Author Topic: Commercial Crew - Discussion Thread 3  (Read 345239 times)

Offline gongora

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10438
  • US
  • Liked: 14356
  • Likes Given: 6148
Re: Commercial Crew - Discussion Thread 3
« Reply #220 on: 01/25/2020 03:22 pm »
In the SpaceX launch abort post flight press conference, Jim was asked why the decision to extend the mission was not already taken. Independently of weather the DM-2 is extended or not, the delay in making this decision is dubious to me. I dont understand what they are waiting for. The question was not answered btw.

I think the answer was given in a recent GAO report. Boeing threatened to bail out. A plan was devised. Boeing can skip the CFT and move straight to operational missions AND get extra money for this. This was and is not necessary for SpaceX and therefore was not done.

It was an OIG report.  Boeing isn't exactly skipping CFT, just expanding it.  It's still their first crewed flight and will need to go through all of the same qualification stuff.  The vehicle still won't be certified for the further missions until after CFT.  The price added to CFT is about the cost of one seat on a normal Boeing mission.

Offline Comga

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6503
  • Liked: 4623
  • Likes Given: 5356
Re: Commercial Crew - Discussion Thread 3
« Reply #221 on: 01/28/2020 04:40 am »
Boeing isn't exactly skipping CFT, just expanding it.  It's still their first crewed flight and will need to go through all of the same qualification stuff.  The vehicle still won't be certified for the further missions until after CFT.  The price added to CFT is about the cost of one seat on a normal Boeing mission.

Yes they are, if NASA approves the flight without rescinding the extension. Particularly if they are allowed to add in what they (were instructed to) skip in the core of the OFT. And promise to do what they forgot (use their QA system) in the Ground Abort. After they blackmailed their way into negotiated a contract for four operational missions (which you acknowledge their craft isn’t certified for) at higher prices than their more successful competitor (Yes: competitor) plus additional sweeteners.

At this time various groups, airlines, the Air Force,... are all bludgeoning Boeing, with justification. We will see if NASA is sufficiently emboldened to join them and shake off their subservient approach and have Boeing do what they claimed to be preeminent at, or quit this too.
« Last Edit: 01/28/2020 04:43 am by Comga »
What kind of wastrels would dump a perfectly good booster in the ocean after just one use?

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50808
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85322
  • Likes Given: 38210
Re: Commercial Crew - Discussion Thread 3
« Reply #222 on: 01/28/2020 06:35 pm »
New short promo video from NASA



Offline Coastal Ron

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8967
  • I live... along the coast
  • Liked: 10331
  • Likes Given: 12055
Re: Commercial Crew - Discussion Thread 3
« Reply #224 on: 01/29/2020 08:01 pm »
At this time various groups, airlines, the Air Force,... are all bludgeoning Boeing, with justification. We will see if NASA is sufficiently emboldened to join them and shake off their subservient approach and have Boeing do what they claimed to be preeminent at, or quit this too.

Yes, and that is a tough spot for NASA to be in. They have spent years getting to this point, and have valid reasons for needing two independent crew transportation providers.

So while Boeing did propose the crew flight to the ISS, and NASA wrote it into their contract, there is no law stating that NASA can't re-evaluate that requirement. Plus the government does take the health of their contractors into account when deciding penalties, because it behooves the U.S. Government to have more than one provider of a product or service.

That said, encouraging bad behavior is never good, and Boeing has the financial resources to abide with the letter and intent of the current contract.

Ultimately my concern is the utilization of the ISS, so I don't have a dog in this hunt - whatever NASA decides is fine with me, because NASA knows they have to live with the results. This is where we find out if the new associate administrator for the Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate, Douglas Loverro, is up to the job. Bill Gerstenmaier's decision on such a matter would have been instantly respected, so Loverro has to use this issue as an opportunity to show why his decisions merit the same level of respect.
If we don't continuously lower the cost to access space, how are we ever going to afford to expand humanity out into space?

Offline S.Paulissen

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 443
  • Boston
  • Liked: 334
  • Likes Given: 511
"An expert is a person who has found out by his own painful experience all the mistakes that one can make in a very narrow field." -Niels Bohr
Poster previously known as Exclavion going by his real name now.

