Author Topic: Amazon Project Kuiper Broadband Constellation  (Read 194992 times)

Offline Comga

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6502
  • Liked: 4617
  • Likes Given: 5340
Re: Amazon Project Kuiper Broadband Constellation
« Reply #260 on: 04/05/2022 04:33 pm »
This is a major industry-shifting event.

For a very long time lack of demand was cited as the reason for not investing in reuse but after this contract and sanctions against Russia we are actually seeing a shortage of launch capability.

Worth noting there were no wins for Neutron despite the fact that it should become available in this timeframe.

Many people say that all the small-launch providers are just a bubble but with historic demand in the medium-lift sector we're likely to see even more investment. There is an opportunity for additional providers who can jump from small to medium rockets.

I don’t see how this invalidates the idea that small-launch providers are in a bubble. I see 80+ launches for the next big mega-constellation announced today, and not one was awarded to Electron or Astra or Virgin Orbit.

Small launch doesn’t make sense for mega-constellations. If these companies have to develop medium launchers to be viable then they are by definition no longer small launchers.

Not only that, but SpaceX has already done ride shares on Starlink launches.
Every one of these Project Kuiper launches is an opportunity for a moderate payload, a full Electron or Astra or VO or Firefly worth, to tag along, not that any are as yet announce or will happen.

Big rockets flying multiple times per week is that much more competition for the dozens to hundreds of payloads that are supposed to make small launchers sufficiently profitable to justify their current market valuations.

But until such a rideshare is announced, that's about small launchers, not Kuiper.  We can take this discussion there.
What kind of wastrels would dump a perfectly good booster in the ocean after just one use?

Offline r8ix

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 306
  • Liked: 297
  • Likes Given: 94
Re: Amazon Project Kuiper Broadband Constellation
« Reply #261 on: 04/05/2022 04:52 pm »
I think it's interesting (and probably a bit risky for Amazon) that this is 68-83 launches on vehicles which have no flight heritage to date...

Online markbike528cbx

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 172
  • The Everbrown portion of the Evergreen State
  • Liked: 149
  • Likes Given: 89
Re: Amazon Project Kuiper Broadband Constellation
« Reply #262 on: 04/05/2022 05:01 pm »
..snip...

It's exciting to see that many launches under contract, even if they will be 4-5 years behind Starlink.

And slightly horrifying, when you realize Amazon is spending ~$7B on launch -- it makes Starship's development costs look quite reasonable by comparison.

But Amazon is on a timeline and needs must, so...
What is the timeline? 
FCC or ITU document or NSF post would be appreciated.

Offline JayWee

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1021
  • Liked: 1033
  • Likes Given: 2044
Re: Amazon Project Kuiper Broadband Constellation
« Reply #263 on: 04/05/2022 05:23 pm »
I think it's interesting (and probably a bit risky for Amazon) that this is 68-83 launches on vehicles which have no flight heritage to date...
We are at a very unique point in launch history. They have no other choice. The only proven launcher right now you can buy launch on is the Falcon 9 (and ISRO, but they don't have the launch rate).

Offline andrewi

  • Member
  • Posts: 11
  • To Infinity
  • Benalla, Australia
  • Liked: 21
  • Likes Given: 28
Re: Amazon Project Kuiper Broadband Constellation
« Reply #264 on: 04/05/2022 05:29 pm »
Wow - Interesting times indeed..

Have we just seen 3 launch companies commit to big loss making contracts?

Lets assume that the OneWeb-Arianne(Soyuz) quantity deal of 60 million USD per launch was the worst case bargaining point for the Amazon team.  I think a reasonable one.

I don't think Arianne Space, ULA or Blue Origin can make a profit on this contract at 60 million USD per launch.  Potentially they don't either but are thinking that this will reduce their fixed costs (as more launches) and make a larger profit on their normal customer contracts that won't get a discount....  till those customers say well we want discounts as well or we walk (OK Arianne Space customers can't walk and ULA has the AirForce and Spaceforce thinking they are number 1 for the time being till that is tested!)

