Author Topic: Star Wars:The Rise Of Skywalker  (Read 63532 times)

Offline Hauerg

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 901
  • Berndorf, Austria
  • Liked: 520
  • Likes Given: 2575
Re: Star Wars:The Rise Of Skywalker
« Reply #100 on: 12/23/2019 10:37 am »
Could it have been better?
Of course.

Could it have been worse?
Of course. A lot.

And it was "good enough" that my wife decided yesterday that we will have to watch 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 again soonish.
« Last Edit: 12/25/2019 08:47 am by Hauerg »

Offline sanman

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6088
  • Liked: 1369
  • Likes Given: 8
Re: Star Wars:The Rise Of Skywalker
« Reply #101 on: 12/23/2019 03:56 pm »
The first few seasons of GoT were anything but an "age-old savior-prophecy". It's not like that in the books either.

Instead it's inspired by all the generic save-the-world superhero theme park ride trash that dominates the big screen nowadays.

The main gimmick was the "Force Dyad" thing between Rey and Kylo, with the former being of Sith descent (Palpatine) and the latter being of Jedi descent (Skywalker) - which is basically like the Jon-Dany thing underpinning GoT. (Notice that GoT showrunners Benioff and Weiss were slated to do a new Star Wars film trilogy, before that fell through.)

They just didn't have a story plan like GoT did, and that led to disjointed, poor execution.
Star Wars is a billion-dollar property, and they managed to squander its potential.


The rumor is that the top job at Lucasfilm will now go to Jon Favreau, who is currently producer for The Mandalorian, having also produced Iron Man and various other hits.
« Last Edit: 12/23/2019 04:38 pm by sanman »

Offline Athelstane

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 386
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Liked: 375
  • Likes Given: 1004
Re: Star Wars:The Rise Of Skywalker
« Reply #102 on: 12/23/2019 04:28 pm »
The first few seasons of GoT were anything but an "age-old savior-prophecy". It's not like that in the books either.

Instead it's inspired by all the generic save-the-world superhero theme park ride trash that dominates the big screen nowadays.


The rumor is that the top job at Lucasfilm will now go to Jon Favreau, who is currently producer for The Mandalorian, having also produced Iron Man and various other hits.

I think it's telling that THE MANDALORIAN is producing something like a hundred times the meme material as the entire sequel trilogy is right now.

Removing Kennedy alone would be a big step in the right direction.

Offline mme

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1510
  • Santa Barbara, CA, USA, Earth, Solar System, Milky Way Galaxy, Virgo Supercluster
  • Liked: 2034
  • Likes Given: 5383
Re: Star Wars:The Rise Of Skywalker
« Reply #103 on: 12/23/2019 06:36 pm »
...
Disney, like a well-tuned corporate empire, has then efficiently brought together a bunch of big name talents to mechanically execute on a plan that had a seed, but no soul. And the results of this are plain for all to see.

J J Abrams, who originally made his name in television and had landed the Star Trek movie reboots, has likewise shown up to do this movie for the paycheque, while also re-capitulating what entertained him in his youth. And that's what he's done in this movie - re-hashed what was done before.

The power of the paycheque and the quarterly profit statement has prevailed, while inspiration and originality have taken a backseat to plagiarism and performing on command.

A lack of vision gave way to free-form arbitrary plot contrivance, which was passed off as pleasing the masses.
Rules and conventions that had evolved for a story universe were cast aside for expediency, and this was branded as boldness and originality.

Original Star Wars: I have a story to tell you.
New Star Wars: It's time for me to $ell a $tar War$ $tory again, so just take whatever I can come up with

This is akin to farming fertile land until it becomes dry dust.
I just have to point out the George Lucas milked Star Wars for every dollar it was worth. The Christmas Special? The special editions changing Mos Eisley from dangerous outpost town into a cornucopia of silly Saturday morning sight gags? Ewoks, Jar Jar Binks? Lucas may have started with "I've got a story to tell you" but it turned into "I've got a cash cow" long before Disney bought it.

Frankly I found the last movie a fine conclusion to the saga. It "brought balance to the Force." I will watch it more times than I can stomach the prequels.
Space is not Highlander.  There can, and will, be more than one.

Offline Oersted

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2953
  • Liked: 4198
  • Likes Given: 2804
Re: Star Wars:The Rise Of Skywalker
« Reply #104 on: 12/25/2019 06:02 am »
In my family we've had a Christmas tradition of going to see the latest StarWars movie the last couple of years. This year we haven't even considered it. The last few times were just increasingly "meh". Talk about a franchise that was run into the ground...

