Quote from: Zed_Noir on 12/13/2020 01:00 pmQuote from: su27k on 12/13/2020 01:54 amI don't see this go anywhere. Well, maybe if E2E works, they can get an E2E spaceport, other than that, no. Brazil sent similar invitation to US launch companies, and they're a lot closer than Indonesia, I think SpaceX basically ignored them.Brazil don't have massive nickel deposits. IIRC Indonesia recently prohibits the export of nickel ore. Might be worth it put up some floating launch facility to get access to the nickel for SX CTO's side business of making batteries.IMO this whole thing is a deal-sweerener for the proposed Tesla-Indonesia deal for nickel saleshttps://www.reuters.com/article/us-indonesia-battery/tesla-teams-to-visit-indonesia-to-check-on-investment-in-ev-components-government-idUSKBN28M08HQuoteJAKARTA (Reuters) - Tesla, the U.S. automaker, will send delegations to Indonesia next month to discuss potential investment in a supply chain for its electric vehicles, the government said on Saturday in a statement.President Joko Widodo has touted Indonesia’s nickel reserves on a number of occasions, telling Reuters last month that “it’s very important because we have a great plan to make Indonesia the biggest producer of lithium batteries and we have the biggest nickel (reserves).”
Quote from: su27k on 12/13/2020 01:54 amI don't see this go anywhere. Well, maybe if E2E works, they can get an E2E spaceport, other than that, no. Brazil sent similar invitation to US launch companies, and they're a lot closer than Indonesia, I think SpaceX basically ignored them.Brazil don't have massive nickel deposits. IIRC Indonesia recently prohibits the export of nickel ore. Might be worth it put up some floating launch facility to get access to the nickel for SX CTO's side business of making batteries.
I don't see this go anywhere. Well, maybe if E2E works, they can get an E2E spaceport, other than that, no. Brazil sent similar invitation to US launch companies, and they're a lot closer than Indonesia, I think SpaceX basically ignored them.
JAKARTA (Reuters) - Tesla, the U.S. automaker, will send delegations to Indonesia next month to discuss potential investment in a supply chain for its electric vehicles, the government said on Saturday in a statement.President Joko Widodo has touted Indonesia’s nickel reserves on a number of occasions, telling Reuters last month that “it’s very important because we have a great plan to make Indonesia the biggest producer of lithium batteries and we have the biggest nickel (reserves).”
Quote from: docmordrid on 12/13/2020 03:41 pmQuote from: Zed_Noir on 12/13/2020 01:00 pmQuote from: su27k on 12/13/2020 01:54 amI don't see this go anywhere. Well, maybe if E2E works, they can get an E2E spaceport, other than that, no. Brazil sent similar invitation to US launch companies, and they're a lot closer than Indonesia, I think SpaceX basically ignored them.Brazil don't have massive nickel deposits. IIRC Indonesia recently prohibits the export of nickel ore. Might be worth it put up some floating launch facility to get access to the nickel for SX CTO's side business of making batteries.IMO this whole thing is a deal-sweerener for the proposed Tesla-Indonesia deal for nickel saleshttps://www.reuters.com/article/us-indonesia-battery/tesla-teams-to-visit-indonesia-to-check-on-investment-in-ev-components-government-idUSKBN28M08HQuoteJAKARTA (Reuters) - Tesla, the U.S. automaker, will send delegations to Indonesia next month to discuss potential investment in a supply chain for its electric vehicles, the government said on Saturday in a statement.President Joko Widodo has touted Indonesia’s nickel reserves on a number of occasions, telling Reuters last month that “it’s very important because we have a great plan to make Indonesia the biggest producer of lithium batteries and we have the biggest nickel (reserves).”Why would this sweeten the Tesla deal, and which side is sweetening it for which?It seems more likely to me that Must has two things the Indonesian government wants: Tesla vehicle/component production and SpaceX launch business. Having got his attention with one of them, they are now talking to him about the other.
This seems to be a passing comment which receives far more attention than it deserves.
Er... ITAR ?
