Slide 32 has this this to say about SpX-18:Quote from: NASA NAC End of May MeetingSpaceX CRS-18 Mission StatusUpmass – 3,310 kg estimated
SpaceX CRS-18 Mission StatusUpmass – 3,310 kg estimated
Quote from: yg1968 on 06/10/2019 12:39 amSlide 32 has this this to say about SpX-18:Quote from: NASA NAC End of May MeetingSpaceX CRS-18 Mission StatusUpmass – 3,310 kg estimatedThat's quite a jump from the ~2,442 kg of CRS-17. Is that because of the IDA, or are they debuting new densified packing techniques?
http://www.launchphotography.com/Delta_4_Atlas_5_Falcon_9_Launch_Viewing.htmlQuoteA Falcon 9 is slated to launch the ISS Dragon resupply mission CRS-18 from pad 40 on July 21 at 7:32 pm EDT.
A Falcon 9 is slated to launch the ISS Dragon resupply mission CRS-18 from pad 40 on July 21 at 7:32 pm EDT.
CRS-11 used the Dragon from CRS-4CRS-12 was the last flight of a new Cargo Dragon CRS-13 used the Dragon from CRS-6CRS-14 used the Dragon from CRS-8CRS-15 used the Dragon from CRS-9CRS-16 used the Dragon from CRS-10CRS-17 used the Dragon from CRS-12CRS-18 CRS-5 or the first third reuse?
Quote from: whitelancer64 on 06/12/2019 02:58 pmCRS-11 used the Dragon from CRS-4CRS-12 was the last flight of a new Cargo Dragon CRS-13 used the Dragon from CRS-6CRS-14 used the Dragon from CRS-8CRS-15 used the Dragon from CRS-9CRS-16 used the Dragon from CRS-10CRS-17 used the Dragon from CRS-12CRS-18 CRS-5 or the first third reuse?On the last CRS mission Hans said the last ones would be third used capsules so I'd say any one of the above already twice-used capsules. The last ones have more probabilities considering they are the last ones out of the production and they introduced a lot of changes from the CRS-8 capsule onwards to improve reuse so maybe next one will be the CRS-9/15 capsule? Or probably the CRS-8/14 capsule? Who knows, but those last ones might have a better chance to be the ones used three times.
B1056.2 has arrived back at Cape Canaveral in Florida for the launch of CRS-18 to the ISS on July 18th. This booster previously launched CRS-17 to orbit (and then returned to land at LZ-1) on May 4th. 🚀
Guys, I'm next to a Falcon 9 just recovered! They just got it back, just as we were passing by the Kennedy Space Center bus!
If I squint really hard, the number looks closer to 47 than to 56!
The ASAP meeting mentioned an EMU going up on this flight.
Quote from: Steven Pietrobon on 07/04/2019 07:22 amIf I squint really hard, the number looks closer to 47 than to 56!Yeah, it's definitely not a B105X booster but the second digit could be a 7 or 9. Does look like the transporter turned around and was backing into the 39A hangar, which is the correct orientation. If I had to guess, SpaceX is just making use of the available space to refurb or store a booster while 39A is inactive, on top of whichever booster was in the hangar as of late June.