Poll

What is Elon talking about regarding a new second stage (Nov 2018)?

 A true "mini-BFS"
14 (13%)
A modified 2nd stage
87 (80.6%)
Something else, I will clarify in a comment
7 (6.5%)

Total Members Voted: 108

Voting closed: 12/08/2018 07:06 PM


Author Topic: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage  (Read 2813 times)

Offline whitelancer64

POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« on: 11/08/2018 03:57 PM »
Per the various tweets from Elon Musk that have generated much interest today:

What do you think the intent is? A true "mini-BFS" or a modified 2nd stage?

A or B?

*edit*

or C, "other" please describe :)
« Last Edit: 11/08/2018 07:08 PM by whitelancer64 »
"One bit of advice: it is important to view knowledge as sort of a semantic tree -- make sure you understand the fundamental principles, ie the trunk and big branches, before you get into the leaves/details or there is nothing for them to hang on to." - Elon Musk
"There are lies, damned lies, and launch schedules." - Larry J

Offline cbarnes199

  • Member
  • Posts: 7
  • United States
  • Liked: 2
  • Likes Given: 29
Re: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #1 on: 11/08/2018 04:01 PM »
B

I think they want to use these modified second stages to launch paying customers.  So they need to be very lightly modified in order to serve their primary purpose.

Anything done to a second stage that will be ready to launch by June is not very major.

Offline kevinof

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 682
  • Antibes
  • Liked: 492
  • Likes Given: 513
Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #2 on: 11/08/2018 04:04 PM »
B
An existing, slightly modifed S2 with current MVac.

Offline rpapo

  • Cybernetic Mole
  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1198
  • Michigan, USA
  • Liked: 632
  • Likes Given: 486
Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #3 on: 11/08/2018 04:08 PM »
B.  That's the SpaceX way of doing things.
An Apollo fanboy . . . fifty years ago.

Offline nacnud

  • Extreme Veteran
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2381
  • Liked: 600
  • Likes Given: 237
Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #4 on: 11/08/2018 04:10 PM »
B

Offline lamontagne

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1306
  • Liked: 1779
  • Likes Given: 285
Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #5 on: 11/08/2018 05:04 PM »
A.  Need to test the canards

Offline jak Kennedy

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 142
  • Liked: 41
  • Likes Given: 33
Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #6 on: 11/08/2018 05:10 PM »
A. Although I think the diameter will match the current fairing. If really reusable the mini BFS would not have to be shipped too much.

Offline speedevil

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3187
  • Fife
  • Liked: 1631
  • Likes Given: 1956
Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #7 on: 11/08/2018 05:10 PM »
B).
Carbon chomper, with the maximum diameter of the current fairing. Probably with Mvac initially, but designed to go to Rvac and eventually land propulsively if things go right.

Online tyrred

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 247
  • Seattle
  • Liked: 143
  • Likes Given: 584
Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #8 on: 11/08/2018 05:14 PM »
B (C)

B Modified S2

(C) With aero surfaces "tucked" away during launch, so won't look like B quite so much

Offline saliva_sweet

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 572
  • Liked: 446
  • Likes Given: 1428
Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #9 on: 11/08/2018 06:09 PM »
B

Offline zodiacchris

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 158
  • Port Macquarie, Australia
  • Liked: 230
  • Likes Given: 339
Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #10 on: 11/08/2018 06:16 PM »
B modified first stage, no payload, test vehicle only...

Offline Wolfram66

Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #11 on: 11/08/2018 06:37 PM »
B (C)

B Modified S2

(C) With aero surfaces "tucked" away during launch, so won't look like B quite so much

or new fairing that encapsulates the entire mBFR S2 thus covering the aero surfaces in "Stowed configuration" like Atlas V DreamChaser[TM]

Offline Poole Amateur

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 136
  • Liked: 84
  • Likes Given: 2699
Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #12 on: 11/08/2018 06:51 PM »
B, I believe it to be a test stage only.

Offline Lar

  • Fan boy at large
  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10796
  • Saw Gemini live on TV
  • A large LEGO storage facility ... in Michigan
  • Liked: 7720
  • Likes Given: 5560
Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #13 on: 11/08/2018 07:11 PM »
I have created an actual poll.

