Author Topic: ARCA  (Read 152473 times)

Offline Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39358
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25386
  • Likes Given: 12163
Re: ARCA
« Reply #320 on: 07/21/2022 04:51 pm »
Hydrogen rockets have steam as the exhaust… Don’t need to design it like the ARCA monstrosity to have low pollution.
« Last Edit: 07/21/2022 04:52 pm by Robotbeat »
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline trimeta

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1785
  • Kansas City, MO
  • Liked: 2252
  • Likes Given: 57
Re: ARCA
« Reply #321 on: 07/21/2022 04:58 pm »
Hydrogen rockets have steam as the exhaust… Don’t need to design it like the ARCA monstrosity to have low pollution.

But crucially, you do need the competence to handle deep cryogens. That seems to be well beyond ARCA's capabilities, when they can't even handle "normal" cryogens (e.g., LOX).

Offline Nomadd

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8894
  • Lower 48
  • Liked: 60677
  • Likes Given: 1333
Re: ARCA
« Reply #322 on: 07/21/2022 05:06 pm »
 I'm working on a giant rocket shaped like a Coke bottle that you fill with freeze spray and put upside down in a giant coffee cup full of boiling water. Testing has already resulted in successful disassembly of several overhead panels.
 Send me your money.
Those who danced were thought to be quite insane by those who couldn't hear the music.

Offline trimeta

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1785
  • Kansas City, MO
  • Liked: 2252
  • Likes Given: 57
Re: ARCA
« Reply #323 on: 07/21/2022 05:12 pm »
I'm working on a giant rocket shaped like a Coke bottle that you fill with freeze spray and put upside down in a giant coffee cup full of boiling water. Testing has already resulted in successful disassembly of several overhead panels.
 Send me your money.

If you're aiming for a sponsorship deal anyway, might as well make a monoprop rocket with Coke as the fuel, using a catalyst bed of Mentos.

Offline Mandella

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 526
  • Liked: 802
  • Likes Given: 2673
Re: ARCA
« Reply #324 on: 07/21/2022 05:17 pm »
Hydrogen rockets have steam as the exhaust… Don’t need to design it like the ARCA monstrosity to have low pollution.

Hydrogen boosters have their own issues (gone over many, many times so no need to repeat), but the point is moot anyway since the bottom line is their steam rockets don't work with anything like the efficiency needed to get a meaningful payload to orbit, no matter how many you strap together.

So the issue isn't "regular rockets pollute (or not)," the issue is this system doesn't work. And once upon a time I would have given them the benefit of the doubt that they were reaching for what they might actually think was an attenable goal, at this point I really think that goal is "fleece the gullible."

Offline edzieba

  • Virtual Realist
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6494
  • United Kingdom
  • Liked: 9936
  • Likes Given: 43
Re: ARCA
« Reply #325 on: 07/21/2022 05:26 pm »
It's a real shame, as triggered boiling of supercritical water is a neat concept that could have practical applications if implemented sanely. But that's not what Arca are doing.
I'm working on a giant rocket shaped like a Coke bottle that you fill with freeze spray and put upside down in a giant coffee cup full of boiling water. Testing has already resulted in successful disassembly of several overhead panels.
 Send me your money.
Or you could fill your giant coke bottle with regular old coke, and hire SpaceX's giant arm to shake it up and down. Autogenous pressurisation, phase-change propulsion, nontoxic biodegradable propellants, it ticks all the buzzword boxes!

Online matthewkantar

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2189
  • Liked: 2647
  • Likes Given: 2314
Re: ARCA
« Reply #326 on: 07/21/2022 09:35 pm »
I imagine an employee in a green head shade pulling on the crank of an adding machine: Sir, looks like 420 modules will do nicely for the first stage.

Offline SpaceCadet1980

  • Member
  • Posts: 63
  • Liked: 102
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: ARCA
« Reply #327 on: 07/21/2022 10:38 pm »
It's a real shame, as triggered boiling of supercritical water is a neat concept that could have practical applications if implemented sanely. But that's not what Arca are doing.
I'm working on a giant rocket shaped like a Coke bottle that you fill with freeze spray and put upside down in a giant coffee cup full of boiling water. Testing has already resulted in successful disassembly of several overhead panels.
 Send me your money.
Or you could fill your giant coke bottle with regular old coke, and hire SpaceX's giant arm to shake it up and down. Autogenous pressurisation, phase-change propulsion, nontoxic biodegradable propellants, it ticks all the buzzword boxes!
I think someone would probably quibble about whether nontoxic applies. (Not me, I drink it regularly, preferably with real sugar.)

Online CameronD

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2428
  • Melbourne, Australia
    • Norton Consultants
  • Liked: 901
  • Likes Given: 564
Re: ARCA
« Reply #328 on: 07/21/2022 11:20 pm »
Let's continue the show...

AMi Exploration Mission Profile

No.. please, no.  They even have the audacity to quote "$85 million" as being the value of the material they'll recover?!??

I was willing to give them at least a few brownie points for coming up with something novel (their mega-sized bottle rocket), testing it with spectacular results and then convincing the Navy to help.. but this work of fiction does nothing for their credibility at all.

   
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine - however, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are
going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead.