For sake of rough figures going to assume Falcon 9, Arianne 6, Vulcan and New Glenn all have the same capacity - most unfair to New Glenn - but even if New Glenn had twice the capacity of Falcon 9 was was getting 120 million per launch - I don't think BO would be looking at a profit - conjecture as yet to see prices but I have seen nothing that suggest BO knows how to do anything on a bang for buck basis.

Hmmm 83 launches for 3,236 sats is 39 sats avg per launch.
 9 launches on Atlas (ULA)
38 launches on Vulcan (ULA)
18 launches on Arianne 6 (Arianne Space)
12 launches on New Glenn (BO) with options for 15 more.
which is 77 launches (with opt 15 not counted) - but New Glenn is heavy lift not medium lift so can carry more.
If 7 billion total value then potentially 84 million per launch approx (83 launches).

This post https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=55606.msg2331202#msg2331202  has LEO prices at
$35M  - Soyuz 2.1a     7.0t @ 51.6°   [$5,000/kg]
$50M  - Falcon 9R     15.7t @ 28.5°   [$3,200/kg] (used discount)
$65M  - Proton M      21.6t @ 51.6°   [$3,000/kg] (to be replaced by Angara A5: $70M for 24 tons: $2,900/kg)
$40M  - Vega           2.3t @ 5°      [$17,400/kg] (to be replaced by Vega-C: $40m? for 3.2? tons)
$47M  - GSLV-MkII      5.0t @ 45°     [$9,400/kg]
$80M  - HII-A         10.0t @ 30°     [$8,000/kg] (to be replaced by H3 series starting at $50M for ?? tons)
$115M - Atlas V 411   12.1t @ 28.5°   [$9,500/kg] (To be replaced by Vulcan VC0: $82M for 10.6 tons: $7,750/kg)
$153M - Atlas V 551   18.8t @ 28.5°   [$8,150/kg] (To be replaced by Vulcan VC6: $122M(?) for 27.2 tons)
$175M - Ariane 5 ECA  21.0t @ 5°      [$8,300/kg] (To be replaced by Ariane 64: $131M for 21.6 tons: $6,000/kg)

so re-organising and ignoring inclination etc - I know gross simplification.
Falcon 9R   - $3,200/kg  (but widely assumed based Elon tweets Starlink is more like $2000/kg ie $30M per launch)
Vulcan VC6  - $4,500/kg estimate (maybe issues with space in fairing etc vis FH which I didn't include for LEO)
Soyuz 2.1a  - $5,000/kg (need to beat this figure to make a profit for Amazon contract?)
Ariane 64   - $6,000/kg estimate
Vulcan VC0  - $7,750/kg estimate
Atlas V 551 - $8,150/kg
Ariane5 ECA - $8,300/kg
Atlas V 411 - $9,500/kg
New Glenn   - no estimate but I don't think will beat ULA and Vulcan/kg etc.

Amazon must deploy half (1618) the low Earth orbit (LEO) constellation by July 2026 under regulatory conditions tied to its license. All the satellites have to be in place by July 2029.  ie need to launch 38 sats per month starting 2023 jan to 2026 july (43 months) - so avg 1 launch per month.  Only 36 months for second half - but New Glenn on-line?

The full Kuiper constellation will be deployed in five phases, according to regulatory filings. The first phase includes 578 satellites deployed at 630 kilometres altitude at an inclination of 51.9 degrees.

Fundamentally Arianne 6, Vulcan and New Glenn are all in development and their launch production costs are unknown (ULA is already unhappy about BO prices for BE4 (7 million each?)- not as unhappy as BO is making a loss for each one it sells to ULA?), as are the delivery dates of the actual launch vehicles let alone the ability to be able to ramp these launch vehicles production and get volume discounts - all their suppliers are on notice that they (Arianne Space, ULA and BO) need to deliver these vehicles regardless and no reason to play ball and not up their prices now.....  If Arianne Space, ULA and BO haven't already locked in pricing with their suppliers and they are now in a very poor negotiation position.

Amazon is known as being a very hard negotiating company and I would expect there are penalties in the contract for non performance which will make life hard for Arianne Space, ULA and BO.

So is this a great deal for Amazon?

Not really really - SpaceX is launching Starlink with a marginal cost of 30 Million USD - half the "assumed" cost 60 million for Arianne 6, Vulcan and New Glenn.