Offline HVM

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 759
  • Finland
  • Liked: 1212
  • Likes Given: 619
Re: Star Wars:The Rise Of Skywalker
« Reply #105 on: 12/25/2019 08:08 am »

Offline libra

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1818
  • Liked: 1230
  • Likes Given: 2357
Re: Star Wars:The Rise Of Skywalker
« Reply #106 on: 12/25/2019 09:08 am »
With the movies truly at the end of their rope (and the Skywalker saga concluding)
In  stark contrast with the raving critics of The Mandalorian

I'm left wondering - whatif Star Wars future (and possible renewal / redemption) belonged to SERIES ?

We are, possibly, at a turning point.

As shown by The Mandalorian, Star Wars basic settings/ universe, which made a large part of the original trilogy, can be better explored / exploited, at length, in a serie rather than in a movie. Plus in a serie one can develop brand new characters with more depth than in a movie.

Offline ChrisWilson68

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5261
  • Sunnyvale, CA
  • Liked: 4992
  • Likes Given: 6458
Re: Star Wars:The Rise Of Skywalker
« Reply #107 on: 12/25/2019 01:58 pm »
With the movies truly at the end of their rope (and the Skywalker saga concluding)
In  stark contrast with the raving critics of The Mandalorian

I'm left wondering - whatif Star Wars future (and possible renewal / redemption) belonged to SERIES ?

We are, possibly, at a turning point.

As shown by The Mandalorian, Star Wars basic settings/ universe, which made a large part of the original trilogy, can be better explored / exploited, at length, in a serie rather than in a movie. Plus in a serie one can develop brand new characters with more depth than in a movie.

I think a movie just as good as the Mandalorian could have been made.  They just didn't have the right people making the recent movies.

Offline HVM

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 759
  • Finland
  • Liked: 1212
  • Likes Given: 619
Re: Star Wars:The Rise Of Skywalker
« Reply #108 on: 12/25/2019 05:31 pm »

Offline sanman

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6088
  • Liked: 1369
  • Likes Given: 8
Re: Star Wars:The Rise Of Skywalker
« Reply #109 on: 12/25/2019 06:17 pm »
With the movies truly at the end of their rope (and the Skywalker saga concluding)
In  stark contrast with the raving critics of The Mandalorian

I'm left wondering - whatif Star Wars future (and possible renewal / redemption) belonged to SERIES ?

We are, possibly, at a turning point.

As shown by The Mandalorian, Star Wars basic settings/ universe, which made a large part of the original trilogy, can be better explored / exploited, at length, in a serie rather than in a movie. Plus in a serie one can develop brand new characters with more depth than in a movie.

Yeah, I was thinking the same thing - not just for Star Wars, but for anything - because big budget streaming serials are now the premier form of entertainment, having displaced cinema movie releases. Maybe even George Lucas might be able to see this writing on the wall, and figure out a way to use this to get himself more involved in storytelling again.

Offline HVM

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 759
  • Finland
  • Liked: 1212
  • Likes Given: 619
Re: Star Wars:The Rise Of Skywalker
« Reply #110 on: 12/26/2019 08:34 pm »
Don't worry be like Gus Johnson:

Re: Star Wars:The Rise Of Skywalker
« Reply #111 on: 12/27/2019 12:05 am »
The head of Disney's newly-purchased Lucasfilm, Kathleen Kennedy, was tasked to oversee the production of this new trilogy while not having any over-arching story plan for it beyond just an imported cloned premise.

Kennedy was never an 'idea' person, she is the money producer, an experienced producer who was with Lucas and Spielberg for decades. who's job it was to oversee the nuts and bolts of a production but not the creativity. To use an example of another franchise, she is Star War's version of Rick Berman. A guy who should never write a script as he proved many times. Unlike Berman, Kennedy has no Michael Pillar, Ira Behr or Ron Moore.

It has been discussed around the trade sites that she also wanted to deviate from the Marvel format, where the creatives, directors/writers are basically restrained from being creative. They have to fit within a story and style that is created by a handful of people, overseen by one man, Kevin Feige. Kennedy's intent was to give each writer/director pretty much carte blanche with where they went on the story and she had outline where it would end up. Which is why you go from the Force Awakens to the out of left field, wtf was that The Last Jedi.

