Author Topic: SpaceX F9 : Starlink v1.0 L14 : CCAFS SLC-40: Oct 24, 2020 (15:31 UTC)  (Read 76016 times)

Offline rsdavis9

I saw a collage of 100 launch photos somewhere to commemorate the 100th launch. Now I can't find it. Anybody have links?
With ELV best efficiency was the paradigm. The new paradigm is reusable, good enough, and commonality of design.
Same engines. Design once. Same vehicle. Design once. Reusable. Build once.

Online smoliarm

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 833
  • Moscow, Russia
  • Liked: 720
  • Likes Given: 612
I saw a collage of 100 launch photos somewhere to commemorate the 100th launch. Now I can't find it. Anybody have links?
here
https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=52183.0

Offline edkyle99

  • Expert
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15502
    • Space Launch Report
  • Liked: 8788
  • Likes Given: 1386
No signs of Falcon 9 second stages left in orbit during the v1-13 and v1-14 missions.  The v1-12 second stage is still up there, possibly set to fall from orbit on October 30.

 - Ed Kyle

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50720
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85246
  • Likes Given: 38179
https://twitter.com/spacexfleet/status/1321503382813757440

Quote
Recovery technicians are retracting the landing legs on B1060.3 at Port Canaveral

Watch live on @NASASpaceflight Fleetcam: youtube.com/watch?v=gnt2wZ…

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50720
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85246
  • Likes Given: 38179

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10438
  • US
  • Liked: 14355
  • Likes Given: 6148
https://twitter.com/planet4589/status/1324184557575430146
Quote
Looks like the Oct 24 Starlink launch also left its second stage in orbit.  Starlink 1915 and 1950 look to be in trouble still.

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10438
  • US
  • Liked: 14355
  • Likes Given: 6148
https://twitter.com/planet4589/status/1324827098075320321
Quote
As expected,  failed Starlinks 1915 and 1950 reentered on Nov 6,  13 days after launch.

Offline Comga

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6503
  • Liked: 4623
  • Likes Given: 5353
https://twitter.com/planet4589/status/1324184557575430146
Quote
Looks like the Oct 24 Starlink launch also left its second stage in orbit.  Starlink 1915 and 1950 look to be in trouble still.
The Starlinks are descending 3 or 4 times faster than the low density second stage, and as fast as the other Starlinks are ascending. They must be under control and power. They don’t seem to be simply “failed”.  Makes me wonder why they are being deorbited.


Perhaps this discussion should be moved from the launch thread to a Starlink thread after the second stage renters.
What kind of wastrels would dump a perfectly good booster in the ocean after just one use?

Offline WannaWalnetto

  • Member
  • Posts: 73
  • US Left Coast
  • Liked: 90
  • Likes Given: 24
Can anybody share the status of the second stage used during this launch?  The last I saw was some conjecture that it would enter the atmosphere in an uncontrolled manner.

I don’t know enough about tracking individual space objects to find this answer out for myself.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0