Author Topic: SpaceX F9 : Starlink v1.0 L14 : CCAFS SLC-40: Oct 24, 2020 (15:31 UTC)  (Read 76010 times)

Online mtakala24

They have obviously lost a feed from the camera, and with no means to check if it has mechanically lost, cable loose, or just a failure within the unit, they decided to scrub.

Offline IntoTheVoid

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 422
  • USA
  • Liked: 420
  • Likes Given: 134
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1319313339026010112

Quote
Just a small-seeming issue with loss of upper stage camera. Probably nothing serious, but standing down to re-examine whole vehicle just in case.

Presumably, if it's a networked camera, they would want to exercise any or all other sensors that might be on that subnet if any.

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50699
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85218
  • Likes Given: 38177
https://twitter.com/emrekelly/status/1319377675492954113

Quote
New hazard area indicates SpaceX is now targeting no earlier than 10/24 @ ~1130 ET for next attempt at 15th Starlink mission.

Offline Ken the Bin

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3100
  • US Pacific Time Zone
    • @kenthebin@spacey.space
  • Liked: 5675
  • Likes Given: 6289
Here's the notice I received from the NGA.

Primary Day = Saturday, October 24 at ~15:31 UTC.
Backup Day = Sunday, October 25 at ~15:10 UTC.

Quote from: NGA
222006Z OCT 20
NAVAREA IV 1025/20(11,26).
WESTERN NORTH ATLANTIC.
FLORIDA.
1. HAZARDOUS OPERATIONS, ROCKET LAUNCHING
   241516Z TO 241634Z OCT, ALTERNATE
   251455Z TO 251613Z OCT
   IN AREAS BOUND BY:
   A. 28-38-22N 080-37-14W, 29-16-00N 079-53-00W,
      29-13-00N 079-45-00W, 28-27-00N 080-31-00W,
      28-27-30N 080-31-30W.
   B. 31-29-00N 077-32-00W, 33-15-00N 075-57-00W,
      33-40-00N 074-59-00W, 33-21-00N 074-25-00W,
      32-45-00N 074-32-00W, 31-13-00N 077-13-00W.
2. CANCEL NAVAREA IV 1018/20.
3. CANCEL THIS MSG 251713Z OCT 20.

Referenced:
Quote from: NGA
202033Z OCT 20
NAVAREA IV 1018/20(11,26).
WESTERN NORTH ATLANTIC.
FLORIDA.
1. HAZARDOUS OPERATIONS, ROCKET LAUNCHING
   221559Z TO 221717Z OCT, ALTERNATE
   231538Z TO 231656Z, 241516Z TO 241634Z
   AND 241516Z TO 241634Z OCT
   IN AREAS BOUND BY:
   A. 28-38-22N 080-37-14W, 29-16-00N 079-53-00W,
      29-13-00N 079-45-00W, 28-27-00N 080-31-00W,
      28-27-30N 080-31-30W.
   B. 31-29-00N 077-32-00W, 33-15-00N 075-57-00W,
      33-40-00N 074-59-00W, 33-21-00N 074-25-00W,
      32-45-00N 074-32-00W, 31-13-00N 077-13-00W.
2. CANCEL NAVAREA IV 1000/20.
3. CANCEL THIS MSG 241734Z OCT 20.

Offline The Roadie

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 426
  • Portland, Oregon
  • Liked: 2327
  • Likes Given: 98
They have obviously lost a feed from the camera, and with no means to check if it has mechanically lost, cable loose, or just a failure within the unit, they decided to scrub.
Nobody wants either of the cameras aimed at the MVac to be flopping about near the sensitive bits during ascent, nor the payload cam. Or their cables. Or if it's a data multiplexing issue, what other telemetry might they lose at a critical time?
"A human being should be able to...plan an invasion..conn a ship..solve equations, analyze a new problem..program a computer, cook a tasty meal.."-RAH

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2235
  • Likes Given: 373
They have obviously lost a feed from the camera, and with no means to check if it has mechanically lost, cable loose, or just a failure within the unit, they decided to scrub.
Nobody wants either of the cameras aimed at the MVac to be flopping about near the sensitive bits during ascent, nor the payload cam. Or their cables. Or if it's a data multiplexing issue, what other telemetry might they lose at a critical time?

I concur, especially in the context of the engine trouble with B1062.

An abundance of caution coincides with risk management in this case.

Also gives a couple of additional days for repairs to the fairing catchers.

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2235
  • Likes Given: 373
Space Force official: Launch scrubs are no reason to despair

Quote from: Spacenews
A streak of United Launch Alliance and SpaceX launch scrubs has frustrated rocket company executives and space aficionados. But Space Force launch managers are not discouraged, and in fact see scrubs as proof that systems are working like they should, Col. Douglas Pentecost said Oct. 22.

