Author Topic: DoD seeks solutions for a self-contained and free flying orbital outpost  (Read 8963 times)

Offline whitelancer64

I think a lot of people here are getting too hung up on specific details of the requirements. The key thing here is they're looking for a space station. Not an ISS addon, not a cargo vehicle

The time to think through what is needed is before the contracts are granted. Requirement modifications are just the cost of a handful of people sitting in an office. Plus the cost of a typist producing a new document. Both the current state and what is expected to happen in the next 10 years needs including.

So does the military space station need a Common Berthing Module or a NASA Docking System (also know as IDSS)?
Can CBM be unberthed by remote control?

Are any of the ISS and LOP-G standards appropriate such as electrical voltage levels?

Robotic arms can be remotely controlled, we do this all the time on Mars. The one on the ISS "can" be remotely operated, but I do not think that has ever been done. It is much much faster to command the robotic arm in real time.
"One bit of advice: it is important to view knowledge as sort of a semantic tree -- make sure you understand the fundamental principles, ie the trunk and big branches, before you get into the leaves/details or there is nothing for them to hang on to." - Elon Musk
"There are lies, damned lies, and launch schedules." - Larry J

Offline Bananas_on_Mars

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 554
  • Liked: 448
  • Likes Given: 282
Robotic arms can be remotely controlled, we do this all the time on Mars. The one on the ISS "can" be remotely operated, but I do not think that has ever been done. It is much much faster to command the robotic arm in real time.

Controlling the robotic arm remotely is done all the time on ISS.

IIRC when berthing Cygnus or Dragon, the crew on board does the grappling, but the translation to the docking ports is controlled by a ground team. Also a lot of the recent battery replacement activities were done remotely from the ground. Crew time on ISS is much more valuable than Controllers on the ground.

Offline Zed_Noir

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5490
  • Canada
  • Liked: 1811
  • Likes Given: 1302
....

Is there anything the cargo dragon has that the crew dragon no longer has? Otherwise, just modify a crew dragon...

Common Berthing Port. Dragon 2/Crewed Dragon can not installed it.

Offline leovinus

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1178
  • Porto, Portugal
  • Liked: 924
  • Likes Given: 1828
One year later, and it seems like SNC was awarded the contract.

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/34840/the-pentagon-moves-to-launch-its-own-experimental-mini-space-station

Quote
The Sierra Nevada Corporation recently received a Pentagon contract to craft an experimental space outpost capable of supporting various research and development, training, and operational missions, including potentially with humans aboard.

Quote
On July 14, 2020, the Nevada-headquartered aerospace company announced the deal with the Defense Innovation Unit (DIU), but did not state the approximate value of the award.

Also mentioned in the SNC update thread

Quote
OZMENS’ SNC SELECTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TO DESIGN, DEVELOP UNMANNED ORBITAL OUTPOST PROTOTYPE

Proposed Design Leverages Existing Commercial Tech to Achieve Savings in Cost, Schedule

SPARKS, Nev., July 14, 2020 – Sierra Nevada Corporation (SNC), the global aerospace and national security leader owned by Eren and Fatih Ozmen, was awarded a contract to repurpose SNC’s Shooting Star transport vehicle as a proposed commercial solution for an Unmanned Orbital Outpost – essentially a scalable, autonomous space station for experiments and logistics demonstrations – by the Defense Innovation Unit (DIU). SNC’s Shooting Star transport vehicle serves as the core structure for the proposed design.

Offline Eer

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 644
  • Liked: 479
  • Likes Given: 963
From "The Rhetoric of Interstellar Flight", by Paul Gilster, March 10, 2011: We’ll build a future in space one dogged step at a time, and when asked how long humanity will struggle before reaching the stars, we’ll respond, “As long as it takes.”

Offline Bananas_on_Mars

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 554
  • Liked: 448
  • Likes Given: 282
One year later, and it seems like SNC was awarded the contract.

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/34840/the-pentagon-moves-to-launch-its-own-experimental-mini-space-station


So, ... scaled up X-37B kinda thing?
No, Shooting Star is the Cargo Section/ Service Module of Dreamchaser that would normally be jettisoned prior to reentry and would burn up in the atmosphere. That‘s why it’s called Shooting Star. It‘s not the winged Spaceplane called Dreamchaser.

Offline Eer

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 644
  • Liked: 479
  • Likes Given: 963
One year later, and it seems like SNC was awarded the contract.

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/34840/the-pentagon-moves-to-launch-its-own-experimental-mini-space-station


So, ... scaled up X-37B kinda thing?
No, Shooting Star is the Cargo Section/ Service Module of Dreamchaser that would normally be jettisoned prior to reentry and would burn up in the atmosphere. That‘s why it’s called Shooting Star. It‘s not the winged Spaceplane called Dreamchaser.
Thanks for the correction
From "The Rhetoric of Interstellar Flight", by Paul Gilster, March 10, 2011: We’ll build a future in space one dogged step at a time, and when asked how long humanity will struggle before reaching the stars, we’ll respond, “As long as it takes.”

