Not sure, but I believe we are looking at the inner PMA hatch; beyond that is the vestibule and the outer PMA hatch, and right behind that hatch is the Dragon hatch. Anybody know better?
Correct. Inner hatch opened and the view is down the PMA to the vestibule hatch.Quote from: DecoLV on 05/31/2020 04:07 pmNot sure, but I believe we are looking at the inner PMA hatch; beyond that is the vestibule and the outer PMA hatch, and right behind that hatch is the Dragon hatch. Anybody know better?
<snip>I assumed they were some sort of e-ink device as they seemed to have constant display during ingress till liftoff.
Quote from: Lars-J on 05/31/2020 01:43 amQuote from: Comga on 05/31/2020 01:36 amQuote from: trekkie604 on 05/30/2020 10:42 pmDragon capsule is Endeavour. Yawn Is there a historic name with less connotation?Well it was their personal choice, so it has a lot of connotation for *them*. Both of them had their first space flight on the Shuttle Endeavor.All space geeks will have an opinion. I'm totally happy with Endeavour. The guys who made the choice are the ones who strapped their pink fannies on the pointy end of a Falcon 9.Go Endeavour!
Quote from: Comga on 05/31/2020 01:36 amQuote from: trekkie604 on 05/30/2020 10:42 pmDragon capsule is Endeavour. Yawn Is there a historic name with less connotation?Well it was their personal choice, so it has a lot of connotation for *them*. Both of them had their first space flight on the Shuttle Endeavor.
Quote from: trekkie604 on 05/30/2020 10:42 pmDragon capsule is Endeavour. Yawn Is there a historic name with less connotation?
Dragon capsule is Endeavour.
Quote from: alexterrell on 05/31/2020 06:51 amThe obvious way to have a mic would be over a blue tooth link (or if NASA were doing this, some new standard they'd invent at great cost).Bluetooth is not the kind of technology I'd expect to see in a spacecraft. It's finicky even in regular consumer applications, the protocol is rather complex for reasons that make no sense in spaceflight applications, and if things go wrong, figuring out what went wrong and how to fix it is not easy. Take COTS components and pray it works is probably the only approach that favors Bluetooth.That said, Bluetooth is not the only wireless option. There are non-Bluetooth microphones easily available.
The obvious way to have a mic would be over a blue tooth link (or if NASA were doing this, some new standard they'd invent at great cost).
Quote from: Kabloona on 05/31/2020 03:47 pmQuote from: tjchambers on 05/31/2020 03:41 pmAnyone know what type of tablets they are using on their leg pouches? Heard report of 66 and 32 charge on them.Chris G on NSF livestream is calling them iPads.I assumed they were some sort of e-ink device as they seemed to have constant display during ingress till liftoff.
Quote from: tjchambers on 05/31/2020 03:41 pmAnyone know what type of tablets they are using on their leg pouches? Heard report of 66 and 32 charge on them.Chris G on NSF livestream is calling them iPads.
Anyone know what type of tablets they are using on their leg pouches? Heard report of 66 and 32 charge on them.
Being VERY parocial I saw that Chris Cassidy just stowed the visual alignment cross from the docking target. On it is the STORRM IR lidar "clip-on" target. (It's the box on the cross itself. There are four more clipped to the periphery of the target itself.)I worked on those back in the day! I wonder if they are still functional after a decade of facing into the stream of atomic oxygen.
Quote from: Comga on 05/31/2020 04:49 pmBeing VERY parocial I saw that Chris Cassidy just stowed the visual alignment cross from the docking target. On it is the STORRM IR lidar "clip-on" target. (It's the box on the cross itself. There are four more clipped to the periphery of the target itself.)I worked on those back in the day! I wonder if they are still functional after a decade of facing into the stream of atomic oxygen.Wasnt that system tested during one of the final Shuttle missions?
Bob hit his head