... apart from an investment partnership with Tesla, Mr Widodo also asked Mr Musk to look into the possibility of setting up a space launch station in Indonesia."President Joko Widodo invites [Musk] to look into Indonesia as a launching pad for SpaceX," the ministry said.Indonesia's National Institute of Aeronautics and Space (LAPAN) has plans to construct its first spaceport. It will be located in Biak, on the island of Papua.
Quote from: steveleach on 12/13/2020 12:22 amQuote from: baldusi on 12/12/2020 10:59 pmThe ITAR problem is solved by basically declaring the launch port a diplomatic premise. So they basically behave as in US soil. But that is also expensive. The question is if there's such demand for performance above Falcon 9's to equatorial orbits that justifies the investment and upkeep beyond making a bigger rocket. Give the bigger rocket that they are developing, I don't think this is something SpaceX would seriously think about.Besides, there's a lot more to launching rocket than the latitude. SpaceX does has experience with equatorial remote location launch sites. And they certainly said that all the hassle and lack of infrastructure was not worth the hassle. KSC/CCAFS is probably the single best launch site in the world (not specifically for GTO nor Polar). You have everything. You want a contractor? You have them all at a few hours drive, or you can fly them from US soil on commercial flights all through the day. Any piece of equipment you need you can source in couple of days, and for general stuff like scaffolding, paint, cherry-pickers, hardware store stuff and such in hours. You simply can't do that anywhere else.That's true, but with an equatorial site, cheap labour and a government bending over backwards to offer investment and subsidies they could in time create the world's best spaceport. One thing they would need is a high-profile, high-volume keystone customer which could be why they are courting SpaceX.And it might be attractive to SpaceX if the US Government doesn't allow them to launch as often as they want from the sites they want. Or if congress slaps overbearing regulations on Starship to try to protect SLS.Also, if KSC/CCAFS is the best launch site in the world, why did SpaceX decide to do Starship in Boca Chica?KSC/CCAFS is the best launch site in the world for the whole stack. Boca Chica is just a rocket development ground. They are their own range, among other things. So they are free to play. But if you actually have a satellite, and need suplies like storable propellants, sophisticated payload processing installations and equipment, having an expert on any possible subject available and being able to get repair parts and services a call away, there are very little other places that can compete.
Quote from: baldusi on 12/12/2020 10:59 pmThe ITAR problem is solved by basically declaring the launch port a diplomatic premise. So they basically behave as in US soil. But that is also expensive. The question is if there's such demand for performance above Falcon 9's to equatorial orbits that justifies the investment and upkeep beyond making a bigger rocket. Give the bigger rocket that they are developing, I don't think this is something SpaceX would seriously think about.Besides, there's a lot more to launching rocket than the latitude. SpaceX does has experience with equatorial remote location launch sites. And they certainly said that all the hassle and lack of infrastructure was not worth the hassle. KSC/CCAFS is probably the single best launch site in the world (not specifically for GTO nor Polar). You have everything. You want a contractor? You have them all at a few hours drive, or you can fly them from US soil on commercial flights all through the day. Any piece of equipment you need you can source in couple of days, and for general stuff like scaffolding, paint, cherry-pickers, hardware store stuff and such in hours. You simply can't do that anywhere else.That's true, but with an equatorial site, cheap labour and a government bending over backwards to offer investment and subsidies they could in time create the world's best spaceport. One thing they would need is a high-profile, high-volume keystone customer which could be why they are courting SpaceX.And it might be attractive to SpaceX if the US Government doesn't allow them to launch as often as they want from the sites they want. Or if congress slaps overbearing regulations on Starship to try to protect SLS.Also, if KSC/CCAFS is the best launch site in the world, why did SpaceX decide to do Starship in Boca Chica?