Offline Rocket Science

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10586
  • NASA Educator Astronaut Candidate Applicant 2002
  • Liked: 4548
  • Likes Given: 13523
Sound a bit like MOL in some ways...
"The laws of physics are unforgiving"
~Rob: Physics instructor, Aviator

Offline leovinus

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1178
  • Porto, Portugal
  • Liked: 924
  • Likes Given: 1828
Sound a bit like MOL in some ways...

Also mentioned in this article https://breakingdefense.com/2020/07/sierra-nevada-wins-diu-contract-for-experimental-space-station/

Quote
The Defense Innovation Unit (DIU) picked Sierra Nevada Corp’s “Shooting Star” spacecraft, originally designed to carry payloads to the ISS for NASA, as its “Unmanned Orbital Outpost” space station to test capabilities — and perhaps in future serve as on-orbit fuel stations or logistics hubs.

Offline Rocket Science

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10586
  • NASA Educator Astronaut Candidate Applicant 2002
  • Liked: 4548
  • Likes Given: 13523
Sound a bit like MOL in some ways...

Also mentioned in this article https://breakingdefense.com/2020/07/sierra-nevada-wins-diu-contract-for-experimental-space-station/

Quote
The Defense Innovation Unit (DIU) picked Sierra Nevada Corp’s “Shooting Star” spacecraft, originally designed to carry payloads to the ISS for NASA, as its “Unmanned Orbital Outpost” space station to test capabilities — and perhaps in future serve as on-orbit fuel stations or logistics hubs.
Perhaps related to the Space Force...
"The laws of physics are unforgiving"
~Rob: Physics instructor, Aviator

Offline dror

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 730
  • Israel
  • Liked: 245
  • Likes Given: 593
One year later, and it seems like SNC was awarded the contract.

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/34840/the-pentagon-moves-to-launch-its-own-experimental-mini-space-station

They are actually the third company to win such a contract according to this article:

https://spacenews.com/three-companies-studying-orbital-outpost-space-station-concepts-for-defense-department/

Quote
The same database also shows that DIU issued a second award to Nanoracks for $389,900 in late 2019 for the same project.
Quote
A third company, Arkisys, received $366,000 from DIU for the Orbital Outpost project in March. 
Space is hard immensely complex and high risk !

Offline dror

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 730
  • Israel
  • Liked: 245
  • Likes Given: 593
I wonder why dragon 1 or dragon XL, or cygnus and starliner weren't considered or chosen. Was it cost or compatibility, or lack of interest?
 or maybe there is phase 2 coming?
Space is hard immensely complex and high risk !

Offline ChrisWilson68

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5261
  • Sunnyvale, CA
  • Liked: 4992
  • Likes Given: 6458
I wonder why dragon 1 or dragon XL, or cygnus and starliner weren't considered or chosen. Was it cost or compatibility, or lack of interest?
 or maybe there is phase 2 coming?

Since this round of contracts was just for studies, I don't think it's very meaningful.  SpaceX, Boeing, and NGIS might just not want to bother with such small-scale study contracts.  If and when there is a contract available for actually building hardware, then you might see more interest from the bigger companies.

It might also be as simple as Dragon, Cygnus, and Starliner already being so well-developed that a study contract like this just isn't needed at all for them.

Offline john smith 19

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10444
  • Everyplaceelse
  • Liked: 2492
  • Likes Given: 13762
Possibly, something that was tested out on the X-37B worked super well.
I think this might have something to do with it.

The X37b's have done several long duration missions, serving effectively as temporary satellites.  Part of that has probably been space qualifying new parts to guard against obsolescence. But someone has realized that this also ties up all the structure, TPS and GNC of a very flexible vehicle.  So.

Have an X37b take the package to orbit, connect it up to outpost for long term testing, while keeping any short term experiments in the bay for return to earth for study or to dump data if it's data rate or volume is too high.
X37b get turned around for new missions while outpost runs the parts for long term soak test. Then X37b returns to collect them for analysis to see how well they've survived being cooked on orbit for X days.
Firstly note that 1m^3 is tiny for humans. I'm picturing this as a "glove box in space"

A CBM means (in principle) you could cluster a bunch of these together to get a bigger unit. That moves you from "knee hole space under a desk" up to "broom closet".  :(

That said human rating could just be to allow it to be linked to ISS if the need arose without any issues.

As usual you wonder what are the DoD not saying that only their preferred winner would know.

My guess was wheather it would need to fit inside the payload bay of an X37b but probably not. 
MCT ITS BFR SS. The worlds first Methane fueled FFSC engined CFRP SS structure A380 sized aerospaceplane tail sitter capable of Earth & Mars atmospheric flight.First flight to Mars by end of 2022 2027?. T&C apply. Trust nothing. Run your own #s "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof" R. Simberg."Competitve" means cheaper ¬cheap SCramjet proposed 1956. First +ve thrust 2004. US R&D spend to date > $10Bn. #deployed designs. Zero.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1