Author Topic: Chang'e-4 lunar operations  (Read 278079 times)

Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40429
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 34447
  • Likes Given: 12704
Re: Chang'e-4 lunar operations
« Reply #140 on: 01/03/2019 03:36 am »
Lunar base by 2030!
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Offline Little Flying Horse

  • Member
  • Posts: 2
  • Hong Kong
  • Liked: 1
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Chang'e-4 lunar operations
« Reply #141 on: 01/03/2019 03:40 am »
Lunar exploration timeline.


They forgot about SELENE (Kaguya)

Offline wahaha

  • Member
  • Posts: 54
  • Liked: 34
  • Likes Given: 9
Re: Chang'e-4 lunar operations
« Reply #142 on: 01/03/2019 03:43 am »
Landing site: 177.6°E 45.5°S
Beijing time: 10:26AM
« Last Edit: 01/03/2019 03:44 am by wahaha »

Offline zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14871
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 9803
  • Likes Given: 103000
Re: Chang'e-4 lunar operations
« Reply #143 on: 01/03/2019 03:44 am »
Professor Yuagong answers a final question about the future of lunar exploration with an expanding number of national players (no mention of commercial exploration/exploitation?), and the possibility of lunar international law to regulate disputes, and the establishment of a "lunar village."
***

Now covering the US Federal partial government shutdown.
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Offline AstroWare

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 301
  • Arizona
  • Liked: 234
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Chang'e-4 lunar operations
« Reply #144 on: 01/03/2019 03:51 am »
Normally I just follow along with the threads here on NSF, but I had to see if anyone else noticed that according CGTN, the SpaceX Starship apperently contributed to this landing? Lol
« Last Edit: 01/03/2019 03:51 am by AstroWare »

Offline Sizzy

  • Member
  • Posts: 34
  • Hongkong
  • Liked: 49
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: Chang'e-4 lunar operations
« Reply #145 on: 01/03/2019 03:53 am »
The first image taken by the CE4 lander
« Last Edit: 01/03/2019 04:13 am by Sizzy »

Offline zubenelgenubi

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14871
  • Arc to Arcturus, then Spike to Spica
  • Sometimes it feels like Trantor in the time of Hari Seldon
  • Liked: 9803
  • Likes Given: 103000
Re: Chang'e-4 lunar operations
« Reply #146 on: 01/03/2019 03:53 am »
Lunar exploration timeline.


They forgot about SELENE (Kaguya)

Their timeline apparently focuses on "firsts"--Hiten was the first Japanese lunar orbiter.
(Plus all Chinese lunar missions)
Support your local planetarium! (COVID-panic and forward: Now more than ever.) My current avatar is saying "i wants to go uppies!" Yes, there are God-given rights. Do you wish to gainsay the Declaration of Independence?

Offline JimO

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2000
  • Texas, USA
  • Liked: 482
  • Likes Given: 195
Re: Chang'e-4 lunar operations
« Reply #147 on: 01/03/2019 04:03 am »
Some background on the target region, one of the most interesting scientific AND resource-utilization regions on the moon, as US scientists realized years ago  ==
Aitken Basin mission, “Astronomy” magazine, Dec 2005

Online Blackstar

  • Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17793
  • Liked: 10611
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: Chang'e-4 lunar operations
« Reply #148 on: 01/03/2019 04:26 am »
Some background on the target region, one of the most interesting scientific AND resource-utilization regions on the moon, as US scientists realized years ago  ==
Aitken Basin mission, “Astronomy” magazine, Dec 2005


A South Pole-Aitken Basin sample return mission was prioritized in the (American) 2001 planetary science decadal survey, and recognized as scientifically important long before then.

Offline chetan_chpd

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 154
  • Please visit: https://chetanaerospace.blogspot.com
  • Pune
  • Liked: 42
  • Likes Given: 38
Re: Chang'e-4 lunar operations
« Reply #149 on: 01/03/2019 04:35 am »
mission control room "erupting" in joy after landing confirmed!

https://twitter.com/news_srb/status/1080698118310645761

Offline SciNews

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 819
  • Romania
  • Liked: 748
  • Likes Given: 7
Re: Chang'e-4 lunar operations
« Reply #150 on: 01/03/2019 06:03 am »
Chang’e-4 lands on the Moon and sends back first images

Offline woods170

  • IRAS fan
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12934
  • IRAS fan
  • Currently not in The Netherlands
  • Liked: 22146
  • Likes Given: 15280
Re: Chang'e-4 lunar operations
« Reply #151 on: 01/03/2019 06:16 am »
The lack of coverage - especially on CGTN - is not just frustrating it is bizzare! >:(

Their program, their coverage.

Live with it.

Offline Svetoslav

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1753
  • Bulgaria
  • Liked: 1312
  • Likes Given: 118
Re: Chang'e-4 lunar operations
« Reply #152 on: 01/03/2019 06:32 am »
Most of the people who demand live coverage of space events are living in Europe and the USA, and our culture focuses too much on instant gratification. People complained on Twitter that New Horizons photos aren't published instantly when they are received on Earth. Even a few hours delay (until the press conference) was enough to annoy certain enthusiasts.