If you have ever paid much attention to JJ's interviews you will notice one thing, he throws crap at the wall and sees what sticks. And while he was promoted as the idea guy for all three movies it is now painfully obvious that actually he did his usual, came up with a bunch of ideas in the original movie that the following creators could pick up and carry forward or abandon as they wanted. If he didn't stick around because of his work load or whatever it is obvious he had no start at A and finish at C type of story in mind either.

Quote
George Lucas was retired from the franchise after having cashed out, he had no real role or stake in architecting such an arc.

Actually George was/is far from out emotionally at least. He's been throwing a temper tantrum for years that Disney refused to follow his plotted out story arc for the final three movies. My thoughts on that is he sold the franchise off. If he wanted control he could have kept it, Disney chose though to put him out to pasture so to speak. So he wanted his movies, but he no longer owned it. And evidently the story delt with the micro universe of the midi-chlorians... Ack!

Quote
J J Abrams, who originally made  name in television and had landed the Star Trek movie reboots, has likewise shown up to do this movie for the paycheque

I believe that is unfair to JJ. He returned to save the last movie after they crap canned the director/writer who evidently was doing a worse job than Rian Johnson. If that is even possible. This is entirely Kennedy's fault who instead of having an outline that at least detailed something of a story arc for all three movies with a specific destination for the final one, decided to let the creatives do as they wish, go where they want. While Lucas obviously played fast and loose with how his storyline played out and who some of the characters were, he still had a final destination for Return of the Jedi and that didn't change much. That can't be said for this trilogy.

Quote
The power of the paycheque and the quarterly profit statement has prevailed, while inspiration and originality have taken a backseat to plagiarism and performing on command.

If it wasn't there to make money it wouldn't exist in the first place.

Quote
Original Star Wars: I have a story to tell you.

Sorry but if you study the history of star Wars it is blatantly obvious that the 'story' was a money grab. Lucas has always been a better businessman than a writer. He knew that even if Star Wars was a middling movie or even a bomb he could make a lot of money off of the toy licenses. In fact he was so worried about Star Wars not being a hit, that to keep the toys going he had Alan Dean Foster craft a screenplay sequel that could be produced for as little as 2 or 3 million and not the 11 million Star Wars itself was costing while filming the first movie.  The screenplay became the novel "Splinter of the Mind's Eye".

Star Wars is really a carefully crafter 2.5 hour commercial for a toy line. Think about it, all those droid designs, aliens... Were they really needed for the storyline? No the storyline for the movie is all humans vs humans with a couple of droids. Did he need so many droid variations for the Jawa scenes? No. Did he need all the aliens for the Cantina Scene? No.

But I don't think even Lucas realized just how big a kids toy commercial it was because as the decades passed he kept revising the original movies to be even more kid "friendly". The most notable change, Han shoots first. Dumbing the movie down to a 5 year old's level. But that wasn't the only change to make them more kid friendly, there is a good youtube video detailing all of the kiddyfaction of Star Wars.

Quote
New Star Wars: It's time for me to $ell a $tar War$ $tory again, so just take whatever I can come up with

When he finished Return of the Jedi, he made it well known he was stopping there because the Special Effects technology just wasn't where he needed it to be for the Sequels. The special editions were used to push the technology to where he needed. We may not like the final results, but Lucas was already a very rich man at the time he started the sequels. He didn't need the money, ILM alone was rolling in the money. He'd adopted a couple of kids and wanted to tell them the story. Unfortunately the story appealed to kids.

Quote
This is akin to farming fertile land until it becomes dry dust.

No it's not. Lucas got to obsessed with it being kid friendly. He started with a movie that was like old Warner Bugs Bunny cartoons. Something a kid could understand but enjoyable for an adult and his last try at it was more like a Saturday morning my little pony show, all commercial for toys. Lucas in his concern for children, got in his own way.

Put the franchise in the rights hands and you'll be crying it's greatness once again. Kennedy wasn't the  right hands. A least not alone. She needs a creative next to her, guiding a story.

Offline libra

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1818
  • Liked: 1230
  • Likes Given: 2357
Re: Star Wars:The Rise Of Skywalker
« Reply #112 on: 12/27/2019 04:25 am »
Quote
Kennedy wasn't the  right hands. A least not alone. She needs a creative next to her, guiding a story.

We need to hire a Sihran or an Oswald (or a Chappaquidick bridge, or a Martha's Vineyard night flight) to shoot her then ?