Offline libra

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1818
  • Liked: 1230
  • Likes Given: 2357
Re: ARCA
« Reply #329 on: 07/22/2022 10:52 am »
Folks,

It has just dawned on me like an evidence. That ECO-rocket (ecology, my hasse) should be rebranded ESCROC-rocket. If you wonder, ESCROC is french slang for con man.

All hail the con man rocket !   Also known as scam-in-a-can.


I imagine an employee in a green head shade pulling on the crank of an adding machine: Sir, looks like 420 modules will do nicely for the first stage.

Also a propeller hat on his head, LMAO. One wonder whether they hired Wile E. Coyote as consultant rocket scientist.

I'm working on a giant rocket shaped like a Coke bottle that you fill with freeze spray and put upside down in a giant coffee cup full of boiling water. Testing has already resulted in successful disassembly of several overhead panels.
 Send me your money.

Look, if we build that large wooden badger... and then loaded it with some coconuts... using a dynamite rabbit drive for propulsion...

Those ARCA folks are  the living embodiment of South Park Gnomes underpants scheme, with a touch of Ponzi.

Online Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39463
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 33122
  • Likes Given: 8901
Re: ARCA
« Reply #330 on: 07/23/2022 06:15 am »
Latest ARCA video showing their AMi presentation. Seems to me like ARCA has a short attention span, never finishing their current project and always switching to something shiny and new.

Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Offline catdlr

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12415
  • Enthusiast since the Redstones
  • Marina del Rey, California, USA
  • Liked: 10136
  • Likes Given: 8473
Re: ARCA
« Reply #331 on: 07/23/2022 07:39 am »
AMi - EcoRocket Heavy Design Philosophy

It's Tony De La Rosa, ...I don't create this stuff, I just report it.

Online Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39463
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 33122
  • Likes Given: 8901
Re: ARCA
« Reply #332 on: 07/23/2022 08:11 am »
ARCA saying that the first Ecorocket couldn't be launched from the Black Sea due to the invasion of Ukraine, but that the rocket will now be launched from elsewhere in the EU this year. They are also planning sea trials of Ecorocket Heavy (EH) at the end of this year.
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Offline trimeta

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1785
  • Kansas City, MO
  • Liked: 2252
  • Likes Given: 57
Re: ARCA
« Reply #333 on: 07/23/2022 04:20 pm »
Latest ARCA video showing their AMi presentation. Seems to me like ARCA has a short attention span, never finishing their current project and always switching to something shiny and new.

They hope that by changing plans before anything comes to completion, they can distract investors from the fact that none of their plans can in principle come to completion.

Offline launchwatcher

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 765
  • Liked: 729
  • Likes Given: 996
Re: ARCA
« Reply #334 on: 07/24/2022 05:36 pm »
My first reaction was - that wouldn't even work in Kerbal.
Here's evidence the shape worked in older versions (when aerodynamics was less of a factor).  An extreme example is depicted here:   

but note that unlike ARCA it's using engines with significantly higher Isp.

I've seen this approach called "asparagus staging".   Besides a limited aerodynamic model, KSP also doesn't model the power requirements or propellant inertia effects of crossfeed, and its propellant crossfeed widget has unlimited flow rate.
« Last Edit: 07/24/2022 07:27 pm by launchwatcher »

Offline xyv

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 236
  • South of Vandenberg
  • Liked: 523
  • Likes Given: 100
Re: ARCA
« Reply #335 on: 07/24/2022 09:22 pm »
Hilarious.  I amusingly stand corrected.  Maybe..."would only work in Kerbal..."

 :D

Offline PM3

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1527
  • Germany
  • Liked: 1892
  • Likes Given: 1354
Re: ARCA
« Reply #336 on: 07/27/2022 07:20 pm »
« Last Edit: 07/27/2022 07:25 pm by PM3 »
"Never, never be afraid of the truth." -- Jim Bridenstine

Offline rubicondsrv

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 227
  • Liked: 225
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: ARCA
« Reply #337 on: 07/27/2022 07:45 pm »
Omg, OTRAG is back.  :o

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/OTRAG
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/OTRAG_(rocket)


except with steam rockets. 

OTRAG at least worked on paper, this really doesn't. 




Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
Re: ARCA
« Reply #338 on: 07/28/2022 07:05 am »

Offline Lars-J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6809
  • California
  • Liked: 8487
  • Likes Given: 5385
Re: ARCA
« Reply #339 on: 07/28/2022 10:38 pm »
One extra thing that adds to the non-believable-ness of this whole idea that few (if any) have commented on is the incredible amount of passive structures this ... thing ... would require to be able to fly.

Remember how SpaceX had to create a modified core stage design for FH to handle the extra loads? Now for the "Eco Heavy", the 2nd stage fully fueled would weight around 900 tonnes. (two F9's) The 3rd stage would weigh around 200 tonnes. So... The inner 36 'cores' of the first stage would need carry in excess of 1100 tonnes! Or 30.5 tonnes each. And then to be pulled/pushed by the outer cores, which are pulled/pushed by the next ring out, and so on. 

That would require them to be severely strengthened, or have a massive passive load bearing ring that holds the 2nd stage. And the outer 30 cores of the 2nd stage would be the lifting point to hold the weight of the 2nd and 3rd stage.

This is where are more typical on-top 2nd stage would simplify things since the loads could be more easily shared, and the 2nd stage also spread its load among its cores. But cranes are expensive!  :o ::)
« Last Edit: 07/28/2022 10:40 pm by Lars-J »

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1