Author Topic: SpaceX F9 : SXM-8 : CCSFS SLC-40 : 6 June 2021 (0426 UTC)  (Read 52996 times)

Offline OneSpeed

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1655
  • Liked: 5119
  • Likes Given: 2171
Re: SpaceX F9 : SXM-8 : CCSFS SLC-40 : 6 June 2021 (0426 UTC)
« Reply #100 on: 06/06/2021 12:44 pm »
There is not much to separate the telemetry for SXM-7 and SXM-8. The biggest difference I see is that the SXM-8 second stage flew with a bit more loft, but to the same injection parameters.

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50715
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85225
  • Likes Given: 38177
Re: SpaceX F9 : SXM-8 : CCSFS SLC-40 : 6 June 2021 (0426 UTC)
« Reply #101 on: 06/06/2021 02:02 pm »
https://twitter.com/spacex/status/1401535389337198601

Quote
Falcon 9 launches SXM-8 to orbit – SpaceX’s 125th successful mission

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50715
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85225
  • Likes Given: 38177
Re: SpaceX F9 : SXM-8 : CCSFS SLC-40 : 6 June 2021 (0426 UTC)
« Reply #102 on: 06/06/2021 02:40 pm »
https://twitter.com/julia_bergeron/status/1401543921252044801

Quote
Falcon's Fury

Nine Merlin engines pushing the @SIRIUSXM SXM-8 satellite into orbit from LC-40 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station.

NSF recap of the mission:
https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2021/06/sxm8-launch/

Offline daveglo

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 568
  • "a big enough engine, even a water tower can fly"
  • St. Louis, MO, USA
  • Liked: 714
  • Likes Given: 666
Re: SpaceX F9 : SXM-8 : CCSFS SLC-40 : 6 June 2021 (0426 UTC)
« Reply #103 on: 06/06/2021 03:13 pm »
There is not much to separate the telemetry for SXM-7 and SXM-8. The biggest difference I see is that the SXM-8 second stage flew with a bit more loft, but to the same injection parameters.

Ken the Bin noted earlier that the updated timeline showed the fairing deployment some 14 seconds earlier on SXM-8 compared to SXM-7.  Maybe the increased lofting allowed the earlier fairing deploy?  I wonder if that helps with fairing recovery by reducing re-entry velocity?

Offline Conexion Espacial

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2081
  • Liked: 3166
  • Likes Given: 2275
Re: SpaceX F9 : SXM-8 : CCSFS SLC-40 : 6 June 2021 (0426 UTC)
« Reply #104 on: 06/06/2021 03:45 pm »
Another photo for Launch.
By: SpaceX
I publish information in Spanish about space and rockets.
www.x.com/conexionspacial

There is no sound insulation cotton on the fairing

Online ZachS09

  • Space Savant
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8496
  • Roanoke, TX
  • Liked: 2416
  • Likes Given: 2104
Re: SpaceX F9 : SXM-8 : CCSFS SLC-40 : 6 June 2021 (0426 UTC)
« Reply #106 on: 06/06/2021 05:46 pm »
There is no sound insulation cotton on the fairing

Didn't pay attention to that detail. Good catch.
Liftoff for St. Jude's! Go Dragon, Go Falcon, Godspeed Inspiration4!

Offline cpushack

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 395
  • Klamath Falls, Oregon
  • Liked: 472
  • Likes Given: 132
Re: SpaceX F9 : SXM-8 : CCSFS SLC-40 : 6 June 2021 (0426 UTC)
« Reply #107 on: 06/06/2021 05:51 pm »
There is no sound insulation cotton on the fairing

Didn't pay attention to that detail. Good catch.

Indeed, usually its only Starlink missions that omit the acoustic tiles.  There is nothing preventing other satellites though from being made compatible with that same acoustic environment though.  It does save mass

Online ZachS09

  • Space Savant
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8496
  • Roanoke, TX
  • Liked: 2416
  • Likes Given: 2104
Re: SpaceX F9 : SXM-8 : CCSFS SLC-40 : 6 June 2021 (0426 UTC)
« Reply #108 on: 06/06/2021 08:32 pm »
But why else do Starlink missions eliminate the acoustic tiles besides shave off dry mass?
Liftoff for St. Jude's! Go Dragon, Go Falcon, Godspeed Inspiration4!

Offline Tommyboy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 307
  • The Netherlands
  • Liked: 374
  • Likes Given: 598
Re: SpaceX F9 : SXM-8 : CCSFS SLC-40 : 6 June 2021 (0426 UTC)
« Reply #109 on: 06/06/2021 08:49 pm »
But why else do Starlink missions eliminate the acoustic tiles besides shave off dry mass?
They're porous so probably absorb water after landing, requiring a lot of time to remove, clean, and replace with new insulation. Also more weight in the fairing (especially when waterlogged) increasing risk of damage when lifting/transporting.

