Author Topic: SpaceX F9 : Starlink 7 (v1.0 L6) : April 22, 2020 : Discussion  (Read 62728 times)

Offline Elthiryel

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 434
  • Kraków, Poland
  • Liked: 1009
  • Likes Given: 13037
According to the simulations I've seen (and also my own simple ones), the second stage and the satellites should pass more or less over London a few minutes after the separation, coming from the west/northwest. I am also pretty sure that's well before entering the Earth shadow.

However, I have no idea how bright this is going to be, I don't recall seeing any videos of Starlink sightings just after the separation.
« Last Edit: 04/22/2020 01:41 pm by Elthiryel »
GO for launch, GO for age of reflight

Offline anof

  • Member
  • Posts: 63
  • Michigan
  • Liked: 54
  • Likes Given: 106
According to the simulations I've seen (and also my own simple ones), the second stage and the satellites should pass more or less over London a few minutes after the separation, coming from the west/northwest. I am also pretty sure that's well before entering the Earth shadow.

However, I have no idea how bright this is going to be, I don't recall seeing any videos of Starlink sightings just after the separation.

The satellites will probably have not deployed their solar panels at that point so they might not be very bright.

Offline Norm38

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1721
  • Liked: 1285
  • Likes Given: 2349
It's 11:45 CDT right now, and YouTube is saying 12:40pm CDT.  For a launch that's happening at 2:30pm CDT?

That's quite early for a webcast to start.

Offline Elthiryel

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 434
  • Kraków, Poland
  • Liked: 1009
  • Likes Given: 13037
It's not the first time when the webcast on YouTube is showing a strange start time. On Twitter they stated that the webcast will be available around 10 minutes before the launch and I think we can safely assume that's still the plan.

EDIT: Not Twitter, but their website, sorry. But it's still there: https://www.spacex.com/webcast
« Last Edit: 04/22/2020 05:10 pm by Elthiryel »
GO for launch, GO for age of reflight

Offline rockets4life97

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 800
  • Liked: 538
  • Likes Given: 367
I didn't see a logo on the fairing in the pictures posted in the update thread from the remote setup. Did I miss it or is this common for Starlink launches?

Common to not have logo.

Offline wannamoonbase

  • Elite Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5519
  • Denver, CO
    • U.S. Metric Association
  • Liked: 3222
  • Likes Given: 3986
Common to not have logo.

I assumed they didn't want to add the expense, but more importantly the charred logo may impact the ability and cost to reuse the fairings.
Starship, Vulcan and Ariane 6 have all reached orbit.  New Glenn, well we are waiting!

Offline aero

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3629
  • 92129
  • Liked: 1146
  • Likes Given: 360
It's not the first time when the webcast on YouTube is showing a strange start time. On Twitter they stated that the webcast will be available around 10 minutes before the launch and I think we can safely assume that's still the plan.

EDIT: Not Twitter, but their website, sorry. But it's still there: https://www.spacex.com/webcast

Yes, it's still there but it now says 3:30 PM EDT.
Retired, working interesting problems

Offline kwan3217

  • Member
  • Posts: 25
  • Liked: 13
  • Likes Given: 4
They just mentioned excess alcohol in the engine as the cause of the failure last flight. Had that been announced before, or is that new information (to us) today>

Offline aameise9

  • Member
  • Posts: 96
  • Potsdam, Germany
    • MSc Integrative Neuroscience
  • Liked: 66
  • Likes Given: 193
Did the presenter just explain that the engine issue on the last flight was due to isopropyl alcohol (cleaning fluid)?

We did not know this before!

Or did I misunderstand?

Offline rabe0070

  • Member
  • Posts: 31
  • California
  • Liked: 9
  • Likes Given: 10
Yes. Elon Musk tweeted it out this morning, but there are really no other details.

Offline lrk

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 884
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 755
  • Likes Given: 1128
They just mentioned excess alcohol in the engine as the cause of the failure last flight. Had that been announced before, or is that new information (to us) today>

Elon posted it on twitter this morning, that is the earliest we have heard about this. 

Offline kwan3217

  • Member
  • Posts: 25
  • Liked: 13
  • Likes Given: 4
They said that they wouldn't try to catch the fairings, but rather fish them out of the water. I didn't catch why, did anyone else?

Offline rabe0070

  • Member
  • Posts: 31
  • California
  • Liked: 9
  • Likes Given: 10
Updating software.

Offline punder

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1261
  • Liked: 1858
  • Likes Given: 1472
Landing, hurrah!

Offline StuffOfInterest

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 934
  • Just interested in space
  • McLean, Virginia, USA
  • Liked: 927
  • Likes Given: 233
It would be nice to have a longer camera view from inside of the LOX tank after SECO.  Looks like a really interesting pattern of movement when the acceleration stops.

Offline Norm38

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1721
  • Liked: 1285
  • Likes Given: 2349
 A 4 engine entry burn?  That's new isn't it?

Offline XenIneX

  • Member
  • Posts: 61
  • Liked: 114
  • Likes Given: 0
A 4 engine entry burn?  That's new isn't it?
3 on first stage, 1 on second stage.

Offline envy887

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8166
  • Liked: 6836
  • Likes Given: 2972
A 4 engine entry burn?  That's new isn't it?

She was including the upper stage engine in that count "4 burning at once".

Offline Norm38

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1721
  • Liked: 1285
  • Likes Given: 2349
Landing, hurrah!

Bring on flight number 5!

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0