Pretty neat!
We'll see if this turns out to be any more accurate as a true description of the future, or just some pretty CGI
Quote from: john smith 19 on 03/01/2020 10:35 amWe'll see if this turns out to be any more accurate as a true description of the future, or just some pretty CGI It certainly doesn't look like anything that'll come out of RSC Energia any time soon.
Flyback boosters could have been done. NASA considered it, but thought it too costly. Russia used 4 based on the Zenit rocket. The Zenit would probably have to have been stretched some for extra fuel to carry the wings and landing gear. The flybacks probably would require less fuel for landing, but more complexity. Today this could be done with F9 rockets, four strapped around the SLS core instead of the solids. Someone on You Tube suggested it. Some mods to the core would have to be done and the transporter and pad, but in the long run it would be cheaper than the expendable solids as the boosters could be reused. I would hope Russia would resurrect this concept and develop a heavy lifter based on the Energia model as this is probably the only way Russia can get a very heavy lifter to work because of their transportation system. They could build a heavy lifter at the launch site like Starship. Maybe they will quit spending so much on the military and give more to their space program. I don't see the oil and gas industry that they depend on making so much money long term for them, with more countries going nuclear, solar, and wind for their energy needs.
Yes, it’s a great animation. I posted it in an old existing Energia II thread:https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=28014.0