Total Members Voted: 133
Voting closed: 05/28/2020 07:21 pm
Quote from: gongora on 09/13/2019 06:14 pmDo the displays still move? I thought that changed.Looks like you're right, I forgot they did that. But it is tucked back now a lot more than when it flipped down, so when they're out of their seats, they'll have plenty of room.
Do the displays still move? I thought that changed.
In a CNN Starship interview last night Elon said he expects SpaceX to by flying people to the ISS in 3 to 4 months. Video at:https://edition.cnn.com/2019/09/29/business/elon-musk-spacex-mars-starship-cost/index.html
Elon said 3 or 4 months to CNN on Sept 28th. It may well be very likely to launch in 2020. However have we got something more definitive? 3 months lower limit seems to suggest it could still be as early Dec 28.https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=8184.2500 has NET Dec 30 2019.
Quote from: crandles57 on 09/30/2019 04:08 pmElon said 3 or 4 months to CNN on Sept 28th. It may well be very likely to launch in 2020. However have we got something more definitive? 3 months lower limit seems to suggest it could still be as early Dec 28.https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=8184.2500 has NET Dec 30 2019.Rest assured: DM-2 is firmly in 2020. It stands a snowball's chance in hell of being launched in 2019.
Would a mission extension include an increase in the size of the crew?
Quote from: NX-0 on 10/08/2019 12:32 amWould a mission extension include an increase in the size of the crew?Negative. The only thing that would change is the launchdate (shift to right) to accomodate a longer crew training regime.Should NASA formally request SpaceX to turn DM-2 into a long duration mission than it will be launched almost certainly after Boeing's CFT has launched.Currently Behnken and Hurley lack the necessary training for a longer duration mission.
Quote from: woods170 on 10/08/2019 07:06 amQuote from: NX-0 on 10/08/2019 12:32 amWould a mission extension include an increase in the size of the crew?Negative. The only thing that would change is the launchdate (shift to right) to accomodate a longer crew training regime.Should NASA formally request SpaceX to turn DM-2 into a long duration mission than it will be launched almost certainly after Boeing's CFT has launched.Currently Behnken and Hurley lack the necessary training for a longer duration mission.Ok so then DM-2 will fly by the end of the summer of 2020 because at this rate CFT won't fly until spring 2020...
~10 weeks says Elon
https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/10/spacex-targeting-abort-test-late-this-year-crew-flight-soon-after/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_source=twitter&utm_social-type=owned&utm_medium=socialQuoteIf this is the case, the ball would move to NASA's court to review all of the company's paperwork and procedures and sign off on a crewed mission. One source said it was possible this could be done in time to support a flight early in the spring of 2020If I read this correct, DM-2 will be not earlier then end of March.
If this is the case, the ball would move to NASA's court to review all of the company's paperwork and procedures and sign off on a crewed mission. One source said it was possible this could be done in time to support a flight early in the spring of 2020
This may be a dumb question, but why does a longer duration mission require more crew training? What would they be doing on a longer mission they're not doing on a shorter mission, besides float around?The crew are SpaceX, not NASA. They're not training for spacewalks. Tending some experiment? Train them on orbit, they'll have time.
The crew are SpaceX, not NASA.