Author Topic: SpaceX F9 : Starlink 5 (v1.0 L4) : Feb. 17, 2020 : Master Thread  (Read 138499 times)

Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39463
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 33125
  • Likes Given: 8906
T+12 minutes.
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Online DaveS

  • Shuttle program observer
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8548
  • Sweden
  • Liked: 1240
  • Likes Given: 65
What was released from near the grid fin? around 7:30

Piece of ice around an umbilical opening. Has been seen before.
"For Sardines, space is no problem!"
-1996 Astronaut class slogan

"We're rolling in the wrong direction but for the right reasons"
-USA engineer about the rollback of Discovery prior to the STS-114 Return To Flight mission

Offline Johnnyhinbos

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3864
  • Boston, MA
  • Liked: 8095
  • Likes Given: 946
I feared that when the piece broke loose from the grid fin.
It looked like extruded frozen LOX
John Hanzl. Author, action / adventure www.johnhanzl.com

Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39463
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 33125
  • Likes Given: 8906
One minute to separation.
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Offline Wolfram66

I feared that when the piece broke loose from the grid fin.

Hydraulic leak? Maybe was frozen hydraulic fluid?

Offline Pete

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 767
  • Cubicle
  • Liked: 1029
  • Likes Given: 395
I feared that when the piece broke loose from the grid fin.
It looked like extruded frozen LOX
That thingy can be seen slowly growing from about mission time 5:12 or so...

Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39463
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 33125
  • Likes Given: 8906
T+14 minutes.

Separation!
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50695
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85214
  • Likes Given: 38173
From webcast: Booster made a soft landing at sea, may be in one piece
« Last Edit: 02/17/2020 02:22 pm by FutureSpaceTourist »

Offline A12

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 260
  • ROME, ITALY
  • Liked: 69
  • Likes Given: 487
"The booster Made a soft landing on the water"

From the SX streaming.
« Last Edit: 02/17/2020 02:23 pm by A12 »

Offline ZachS09

  • Space Savant
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8494
  • Roanoke, TX
  • Liked: 2416
  • Likes Given: 2103
Why does SpaceX cut the feed during the retention rod separation? I’ve always wanted to see that event.
« Last Edit: 02/17/2020 02:24 pm by ZachS09 »
Liftoff for St. Jude's! Go Dragon, Go Falcon, Godspeed Inspiration4!

Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39463
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 33125
  • Likes Given: 8906
T+16 minutes. Wrapping up coverage.

End of webcast.

Congratulations to SpaceX for the successful launch!
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Offline Chris Bergin

Support NSF via L2 -- Help improve NSF -- Site Rules/Feedback/Updates
**Not a L2 member? Whitelist this forum in your adblocker to support the site and ensure full functionality.**

Online yokem55

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 653
  • Oregon (Ore-uh-gun dammit)
  • Liked: 468
  • Likes Given: 13
The only reasonable explanation on that is that there is some secret sauce involved they don't want shown.

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50695
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85214
  • Likes Given: 38173
https://twitter.com/trevormahlmann/status/1229426411477315584

Quote
Liftoff of @SpaceX's fifth batch of 60 #starlink satellites. Definitely one of the loudest ones I've heard yet! Gave CRS-10 with the low cloud deck a run for its 💰

full gallery all my best Starlink mission photography: tmahlmann.com/photos/Rockets…

Offline cscott

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
  • Liked: 2869
  • Likes Given: 726
Why does SpaceX cut the feed during the tension rod separation? I’ve always wanted to see that event.
As a wild guess: the vehicle recoils and that's enough to throw off the aim of the RF link for a few seconds until it is restablished.  The vehicle is always pretty far downrange, so there's not a lot of link margin.

The same reason we often lose link during reentry burn (unpredictable vehicle dynamics plus far downrange plus (probably) plasma shielding), and from the droneship during landing (exhaust directed at the deck moving everything plus again plasma shielding).

Offline LM13

  • Member
  • Posts: 90
  • Where the skies are so blue...
  • Liked: 59
  • Likes Given: 73
What was released from near the grid fin? around 7:30

Think it's the same thing as this thing during the CRS-16 launch (which also ended in a soft water landing)?

https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=46901.msg1884246#msg1884246

Offline ZachS09

  • Space Savant
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8494
  • Roanoke, TX
  • Liked: 2416
  • Likes Given: 2103
Why does SpaceX cut the feed during the tension rod separation? I’ve always wanted to see that event.
As a wild guess: the vehicle recoils and that's enough to throw off the aim of the RF link for a few seconds until it is restablished.  The vehicle is always pretty far downrange, so there's not a lot of link margin.

The same reason we often lose link during reentry burn (unpredictable vehicle dynamics plus far downrange plus (probably) plasma shielding), and from the droneship during landing (exhaust directed at the deck moving everything plus again plasma shielding).

I thought they did not show the separation on purpose.
« Last Edit: 02/17/2020 02:28 pm by ZachS09 »
Liftoff for St. Jude's! Go Dragon, Go Falcon, Godspeed Inspiration4!

Offline kessdawg

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 175
  • Liked: 328
  • Likes Given: 1567
Why does SpaceX cut the feed during the tension rod separation? I’ve always wanted to see that event.
As a wild guess: the vehicle recoils and that's enough to throw off the aim of the RF link for a few seconds until it is restablished.  The vehicle is always pretty far downrange, so there's not a lot of link margin.

The same reason we often lose link during reentry burn (unpredictable vehicle dynamics plus far downrange plus (probably) plasma shielding), and from the droneship during landing (exhaust directed at the deck moving everything plus again plasma shielding).

I thought they did not show the separation on purpose.

They haven't said that; it's speculation.  I find it equally plausible that the deployment reaction causes the RF link to drop for a bit.

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50695
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85214
  • Likes Given: 38173
Tweeted just before launch:

https://twitter.com/mayemusk/status/1229421456058019840

Quote
Watching @SpaceX launch,  next to a photo of my Mom holding prizes as a co-winner of the Cape to Algiers rally in the 50’s. Coincidence? I think not😉

Offline John Alan

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 958
  • Central IL - USA - Earth
    • Home of the ThreadRipper Cadillac
  • Liked: 721
  • Likes Given: 2735
Looks like they another one to sink at sea...  :(
I hope this time they got a better plan besides running it over with a boat out of Bermuda...  ???
« Last Edit: 02/17/2020 02:51 pm by John Alan »

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0