Author Topic: SpaceX Dragon 2 Updates and Discussion - Thread 3  (Read 815135 times)

Offline Lars-J

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6809
  • California
  • Liked: 8487
  • Likes Given: 5385
Re: SpaceX Dragon 2 Updates and Discussion - Thread 3
« Reply #1560 on: 09/19/2021 03:43 am »
So many little details for this flight...

Looks like SpaceX added an extension plate to the footrest to decrease Hayley's knee bend angle when seated.

I'm assuming that its to help lower the stress on the prosthetic during launch and landing.
It could be that, but also because of her height perhaps? She appears to be the shortest person to fly in Dragon.

Offline docmordrid

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6351
  • Michigan
  • Liked: 4223
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: SpaceX Dragon 2 Updates and Discussion - Thread 3
« Reply #1561 on: 09/19/2021 04:51 am »
A poster on the Inspiration4 discussion thread mentioned in passing that a private customer was looking to fly a flight that exceeded the altitude of the highest Gemini flight. I am guessing this would be with Dragon 2. The only thing is I thought the Inspiration4 mission was already at the maximum safe altitude for Drsgon 2?

http://www.collectspace.com/news/news-021820a-space-adventures-spacex-crew-dragon.html

Quote
[...]Space Adventures' free-flyer mission will provide up to four crew members with the opportunity to break the world altitude record for a private citizen spaceflight. The current orbital record of 853 miles (1,373 kilometers) was set in September 1966 by Charles "Pete" Conrad and Richard "Dick" Gordon on NASA's Gemini 11 mission. (Apollo astronauts, including Conrad and Gordon, later flew farther from Earth on missions to the moon, but the Gemini 11 record stands for the highest Earth orbit reached by a crewed spacecraft.)

https://spaceadventures.com/space-adventures-announces-agreement-with-spacex-to-launch-private-citizens-on-the-crew-dragon-spacecraft/

Quote
[...]Space Adventures, Inc. has entered into an agreement with SpaceX to fly private citizens on the first Crew Dragon free-flyer mission. This will provide up to four individuals with the opportunity to break the world altitude record for private citizen spaceflight and see planet Earth the way no one has since the Gemini program.

« Last Edit: 09/19/2021 04:53 am by docmordrid »
DM

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14184
  • UK
  • Liked: 4052
  • Likes Given: 220
Re: SpaceX Dragon 2 Updates and Discussion - Thread 3
« Reply #1562 on: 09/19/2021 06:56 am »
A poster on the Inspiration4 discussion thread mentioned in passing that a private customer was looking to fly a flight that exceeded the altitude of the highest Gemini flight. I am guessing this would be with Dragon 2. The only thing is I thought the Inspiration4 mission was already at the maximum safe altitude for Drsgon 2?

http://www.collectspace.com/news/news-021820a-space-adventures-spacex-crew-dragon.html

Quote
[...]Space Adventures' free-flyer mission will provide up to four crew members with the opportunity to break the world altitude record for a private citizen spaceflight. The current orbital record of 853 miles (1,373 kilometers) was set in September 1966 by Charles "Pete" Conrad and Richard "Dick" Gordon on NASA's Gemini 11 mission. (Apollo astronauts, including Conrad and Gordon, later flew farther from Earth on missions to the moon, but the Gemini 11 record stands for the highest Earth orbit reached by a crewed spacecraft.)

Thanks. Will that mean expending the F9 first stage and therefore pushing the price up?
« Last Edit: 09/19/2021 03:43 pm by gongora »

Offline MATTBLAK

  • Elite Veteran & 'J.A.F.A'
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5361
  • 'Space Cadets' Let us; UNITE!! (crickets chirping)
  • New Zealand
  • Liked: 2240
  • Likes Given: 3883
Re: SpaceX Dragon 2 Updates and Discussion - Thread 3
« Reply #1563 on: 09/19/2021 07:00 am »
It might; they may use one of the oldest and most-used Falcon 9 first stages in that instance.
"Those who can't, Blog".   'Space Cadets' of the World - Let us UNITE!! (crickets chirping)

Offline Star One

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14184
  • UK
  • Liked: 4052
  • Likes Given: 220
Re: SpaceX Dragon 2 Updates and Discussion - Thread 3
« Reply #1564 on: 09/19/2021 09:01 am »
It might; they may use one of the oldest and most-used Falcon 9 first stages in that instance.
That would be breaking new ground in itself using such an old stage on a manned flight.

Offline Rekt1971

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 116
  • Liked: 304
  • Likes Given: 1170
Re: SpaceX Dragon 2 Updates and Discussion - Thread 3
« Reply #1565 on: 09/19/2021 11:53 am »
Thanks. Will that mean expending the F9 first stage and therefore pushing the price up?

