Kick Stage’s 3D printed Curie engine performed two separate burns; one to raise OHB Group’s satellite to a 1,200 km circular orbit, and a second burn to lower the Kick Stage’s perigee after payload deployment, speeding up the de-orbit process to avoid the Kick Stage becoming long-term orbital debris. Across the two maneuvers, Curie completed more than 267 seconds of total burn time and delivered 1,722 km of perigee change, ascending 982 km and descending 740 km. The complex maneuvers saw Curie burn for more than twice the standard Kick Stage mission profile to low Earth orbit. The extended burn time was made possible thanks to the adaptable design of the Kick Stage which enabled engineers to double the standard number of propellant tanks from four to eight, delivering more on-orbit performance.
“Increasingly we're seeing small satellite operators seeking unique orbits and complex mission profiles on tight timelines,” said Peter Beck, Rocket Lab founder and CEO. “The Kick Stage delivers an unmatched level of on-orbit maneuverability for our customers, enabling them to get exactly where they need to, and get the most functionality from their spacecraft, all on a tight timeline.”
‘Another One Leaves the Crust’ was launched just six months after the launch contract was signed with OHB Group, shaving more than two years off common wait times small satellites can experience to get on orbit. Beyond providing the launch service, Rocket Lab also built the reaction wheels and star tracker used in OHB’s payload inside the six-month window too.
“By being fully vertically integrated, our team is in control of critical supply chain areas and can quickly scale manufacturing pace to meet customer demand, delivering a vehicle for launch in as little as 30 days,” said Mr. Beck. “As the second most frequently launched U.S. last year, our team has proven they can deliver an integration and launch campaign with unmatched speed and efficiency for the small satellite industry. In this instance the mission delivery time was just six months, but our team, manufacturing facilities, and launch infrastructure are capable of supporting even tighter timelines measured in short weeks.”
-
#60
by
Asteroza
on 27 Jan, 2021 21:21
-
Does this upper stage having double propellant load (which would nominally require a larger upper stage), mean you can effectively also order a double sized Photon then?
-
#61
by
TrevorMonty
on 27 Jan, 2021 22:34
-
Does this upper stage having double propellant load (which would nominally require a larger upper stage), mean you can effectively also order a double sized Photon then?
Photon and its payload have to stay with Electron 300kg to LEO and lighter for higher orbits. Electron 2nd stage is always same regardless of mission.
RL customize Photon kickstage for mission.
Photon can use, mono or bipropellant, either lower ISP pressure fed Curie engine or high performance electric turbo HyperCurie. HyperCurie allows for thin wall low mass tanks, while pressure fed version need thick wall tanks and lot more pressurization gas. HyperCurie version has high DV but also more expensive to build. Its case of horses for courses.
Sent from my SM-G570Y using Tapatalk
-
#62
by
edzieba
on 28 Jan, 2021 13:29
-
Does this upper stage having double propellant load (which would nominally require a larger upper stage), mean you can effectively also order a double sized Photon then?
Yes: see the Rocketlab press release immediately above your post.
-
#63
by
gongora
on 28 Jan, 2021 16:09
-
-
#64
by
Asteroza
on 28 Jan, 2021 21:20
-
Does this upper stage having double propellant load (which would nominally require a larger upper stage), mean you can effectively also order a double sized Photon then?
Yes: see the Rocketlab press release immediately above your post.
My reading of that press release didn't immediately imply the double fueled kick stage would be Photon derivative capable, but all things considered, since Photon is mostly mods bolted to the kick stage payload adapter frame, it shouldn't be too hard to convert a double fueled kick stage to Photon spec.
Do we have good pictures to compare the outer mold lines of the single and double fueled kick stage versions though? I was under the impression that the tank fitting was pretty tight in the payload adapter skirt area on the existing kick stage. Did they splice in a barrel segment to the skirt, or change the angle of the cone skirt to lengthen it?
-
#65
by
Steven Pietrobon
on 29 Jan, 2021 04:20
-
Do we have good pictures to compare the outer mold lines of the single and double fueled kick stage versions though? I was under the impression that the tank fitting was pretty tight in the payload adapter skirt area on the existing kick stage. Did they splice in a barrel segment to the skirt, or change the angle of the cone skirt to lengthen it?
Seems like there is plenty of room to add another four tanks. Add another helium bottle at the bottom, move the box next to the two tanks at left, and add two tanks at left and two tanks at right.
-
#66
by
edzieba
on 29 Jan, 2021 12:19
-
Does this upper stage having double propellant load (which would nominally require a larger upper stage), mean you can effectively also order a double sized Photon then?
Yes: see the Rocketlab press release immediately above your post.
My reading of that press release didn't immediately imply the double fueled kick stage would be Photon derivative capable, but all things considered, since Photon is mostly mods bolted to the kick stage payload adapter frame, it shouldn't be too hard to convert a double fueled kick stage to Photon spec.
Do we have good pictures to compare the outer mold lines of the single and double fueled kick stage versions though? I was under the impression that the tank fitting was pretty tight in the payload adapter skirt area on the existing kick stage. Did they splice in a barrel segment to the skirt, or change the angle of the cone skirt to lengthen it?