SpaceX is already manufacturing Starlink satellites at $250,000 per unit (ver 1.2) and even if the ver 1.5/2.0 are a half million each (with the laser inter-satellite communication links, increased mass and capability) again this is half the assumed cost of any one else in the industry producing Sats at over 1 million each.  Granted yet to hear details on Kuiper satellite.

The financials get worse when you realize that the satellites only last 5 years and need to be de-orbited, and new replacement ones constantly built and re-launched at more than premium prices from Amazon teams point of view and loss making for the other companies involved.  Sad thing is - all the executives will get bonuses for signing the Amazon deal which is unlikely to make money for Arianne Space, ULA and BO.

SpaceX is getting ready for ver 3 of its client base station unit (phase array dish) expected to reduce unit costs from the version 1 at over $3000, the version 2 at $750 (current) and ver 3 expected to be under $400 - no-one else is producing anything at under $2000 grand yet. Granted yet to hear details on Kuiper client base station.

Tesla is known as having the highest margins in the car business - 30% profit on every car - Starlink could have much more (50%) and thats including the yet to be thrown in for free Amazon Prime Video membership just to rub things in! (OK I am having some fun here - but could easily be done!)

So if Kuiper is paying more per launch, per satellite, per client base station how does it compete?

Possibly doesn't have too.  It can possibly make a slim profit matching Starlink prices, while Starlink makes a great profit and funds Starship Mars.  Starlink can only serve so many people with the bandwidth they have.  So will be room for OneWeb and Kuiper.  I am not sure the 30 thousand Starlink proposal will get up or is even practicable- but SpaceX will certainly get their 12,000 node constellation up and running.

Amazon can certainly afford this and so it only remains to be seen if the launch companies can.....  but it is a great opportunity for them if they can reduce their costs to make a profit from it.

I think we can assume that potentially Goggle, Microsoft (Azure) and/or Apple will align with Starlink, while AWS will use Kuiper.

Similarly as Kuiper will use Ariane Space European bandwidth and ground station licensing shouldn't be an issue.  Possibly be a smart move to include a Indian launcher to get them on side as well.

But I could easily be wrong and Amazon may be paying more as a lot of launches are needed by 2026 July and willing to pay the premium.  Now they just need to have a proven tested satellite design - but aside from Starlink and perhaps the new DOD Transport Layer Tranche 1 (at over 9 million per sat) these are not common.  OneWeb not too far away.

Offline JayWee

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1021
  • Liked: 1033
  • Likes Given: 2044
Re: Amazon Project Kuiper Broadband Constellation
« Reply #265 on: 04/05/2022 05:31 pm »
What is the timeline? 
FCC or ITU document or NSF post would be appreciated.
https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-authorizes-kuiper-satellite-constellation
Relevant part:
Quote from: FCC
In its July 4, 2019 application,  Kuiper proposes to deliver high-speed, low-latency broadband services by operating 3,236 satellites in 98 orbital planes at altitudes of 590 km, 610 km, and 630 km.
Quote from: FCC
Section 25.164(b) requires Kuiper to launch and operate 50 percent of its satellites no later than July 30, 2026, and Kuiper must launch the remaining space stations necessary to complete its authorized service constellation, place them in their assigned orbits, and operate each of them in accordance with the authorization no later than July 30, 2029.  47 CFR § 25.164(b).


That means, if everything goes well with the prototypes, 3.5 years for ~half of the 83 launches (they don't have the same number of sats, NG is likely stacked at the end, etc...) meaning, at least 12 launches per year minimum. Should be doable.

Edit: Ninjad by andrewi.
« Last Edit: 04/05/2022 05:36 pm by JayWee »

Online Thorny

  • Regular
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 905
  • San Angelo, Texas
  • Liked: 311
  • Likes Given: 461
Re: Amazon Project Kuiper Broadband Constellation
« Reply #266 on: 04/05/2022 05:35 pm »

That means, if everything goes well with the prototypes, 3.5 years for ~half of the 83 launches (they don't have the same number of sats, NG is likely stacked at the end, etc...) meaning, at least 12 launches per year minimum. Should be doable.


Can these companies (Starlink, OneWeb and Kuiper) petition for an extension due to COVID? Everything in the world has been heavily delayed the last two years. COVID is definitely an "act of God" situation out of their control.

