Author Topic: SpaceX F9 : Starlink v1.0 L14 : CCAFS SLC-40: Oct 24, 2020 (15:31 UTC)  (Read 76015 times)

Offline capoman

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 998
  • Ontario Canada
  • Liked: 1443
  • Likes Given: 1332
Was there a static fire test?
Not required for internal payloads on a flown booster. Flight by flight determination for flown boosters. All maiden flight boosters are subject to the customary static fire at McGregor and the Flight Readiness Firing (Static Fire) at their assigned pad for that launch. The plan is to phase pad FRF SF's out and only be required to the Quality Assurance Verification Static Fire at McGregor for new boosters. If flight rate stays strong it negates most of the need for the FRF to verify pad systems through ignition sequence post start with shutdown.

Per SpaceflightNow.com, F9 is on the pad now and expect a static fire.
« Last Edit: 10/21/2020 02:12 pm by capoman »

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50720
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85246
  • Likes Given: 38179
https://twitter.com/spaceflightnow/status/1318911609746739200

Quote
A Falcon 9 is upright on launch complex 40 at Cape Canaveral: spaceflightnow.com/2020/10/21/fal…

Offline RocketLover0119

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2896
  • Space Geek
  • Tampa, Florida
  • Liked: 6802
  • Likes Given: 1609
Was there a static fire test?
Not required for internal payloads on a flown booster. Flight by flight determination for flown boosters. All maiden flight boosters are subject to the customary static fire at McGregor and the Flight Readiness Firing (Static Fire) at their assigned pad for that launch. The plan is to phase pad FRF SF's out and only be required to the Quality Assurance Verification Static Fire at McGregor for new boosters. If flight rate stays strong it negates most of the need for the FRF to verify pad systems through ignition sequence post start with shutdown.

Per SpaceflightNow.com, F9 is on the pad now and expect a static fire.

The reasoning for firing up these 2 past missions before launch prob has to do with them checking the engines and making sure everything is fine and nothing is wrong that correlates with the GPS III stand down.
"The Starship has landed"

Offline intelati

Was there a static fire test?
Not required for internal payloads on a flown booster. Flight by flight determination for flown boosters. All maiden flight boosters are subject to the customary static fire at McGregor and the Flight Readiness Firing (Static Fire) at their assigned pad for that launch. The plan is to phase pad FRF SF's out and only be required to the Quality Assurance Verification Static Fire at McGregor for new boosters. If flight rate stays strong it negates most of the need for the FRF to verify pad systems through ignition sequence post start with shutdown.

Per SpaceflightNow.com, F9 is on the pad now and expect a static fire.

The reasoning for firing up these 2 past missions before launch prob has to do with them checking the engines and making sure everything is fine and nothing is wrong that correlates with the GPS III stand down.

Wasn't the last flight a 7th launch for a booster?

So that one seems independent from from the GG issues.

If we do see a static fire here, I think it's because of the issues. a 3rd (?) flight is old hat to SpaceX now.
Starships are meant to fly

Online Chris Bergin

Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Offline whitelancer64

Was there a static fire test?
Not required for internal payloads on a flown booster. Flight by flight determination for flown boosters. All maiden flight boosters are subject to the customary static fire at McGregor and the Flight Readiness Firing (Static Fire) at their assigned pad for that launch. The plan is to phase pad FRF SF's out and only be required to the Quality Assurance Verification Static Fire at McGregor for new boosters. If flight rate stays strong it negates most of the need for the FRF to verify pad systems through ignition sequence post start with shutdown.

Per SpaceflightNow.com, F9 is on the pad now and expect a static fire.

The reasoning for firing up these 2 past missions before launch prob has to do with them checking the engines and making sure everything is fine and nothing is wrong that correlates with the GPS III stand down.

Wasn't the last flight a 7th launch for a booster?

So that one seems independent from from the GG issues.

If we do see a static fire here, I think it's because of the issues. a 3rd (?) flight is old hat to SpaceX now.