A is the first option, B the second and C the third when trying to correlate what people said in early comments to the actual poll.
« Last Edit: 11/08/2018 07:12 PM by Lar »
"I think it would be great to be born on Earth and to die on Mars. Just hopefully not at the point of impact." -Elon Musk
"We're a little bit like the dog who caught the bus" - Musk after CRS-8 S1 successfully landed on ASDS OCISLY

Offline Coastal Ron

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4313
  • I live... along the coast
  • Liked: 2941
  • Likes Given: 3884
Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #14 on: 11/08/2018 07:43 PM »
I chose "B" based on what Elon Musk has said. I'm thinking this won't be a product per se, but just a modification that allows them to incrementally test components for the BFS.
If we don't continuously lower the cost to access space, how are we ever going to afford to expand humanity out into space?

Offline Darkseraph

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 592
  • Liked: 289
  • Likes Given: 124
Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #15 on: 11/08/2018 07:47 PM »
I think the third option:

I believe it will be a transitional vehicle that is not quite a mini-BFS yet (no propulsive landing, no in space refuelling) but the door will be left open to develop it into a full mini-spaceship in order to make Falcon completely reusable or in case BFR is delayed.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." R.P.Feynman

Offline HVM

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 120
  • Finland
  • Liked: 110
  • Likes Given: 98
Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #16 on: 11/08/2018 08:06 PM »
I am pretty sure it going to be dedicated mission just for testing re-entry, regular vac-merlin and tanks but with a heat shield and aerodynamic surfaces. And will look like A.

Offline Kansan52

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1167
  • Hutchinson, KS
  • Liked: 362
  • Likes Given: 417
Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #17 on: 11/08/2018 08:26 PM »
D - Shaped like A and dispenses Matchbook Teslas.

Really though. A if they announce recovery and B if only test. And the A could be a small sat dispenser even with no recovery to pay for some of the costs.

Offline Negan

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 363
  • Southwest
  • Liked: 85
  • Likes Given: 292
Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #18 on: 11/08/2018 08:42 PM »
I chose B because I can't understand how a 2nd stage that carries no payload could be considered an "upgrade" which is the actual purpose of the Falcon 2nd stage!

Upgrade - raise (something) to a higher standard, in particular improve (equipment or machinery) by adding or replacing components.
« Last Edit: 11/08/2018 08:47 PM by Negan »

Offline Doesitfloat

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 259
  • Detroit MI
  • Liked: 343
  • Likes Given: 175
Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #19 on: 11/08/2018 08:44 PM »
Looking at the Manifest, Spacex has the SARah missions coming up.  Those missions were initially sold as F1 missions. They are 3 small satellites but go to different planes. That is 3 potential flights all out of Vandenburg.
Plenty of excess performance to use for this experiment.  The First part of the mission is to deliver a satellite so the payload adapter and fairing are required. Would be great if they were recovered and reused. 

Offline Rocket Science

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9112
  • NASA Educator Astronaut Candidate Applicant 2002
  • Liked: 2981
  • Likes Given: 7946
Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #20 on: 11/08/2018 10:05 PM »
Voted B as part of the full reusability desire for Falcon 9...
"The laws of physics are unforgiving"
~Rob: Physics instructor, Aviator, Vintage auto racer

Offline Zed_Noir

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2562
  • Canada
  • Liked: 401
  • Likes Given: 599
Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #21 on: 11/08/2018 10:45 PM »
Pick C. Think SX will do option B first then option A if there is no hiccups.

They will have to test out the forward canards eventually. Better on a mini-BFS then a full size article.

Online QuantumG

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8712
  • Australia
  • Liked: 3652
  • Likes Given: 858
Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #22 on: 11/08/2018 11:26 PM »
I just hope they don't go for B and end up doing A. Feature creep is a project killer.
I hear those things are awfully loud. It glides as softly as a cloud. What's it called? Monowhale!

Offline tater

  • Member
  • Posts: 52
  • NM
  • Liked: 28
  • Likes Given: 65
Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #23 on: 11/08/2018 11:29 PM »
They could do B, and still probably get some sort of folded canard (grid fins?) just under the fairing as well.

Offline hkultala

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 884
  • Liked: 360
  • Likes Given: 328
Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #24 on: 11/09/2018 06:03 AM »
C.

Both separate fairing AND the hands.