Offline Rondaz

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27059
  • Liked: 5301
  • Likes Given: 169
Re: SpaceX F9 : SXM-8 : CCSFS SLC-40 : 6 June 2021 (0426 UTC)
« Reply #110 on: 06/06/2021 10:20 pm »
The SXM-8 radio broadcasting satellite has been cataloged in a sub-synchronous transfer orbit of 235 x 19384 km x 27.0 deg. The heavy 7 tonne satellite is  mostly propellant and will use its own engine to first raise apogee and then perigee to GEO altitude (~35800 km)

https://twitter.com/planet4589/status/1401587235087024130

Offline Lars-J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6809
  • California
  • Liked: 8487
  • Likes Given: 5385
Re: SpaceX F9 : SXM-8 : CCSFS SLC-40 : 6 June 2021 (0426 UTC)
« Reply #111 on: 06/06/2021 10:27 pm »
But why else do Starlink missions eliminate the acoustic tiles besides shave off dry mass?
They're porous so probably absorb water after landing, requiring a lot of time to remove, clean, and replace with new insulation. Also more weight in the fairing (especially when waterlogged) increasing risk of damage when lifting/transporting.

Another contributing factor could be that they have been collecting data on the Starklink missions and now know that the extra acoustic tiles are unnecessary - at least for this kind of payload.

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50715
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85225
  • Likes Given: 38177
Re: SpaceX F9 : SXM-8 : CCSFS SLC-40 : 6 June 2021 (0426 UTC)
« Reply #112 on: 06/06/2021 11:48 pm »
https://twitter.com/julia_bergeron/status/1401678420929568768

Quote
Because you need more Falcons and Fleet in your day, no, really, you do, Finn Falgout and JRTI have left the LZ with B1061. It will be a few days before they arrive giving OCISLY more time to continue prepping for departure. #SpaceXFleet

Offline edkyle99

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15502
    • Space Launch Report
  • Liked: 8788
  • Likes Given: 1386
Re: SpaceX F9 : SXM-8 : CCSFS SLC-40 : 6 June 2021 (0426 UTC)
« Reply #113 on: 06/06/2021 11:49 pm »
100th Falcon 9 v1.2 launched, and 100th success.  A 101st v1.2 was lost with AMOS 6 in the 2016 pre-static firing propellant loading explosion at SLC 40.

 - Ed Kyle
« Last Edit: 06/06/2021 11:51 pm by edkyle99 »

Offline su27k

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6414
  • Liked: 9104
  • Likes Given: 885
Re: SpaceX F9 : SXM-8 : CCSFS SLC-40 : 6 June 2021 (0426 UTC)
« Reply #114 on: 06/07/2021 11:28 am »
https://twitter.com/Maxar/status/1401516577288249347

Quote
[1 of 2] The Maxar-built SXM-8 geostationary satellite for @SIRIUSXM is performing as expected after a successful launch on a @SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket early this morning and will now commence with on orbit commissioning.


https://twitter.com/Maxar/status/1401516796717506560

Quote
[2 of 2] Shortly after launch, SXM-8 deployed its solar arrays, confirmed communications with the ground stations and began firing its thrusters to start its journey to its final orbit.
« Last Edit: 06/07/2021 11:28 am by su27k »

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2235
  • Likes Given: 373
Re: SpaceX F9 : SXM-8 : CCSFS SLC-40 : 6 June 2021 (0426 UTC)
« Reply #115 on: 06/08/2021 12:55 am »
https://twitter.com/spacexfleet/status/1402013878859542533

Quote
GO Searcher and GO Navigator are due to arrive at Port Canaveral tomorrow morning around/after dawn, with the fairing halves from the SXM-8 mission.

Expecting to see JRTI and B1061 early Wednesday. (Subject to change)
« Last Edit: 06/08/2021 12:56 am by Jansen »

Offline Rondaz

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27059
  • Liked: 5301
  • Likes Given: 169
Re: SpaceX F9 : SXM-8 : CCSFS SLC-40 : 6 June 2021 (0426 UTC)
« Reply #116 on: 06/08/2021 09:53 am »
GO Searcher and GO Navigator are about 90 minutes away from arriving at Port Canaveral.

https://twitter.com/SpaceXFleet/status/1402187278286569472

Offline Rondaz

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27059
  • Liked: 5301
  • Likes Given: 169
Re: SpaceX F9 : SXM-8 : CCSFS SLC-40 : 6 June 2021 (0426 UTC)
« Reply #117 on: 06/08/2021 12:00 pm »
GO Navigator and GO Searcher have returned with the fairing halves from the SXM-8 mission. Bonus view of people for scale showing you could host quite a party in a fairing half.

https://twitter.com/julia_bergeron/status/1402227094113947652

Offline Rondaz

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27059
  • Liked: 5301
  • Likes Given: 169
Re: SpaceX F9 : SXM-8 : CCSFS SLC-40 : 6 June 2021 (0426 UTC)
« Reply #118 on: 06/09/2021 01:01 am »
JRTI and B1061 will be within the vicinity of Port Canaveral from around midnight tonight. They can than set up for an arrival around dawn tomorrow.

OCISLY droneship is currently occupying the parking space for JRTI so needs to be moved or depart before JRTI arrival can happen.

https://twitter.com/SpaceXFleet/status/1402394486806884355

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50715
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85225
  • Likes Given: 38177
Re: SpaceX F9 : SXM-8 : CCSFS SLC-40 : 6 June 2021 (0426 UTC)
« Reply #119 on: 06/09/2021 09:04 am »
https://twitter.com/spacexfleet/status/1402551208959750144

Quote
Just Read the Instructions and B1061 are just offshore and it looks like arrival is being timed for about 6am ET.

OCISLY is still occupying the booster unloading dock so perhaps JRTI will be berthed elsewhere.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1