Offline cpushack

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 395
  • Klamath Falls, Oregon
  • Liked: 472
  • Likes Given: 132
They have obviously lost a feed from the camera, and with no means to check if it has mechanically lost, cable loose, or just a failure within the unit, they decided to scrub.
Nobody wants either of the cameras aimed at the MVac to be flopping about near the sensitive bits during ascent, nor the payload cam. Or their cables. Or if it's a data multiplexing issue, what other telemetry might they lose at a critical time?

Or one of the internal cams.  Certainly don't want the LOX tank cam flopping about.

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50699
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85218
  • Likes Given: 38177
L-2 launch weather forecast (issued yesterday for launch tomorrow) is 60% GO

Offline scr00chy

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1196
  • Czechia
    • ElonX.net
  • Liked: 1694
  • Likes Given: 1690
Exact launch time is October 24 at 11:31am EDT, according to Ben Cooper.

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2235
  • Likes Given: 373
Exact launch time is October 24 at 11:31am EDT, according to Ben Cooper.

That’s the time given by SFN.

Offline SMS

  • Regular
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3224
    • Astronauts & their spaceflights
  • Liked: 2174
  • Likes Given: 249
---
SMS ;-).

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50699
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85218
  • Likes Given: 38177
twitter.com/spacexfleet/status/1319753143081644032

Quote
  Navigator and GO Searcher are being deployed for fairing recovery, replacing Ms. Tree and Ms. Chief for the Starlink mission.

Both ships are leaving right now but won't be able to get into position in time for launch tomorrow... which suggests a few days delay to Starlink.

https://twitter.com/spacexfleet/status/1319753177005199367

Quote
Dragon recovery equipment was removed from the two ships earlier today and the equipment for fairing recovery installed. The ships will able to haul the fairing from the water.

Photo earlier today via @NASASpaceflight fleetcam of the fairing recovery inflatables being installed.

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2235
  • Likes Given: 373
18 hours isn’t enough time to deploy to fairing landing area? Thought they only needed 8 hours travel time.

Offline scr00chy

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1196
  • Czechia
    • ElonX.net
  • Liked: 1694
  • Likes Given: 1690
18 hours isn’t enough time to deploy to fairing landing area? Thought they only needed 8 hours travel time.
That only applies to Chief/Tree coming from Morehead City. Searcher/Navigator are slower and coming from Port Canaveral which is further away.

Offline pb2000

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 671
  • Calgary, AB
  • Liked: 759
  • Likes Given: 237
It looks like economical cruising speed is around 20km/h, so it would take 36 hours to get 725km downrange. I can't find anything about top speed though.
Launches attended: Worldview-4 (Atlas V 401), Iridium NEXT Flight 1 (Falcon 9 FT), PAZ+Starlink (Falcon 9 FT), Arabsat-6A (Falcon Heavy)
Pilgrimaged to: Boca Chica (09/19 & 01/22)

Online zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11944
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 7961
  • Likes Given: 77688
Quote from: SpaceXFleet.com Tweet
Navigator and GO Searcher are being deployed for fairing recovery, replacing Ms. Tree and Ms. Chief for the Starlink mission.
 Both ships are leaving right now but won't be able to get into position in time for launch tomorrow...which suggests a few days delay to Starlink.
Quote from: SpaceXFleet.com Tweet
Dragon recovery equipment was removed from the two ships earlier today and the equipment for fairing recovery installed. The ships will able to haul the fairing from the water.

A valid deduction.

However, might Navigator and GO Searcher retrieve the PLF halves from the water hours or a day after they splash down?  How long do fairing pieces float?  What is the sea state in the PLF recovery zone?

(God to Noah, via Bill Cosby: "How long can you tread water?")
***

EDIT: Well, I was partially correct. No one (?) considered SpaceX chartering another boat to babysit the floating PLF halves until one of the specialized SpaceX fleet can arrive on-scene, until later. :)
« Last Edit: 10/24/2020 09:15 pm by zubenelgenubi »
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Offline Nomadd

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8894
  • Lower 48
  • Liked: 60677
  • Likes Given: 1333
It looks like economical cruising speed is around 20km/h, so it would take 36 hours to get 725km downrange. I can't find anything about top speed though.
That's probably close to top speed for that thing.
Those who danced were thought to be quite insane by those who couldn't hear the music.

Offline cpushack

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 395
  • Klamath Falls, Oregon
  • Liked: 472
  • Likes Given: 132
I wonder how far they can 'fly' the fairings closer?  If they can use the steerable chutes to get closer they can make up for some of the gap

Offline Ken the Bin

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3100
  • US Pacific Time Zone
    • @kenthebin@spacey.space
  • Liked: 5675
  • Likes Given: 6289
L-1 weather forecast for today and tomorrow: 60% 'Go' for today, 50% 'Go' for tomorrow.  The forecast says that it was produced yesterday at 12:00 UTC but I can tell you with certainty that it was wasn't posted publicly until after 04:00 today.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0