Offline HVM

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 120
  • Finland
  • Liked: 110
  • Likes Given: 98
Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #25 on: 11/09/2018 06:57 AM »
Clearly they are going to re-engineer the payload adapter and the fearing ring so they can be secured and ejected through TPS; open multiple holes to the TPS and put whole reentry test in jeopardy. In a mission with very little payload margin. And find a customer for this configuration.
« Last Edit: 11/09/2018 07:05 AM by HVM »

Offline su27k

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1201
  • Liked: 936
  • Likes Given: 81
Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #26 on: 11/09/2018 12:47 PM »
C. It's a modified 2nd stage that looks like A from the outside.

Offline whitelancer64

Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #27 on: 11/09/2018 03:44 PM »
Clearly they are going to re-engineer the payload adapter and the fearing ring so they can be secured and ejected through TPS; open multiple holes to the TPS and put whole reentry test in jeopardy. In a mission with very little payload margin. And find a customer for this configuration.

"Holes in TPS" has never really been a problem. The Shuttle had a similar "issue" with the ET attach points. And its landing gear.
"One bit of advice: it is important to view knowledge as sort of a semantic tree -- make sure you understand the fundamental principles, ie the trunk and big branches, before you get into the leaves/details or there is nothing for them to hang on to." - Elon Musk
"There are lies, damned lies, and launch schedules." - Larry J

Offline jongoff

  • Recovering Rocket Plumber/Space Entrepreneur
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6214
  • Lafayette/Broomfield, CO
  • Liked: 2355
  • Likes Given: 790
Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #28 on: 11/10/2018 09:52 PM »
I voted for the second option. I think this is a modified upper stage with TPS and aerosurfaces to test some of the BFR reentry/control concepts. I wish it were a mini-BFS that had a clear path to making F9US fully-reusable, but I highly doubt it's that, especially given how short the timeframe is between now and then. I remember how crazy it was designing and building Xoie at Masten in a short time period. Trying to build a hypersonic glider system and TPS in 8 months suggests it's the first of a series of post-payload separation experiments to start learning how BFS reentry might work. Which is still awesome, even without acting like a fully reusable Falcon 9 is just around the corner.

~Jon

Offline skybum

  • Member
  • Posts: 43
  • London, UK
  • Liked: 60
  • Likes Given: 44
Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #29 on: 11/11/2018 12:01 AM »
A, even if it's just a test article rather than a regular-service vehicle. If they're using this thing to test the re-entry interface and hypersonic controls, it'll need to follow the BFS mold lines and mass distribution pretty closely.

Offline deruch

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2355
  • California
  • Liked: 1897
  • Likes Given: 4447
Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #30 on: 11/15/2018 06:54 AM »
B.

This is the vehicle with the shortest development cycle that answers the question, "We've already got the 2nd stage up there re-entering.  What can we do with it to start learning what we really need to know for a fully operational BFS as soon as possible?"
Shouldn't reality posts be in "Advanced concepts"?  --Nomadd

Offline AndersofOz

  • Member
  • Posts: 12
  • Western Australia
  • Liked: 4
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #31 on: 11/16/2018 01:19 AM »
I have voted for B if they plan on flying with customers which was the pattern with the first stage landings.

I wonder if they might not need a better ACS in conjunction with a better way to vent residual propellant (i.e. without causing the stage to spin) in addition to the obvious TPS and fins to ensure the correct AoA on reentry.

Offline moreno7798

Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #32 on: 11/18/2018 05:23 PM »
I'd say it's going to be "A". Mini-BFS test article only - no payloads, no propulsive landings - just for testing of heat shield, and atmosphere winged entry, and drag dynamics. This will be the proof of concept for Full BFS tests at Boca Chica. This will also be the backup plan in case there are major delays in Full BFS test developments. In that case, all you have to do is add the propulsive landing capability to mini BFS.
« Last Edit: 11/18/2018 05:28 PM by moreno7798 »

Offline smoliarm

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 580
  • Moscow, Russia
  • Liked: 371
  • Likes Given: 135
Re: POLL: "Mini-BFS" or Modified 2nd Stage
« Reply #33 on: 11/18/2018 05:48 PM »
B.

As I understand Elon's tweets, the purpose is to study re-entry profile (in search for a survivable one) and control system for it. Therefore no need for "A"-type, just regular s2 plus thermal protection and control surfaces with actuators.

I also would guess that such experiment will take place on the next launch deploying Starlink

Tags: