Author Topic: Lynk Global (formerly Ubiquitilink)  (Read 57422 times)

Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10300
  • Liked: 706
  • Likes Given: 727
Re: Lynk Global (formerly Ubiquitilink)
« Reply #80 on: 03/04/2022 12:02 am »
Bump. What is the CURRENT capability of Lynk Global? Can it be used to get text messages from out of places like Ukraine (or Russia)?

Lynk can only operate where it has service agreements with telephone system operators. AFAIK, there is no agreement in Ukraine yet.

Online Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39358
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25386
  • Likes Given: 12163
Re: Lynk Global (formerly Ubiquitilink)
« Reply #81 on: 03/04/2022 06:17 am »
Yeah, that’s pretty easy to arrange in this kind of situation.

Remember that one official begged for Starlink. (And got it!)

But I don’t know how Lynk’s architecture works.
« Last Edit: 03/04/2022 06:20 am by Robotbeat »
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline Asteroza

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2910
  • Liked: 1126
  • Likes Given: 33
Re: Lynk Global (formerly Ubiquitilink)
« Reply #82 on: 03/04/2022 07:52 am »
Regardless they don't have their full IoT constellation either, so their coverage is spotty at best (full IoT constellation was going to be coverage available every hour roughly)

Online Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39358
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25386
  • Likes Given: 12163
Re: Lynk Global (formerly Ubiquitilink)
« Reply #83 on: 03/04/2022 01:35 pm »
Even spotty coverage is useful for getting messages in and out. Virtually everyone has a cellphone.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline Asteroza

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2910
  • Liked: 1126
  • Likes Given: 33
Re: Lynk Global (formerly Ubiquitilink)
« Reply #84 on: 03/04/2022 10:00 pm »
Even spotty coverage is useful for getting messages in and out. Virtually everyone has a cellphone.

Getting the SIM cards there might be problematic (wonder if you could do an eSIM though...)

Online Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39358
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25386
  • Likes Given: 12163
Re: Lynk Global (formerly Ubiquitilink)
« Reply #85 on: 03/04/2022 11:54 pm »
There are still logistics in Ukraine. Small things like SIM cards can get through, perhaps even to some “encircled” cities.

But I don’t think they require a SIM card necessarily, as you say.
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10300
  • Liked: 706
  • Likes Given: 727
Re: Lynk Global (formerly Ubiquitilink)
« Reply #86 on: 03/14/2022 02:16 pm »
Even spotty coverage is useful for getting messages in and out. Virtually everyone has a cellphone.

Getting the SIM cards there might be problematic (wonder if you could do an eSIM though...)

Lynk does not require specialized SIM cards for customers.

Offline Asteroza

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2910
  • Liked: 1126
  • Likes Given: 33
Re: Lynk Global (formerly Ubiquitilink)
« Reply #87 on: 03/14/2022 09:29 pm »
Even spotty coverage is useful for getting messages in and out. Virtually everyone has a cellphone.

Getting the SIM cards there might be problematic (wonder if you could do an eSIM though...)

Lynk does not require specialized SIM cards for customers.

special no, but unless you are doing remote provisioning somehow like an eSIM, they'll need provisioned/activated cards

Offline edzieba

  • Virtual Realist
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6494
  • United Kingdom
  • Liked: 9936
  • Likes Given: 43
Re: Lynk Global (formerly Ubiquitilink)
« Reply #88 on: 03/15/2022 10:36 am »
Even spotty coverage is useful for getting messages in and out. Virtually everyone has a cellphone.

Getting the SIM cards there might be problematic (wonder if you could do an eSIM though...)

Lynk does not require specialized SIM cards for customers.

special no, but unless you are doing remote provisioning somehow like an eSIM, they'll need provisioned/activated cards
A GSM device can still make emergency calls without a SIM present (and on any available network), so clearly there is not a hard technical requirement for presence of a provisioned SIM for basic connectivity (including voice and SMS). That sort of free-for-all setup is not viable for normal service, but for the current emergency situation it's not a concern unless you wish to preserve its use for specific users (e.g. emergency services, military) rather than for general population emergency access - though some sort of whitelisting/blacklisting could be viable based purely on IMEI.

