SpaceX @SpaceXNASA has selected Falcon Heavy to launch the first two elements of the lunar Gateway together on one mission! http://nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-awards-contract-to-launch-initial-elements-for-lunar-outpost
We’ve selected @SpaceX to provide launch services for the Power and Propulsion Element (PPE) and Habitation and Logistics Outpost (HALO)—the foundational elements of the #Artemis Gateway.
There are fairly recent (within the last six months) FISO presentations from Scott Tilley (Maxar) and Chad Davis (Northop Grumman) on the co-manifested PPE/HALO:http://fiso.spiritastro.net/telecon/Tilley_9-30-20/http://fiso.spiritastro.net/telecon/Davis_11-4-20/They mention a sub-GTO insertion and ~300 days for orbit raising.
NASA's tweet with the same news:Quote from: NASA ArtemisWe’ve selected @SpaceX to provide launch services for the Power and Propulsion Element (PPE) and Habitation and Logistics Outpost (HALO)—the foundational elements of the #Artemis Gateway.https://twitter.com/NASAArtemis/status/1359256483779776523
Huh. For a lot of rocket hardware, the isogrid gets machined flat and then gently bent into a cylindrical section. Interesting that they're machining it curved.
[...]There was a pretty energetic and interesting thread about this decision in the SpaceX Missions sub forum and then one day last week I tried to click on it and it had gone *poof.* Why was it deleted? Maybe a Mod can explain please?
Quote from: Herb Schaltegger on 02/21/2021 01:37 pm[...]There was a pretty energetic and interesting thread about this decision in the SpaceX Missions sub forum and then one day last week I tried to click on it and it had gone *poof.* Why was it deleted? Maybe a Mod can explain please?This thread may be of interest:SpaceX Falcon Heavy : PPE/HALO : NET May 2024https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=53069.0
So; after the co-launch of the first two modules, if the first Habitation module is then attached, does this represent the first, basic usable configuration of the Gateway?
Lueders says she's disappointed Russia hasn't joined Gateway. Have learned a lot from them in ISS, they have diff approach. Hope we can find ways to work together in future.
She [Lueders] adds she is “disappointed” that Russia doesn’t plan to cooperate on the lunar Gateway because they have different priorities. Hopes to find future partnerships with them.
Quote from: Joey RouletteAfter Russia and China announced their agreement to work on a lunar space station, NASA now says in response to @verge questions for comment that it's "pursuing other options for the provider of" the Lunar Gateway's airlock, which it had long planned to get from Russia.https://twitter.com/joroulette/status/1369730064707911685
After Russia and China announced their agreement to work on a lunar space station, NASA now says in response to @verge questions for comment that it's "pursuing other options for the provider of" the Lunar Gateway's airlock, which it had long planned to get from Russia.