Author Topic: USCV Crew Rotation Question  (Read 28870 times)

Online Thorny

  • Regular
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 905
  • San Angelo, Texas
  • Liked: 311
  • Likes Given: 462
Re: USCV Crew Rotation Question
« Reply #40 on: 09/15/2020 01:59 am »
NASA should not compressed the review processes which is at least 6 months each for OFT-2 and CFT

Why would the review process be six months? Hasn't Boeing always said they expect a relatively short span between OFT and CFT (now that would be OFT-2 and CFT)?

Offline abaddon

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3176
  • Liked: 4167
  • Likes Given: 5622
Re: USCV Crew Rotation Question
« Reply #41 on: 09/15/2020 02:07 am »
The days when that was believable are long gone.

Offline woods170

  • IRAS fan
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12192
  • IRAS fan
  • The Netherlands
  • Liked: 18492
  • Likes Given: 12560
Re: USCV Crew Rotation Question
« Reply #42 on: 09/15/2020 08:36 am »
NASA should not compressed the review processes which is at least 6 months each for OFT-2 and CFT

Why would the review process be six months? Hasn't Boeing always said they expect a relatively short span between OFT and CFT (now that would be OFT-2 and CFT)?

It is not up to Boeing to determine how much time passes between OFT-2 and CFT. NASA is in the lead there, because NASA is the certifying agency.
« Last Edit: 09/15/2020 08:36 am by woods170 »

Offline SMS

  • Regular
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3223
    • Astronauts & their spaceflights
  • Liked: 2174
  • Likes Given: 249
---
SMS ;-).

Online DwightM

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2412
  • Valdez, AK
  • Liked: 726
  • Likes Given: 988
Re: USCV Crew Rotation Question
« Reply #44 on: 10/08/2020 04:42 am »

Minor mental nag that I have with this.

Logistically this seems wasteful: You would need to bring your landing vehicle's suit with you on the launching vehicle and the reverse going back down (or consume cargo volume on the launching vehicle with an empty suit).

Both suits are mostly single piece which consumes precious monolithic cargo space on both flights.

Alternately Boeing and SpaceX could release adapters / converters for their umbilicals  ;)
I'm sure they could launch the landing suit in the landing vehicle instead of needing to bring it along.  I'm wondering if they're considering doing this if an RSA cosmonaut does not fly on Crew-3 and they put the one-year NASA astronaut in or is either Marshburn or Chari being tapped for that?

Offline kdhilliard

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1100
  • Kirk
  • Tanstaa, FL
  • Liked: 1606
  • Likes Given: 4204
Re: USCV Crew Rotation Question
« Reply #45 on: 10/08/2020 12:14 pm »
I'm sure they could launch the landing suit in the landing vehicle instead of needing to bring it along.

They would, of course, need four suits for two people, since the long-duration-stay astronaut would be ascending in a Dragon and returning in a Starliner -- the opposite of the commercial visitor.

It would be funny if they limited the commercial visitor to being a body double of the long-duration-stay astronaut.  (I wonder which pool of candidates is larger.)

Offline dcfowler1

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 164
  • Liked: 37
  • Likes Given: 8
Re: USCV Crew Rotation Question
« Reply #46 on: 05/20/2022 10:52 pm »
I thought the Boeing naming system is CTS 1, CTS 2, etc. Don't know what CTS stands for though.

https://nextspaceflight.com/launches/details/2409
Crew Transport Service?

CTS = Crew Transfer System.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0