While the 'Interplanetary Photon' has a significantly different form-factor, 'LEO Photon' is structurally the same as the Kick Stage, barring the addition of the solar panels. Both are built 'inside' the conical payload adapter, and photos of the Kick Stage show plenty of room within the PA for enlarged or additional tanks (as far as I can tell, there are no public photos of 'LEO Photon' without the baseplate MLI).
The Hypercurie-propelled 'Interplanetary Photon' has a different structure in addition to the much larger tanks and different engine.
-
#67
by
Rik ISS-fan
on 29 Jan, 2021 13:28
-
Wouldn't in be structuaraly more efficient to go to larger diameter spherical tanks, or cylindrical (2x) instead of 4x spherical tanks. If they build it themselves the spherical and cylindirical tanks can be made with the same tooling. The tanks could look like the CFRP wrapped pressurization tanks (without the CFRP wrapping).
-
#68
by
spacenut
on 29 Jan, 2021 13:39
-
When are they going to try to recover their booster with a helicopter and parachutes? It would be cool if a second company can recover and reuse their boosters. I know it is a small sat launcher, but it is still ahead of Blue Origin.
It would also seem they could add two side boosters and make a "small sat heavy" version, or cluster 7 for a medium launcher without a new booster and have they come apart like flower pedals and recover them with a several helicopters or maybe boats if they can make them sea water proof.
-
#69
by
trimeta
on 29 Jan, 2021 14:51
-
Wouldn't in be structuaraly more efficient to go to larger diameter spherical tanks, or cylindrical (2x) instead of 4x spherical tanks. If they build it themselves the spherical and cylindirical tanks can be made with the same tooling. The tanks could look like the CFRP wrapped pressurization tanks (without the CFRP wrapping).
I believe the interplanetary Photon does use substantially larger-diameter tanks. So they have those lying around. I guess it was nonetheless easier to just add some additional small tanks, rather than replace the existing small tanks with large ones while keeping the same hardware associated with the "normal" kick stage/LEO Photon.
Edit: Oh, I just remembered, the large-diameter tanks used on interplanetary Photon are not designed for a pressure-fed engine, since interplanetary Photon uses electric pumps. So they couldn't just swap those in with the normal non-Hyper Curie even if they wanted to.
I guess they felt it was easier to use more of the tanks they already had rather than develop a third type of tank for high-energy kick stage/LEO Photon versions. Considering that they're already using four spheres, rather than two cylinders, it seems that ease of use was already more of a factor than absolutely minimizing surface-to-volume. Plus there may be a thickness requirement that would make larger spheres impractical here, and cylinders are sufficiently different from spheres as to require tooling they don't have.
-
#70
by
TrevorMonty
on 29 Jan, 2021 19:52
-
Wouldn't in be structuaraly more efficient to go to larger diameter spherical tanks, or cylindrical (2x) instead of 4x spherical tanks. If they build it themselves the spherical and cylindirical tanks can be made with the same tooling. The tanks could look like the CFRP wrapped pressurization tanks (without the CFRP wrapping).
I believe the interplanetary Photon does use substantially larger-diameter tanks. So they have those lying around. I guess it was nonetheless easier to just add some additional small tanks, rather than replace the existing small tanks with large ones while keeping the same hardware associated with the "normal" kick stage/LEO Photon.
Edit: Oh, I just remembered, the large-diameter tanks used on interplanetary Photon are not designed for a pressure-fed engine, since interplanetary Photon uses electric pumps. So they couldn't just swap those in with the normal non-Hyper Curie even if they wanted to.
I guess they felt it was easier to use more of the tanks they already had rather than develop a third type of tank for high-energy kick stage/LEO Photon versions. Considering that they're already using four spheres, rather than two cylinders, it seems that ease of use was already more of a factor than absolutely minimizing surface-to-volume. Plus there may be a thickness requirement that would make larger spheres impractical here, and cylinders are sufficiently different from spheres as to require tooling they don't have.
Even low DV kick should benefit from pump fed engine, even if it is monopropellant engine. Lighter tanks and less pressurisation gas needed. They may move to this eventually.
Sent from my SM-T810 using Tapatalk
-
#71
by
FutureSpaceTourist
on 02 Feb, 2021 02:05
-
https://twitter.com/rocketlab/status/1356438242212548611Launch is only part of opening access to space. We’re making it faster & easier for our customers to build spacecraft too. Not only was our last mission launched 6 months from contract signing, we also built the reaction wheels & star tracker in OHB’s sat in the same time frame.
-
#72
by
gongora
on 02 Feb, 2021 14:30
-
-
#73
by
PM3
on 02 Feb, 2021 14:50
-
Fun fact: The Electron kick stage of this launch is the 8th ever object to be catalogued in a 90.00° inclination. That's precision.
The 7th was 1988-074C, the upper stage of a Scout that launched two U.S. Navy navigation satellites.
-
#74
by
TrevorMonty
on 02 Feb, 2021 18:21
-
Fun fact: The Electron kick stage of this launch is the 8th ever object to be catalogued in a 90.00° inclination. That's precision.
The 7th was 1988-074C, the upper stage of a Scout that launched two U.S. Navy navigation satellites.
Precision orbit injection is ULA's speciality and RL is doing good job of matching it.
Sent from my SM-G570Y using Tapatalk
-
#75
by
Skyrocket
on 04 Nov, 2022 10:24
-
