Author Topic: SpaceX F9 : CRS SpX-17 : May 4, 2019 - DISCUSSION  (Read 76903 times)

Offline Vettedrmr

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1682
  • Hot Springs, AR
  • Liked: 2282
  • Likes Given: 3420
Re: SpaceX F9 : CRS SpX-17 : May 4, 2019 - DISCUSSION
« Reply #160 on: 05/08/2019 12:15 pm »
With SpaceX scrub, NASA again demonstrates commitment to innovation..

"The agency is investing in keeping the United States on the leading edge."

ERIC BERGER - 5/7/2019, 6:54 AM

https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/05/with-spacex-scrub-nasa-again-demonstrates-commitment-to-innovation/?comments=1

Add to that the question in the CRS-17 pre-launch press conference about why NASA/SpaceX were using a new booster as opposed to a flown booster, and you can see the normative paradigm changing rapidly in NASA.  Already getting into the mindset that flown hardware is at least as reliable as new hardware.  In another few (maybe very few) years new hardware may require higher insurance premiums than flown hardware.

Have a good one,
Mike
Aviation/space enthusiast, retired control system SW engineer, doesn't know anything!

Offline FlattestEarth

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 201
  • Usa
  • Liked: 147
  • Likes Given: 76
Re: SpaceX F9 : CRS SpX-17 : May 4, 2019 - DISCUSSION
« Reply #161 on: 05/08/2019 01:21 pm »
I still don't think it's something on the ground
It could be a shadow of landmass plus shadows of clouds.

https://zoom.earth/#-20.924446,34.058176,9z,sat,pm,2019-03-25

Offline Bananas_on_Mars

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 554
  • Liked: 448
  • Likes Given: 282
Re: SpaceX F9 : CRS SpX-17 : May 4, 2019 - DISCUSSION
« Reply #162 on: 06/04/2019 08:05 pm »
https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1135984202678120448

Judging from the picture, I guess they lost the ripped off umbilical before the hottest phase of reentry. Would have been visible right in the middle of the picture, right?

Offline srcln

  • Member
  • Posts: 20
  • Liked: 45
  • Likes Given: 260
Re: SpaceX F9 : CRS SpX-17 : May 4, 2019 - DISCUSSION
« Reply #163 on: 06/04/2019 08:10 pm »
Judging from the picture, I guess they lost the ripped off umbilical before the hottest phase of reentry. Would have been visible right in the middle of the picture, right?

I think the tail end of it still is visible in the picture.

Offline Joffan

Re: SpaceX F9 : CRS SpX-17 : May 4, 2019 - DISCUSSION
« Reply #164 on: 06/04/2019 09:09 pm »
Less than 24 hours from splashdown to port.
Getting through max-Q for humanity becoming fully spacefaring

Offline Yellowstone10

Re: SpaceX F9 : CRS SpX-17 : May 4, 2019 - DISCUSSION
« Reply #165 on: 06/04/2019 09:28 pm »
I think the tail end of it still is visible in the picture.

Yep, still a little bit of it visible.

Offline joseph.a.navin

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 206
  • Freelance photojournalist/Reporter
  • Elon, North Carolina, USA
  • Liked: 269
  • Likes Given: 226
Re: SpaceX F9 : CRS SpX-17 : May 4, 2019 - DISCUSSION
« Reply #166 on: 06/05/2019 01:34 pm »
Does anyone know how far Dragon was from its target at splashdown? Plus was there any quick offloading?
Elon University class of 2024 | Past launches/events seen: Superbird-A2 on Atlas IIAS (Apr 2004), Discovery OV-103 ferry flight to Dulles (2012), NG-12, OFT-1, NG-13, Crew-2, NG-18

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
0