Offline JayWee

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1021
  • Liked: 1033
  • Likes Given: 2044
Re: Amazon Project Kuiper Broadband Constellation
« Reply #267 on: 04/05/2022 05:39 pm »
Amazing post andrewi,
...
New Glenn   - no estimate but I don't think will beat ULA and Vulcan/kg etc.
...
Don't forget there are two prices for NG - "fully expendable" and "partially reusable".
BO would like to sell at the "partially reusable", but that presupposes the ocean landing going well on the first try. Possible, but not entirely likely.

Offline GWH

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1745
  • Canada
  • Liked: 1934
  • Likes Given: 1278
Re: Amazon Project Kuiper Broadband Constellation
« Reply #268 on: 04/05/2022 05:53 pm »
For sake of rough figures going to assume Falcon 9, Arianne 6, Vulcan and New Glenn all have the same capacity - most unfair to New Glenn - but even if New Glenn had twice the capacity of Falcon 9 was was getting 120 million per launch - I don't think BO would be looking at a profit - conjecture as yet to see prices but I have seen nothing that suggest BO knows how to do anything on a bang for buck basis.

Here is a source on what each vehicle will be launching, to help with your analyis:
https://twitter.com/jeff_foust/status/1511340865834430464?s=20&t=0yA96El2k2_Auat3mECElg


Amazing post andrewi,
...
New Glenn   - no estimate but I don't think will beat ULA and Vulcan/kg etc.
...




Don't forget there are two prices for NG - "fully expendable" and "partially reusable".


I've never heard this. Can you elaborate?



Re: Amazon Project Kuiper Broadband Constellation
« Reply #269 on: 04/05/2022 06:27 pm »
So by my count, this is 65 launches before options that Amazon just bought. For reference, there were 51 launches total from the US in 2021; that's all launches sites, and includes smallsat launchers.

The cape will be busy indeed.
Wait, ∆V? This site will accept the ∆ symbol? How many times have I written out the word "delta" for no reason?

Offline JayWee

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1021
  • Liked: 1033
  • Likes Given: 2044
Re: Amazon Project Kuiper Broadband Constellation
« Reply #270 on: 04/05/2022 06:45 pm »

Amazing post andrewi,
...
New Glenn   - no estimate but I don't think will beat ULA and Vulcan/kg etc.
...
Don't forget there are two prices for NG - "fully expendable" and "partially reusable".
I've never heard this. Can you elaborate?
I meant how the BO decides at which price, based on internal costs, it can sell the launch to customer. Not that they offer these explicitely as an option like SX does with FH.

BO says that the NG booster is designed to be reused up to 25 times. If that works as intended, they can offer launch at a certain price which consists of
- (Booster cost/25 + refurbishment) + Upper stage cost + Profit. (the "partially reusable" price)

However, NG is an untested rocket and judging by the SpaceX barge landing & reuse experience, there's a non-zero chance it will take a time to get there. So if you went to BO today to order a launch, the price *might* be closer to:.
- Booster cost + Upper stage cost + Profit. (the "fully expendable" price)

And remember the NG Booster is said to be expensive.

Of course the fact that it's Amazon who is paying for the launches makes it kinda weird. Either BO losses money and Bezos sends more OR it makes Amazon effectively subsidize NG development.

Might explain this from the other thread BTW:
...
New Glenn is capable of placing more satellites up per launch than the other LV's on contract. With a dispenser designed around its unique capabilities it could theoretically do even more.

And yet by count of total satellites launched it will put up only 16% more than Ariane 6, and only 40% of what Vulcan will launch.

That is remarkably dismal for a rocket that is designed specifically for low cost, large volume and large mass delivery to LEO.
« Last Edit: 04/05/2022 07:39 pm by JayWee »

Offline Asteroza

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2910
  • Liked: 1126
  • Likes Given: 33
Re: Amazon Project Kuiper Broadband Constellation
« Reply #271 on: 04/06/2022 12:57 am »

Amazing post andrewi,
...
New Glenn   - no estimate but I don't think will beat ULA and Vulcan/kg etc.
...
Don't forget there are two prices for NG - "fully expendable" and "partially reusable".
I've never heard this. Can you elaborate?
I meant how the BO decides at which price, based on internal costs, it can sell the launch to customer. Not that they offer these explicitely as an option like SX does with FH.