Offline Comga

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6503
  • Liked: 4623
  • Likes Given: 5356
Re: Commercial Crew - Discussion Thread 3
« Reply #226 on: 01/30/2020 03:29 am »
https://www.reddit.com/r/Starliner/comments/evn92n/boeing_incurs_a_410_million_charge_to_provision/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
Should we take this to mean that the internal Starliner marginal cost is $410 million?

This is also posted in the Starliner Update thread and in the CST-100 Starliner Discussion thread:

Boeing seems to think a repeat unmanned test flight is a real possibility, or simply scraping around for plausible accounting writeoffs?

https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/29/boeing-reports-a-410m-charge-in-case-nasa-decides-starliner-needs-another-uncrewed-launch/


Wouldn’t it be more organized to keep the discussion over there, rather than a parallel discussion in this general Commercial Crew thread?
What kind of wastrels would dump a perfectly good booster in the ocean after just one use?

Offline cebri

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 246
  • Spain
  • Liked: 291
  • Likes Given: 181
Re: Commercial Crew - Discussion Thread 3
« Reply #227 on: 02/07/2020 04:26 pm »
NASA Shares Initial Findings from Boeing Starliner Orbital Flight Test Investigation

https://blogs.nasa.gov/commercialcrew/2020/02/07/nasa-shares-initial-findings-from-boeing-starliner-orbital-flight-test-investigation/

NASA and Boeing will host a media teleconference at 3:30 p.m. EST Friday, Feb. 7, to discuss the status of the joint independent review team investigation into the primary issues detected during the company’s uncrewed Orbital Flight Test in December.

https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-boeing-to-provide-update-on-starliner-orbital-flight-test-reviews

"It's kind of amazing that a window of opportunity is open for life to beyond Earth, and we don't know how long this window is gonna be open" Elon Musk
"If you want to see an endangered species, get up and look in the mirror." John Young

Offline yg1968

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17542
  • Liked: 7280
  • Likes Given: 3119
Re: Commercial Crew - Discussion Thread 3
« Reply #228 on: 02/07/2020 10:27 pm »
Interesting Tweets by Lori Garver:

https://twitter.com/Lori_Garver/status/1225919829569343489

https://twitter.com/Lori_Garver/status/1225919970225393665

She mentions that she fought with Gerst to have two commercial crew providers (since he only wanted one which was Boeing).
« Last Edit: 02/07/2020 10:40 pm by yg1968 »

Offline ugordan

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8562
    • My mainly Cassini image gallery
  • Liked: 3631
  • Likes Given: 775
Re: Commercial Crew - Discussion Thread 3
« Reply #229 on: 02/08/2020 12:38 pm »
During that telecon, Doug Loverro admitted that NASA's oversight was insufficient and that the independent review team had recommendations for NASA as well. Could the fallout from this Starliner story mean that additional (re)reviews are instigated on SpaceX software as well?

Offline kevinof

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1594
  • Somewhere on the boat
  • Liked: 1869
  • Likes Given: 1262
Re: Commercial Crew - Discussion Thread 3
« Reply #230 on: 02/08/2020 12:52 pm »
That was my thought exactly. Given the political nature of Nasa and it's overlords, I would not be surprised if they include SpaceX in the review.



During that telecon, Doug Loverro admitted that NASA's oversight was insufficient and that the independent review team had recommendations for NASA as well. Could the fallout from this Starliner story mean that additional (re)reviews are instigated on SpaceX software as well?

Offline hplan

  • Member
  • Posts: 85
  • Michigan, USA
  • Liked: 79
  • Likes Given: 13
Re: Commercial Crew - Discussion Thread 3
« Reply #231 on: 02/08/2020 12:55 pm »
This will result in intensive external scrutiny of Boeing’s software development and testing procedures.

But will ASAP’s other recommendation, that _NASA’s_ procedures need review, result in an intensive external review of NASA?

Offline jak Kennedy

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 265
  • Liked: 137
  • Likes Given: 760
Re: Commercial Crew - Discussion Thread 3
« Reply #232 on: 02/08/2020 01:01 pm »
https://www.reddit.com/r/Starliner/comments/evn92n/boeing_incurs_a_410_million_charge_to_provision/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
Should we take this to mean that the internal Starliner marginal cost is $410 million?