(ok that was an atrocious, lame joke. I run for cover, with tar and feathers thrown at me. Also rotten tomatoes)

Offline JAFO

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1059
    • My hobby
  • Liked: 895
  • Likes Given: 1007
Re: Star Wars:The Rise Of Skywalker
« Reply #113 on: 12/27/2019 04:30 am »
Would The Mandalorian be getting the same attention if it was with a baby Hutt instead of a baby Yoda?
« Last Edit: 12/27/2019 04:34 am by JAFO »
Anyone can do the job when things are going right. In this business we play for keeps.
— Ernest K. Gann

Offline sanman

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6088
  • Liked: 1369
  • Likes Given: 8
Re: Star Wars:The Rise Of Skywalker
« Reply #114 on: 12/27/2019 06:20 am »
Kennedy was never an 'idea' person, she is the money producer, an experienced producer who was with Lucas and Spielberg for decades. who's job it was to oversee the nuts and bolts of a production but not the creativity.

Creativity was the necessary core of it all, without which the rest was just a wasted mechanical effort.

Quote
It has been discussed around the trade sites that she also wanted to deviate from the Marvel format, where the creatives, directors/writers are basically restrained from being creative. They have to fit within a story and style that is created by a handful of people, overseen by one man, Kevin Feige. Kennedy's intent was to give each writer/director pretty much carte blanche with where they went on the story and she had outline where it would end up. Which is why you go from the Force Awakens to the out of left field, wtf was that The Last Jedi.

Kennedy et al really did not know their own product, or its particular fanbase.

Quote
If you have ever paid much attention to JJ's interviews you will notice one thing, he throws crap at the wall and sees what sticks. And while he was promoted as the idea guy for all three movies it is now painfully obvious that actually he did his usual, came up with a bunch of ideas in the original movie that the following creators could pick up and carry forward or abandon as they wanted. If he didn't stick around because of his work load or whatever it is obvious he had no start at A and finish at C type of story in mind either.

J J Abrams just wasn't the right talent to pull off a new Star Wars trilogy. I get that he was brought in at the last minute, but they needed a more creative vision. They needed some kind of vision, period.
 

Quote
Actually George was/is far from out emotionally at least. He's been throwing a temper tantrum for years that Disney refused to follow his plotted out story arc for the final three movies. My thoughts on that is he sold the franchise off. If he wanted control he could have kept it, Disney chose though to put him out to pasture so to speak. So he wanted his movies, but he no longer owned it. And evidently the story delt with the micro universe of the midi-chlorians... Ack!

Gee, they were going to play up the Midi-chlorians even more? How? "Fantastic Voyage" into the Midi-chlorians?

Quote
I believe that is unfair to JJ. He returned to save the last movie after they crap canned the director/writer who evidently was doing a worse job than Rian Johnson. If that is even possible. This is entirely Kennedy's fault who instead of having an outline that at least detailed something of a story arc for all three movies with a specific destination for the final one, decided to let the creatives do as they wish, go where they want. While Lucas obviously played fast and loose with how his storyline played out and who some of the characters were, he still had a final destination for Return of the Jedi and that didn't change much. That can't be said for this trilogy.

They badly needed a creative vision or story arc. This is a well-defined universe.
 

Quote
If it wasn't there to make money it wouldn't exist in the first place.

Without a story, they're obviously going to fall short on that too.
 

Quote
Sorry but if you study the history of star Wars it is blatantly obvious that the 'story' was a money grab. Lucas has always been a better businessman than a writer. He knew that even if Star Wars was a middling movie or even a bomb he could make a lot of money off of the toy licenses. In fact he was so worried about Star Wars not being a hit, that to keep the toys going he had Alan Dean Foster craft a screenplay sequel that could be produced for as little as 2 or 3 million and not the 11 million Star Wars itself was costing while filming the first movie.  The screenplay became the novel "Splinter of the Mind's Eye".

Star Wars is really a carefully crafter 2.5 hour commercial for a toy line. Think about it, all those droid designs, aliens... Were they really needed for the storyline? No the storyline for the movie is all humans vs humans with a couple of droids. Did he need so many droid variations for the Jawa scenes? No. Did he need all the aliens for the Cantina Scene? No.

But I don't think even Lucas realized just how big a kids toy commercial it was because as the decades passed he kept revising the original movies to be even more kid "friendly". The most notable change, Han shoots first. Dumbing the movie down to a 5 year old's level. But that wasn't the only change to make them more kid friendly, there is a good youtube video detailing all of the kiddyfaction of Star Wars.

Yes, I know that the Phantom Menace was kiddified a lot, which is what generated a fan backlash. Toddler Anakin and the pod-racing was way too kiddyish. The dangerous crime lord Jabba-the-Hutt was reduced to just being a big meanie from kiddy show.
 