BO says that the NG booster is designed to be reused up to 25 times. If that works as intended, they can offer launch at a certain price which consists of
- (Booster cost/25 + refurbishment) + Upper stage cost + Profit. (the "partially reusable" price)

However, NG is an untested rocket and judging by the SpaceX barge landing & reuse experience, there's a non-zero chance it will take a time to get there. So if you went to BO today to order a launch, the price *might* be closer to:.
- Booster cost + Upper stage cost + Profit. (the "fully expendable" price)

And remember the NG Booster is said to be expensive.

Of course the fact that it's Amazon who is paying for the launches makes it kinda weird. Either BO losses money and Bezos sends more OR it makes Amazon effectively subsidize NG development.

Might explain this from the other thread BTW:
...
New Glenn is capable of placing more satellites up per launch than the other LV's on contract. With a dispenser designed around its unique capabilities it could theoretically do even more.

And yet by count of total satellites launched it will put up only 16% more than Ariane 6, and only 40% of what Vulcan will launch.

That is remarkably dismal for a rocket that is designed specifically for low cost, large volume and large mass delivery to LEO.

I think the complaint there was fully reusable implies Project Jarvis reusable upper stage is a given, which isn't that clear yet.

Offline su27k

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6414
  • Liked: 9104
  • Likes Given: 885
Re: Amazon Project Kuiper Broadband Constellation
« Reply #272 on: 04/06/2022 03:04 am »
Amazon hails progress in driving down Project Kuiper antenna costs

Quote from: SpaceNews
An Amazon executive said the cost to produce antennas for its proposed Project Kuiper megaconstellation is already “well under $500,” even as SpaceX retreats from the subsidized $499 price it charges customers for its operational Starlink terminals.

“I actually think we can go lower, but when you get under $500 you can then start penciling out a business model that scales broadly, globally,” Dave Limp, senior vice president for Amazon Devices and Services, said during the 37th Space Symposium April 5 here.

Amazon has been leveraging its experience in producing low-cost devices at scale, including Echo smart speakers and Kindle e-readers, to bring down manufacturing costs for an antenna that Limp said is about the size of an LP record.

Online tbellman

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 662
  • Sweden
  • Liked: 977
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: Amazon Project Kuiper Broadband Constellation
« Reply #273 on: 04/21/2022 06:26 pm »
Amazon Kuiper Government Solutions has been awarded $67M by NASA as one of six companies to develop and demonstrate a potential successor to NASA's TDRSS network.  NASA plans to buy this as a service.  This award is only for demonstration; actual services will be later procurement/contract.

See this thread for more information.

Offline Mackilroy

  • Member
  • Posts: 74
  • Liked: 104
  • Likes Given: 320
Re: Amazon Project Kuiper Broadband Constellation
« Reply #274 on: 04/21/2022 11:35 pm »
Has anyone said how many Kuiper satellites each Atlas V will carry?

Offline su27k

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6414
  • Liked: 9104
  • Likes Given: 885
Re: Amazon Project Kuiper Broadband Constellation
« Reply #275 on: 09/22/2022 02:08 am »
Amazon and Telesat coordinate their planned NGSO constellations

Quote from: SpaceNews
Amazon and Telesat said Sept. 21 they have finalized spectrum arrangements to keep their planned satellites in non-geostationary orbit (NGSO) from interfering with each other.

The coordination deals “ensure the coexistence” of their broadband constellations, the companies told the Federal Communications Commission in a letter.

Both constellations plan to use Ka-band spectrum to provide broadband services to user terminals.

Amazon secured a spectrum license for its Project Kuiper network as part of the FCC’s 2020 NGSO processing round, while Telesat’s Lightspeed was processed as part of an earlier 2016 round.

