Author Topic: SpaceX F9 : Starlink v1.0 L15 : CC SLC-40 : Nov 24 2020 (Nov 25 0213 UTC)  (Read 92588 times)

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2235
  • Likes Given: 373
Re: SpaceX F9 : Starlink v1.0 L15 : Florida : NET November 2020
« Reply #20 on: 10/31/2020 05:43 am »
I believe these might be for Starlink v1.0 L15:

File Number 1502-EX-ST-2020

Application:

https://fcc.report/ELS/Space-Exploration-Technologies-Corp-SpaceX/1502-EX-ST-2020

Approval:
https://apps.fcc.gov/els/GetAtt.html?id=261195

Online zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11946
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 7961
  • Likes Given: 77709
Re: SpaceX F9 : Starlink v1.0 L15 : Florida : NET November 2020
« Reply #21 on: 11/15/2020 02:46 am »
Current state of play, Space Coast launch schedule:
November 16 15 - USCV-1: Dragon v2 "Resilience" Crew-1 - Falcon 9-098 (B1061.1 S) - Kennedy LC-39A - 00:27 49
(launch 22-26 minutes earlier/day)

NET November 25 24 23 22 - Starlink flight 16 (x60) [v1.0 L15] (B1049.7 S) - Falcon 9-100 - Canaveral SLC-40 / Kennedy LC-39A - 02:13 34 56 03:17
(launch 21-22 minutes earlier/day)

November (or December?) - NROL-44: Orion 10 (RIO 10, Mission 8306, Mentor 8 ) (TBD) - Delta IV-H [D-385] - Canaveral SLC-37B - 02:00-06:00?
(launch window about 4 minutes earlier/day)

NET December 5 2 - Dragon v2 SpX-21 (CRS-21), Bishop (NanoRacks Airlock Module) - Falcon 9-101 (B1058.4 S) - Kennedy LC-39A - 16:39 17:50
(launch 22-26 minutes earlier/day)

December NET November 18 - NROL-108 - Falcon 9 (B1059.5 L) - Canaveral SLC-40 - 13:55-16:52

December November - SiriusXM SXM-7 - Falcon 9 (S) - Canaveral SLC-40
(launch window about 4 minutes earlier/day)

NET late December - Turksat 5A - Falcon 9 - Canaveral SLC-40 / Kennedy LC-39A
(launch window about 4 minutes earlier/day)

Changes on November 13th
Changes on November 16th
Changes on November 17th
Changes on November 20th
Changes on November 23rd
zubenelgenubi
« Last Edit: 11/24/2020 12:50 pm by zubenelgenubi »
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Online Galactic Penguin SST

Ben Cooper's Launch Photography page now shows this launch as on November 21, 10:17 pm Eastern = November 22, 03:17 UTC, i.e. 10 hours after the F9/Sentinel-6 launch at Vandenberg.
Astronomy & spaceflight geek penguin. In a relationship w/ Space Shuttle Discovery.

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2235
  • Likes Given: 373

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2235
  • Likes Given: 373
“Of Course I Still Love You” will be the ASDS.

Offline Ken the Bin

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3100
  • US Pacific Time Zone
    • @kenthebin@spacey.space
  • Liked: 5675
  • Likes Given: 6289
I received a notice from the NGA for this launch.

Primary Day = Sunday, November 22 at ~03:17 UTC.
Backup Day = Monday, November 23 at ~02:55 UTC.

Quote from: NGA
170449Z NOV 20
NAVAREA IV 1116/20(11,12,26).
WESTERN NORTH ATLANTIC.
FLORIDA.
1. HAZARDOUS OPERATIONS, ROCKET LAUNCHING
   220302Z TO 220420Z NOV, ALTERNATE
   230240Z TO 230358Z NOV
   IN AREAS BOUND BY:
   A. 28-36-53N 080-35-58W, 28-59-00N 080-10-00W,
      29-10-00N 079-54-00W, 29-09-00N 079-51-00W,
      29-02-00N 079-55-00W, 28-50-00N 080-07-00W,
      28-35-00N 080-23-00W, 28-31-00N 080-32-00W,
      28-31-00N 080-33-17W.
   B. 31-39-00N 077-20-00W, 33-15-00N 075-57-00W,
      33-40-00N 074-59-00W, 33-17-00N 074-19-00W,
      32-33-00N 074-39-00W, 31-25-00N 077-06-00W.
2. CANCEL THIS MSG 230458Z NOV 20.

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10438
  • US
  • Liked: 14355
  • Likes Given: 6148
...and the debris  notice
Quote
170459Z NOV 20
HYDROPAC 3372/20(21,22,83).
EASTERN NORTH PACIFIC.
EASTERN SOUTH PACIFIC.
DNC 06, DNC 13.
1. HAZARDOUS OPERATIONS, SPACE DEBRIS
   220413Z TO 220506Z NOV, ALTERNATE
   230351Z TO 230536Z NOV
   IN AREA BOUND BY
   16-21S 137-47W, 09-14S 134-53W,
   01-02N 127-55W, 09-57N 121-33W,
   16-19N 114-48W, 15-16N 113-01W,
   07-44N 116-14W, 01-47S 122-06W,
   10-25S 127-55W, 17-48S 135-31W.
2. CANCEL THIS MSG 230636Z NOV 20.