No, it was another 6th flight, B1051.6

B1049 and B1051 have both flown 6 times, there has not yet been a 7th flight.

The next most experienced booster is B1059, with 4 flights.
"One bit of advice: it is important to view knowledge as sort of a semantic tree -- make sure you understand the fundamental principles, ie the trunk and big branches, before you get into the leaves/details or there is nothing for them to hang on to." - Elon Musk
"There are lies, damned lies, and launch schedules." - Larry J

Offline SMS

  • Regular
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3224
    • Astronauts & their spaceflights
  • Liked: 2175
  • Likes Given: 249
---
SMS ;-).

Offline SMS

  • Regular
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3224
    • Astronauts & their spaceflights
  • Liked: 2175
  • Likes Given: 249
---
SMS ;-).

Offline Rekt1971

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 116
  • Liked: 304
  • Likes Given: 1170
Quote
Targeting Thursday, October 22 at 12:14 p.m. EDT for Falcon 9’s launch of Starlink from SLC-40 in Florida. Keeping an eye on weather; current forecast is 50% favorable for liftoff

https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1318974319951716353

Offline Elthiryel

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 434
  • Kraków, Poland
  • Liked: 1009
  • Likes Given: 13037
Here's the forecast referenced in SpaceX's tweet.

It's 50% GO with an additional high risk of unacceptable booster recovery weather.

Backup day is a bit better with 60% GO and a moderate risk of unacceptable booster recovery weather.
GO for launch, GO for age of reflight

Online ZachS09

  • Space Savant
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8496
  • Roanoke, TX
  • Liked: 2416
  • Likes Given: 2104
Will they recover the fairings for this mission?
Liftoff for St. Jude's! Go Dragon, Go Falcon, Godspeed Inspiration4!

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10438
  • US
  • Liked: 14355
  • Likes Given: 6148
Will they recover the fairings for this mission?

I would guess they fish them from the water after the last mission's adventures.  We won't really know until we see the boats tomorrow.

Offline Jansen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Liked: 2235
  • Likes Given: 373
Will they recover the fairings for this mission?

I would guess they fish them from the water after the last mission's adventures.  We won't really know until we see the boats tomorrow.

Depends on if the nets are repaired or replaced in time.

SpaceXfleet has JRTI in position but no mention of the fairing catchers since offloading yesterday.

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50720
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85246
  • Likes Given: 38179
NSF live link for later today


Offline Elthiryel

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 434
  • Kraków, Poland
  • Liked: 1009
  • Likes Given: 13037
Here's my fan-made press kit for this mission.
GO for launch, GO for age of reflight

Offline soltasto

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 636
  • Italy, Earth
  • Liked: 1119
  • Likes Given: 40
And my version:

Offline Elthiryel

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 434
  • Kraków, Poland
  • Liked: 1009
  • Likes Given: 13037
If the mission launches on time, it's going to be a booster turnaround record of 49d 03h 28m (Starlink-12 -> Starlink-15). The current record is 51d 02h 08m (Crew Demo-2 -> ANASIS-II).
GO for launch, GO for age of reflight

Online Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39463
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 33125
  • Likes Given: 8910
SpaceX livestream link.

Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Offline kdhilliard

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1100
  • Kirk
  • Tanstaa, FL
  • Liked: 1606
  • Likes Given: 4197
...
SpaceXfleet has JRTI in position but no mention of the fairing catchers since offloading yesterday.

MarineTraffic reports both fairing catchers still alongside the quay at Morehead City, North Carolina as of a few minutes ago (08:23 EDT / T-3h51m), and it's a good 8 hr trip to the LZ for them.

* GO Ms. Tree
* GO Ms. Chief

Offline scr00chy

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1196
  • Czechia
    • ElonX.net
  • Liked: 1694
  • Likes Given: 1690
Visual mission profile by ElonX.net (fairing recovery attempt not expected)

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0