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
Re: Amazon Project Kuiper Broadband Constellation
« Reply #276 on: 10/12/2022 04:20 pm »
https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/innovation-at-amazon/amazons-project-kuiper-satellites-will-fly-on-the-new-vulcan-centaur-rocket-in-early-2023

Quote
Amazon’s Project Kuiper satellites will fly on the new Vulcan Centaur rocket in early 2023
2 min
October 12, 2022
Written by Amazon Staff

Amazon created Project Kuiper to deliver fast, affordable broadband to unserved and underserved communities around the world, and our upcoming prototype mission will move us one step closer to delivering on that vision. Our first two satellites—Kuipersat-1 and Kuipersat-2—will be completed later this year, and we are now planning to deploy both satellites on the first flight of United Launch Alliance's (ULA) new Vulcan Centaur rocket in early 2023.

Prototype mission update

ULA is scheduled to provide 47 launches for our satellite constellation, and using Vulcan Centaur for this mission will give us practical experience working together ahead of those launches. The rocket will launch from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida, and our prototype satellites are scheduled to share the ride with the Peregrine lunar lander, a NASA-funded spacecraft from Astrobotic.

Our prototype mission will help us test how the different pieces of our satellite network work together, adding real-world data from space to results from our extensive lab testing, fieldwork, and simulation. We’ll use findings from the mission to help finalize design, deployment, and operational plans for our commercial satellite system, which will provide reliable, affordable broadband to customers around the world.

“We couldn’t be more excited to join the first launch of ULA’s Vulcan Centaur. We’ve already secured 38 Kuiper launches on Vulcan, and using the same launch vehicle for our prototype mission gives us a chance to practice payload integration, processing, and mission management procedures ahead of those full-scale commercial launches,” said Rajeev Badyal, vice president of technology for Project Kuiper. “Our prototype satellites will be ready this year, and we look forward to flying with ULA.”

Alongside preparations for this mission, the Project Kuiper team is starting to scale production to support a full deployment. Our first production satellites—the more advanced spacecraft that will power our commercial broadband service—are scheduled to launch on ULA’s Atlas V rocket. From there, we will begin to phase in the Vulcan rocket alongside newer heavy-lift rockets from two other space launch companies, Arianespace and Blue Origin.

Amazon makes historic launch investment to advance Project Kuiper

Amazon has secured up to 92 launches with ULA, Arianespace, and Blue Origin to deploy its constellation of 3,236 satellites—marking the largest commercial procurement of launch vehicles in history. We also plan to retain two launches with ABL Space Systems, which was originally slotted to carry our two prototype satellites using its all-new RS1 rocket. This diverse launch portfolio reduces risk associated with launch vehicle stand-downs, and gives us flexibility to use different rockets to address different needs for the program.

To support our ambitious deployment plan, Amazon and our partners are investing in new production and launch infrastructure in the U.S. and Europe. Many of those projects are already underway: ULA is expanding manufacturing facilities in Alabama, Northrup Grumman is increasing production and adding capacity in Utah for its solid rocket boosters, and Beyond Gravity is building a second satellite dispenser production facility in Linköping, Sweden.

 More than 1,000 people work on Project Kuiper, and the team is making considerable progress as we prepare to serve tens of millions of customers around the world. Stay tuned for updates on our prototype mission later this year.

Offline Tywin

The knowledge is power...Everything is connected...
The Turtle continues at a steady pace ...

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
Re: Amazon Project Kuiper Broadband Constellation
« Reply #278 on: 10/27/2022 01:56 pm »
https://twitter.com/thesheetztweetz/status/1585629631301832704

Quote
Amazon $AMZN announces Project Kuiper expansion for satellite manufacturing, with plans for a 172,000 sq ft production facility:

https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/innovation-at-amazon/amazon-expands-satellite-manufacturing-at-newly-acquired-project-kuiper-facility

Offline FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50668
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85173
  • Likes Given: 38157
Re: Amazon Project Kuiper Broadband Constellation
« Reply #279 on: 10/27/2022 03:47 pm »
https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1585639889726738435

Quote
Dave Limp, senior vice president of devices and services at Amazon, joins @PostLive to discuss Amazon’s plan to expand broadband access through satellites, his company’s satellite internet technology and ambitions in space.

https://twitter.com/postlive/status/1585657377755480064

Quote
Dave Limp tells @wapodavenport on possibly working with SpaceX to launch satellites: “Yes, we are open to talking to SpaceX. You’d be crazy not to given their track record here.”  #PostLive

Tags: kuiper 
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1