Author Topic: SpaceX Falcon 9 : SAOCOM 1B : Cape Canaveral : August 30, 2020 (23:19 UTC)  (Read 200271 times)

Offline the_other_Doug

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3009
  • Minneapolis, MN
  • Liked: 2193
  • Likes Given: 4620
So, what would take less time, do y'all think?  Letting SAOCOM and its booster sit at SLC-40 for at least a week, waiting for ULA to get its act together and vacate their pad, or clean up 39A real fast, move the SAOCOM booster and spacecraft over, and fly it from there?  Or even, since Starlink is an internal customer, pull it off the pad at 39A, quick move SAOCOM over, and get it off ASAP?

Would moving SAOCOM to 39A fix the issue?  Or does the southerly trajectory make it a complete no-go to launch SAOCOM from either SLC-40 or 39A until ULA either launches, or complies with a cease-and-desist order to put its toys away and let the other kids use the playground for a while?
-Doug  (With my shield, not yet upon it)

Online hartspace

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 333
  • Liked: 319
  • Likes Given: 151
The trajectory is the problem (overflight of SLC-37).  So flying out of 39A doesn't really solve that problem.

Offline kdhilliard

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1100
  • Kirk
  • Tanstaa, FL
  • Liked: 1606
  • Likes Given: 4197
I've added distances and bearings to my post upthread with the map of the pad locations.

LC-40 is 3.65 km (2.25 mi) NNW (336°) of SLC-37B.
LC-39A is 9.40 km (5.85 mi) NNW (340°) of SLC-37B.

As noted by hartspace, the issue is not distance but one of bearings and trajectory resulting in overflight.  LC-39A wouldn't be any better.

... My understanding was the dogleg happens with stage two. So stage one would not have to fly that close to the coast, which it what an over flight of ULA would do.

Here is the upthread post with Raul's tweet of his unofficial ground track estimate.  (Image attached below.)

Yes, the doglegs are conducted by S2, but the initial S1 trajectory takes advantage of the "capeiness" of Cape Canaveral to get it out to sea after overflying SLC-37B and the string of other (mostly retired) pads north of the cape.

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50713
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85225
  • Likes Given: 38177
https://twitter.com/emrekelly/status/1299756124212785152

Quote
Latest Eastern Range schedule still points to two Falcon 9 launches tomorrow: Starlink from 39A at 1012 ET and SAOCOM from 40 at 1918 ET. Buckle up.

So 45th issues new forecast, range schedule still has flight listed, and yet overflights aren’t permitted. What gives?!

Edit to add:

Also Ben Cooper now lists Delta IV as September but still has both SpaceX launches tomorrow.
« Last Edit: 08/29/2020 05:19 pm by FutureSpaceTourist »

Offline kdhilliard

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1100
  • Kirk
  • Tanstaa, FL
  • Liked: 1606
  • Likes Given: 4197
Emre Kelly:
Quote
Latest Eastern Range schedule still points to two Falcon 9 launches tomorrow: Starlink from 39A at 1012 ET and SAOCOM from 40 at 1918 ET. Buckle up.

So 45th issues new forecast, range schedule still has flight listed, and yet overflights aren’t permitted. What gives?!

Edit to add:
Also Ben Cooper now lists Delta IV as September but still has both SpaceX launches tomorrow.

Interesting.  We also have:
https://twitter.com/SpaceXFleet/status/1299726562229661697
Gavin - SpaceXFleet.com / @SpaceXFleet:
Quote
Here's the full recovery fleet update:

OCISLY droneship and GO Quest have arrived at the Starlink LZ. Ms. Tree will be arriving later today.

Ms. Chief is still at the SAOCOM-1B recovery zone for now. That mission will face further delay because of a range conflict with NROL-44.

I'd have though Ms. Chief would be steaming north if tomorrow's SAOCOM-1B launch was precluded.

Is overflight not such a big deal?

How much time would it take for the ULA team to demate the payload and truck it away?

Edit to add: Might SpaceX be planning a more easterly launch followed by an immediate S1 dogleg to avoid overflight?

(So many questions!)
« Last Edit: 08/29/2020 05:27 pm by kdhilliard »

Online hartspace

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 333
  • Liked: 319
  • Likes Given: 151
Quote
How much time would it take for the ULA team to demate the payload and truck it away?