Boeing is setting the bar for what they will charge NASA per flight for the next round after CCtCap.  :o
... the way that we will ratchet up our species, is to take the best and to spread it around everybody, so that everybody grows up with better things. - Steve Jobs

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50808
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85322
  • Likes Given: 38210
Re: Commercial Crew - Discussion Thread 3
« Reply #233 on: 02/11/2020 03:23 pm »
Quote
SpaceX set to launch NASA astronauts first after Boeing narrowly avoids catastrophe in space
By Eric Ralph
Posted on February 11, 2020

SpaceX is set to become the first private company to launch NASA astronauts as few as three months from now, all but guaranteed after Boeing’s competing Starliner spacecraft narrowly avoided a catastrophe in space on its orbital launch debut.

https://www.teslarati.com/spacex-first-private-nasa-astronaut-launch-boeing-catastrophe/

Offline cebri

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 246
  • Spain
  • Liked: 291
  • Likes Given: 181
Re: Commercial Crew - Discussion Thread 3
« Reply #234 on: 02/12/2020 10:07 am »
I hate that "all but guaranteed". Fingers crossed everything goes well for both suppliers from now on. The last year has been a wake up call for everyone. Test, retest, challenge your own assumptions, keep growing.
"It's kind of amazing that a window of opportunity is open for life to beyond Earth, and we don't know how long this window is gonna be open" Elon Musk
"If you want to see an endangered species, get up and look in the mirror." John Young

Offline cebri

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 246
  • Spain
  • Liked: 291
  • Likes Given: 181
Re: Commercial Crew - Discussion Thread 3
« Reply #235 on: 02/15/2020 09:43 am »
https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacex/2020/02/14/spacex-crew-dragon-arrives-for-demo-2-mission/


@spacex

Quote
The SpaceX Crew Dragon spacecraft for its first crew launch from American soil has arrived at the launch site. NASA and SpaceX are preparing for the company’s first flight test with astronauts to the International Space Station as part of the agency’s Commercial Crew Program.

The SpaceX Crew Dragon will launch atop a Falcon 9 rocket with NASA astronauts Bob Behnken and Doug Hurley from historic Launch Complex 39A from NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida. The spacecraft now will undergo final testing and prelaunch processing in a SpaceX facility on nearby Cape Canaveral Air Force Station.
"It's kind of amazing that a window of opportunity is open for life to beyond Earth, and we don't know how long this window is gonna be open" Elon Musk
"If you want to see an endangered species, get up and look in the mirror." John Young

Offline Comga

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6503
  • Liked: 4623
  • Likes Given: 5356
Re: Commercial Crew - Discussion Thread 3
« Reply #236 on: 02/21/2020 05:49 am »
https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacex/2020/02/14/spacex-crew-dragon-arrives-for-demo-2-mission/

Quote
The SpaceX Crew Dragon spacecraft for its first crew launch from American soil has arrived at the launch site. NASA and SpaceX are preparing for the company’s first flight test with astronauts to the International Space Station as part of the agency’s Commercial Crew Program.

The SpaceX Crew Dragon will launch atop a Falcon 9 rocket with NASA astronauts Bob Behnken and Doug Hurley from historic Launch Complex 39A from NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida. The spacecraft now will undergo final testing and prelaunch processing in a SpaceX facility on nearby Cape Canaveral Air Force Station.

But did you read the earlier version before they ... tempered their enthusiasm and added the two words in bold?😉

It’s like those old Star Trek episodes where Spock smiles broadly before regaining his Vulcan composure.
What kind of wastrels would dump a perfectly good booster in the ocean after just one use?

Offline Comga

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6503
  • Liked: 4623
  • Likes Given: 5356
Re: Commercial Crew - Discussion Thread 3
« Reply #237 on: 02/24/2020 07:56 pm »
Trying to remember from the shuttle days, but that seems the usual way astronauts are loaded up on the astrovan. That's probably so that they get photographed and be seen by the public when they are getting on it.

Edit, I remembered correctly:


Looks like a prequel for Commercial Crew.  Ferguson, Hurley,... Even Reisman
Hurley: "I don't know if any of us will get to fly on the next vehicle, whatever that vehicle will be, US vehicle."
But we are pretty close to knowing.
What kind of wastrels would dump a perfectly good booster in the ocean after just one use?

Offline Yxalag

  • Member
  • Posts: 21
  • Liked: 28
  • Likes Given: 22

Offline woods170

  • IRAS fan
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12192
  • IRAS fan
  • The Netherlands
  • Liked: 18491
  • Likes Given: 12560

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0