Inspiration4 had a circular 575km orbit, perhaps if the perigee remained ∼200km (or a little higher) then Dragon might have enough fuel to push the apogee to ∼1400km.
« Last Edit: 09/19/2021 03:44 pm by gongora »

Offline savantu

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 227
  • Romania
  • Liked: 293
  • Likes Given: 131
Re: SpaceX Dragon 2 Updates and Discussion - Thread 3
« Reply #1566 on: 09/19/2021 01:23 pm »
Might be a silly question  ;D , but could do you a Molnya type orbit with Dragon 2 ?
Something like 600x40,000 ? I know you'll pass through the Van Allen belts like 4x/ day, but for 2 days, hey, I think there would be interest anyway.


Offline cscott

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3473
  • Liked: 2869
  • Likes Given: 726
Re: SpaceX Dragon 2 Updates and Discussion - Thread 3
« Reply #1567 on: 09/19/2021 01:39 pm »
Putting the apogee near the poles would completely avoid the van Allen belts.  More details (including how the Apollo trajectories were shaped to avoid the Van Allen Belts) here:
https://science.thewire.in/the-sciences/apollo-11-van-allen-radiation-belts-translunar-injection/

Offline AstroWare

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 296
  • Arizona
  • Liked: 226
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: SpaceX Dragon 2 Updates and Discussion - Thread 3
« Reply #1568 on: 09/19/2021 03:32 pm »

Inspiration4 had a circular 575km orbit, perhaps if the perigee remained ∼200km (or a little higher) then Dragon might have enough fuel to push the apogee to ∼1400km.
I have been thinking about this too.

I think another method to reach higher orbit would be to lower the launch inclination. I4 used the ISS trajectory to maintain abort zones and recovery procedures. But a mission which was trying to reach a higher orbit and willing therefore to assume the increased risk, could opt to launch at 28 degrees.

I4 also had dragon inserted into a low circular parking orbit. I'm sure this is safer if an immediate return is required. But F9 could fly a trajectory which is elliptical to begin with.

We also know F9 flies a less efficient ascent due to possibility of abort and the risk of high G exposure to the crew. Idk what the limit is (dragon structural or human) but there could be an option to fly a higher risk ascent to gain performance.

elliptical orbit + low inclination + modefied ascent and injection orbit?

Wonder where all that gets you in terms of apogee.

( I'm assuming they accept the same van Allen belt transit risk as Gemini and just limit the number of passes )
« Last Edit: 09/19/2021 03:44 pm by gongora »

Online Barley

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1075
  • Liked: 739
  • Likes Given: 409
Re: SpaceX Dragon 2 Updates and Discussion - Thread 3
« Reply #1569 on: 09/19/2021 06:10 pm »
The delta-v from a 200x200 orbit to a 200x1400km orbit is about 320m/s.

I believe you can get about 120m/s with a launch azimuth of 90 rather than 45degrees to the ISS.
The remaining 200 m/s should be within the capability of Dragon 2.  You need to reserve only minimal fuel to deorbit if your heat shield is up to it.

So the mission should be possible without expending a booster, even without any additional performance from stage 2, or mass reducing Dragon.

Offline kevinof

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1594
  • Somewhere on the boat
  • Liked: 1869
  • Likes Given: 1263
Re: SpaceX Dragon 2 Updates and Discussion - Thread 3
« Reply #1570 on: 09/19/2021 06:37 pm »
The delta-v from a 200x200 orbit to a 200x1400km orbit is about 320m/s.

I believe you can get about 120m/s with a launch azimuth of 90 rather than 45degrees to the ISS.
The remaining 200 m/s should be within the capability of Dragon 2.  You need to reserve only minimal fuel to deorbit if your heat shield is up to it.

So the mission should be possible without expending a booster, even without any additional performance from stage 2, or mass reducing Dragon.
Beiji (can't remember his last name) from Spacex said that they still had 50% propellant reserves left after the flight yesterday so it would seem it could go longer or higher ( but maybe not both).

Offline Hitech

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 192
  • United States
  • Liked: 112
  • Likes Given: 202
Re: SpaceX Dragon 2 Updates and Discussion - Thread 3
« Reply #1571 on: 09/19/2021 07:11 pm »
Did anyone else notice the streaming liquid seen in the video of the second stage and the green tinged exhaust toward the end of the burn?

Offline joek

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
  • Liked: 2816
  • Likes Given: 1105
Re: SpaceX Dragon 2 Updates and Discussion - Thread 3
« Reply #1572 on: 09/19/2021 08:13 pm »
Did anyone else notice the streaming liquid seen in the video of the second stage and the green tinged exhaust toward the end of the burn?
No; nothing appeared anomalous. Please provide screen shots of what you think was odd.

Offline Kiwi53

  • Full Member
  • *
  • Posts: 158
  • New Zealand
  • Liked: 155
  • Likes Given: 240
Re: SpaceX Dragon 2 Updates and Discussion - Thread 3
« Reply #1573 on: 09/19/2021 08:38 pm »
It might; they may use one of the oldest and most-used Falcon 9 first stages in that instance.