Probably several days.  And the NRO is not going to do that unless absolutely necessary.

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50713
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85225
  • Likes Given: 38177
Now official:

https://twitter.com/gleesonjm/status/1299774807580520448

Quote
SpaceX is targeting Sunday, August 30th for two Falcon 9 launches – a Starlink mission in the morning and the SAOCOM 1B mission in the evening
« Last Edit: 08/29/2020 06:41 pm by FutureSpaceTourist »

Offline soltasto

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 636
  • Italy, Earth
  • Liked: 1119
  • Likes Given: 40
And here is the webcast link:

Online meekGee

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14669
  • N. California
  • Liked: 14676
  • Likes Given: 1420
Now official:

https://twitter.com/gleesonjm/status/1299774807580520448

Quote
SpaceX is targeting Sunday, August 30th for two Falcon 9 launches – a Starlink mission in the morning and the SAOCOM 1B mission in the evening
Inconceivable!
ABCD - Always Be Counting Down

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50713
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85225
  • Likes Given: 38177
https://twitter.com/ken_kremer/status/1299800752911773696

Quote
#Falcon9 has gone vertical this afternoon for #SpaceX #SAOCOM1B launch slated as the 2nd F9 on Sun Aug 30 at 718 PM ET at pad 40 heading south ! 1st stage to land at LZ-1. So Shiny - and simply Amazing!

Offline vaporcobra

A photo of the fairing via SpaceX.

Edit: And the usual wider prelaunch photo.

[FST: fixed broken 2nd image]
« Last Edit: 08/29/2020 09:08 pm by FutureSpaceTourist »

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50713
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85225
  • Likes Given: 38177
https://twitter.com/erikkuna/status/1299813047209529345

Quote
Ok, here we go. Plotted NROL-44 and SAOCOM-1B together, and played through the SAOCOM-1B launch

The white dot is the point at where Falcon 9 will fall if anything goes wrong. It's never anywhere near SLC-37B.

But would radial debris from an explosion ever be an issue? 🤔🤷‍♂️

Offline soltasto

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 636
  • Italy, Earth
  • Liked: 1119
  • Likes Given: 40
Patch

Online FutureSpaceTourist

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 50713
  • UK
    • Plan 28
  • Liked: 85225
  • Likes Given: 38177
https://twitter.com/spacex/status/1300038419108605953

Quote
Targeting launch of SAOCOM 1B at 7:18 p.m. EDT tonight. Falcon 9 and SAOCOM 1B are vertical on SLC-40. Weather continues to be 40% favorable for liftoff
« Last Edit: 08/30/2020 11:56 am by FutureSpaceTourist »

Offline Elthiryel

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 434
  • Kraków, Poland
  • Liked: 1009
  • Likes Given: 13037
Here's my usual fan-made press kit.

We also have an official confirmation of rideshare payloads.

The first one is GNOMES-1 for PlanetiQ, part of the 20 satellite constellation that will collect radio occultation data by measuring the effects of the atmosphere on navigation system signals.

The second one is Tyvak-0172. It's built by Tyvak Nano-Satellite Systems, but no additional details were given (additional source: https://spaceflightnow.com/2020/08/29/spacex-poised-for-back-to-back-launches-sunday-at-cape-canaveral/).
GO for launch, GO for age of reflight

Offline soltasto

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 636
  • Italy, Earth
  • Liked: 1119
  • Likes Given: 40
version with OCR

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14181
  • UK
  • Liked: 4052
  • Likes Given: 220
How many years is it since we’ve had two launches on the same day from the US, guessing you have to go back to the sixties?

Offline TJL

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1378
  • Liked: 101
  • Likes Given: 163
Believe it was November 11, 1966...Atlas-Agena from LC-14 and Gemini Titan 12 from LC-19.

Offline Bean Kenobi

  • Member
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 590
  • Liked: 383
  • Likes Given: 258
If your question is really "from the US" and not only from Florida, you also have April 4th, 1997 with Titan-2 (DMSP sat) from VAFB and Columbia from KSC.

EDIT : Another one : June 8th, 2007 with Delta II (COSMO 1) from VAFB and Atlantis from KSC.
« Last Edit: 08/30/2020 02:44 pm by Bean Kenobi »

Gemini-8, March 16, 1966 Titan II and Atlas Agena . First docking, Commander was Neil Armstrong

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1