Offline Ken the Bin

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3100
  • US Pacific Time Zone
    • @kenthebin@spacey.space
  • Liked: 5675
  • Likes Given: 6289
I haven't generally posted debris notices because I didn't think they would be of much interest, but I can start doing that.  I do put them into my launch/notice tracking sheets.

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10438
  • US
  • Liked: 14355
  • Likes Given: 6148
The only reason I really put it is that they sometimes use different orbits and the stage reentry might give a clue (although I need to go back and see which reentry times/locations corresponded to which orbits)

Offline Ken the Bin

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3100
  • US Pacific Time Zone
    • @kenthebin@spacey.space
  • Liked: 5675
  • Likes Given: 6289
I don't get into that level of detail, but I'll post all notices that I receive for those who are interested.

The only Space Debris notices that I pay much attention to are returning Dragons.  (I'm sure Doug and Bob were thrilled to be considered Space Debris. ;) )

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2235
  • Likes Given: 373
Confirmed B1049.7

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10438
  • US
  • Liked: 14355
  • Likes Given: 6148
https://twitter.com/Raul74Cz/status/1328759377570959366
"LHAs of #Starlink v1.0-L15 from SLC-40 planned for Nov 22 03:17 UTC, altern. Nov 23. B1049.7 landing 634km downrange. Fairing recovery approx. 709km downrange. S2 debris reentry on the first orbit in Eastern Pacific implies direct inject elliptical orbit. http://bit.do/LHA12"

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50720
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85246
  • Likes Given: 38179
https://twitter.com/spacexfleet/status/1329093913856991233

Quote
OCISLY droneship has departed for the Starlink mission. Tug Hawk is towing the droneship ~635 km downrange.

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10438
  • US
  • Liked: 14355
  • Likes Given: 6148
https://twitter.com/TSKelso/status/1329225077850656768
Quote
Thanks to @SpaceX, CelesTrak has generated pre-launch SupTLEs for the next #Starlink launch set for Nov 22 at 0317 UTC. Deployment of 60 satellites is set for 15 minutes later at 03:32:23.910 UTC: https://celestrak.com/NORAD/elements/supplemental/.

Shows a deployment orbit around 213 x 366 km

Offline WannaWalnetto

  • Member
  • Posts: 73
  • US Left Coast
  • Liked: 90
  • Likes Given: 24
Apologies if this has been asked and answered (and I missed it), but any word on a static fire?  From the SpaceX manifest updates page, it appears that this will be the 7th flight of booster 1049.

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2235
  • Likes Given: 373
Apologies if this has been asked and answered (and I missed it), but any word on a static fire?  From the SpaceX manifest updates page, it appears that this will be the 7th flight of booster 1049.

No word yet, and nothing has been spotted.

Offline sferrin

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 750
  • Utah
  • Liked: 941
  • Likes Given: 790
Apologies if this has been asked and answered (and I missed it), but any word on a static fire?  From the SpaceX manifest updates page, it appears that this will be the 7th flight of booster 1049.

No word yet, and nothing has been spotted.


I would be astonished if they don't slip.  The other SpaceX launch, scheduled for the same day, static fired two days ago.  What's the least amount of time they've done between the static test and launch?
« Last Edit: 11/19/2020 12:28 pm by sferrin »
"DARPA Hard"  It ain't what it use to be.

Offline Rekt1971

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 116
  • Liked: 304
  • Likes Given: 1170
Apologies if this has been asked and answered (and I missed it), but any word on a static fire?  From the SpaceX manifest updates page, it appears that this will be the 7th flight of booster 1049.

No word yet, and nothing has been spotted.


I would be astonished if they don't slip.  The other SpaceX launch, scheduled for the same day, static fired two days ago.  What's the least amount of time they've done between the static test and launch?

I think a couple of Starlink missions static fired just 1 day before launch.

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50720
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85246
  • Likes Given: 38179
L-3 launch weather forecast from yesterday is 80% GO

Online ZachS09

  • Space Savant
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8496
  • Roanoke, TX
  • Liked: 2416
  • Likes Given: 2104
Apologies if this has been asked and answered (and I missed it), but any word on a static fire?  From the SpaceX manifest updates page, it appears that this will be the 7th flight of booster 1049.

No word yet, and nothing has been spotted.


I would be astonished if they don't slip.  The other SpaceX launch, scheduled for the same day, static fired two days ago.  What's the least amount of time they've done between the static test and launch?

I think a couple of Starlink missions static fired just 1 day before launch.

There were a couple Starlinks that did NOT static fire at all and went straight to launch.
Liftoff for St. Jude's! Go Dragon, Go Falcon, Godspeed Inspiration4!

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0