Online Robotbeat

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39358
  • Minnesota
  • Liked: 25386
  • Likes Given: 12163
Re: Lynk Global (formerly Ubiquitilink)
« Reply #89 on: 03/15/2022 12:58 pm »
Is there a thread yet for this company, AST, which doing basically the same thing?

https://twitter.com/AST_SpaceMobile/status/1481987297469997057?s=20&t=0tegY_9jh1iEePfLRiUEBA
Chris  Whoever loves correction loves knowledge, but he who hates reproof is stupid.

To the maximum extent practicable, the Federal Government shall plan missions to accommodate the space transportation services capabilities of United States commercial providers. US law http://goo.gl/YZYNt0

Offline edzieba

  • Virtual Realist
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6494
  • United Kingdom
  • Liked: 9936
  • Likes Given: 43
Re: Lynk Global (formerly Ubiquitilink)
« Reply #90 on: 03/15/2022 02:25 pm »

Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10300
  • Liked: 706
  • Likes Given: 727
Re: Lynk Global (formerly Ubiquitilink)
« Reply #91 on: 03/18/2022 10:37 pm »
Even spotty coverage is useful for getting messages in and out. Virtually everyone has a cellphone.

Getting the SIM cards there might be problematic (wonder if you could do an eSIM though...)

Lynk does not require specialized SIM cards for customers.

special no, but unless you are doing remote provisioning somehow like an eSIM, they'll need provisioned/activated cards
A GSM device can still make emergency calls without a SIM present (and on any available network), so clearly there is not a hard technical requirement for presence of a provisioned SIM for basic connectivity (including voice and SMS). That sort of free-for-all setup is not viable for normal service, but for the current emergency situation it's not a concern unless you wish to preserve its use for specific users (e.g. emergency services, military) rather than for general population emergency access - though some sort of whitelisting/blacklisting could be viable based purely on IMEI.

Lynk operates in partnership with mobile phone operators, so that Lynn’s customers are also the customers of mobile phone operators. Since a cellular user must have a SIM card to be a customer of a mobile phone operator, this discussion about users without SIM cards doesn’t make sense in this topic.

If anyone is all excited about accessing the market for phone users who took out their SIM cards, they can start a new topic.
« Last Edit: 03/18/2022 10:39 pm by Danderman »

Offline edzieba

  • Virtual Realist
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6494
  • United Kingdom
  • Liked: 9936
  • Likes Given: 43
Re: Lynk Global (formerly Ubiquitilink)
« Reply #92 on: 03/19/2022 09:51 am »
Even spotty coverage is useful for getting messages in and out. Virtually everyone has a cellphone.

Getting the SIM cards there might be problematic (wonder if you could do an eSIM though...)

Lynk does not require specialized SIM cards for customers.

special no, but unless you are doing remote provisioning somehow like an eSIM, they'll need provisioned/activated cards
A GSM device can still make emergency calls without a SIM present (and on any available network), so clearly there is not a hard technical requirement for presence of a provisioned SIM for basic connectivity (including voice and SMS). That sort of free-for-all setup is not viable for normal service, but for the current emergency situation it's not a concern unless you wish to preserve its use for specific users (e.g. emergency services, military) rather than for general population emergency access - though some sort of whitelisting/blacklisting could be viable based purely on IMEI.

Lynk operates in partnership with mobile phone operators, so that Lynn’s customers are also the customers of mobile phone operators. Since a cellular user must have a SIM card to be a customer of a mobile phone operator, this discussion about users without SIM cards doesn’t make sense in this topic.

If anyone is all excited about accessing the market for phone users who took out their SIM cards, they can start a new topic.
I think most are more interested in operations where there are no local mobile phone operators (either because the ones that were operating have ceased due to disruption, or because they never existed in the first place) but where commodity phones with a random - provisioned or not - or no SIM card are as ubiquitously available as anywhere else.

Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10300
  • Liked: 706
  • Likes Given: 727
Re: Lynk Global (formerly Ubiquitilink)
« Reply #93 on: 04/01/2022 09:56 pm »
Lynn’s Cell Tower 1 satellite was deployed in orbit today.
« Last Edit: 04/01/2022 09:57 pm by Danderman »

Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10300
  • Liked: 706
  • Likes Given: 727
Re: Lynk Global (formerly Ubiquitilink)
« Reply #94 on: 04/10/2022 06:46 am »
Lynk Global, Inc. (Lynk), the world’s leading satellite-direct-to-phone telecoms company, today announced the successful launch, deployment, and initial on-orbit check-out of Lynk Tower 1. The spacecraft is the company’s sixth ‘cell-tower-in-space’ satellite and is now in position to become the world’s first commercial cell-tower-in-space. Lynk Tower 1 is the first satellite covered by Lynk’s application to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for a global commercial license to operate a satellite direct-to-standard-phone service.

“With the launch of Lynk Tower 1, Lynk is positioned to begin commercial service later this year and provides the world’s first true satellite-direct-to-phone service to citizens across the globe,” said Charles Miller, CEO and co-founder of Lynk. “For our flagship carrier partners, today’s news means that we are only months away from helping them solve the world’s ‘0G Problem’ and enabling their subscribers to connect everywhere.”

Offline su27k

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6414
  • Liked: 9104
  • Likes Given: 885
Re: Lynk Global (formerly Ubiquitilink)
« Reply #95 on: 07/09/2022 11:38 am »
Second commercial Lynk Global satellite still looking for launch

Quote from: SpaceNews
Lynk Global said it is still waiting for Spaceflight to rebook a flight for the second commercial satellite in its cellphone-compatible broadband network, four months after the launch services provider’s space tug was kicked off a SpaceX mission.

<snip>

Lynk Global announced July 5 that it had secured funding from Virginia Venture Partners, the equity investment arm of Virginia’s non-profit Virginia Innovation Partnership Corporation (VIPC), to accelerate its initial commercial services launch in late 2022.

Miller said Lynk Global secured $1 million in funding — the first time VIPC has decided to invest up to its maximum funding cap in a single transaction — which will be used to build and integrate its third and fourth commercial satellites.
« Last Edit: 07/09/2022 11:40 am by su27k »

Offline JayWee

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1021
  • Liked: 1033
  • Likes Given: 2044
Re: Lynk Global (formerly Ubiquitilink)
« Reply #96 on: 07/09/2022 12:00 pm »
Umm, they want to build a megaconstellation with thousands of sats, touting a $1T TAM and... they celebrate raising $1M ? Feels... bad.

Offline su27k

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6414
  • Liked: 9104
  • Likes Given: 885
Re: Lynk Global (formerly Ubiquitilink)
« Reply #97 on: 07/09/2022 01:06 pm »
https://twitter.com/LynkTheWorld/status/1544724878107914246

Quote
@LynkTheWorld wins @mercedesbenz "car2space" Challenge ! Lynk will soon connect hundreds of millions of cars everywhere on Earth using ‘cell towers in space’ -

https://lynk.world/lynk-wins-mercedes-benz-car2space-challenge

Offline Danderman

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10300
  • Liked: 706
  • Likes Given: 727
Re: Lynk Global (formerly Ubiquitilink)
« Reply #98 on: 07/31/2022 04:03 am »
Lynk signs 14th contract — value estimated at >$2B

Lynk signed a “Masters Service Agreement” (MSA) with MTN Group, which is the 8th largest MNO in the world, and the largest in Africa.  This is Lynk’s 14th signed contract with MNOs.

Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 39463
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 33124
  • Likes Given: 8901
Re: Lynk Global (formerly Ubiquitilink)
« Reply #99 on: 07/31/2022 04:30 am »
MNO stands for Mobile Network Operator, for those who wondering what this acronym stood for, like myself.
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0