They'd more likely use an earlier, less used, but hard to refurbish booster.
From what I've read on here, it seems like the later F-9 boosters are much easier and much cheaper to refurbish than the early ones, to the extent that SpaceX are reluctant to use the early ones unless they're not going to refurbish them.

Offline Zed_Noir

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5490
  • Canada
  • Liked: 1811
  • Likes Given: 1302
Re: SpaceX Dragon 2 Updates and Discussion - Thread 3
« Reply #1574 on: 09/19/2021 10:57 pm »
It might; they may use one of the oldest and most-used Falcon 9 first stages in that instance.

They'd more likely use an earlier, less used, but hard to refurbish booster.
From what I've read on here, it seems like the later F-9 boosters are much easier and much cheaper to refurbish than the early ones, to the extent that SpaceX are reluctant to use the early ones unless they're not going to refurbish them.


Well there are the two early Block 5 Falcon Heavy side boosters (B1052 & B1053) in storage.

Offline CuddlyRocket

Re: SpaceX Dragon 2 Updates and Discussion - Thread 3
« Reply #1575 on: 09/20/2021 03:47 am »
A poster on the Inspiration4 discussion thread mentioned in passing that a private customer was looking to fly a flight that exceeded the altitude of the highest Gemini flight. I am guessing this would be with Dragon 2. The only thing is I thought the Inspiration4 mission was already at the maximum safe altitude for Drsgon 2?

Quote
[...]Space Adventures' free-flyer mission will provide up to four crew members with the opportunity to break the world altitude record for a private citizen spaceflight. The current orbital record of 853 miles (1,373 kilometers) was set in September 1966 by Charles "Pete" Conrad and Richard "Dick" Gordon on NASA's Gemini 11 mission. (Apollo astronauts, including Conrad and Gordon, later flew farther from Earth on missions to the moon, but the Gemini 11 record stands for the highest Earth orbit reached by a crewed spacecraft.)

As Gemini 11 was not a private citizen spaceflight, all they have to do "to break the world altitude record for a private citizen spaceflight" is to fly higher than Inspiration 4, which currently holds that record.

Defining an Earth-orbital altitude record as they do gives a reasonable target to aim at with plenty of room on the upside. (Anyone know the maximum possible Earth orbit as so defined? Presumably higher than geostationary orbit and there may be some fancy orbit that avoids the Moon!) Having a record with incremental steps for improvement is often a driver for technological improvements.

Although in these early days of private citizen spaceflights, SpaceX might be well advised not to permit too many compromises on safety, signed waivers notwithstanding. We don't want politicians or regulators to have an excuse to clamp down on such flights.

Offline hektor

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2755
  • Liked: 1234
  • Likes Given: 55

Offline joek

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
  • Liked: 2816
  • Likes Given: 1105
Re: SpaceX Dragon 2 Updates and Discussion - Thread 3
« Reply #1577 on: 09/20/2021 05:25 pm »
...
Cool. Maybe will incent others (CST-***) to also go after that market.

Online abaddon

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3176
  • Liked: 4167
  • Likes Given: 5624
Re: SpaceX Dragon 2 Updates and Discussion - Thread 3
« Reply #1578 on: 09/20/2021 05:42 pm »
...
Cool. Maybe will incent others (CST-***) to also go after that market.
The opposite, I think.  Based on what we know, CST is more expensive by enough that the best way for them to sign commercial flights would be limited availability of Dragon.  The more Dragon opportunities there are, the harder it would be to swallow the price difference.

Boeing could subsidize the difference to try and win some contracts on a more competitive price basis, but that doesn't really seem like their MO.

Offline ZachF

  • Full Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1649
  • Immensely complex & high risk
  • NH, USA, Earth
  • Liked: 2679
  • Likes Given: 537
Re: SpaceX Dragon 2 Updates and Discussion - Thread 3
« Reply #1579 on: 09/20/2021 06:11 pm »
...
Cool. Maybe will incent others (CST-***) to also go after that market.
The opposite, I think.  Based on what we know, CST is more expensive by enough that the best way for them to sign commercial flights would be limited availability of Dragon.  The more Dragon opportunities there are, the harder it would be to swallow the price difference.

Boeing could subsidize the difference to try and win some contracts on a more competitive price basis, but that doesn't really seem like their MO.

They'd have to wait for Vulcan to become man-rated too, since all of the remaining Atlas-Vs are already spoken for.
artist, so take opinions expressed above with a well-rendered grain of salt...
https://www.instagram.com/artzf/

Tags:
 

Advertisement NovaTech
Advertisement Northrop Grumman
Advertisement
Advertisement Margaritaville Beach Resort South Padre Island
Advertisement Brady Kenniston
Advertisement NextSpaceflight
Advertisement Nathan Barker Photography
1