The Chinese understand things differently :) I remember the 2010: Second Odyssey by Arthur Clarke and Tsien spacecraft. Some spoilers : the Chinese never announced what was the purpose of Tsien, and it secretly leaved Low earth orbit to head for Europa. And yes - it was their spacecraft, their right how to operate it and how public it would be.

Actually, there's one thing we can do. If we are unhappy with how other countries operate their missions... then we can ask our governments and countries to make their own missions. Certainly NASA or ESA can do it, right? New Horizons wouldn't have happened without public support. We can do it again.

« Last Edit: 01/03/2019 06:32 am by Svetoslav »

Offline MATTBLAK

  • Elite Veteran & 'J.A.F.A'
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5361
  • 'Space Cadets' Let us; UNITE!! (crickets chirping)
  • New Zealand
  • Liked: 2243
  • Likes Given: 3881
Re: Chang'e-4 lunar operations
« Reply #153 on: 01/03/2019 06:58 am »
The lack of coverage - especially on CGTN - is not just frustrating it is bizzare! >:(

Their program, their coverage.

Live with it.
If you have a point to make - I'm not sure what that is... Why pick on me?! Your irritation mystifies me... (a little)

EDIT: Clarification of my remarks - The Chang'e 3 landing a few years ago was carried absolutely live in great detail. This mission was not - that's what was bizzare to me! They can certainly do what they like - they don't care what a foreigner like me thinks. But your attempted suppression of my opinion is something I would never do to you.
« Last Edit: 01/03/2019 07:06 am by MATTBLAK »
"Those who can't, Blog".   'Space Cadets' of the World - Let us UNITE!! (crickets chirping)

Offline Steven Pietrobon

  • Member
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40429
  • Adelaide, Australia
    • Steven Pietrobon's Space Archive
  • Liked: 34447
  • Likes Given: 12704
Re: Chang'e-4 lunar operations
« Reply #154 on: 01/03/2019 07:21 am »
Short report by CCTV13. The lack of a live broadcast is I think a reflection of what Blackstar pointed out a while ago, that China is becoming more restrictive. The risky Chang'e 3 landing was shown live five years ago and it was great to participate in that moment.

http://tv.cctv.com/2019/01/03/VIDEhQEoDOuWcfY5zyrdFsjr190103.shtml
« Last Edit: 01/03/2019 07:24 am by Steven Pietrobon »
Akin's Laws of Spacecraft Design #1:  Engineering is done with numbers.  Analysis without numbers is only an opinion.

Offline Svetoslav

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1753
  • Bulgaria
  • Liked: 1312
  • Likes Given: 118
Re: Chang'e-4 lunar operations
« Reply #155 on: 01/03/2019 07:33 am »
Let's not forget that a Chinese rocket (Long March 5) suffered a launch failure 1.5 years ago, and it was broadcast live. This certainly had an impact. The landing of Chang'e 4 was very risky -  it truly went where nobody has gone before. Perhaps the Chinese didn't want to risk another failure being broadcast live.

Offline cjx007

  • Member
  • Posts: 20
  • Liked: 7
  • Likes Given: 4
Re: Chang'e-4 lunar operations
« Reply #156 on: 01/03/2019 07:56 am »
Another rumor says (yup, there're always romors for everything), the lack of coverage is due to they don't want to draw too much attentions under current interesting trade war.

Offline gdelottle

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 117
  • Chile
  • Liked: 49
  • Likes Given: 78
Re: Chang'e-4 lunar operations
« Reply #157 on: 01/03/2019 08:14 am »
Is this the first time that China achieves an... absolute "first time" or there have been others in the past, AFAYK?

EDIT: actually two, considering the dual communication system as a separate one and earlier...
« Last Edit: 01/03/2019 08:47 am by gdelottle »

Offline Semmel

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2192
  • Germany
  • Liked: 2460
  • Likes Given: 11989
Re: Chang'e-4 lunar operations
« Reply #158 on: 01/03/2019 08:31 am »
Congratulations China, what a great start into 2019. Please continue and fingers crossed for Boots on the Moon in 2030. Hope there is going to be a race though ;)

Offline Svetoslav

  • Veteran
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1753
  • Bulgaria
  • Liked: 1312
  • Likes Given: 118
Re: Chang'e-4 lunar operations
« Reply #159 on: 01/03/2019 08:32 am »
Is this the first time that China achieves an... absolute "first time" or there have been others in the past, AFAYK?

An excellent question. I may be wrong, but I think the Chinese achieved another first in the past - moon orbiting + asteroid flyby (Chang'e 2 mission). A similar dual mission of the USA (Clementine) was not successful - the spacecraft orbited the moon, but failed to make a scientific flyby of an asteroid.

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0