Quote
When he finished Return of the Jedi, he made it well known he was stopping there because the Special Effects technology just wasn't where he needed it to be for the Sequels. The special editions were used to push the technology to where he needed. We may not like the final results, but Lucas was already a very rich man at the time he started the sequels. He didn't need the money, ILM alone was rolling in the money. He'd adopted a couple of kids and wanted to tell them the story. Unfortunately the story appealed to kids.

That's why there were things like the Ewok movies, etc.
 

Quote
No it's not. Lucas got to obsessed with it being kid friendly. He started with a movie that was like old Warner Bugs Bunny cartoons. Something a kid could understand but enjoyable for an adult and his last try at it was more like a Saturday morning my little pony show, all commercial for toys. Lucas in his concern for children, got in his own way.

Put the franchise in the rights hands and you'll be crying it's greatness once again. Kennedy wasn't the  right hands. A least not alone. She needs a creative next to her, guiding a story.

They also needed a greater moral message to underpin the story.

Offline sanman

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6088
  • Liked: 1369
  • Likes Given: 8
Re: Star Wars:The Rise Of Skywalker
« Reply #115 on: 12/27/2019 07:48 am »
I just remembered - another example of copying from Game of Thrones was that coin thing which gave free passage through the Empire, no questions asked. That was a lot like the coin from Braavos given to Arya Stark ("Valar Morghulis, "Valar Dohaeris", etc). It seemed like a cheap and useless imitation, when they already have the Jedi mind trick.

Re: Star Wars:The Rise Of Skywalker
« Reply #116 on: 12/27/2019 05:24 pm »
Creativity was the necessary core of it all, without which the rest was just a wasted mechanical effort.

Did you even read what I said? Kennedy's intent was to let each movies creative choose where they went. Rian Johnson went where he wanted to that is for sure. The problem was there was no cohesive storyline for all three movies to keep the directors from going off on tangents.

Quote
Kennedy et al really did not know their own product, or its particular fanbase.

I disagree, Rebel One while it's production was a disaster ended up one of the best movies IMO. Solo was also fan fulfillment that got slagged more because Harrison Ford wasn't playing the character. And unfair point since the guy is in his 70s. Kennedy is also a top producer on Mandalorian. As I said she isn't a creative but when she hires the right person we get gold. We'll see how the upcoming Kenobi series is.

Quote
J J Abrams just wasn't the right talent to pull off a new Star Wars trilogy. I get that he was brought in at the last minute, but they needed a more creative vision. They needed some kind of vision, period.

That's your opinion. I think he was the right choice, IF he is able to dedicate his time to it. But he's bogged down in multiple productions and as Paramount learned that isn't a good thing. He has stretched himself too thing and it has shown over the last several years.

Quote
Gee, they were going to play up the Midi-chlorians even more? How? "Fantastic Voyage" into the Midi-chlorians?

If you want he has several interviews and there are numerous articles out there. But yes he wanted to go into the micro universe of his worst idea ever. Starts at the 10:30 mark. A bit of information, the original draft for what became star wars was called the  Journal of the Whills and it was a multi-generational story about the Skywalker family. The first movie was actually the middle of the original draft. So yes ultimately he was going to dive into the micro universe of his creation. 

Quote
They badly needed a creative vision or story arc. This is a well-defined universe.
It is what the overseer of the universe wants it to be. We don't own it and they can do what they want.
 
Quote
Without a story, they're obviously going to fall short on that too.

Well what everyone decrying the latest three movies fail to acknowledge, they all made shittons of money. We can grouse and whine about how bad TLJ was but it still made Disney lots of money. The franchise is worth billions, period and isn't showing any indications of burning out. As I said above, solo appears to have suffered more from the fan base refusing to accept another actor over Ford. You and I can claim we've been betrayed but the bank deposits are still rolling in.
 

Quote
That's why there were things like the Ewok movies, etc.

I really don't know what your point was. The two ewok movies were the mid 80s. Years before the Special Editions and ultimately the Prequels. They were also done on the cheap.
 
Quote
They also needed a greater moral message to underpin the story.

Yah, whatever. Tell you what, they are looking for the next movie trilogy, write up a spec script.

Offline Chandonn

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1241
  • "Pudding!!! UNLIMITED Rice Pudding!!!"
  • Lexington, Ky
  • Liked: 14
  • Likes Given: 17
Re: Star Wars:The Rise Of Skywalker
« Reply #117 on: 12/27/2019 05:58 pm »
Would The Mandalorian be getting the same attention if it was with a baby Hutt instead of a baby Yoda?