The ITAR problem is solved by basically declaring the launch port a diplomatic premise. So they basically behave as in US soil. But that is also expensive. The question is if there's such demand for performance above Falcon 9's to equatorial orbits that justifies the investment and upkeep beyond making a bigger rocket. Give the bigger rocket that they are developing, I don't think this is something SpaceX would seriously think about.Besides, there's a lot more to launching rocket than the latitude. SpaceX does has experience with equatorial remote location launch sites. And they certainly said that all the hassle and lack of infrastructure was not worth the hassle. KSC/CCAFS is probably the single best launch site in the world (not specifically for GTO nor Polar). You have everything. You want a contractor? You have them all at a few hours drive, or you can fly them from US soil on commercial flights all through the day. Any piece of equipment you need you can source in couple of days, and for general stuff like scaffolding, paint, cherry-pickers, hardware store stuff and such in hours. You simply can't do that anywhere else.
Sounds like paradise for Starship & Super Heavy.Also, it would be an interesting field trip for Nasaspaceflight launch coverage team
This thread is a duplicate.
Sounds like paradise for Starship & Super Heavy.
Quote from: smoliarm on 12/14/2020 06:28 amSounds like paradise for Starship & Super Heavy.Well, apart from the need to built them there or ship them there, and to operate them there. e.g. How many hundreds (or more) miles away are the nearest bulk LOX and LCH4 suppliers? What's the lead-time for 304L Stainless rolls? Is there a local workforce to train, or do you need to ship your existing crew across an ocean? Do you really want to fly every McGregor produced item (Raptors, cold-gas and future hot-gas thrusters, avionics, etc) across for every order? And for items that cannot be air-freighted, do you want the added lead-times for sea-freight?
Quote from: baldusi on 12/13/2020 01:15 amQuote from: steveleach on 12/13/2020 12:22 amQuote from: baldusi on 12/12/2020 10:59 pmThe ITAR problem is solved by basically declaring the launch port a diplomatic premise. So they basically behave as in US soil. But that is also expensive. The question is if there's such demand for performance above Falcon 9's to equatorial orbits that justifies the investment and upkeep beyond making a bigger rocket. Give the bigger rocket that they are developing, I don't think this is something SpaceX would seriously think about.Besides, there's a lot more to launching rocket than the latitude. SpaceX does has experience with equatorial remote location launch sites. And they certainly said that all the hassle and lack of infrastructure was not worth the hassle. KSC/CCAFS is probably the single best launch site in the world (not specifically for GTO nor Polar). You have everything. You want a contractor? You have them all at a few hours drive, or you can fly them from US soil on commercial flights all through the day. Any piece of equipment you need you can source in couple of days, and for general stuff like scaffolding, paint, cherry-pickers, hardware store stuff and such in hours. You simply can't do that anywhere else.That's true, but with an equatorial site, cheap labour and a government bending over backwards to offer investment and subsidies they could in time create the world's best spaceport. One thing they would need is a high-profile, high-volume keystone customer which could be why they are courting SpaceX.And it might be attractive to SpaceX if the US Government doesn't allow them to launch as often as they want from the sites they want. Or if congress slaps overbearing regulations on Starship to try to protect SLS.Also, if KSC/CCAFS is the best launch site in the world, why did SpaceX decide to do Starship in Boca Chica?KSC/CCAFS is the best launch site in the world for the whole stack. Boca Chica is just a rocket development ground. They are their own range, among other things. So they are free to play. But if you actually have a satellite, and need suplies like storable propellants, sophisticated payload processing installations and equipment, having an expert on any possible subject available and being able to get repair parts and services a call away, there are very little other places that can compete.The problem is congestion between SpaceX and other launch providers for the limited range opportunities, and the red tape involved with a new development test program with some Ruds, that could affect other launch pads, with a lot of added red tape. It is quite likely, cheaper, and easier to develop Boca Chica than to attempt to do the same thing at the Cape. At Boca, they can run their schedule with only minimal interference from the government and things change to the FAA in control rather than NASA, and that is a good thing for the long term in space.
Quote from: smoliarm on 12/14/2020 06:28 amSounds like paradise for Starship & Super Heavy.Well, apart from the need to built them there or ship them there, and to operate them there. e.g. How many hundreds (or more) miles away are the nearest bulk LOX and LCH4 suppliers? ...