See "The Clone Wars" animated movie...

Offline sanman

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6088
  • Liked: 1369
  • Likes Given: 8
Re: Star Wars:The Rise Of Skywalker
« Reply #118 on: 12/28/2019 11:59 pm »
Did you even read what I said? Kennedy's intent was to let each movies creative choose where they went. Rian Johnson went where he wanted to that is for sure. The problem was there was no cohesive storyline for all three movies to keep the directors from going off on tangents.

Yeah, I'm just saying that what they did on the creative side mattered - ie. just any type of creativity wasn't suitable.
I already commented that they didn't have an over-arching storyline.
 
Quote
I disagree, Rebel One while it's production was a disaster ended up one of the best movies IMO. Solo was also fan fulfillment that got slagged more because Harrison Ford wasn't playing the character. And unfair point since the guy is in his 70s. Kennedy is also a top producer on Mandalorian. As I said she isn't a creative but when she hires the right person we get gold. We'll see how the upcoming Kenobi series is.

Solo did all sorts of things wrong. They even injected woke politics, which detracted from it.

Kennedy being executive producer for The Mandalorian doesn't mean much - it's just a managerial title, whereas the creative force are Jon Favreau and Dave Filoni, and they're the ones who matter.

Quote
If you want he has several interviews and there are numerous articles out there. But yes he wanted to go into the micro universe of his worst idea ever. Starts at the 10:30 mark. A bit of information, the original draft for what became star wars was called the  Journal of the Whills and it was a multi-generational story about the Skywalker family. The first movie was actually the middle of the original draft. So yes ultimately he was going to dive into the micro universe of his creation.


That sounds even more weirdly metaphysical.

James Luceno, who wrote the novel Catalyst, which became the basis for the Rogue One movie, also partnered in writing the Robotech novels for Del Ray publishing. He turned Carl Macek's idea of Protoculture into something like the Force using a quantum physics rationale. So I'm guessing George Lucas would have been trying to do something similar through any storyline exploring the Midichlorians.

I'll check out your youtube link later.


Quote
Yah, whatever. Tell you what, they are looking for the next movie trilogy, write up a spec script.


The anthology stories like Rogue One are a nice idea, filling in the spaces between major Star Wars movie plots.
'Vader Down' has an interesting story concept which could be turned into a movie.

The premise of the sequel trilogy isn't bad, even if plagiarized from Game of Thrones. But perhaps it would require a more detailed treatment in the form of a big-budget multi-season TV series like GoT did, rather than just a few 2-hr movies.

Star Wars helped to usher in the era of blockbuster movies. Now that this era is being superceded by the new era of big-budget TV series on cable and streaming services, then maybe Star Wars needs to roll with the times, or else bow out.
« Last Edit: 12/31/2019 06:28 am by sanman »

Offline GWH

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1745
  • Canada
  • Liked: 1934
  • Likes Given: 1278
Re: Star Wars:The Rise Of Skywalker
« Reply #119 on: 12/30/2019 10:51 pm »
I watched the Rise of Skywalker a few days ago, and didn't hate it as much as I expected. In fact I enjoyed it, although that enjoyment felt entirely superficial. Decent entertainment, but nothing that will stick with me the same way The Empire Strikes Back did.

I thought they tied up the new trilogy well, and finally created a little bit of a bridge to the past 6 movies. But only in that they solved the "problem" they created in the writing. At the end of it the whole affair seemed pretty pointless.


If you want he has several interviews and there are numerous articles out there. But yes he wanted to go into the micro universe of his worst idea ever. Starts at the 10:30 mark.  A bit of information, the original draft for what became star wars was called the  Journal of the Whills and it was a multi-generational story about the Skywalker family. The first movie was actually the middle of the original draft. So yes ultimately he was going to dive into the micro universe of his creation. 

Good post.
In some ways I would really want to know what his intended story was, for the sake of completion and something more coherent.

My biggest problem with the new trilogy is that they introduce this big conflict and characters without any connection to what came before (minus a half assed explanation towards the end). As much as Phantom Menace and part of Attack of the Clones were garbage, at least it all built up to one coherent story - the fall of Anakin and rise of the Empire.

With this new series and how it ties to the overall story there are lots of unanswered themes. How was Anakin ever the "chosen one"? Was it that the whole family needed to eventually get rid of the Emperor (but also not really since someone else did). There are many things that just seem completely pointless. The dyad theme of Kylo/Rei really doesn't make any sense at all in the themes of what came before.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1