Total Members Voted: 133
Voting closed: 05/28/2020 07:21 pm
Quote from: Jorge on 05/21/2020 01:56 amQuote from: kdhilliard on 05/20/2020 11:42 pmQuote from: Lars-J on 05/20/2020 10:34 pmDo they fly T-38's everyone? No. Would it benefit them on this mission? No.Do we know if post-shuttle NASA astronaut pilots still train and stay current on the T-38, and astronaut non-pilots still pull back seat time? NASA has historically considered the cockpit time a useful discipline.Not just a useful discipline, but a useful predictor of performance in stressful situations.Back in the day where astronauts had to fly an unpowered glider back from space, sure, being a good pilot made sense. I don't think the same skillset translates to this current generation of capsules.
Quote from: kdhilliard on 05/20/2020 11:42 pmQuote from: Lars-J on 05/20/2020 10:34 pmDo they fly T-38's everyone? No. Would it benefit them on this mission? No.Do we know if post-shuttle NASA astronaut pilots still train and stay current on the T-38, and astronaut non-pilots still pull back seat time? NASA has historically considered the cockpit time a useful discipline.Not just a useful discipline, but a useful predictor of performance in stressful situations.
Quote from: Lars-J on 05/20/2020 10:34 pmDo they fly T-38's everyone? No. Would it benefit them on this mission? No.Do we know if post-shuttle NASA astronaut pilots still train and stay current on the T-38, and astronaut non-pilots still pull back seat time? NASA has historically considered the cockpit time a useful discipline.
Do they fly T-38's everyone? No. Would it benefit them on this mission? No.
Quote from: Jorge on 05/21/2020 01:56 amQuote from: kdhilliard on 05/20/2020 11:42 pmQuote from: Lars-J on 05/20/2020 10:34 pmDo they fly T-38's everyone? No. Would it benefit them on this mission? No.Do we know if post-shuttle NASA astronaut pilots still train and stay current on the T-38, and astronaut non-pilots still pull back seat time? NASA has historically considered the cockpit time a useful discipline.Not just a useful discipline, but a useful predictor of performance in stressful situations.Back in the day where astronauts had to fly an unpowered glider back from space, sure, being a good pilot made sense. I don't think the same skillset translates to this current generation of capsules.However if you want to stress test an astronaut candidate in a relevant environment, just stick them deep in the Neutral Buoyancy Laboratory pool and then turn off their air supply...
Quote from: Coastal Ron on 05/21/2020 02:32 amBack in the day where astronauts had to fly an unpowered glider back from space, sure, being a good pilot made sense. I don't think the same skillset translates to this current generation of capsules...<cough> the avionics\computer "flew" the vehicle through all of the most critical regimes. Just like Apollo's critical skip re-entry. Neither of these were performed exclusively by a human in the loop. You simply can't stick-and-rudder this stuff.
Back in the day where astronauts had to fly an unpowered glider back from space, sure, being a good pilot made sense. I don't think the same skillset translates to this current generation of capsules...
Did someone forget to install an engine??
Quote from: Coastal Ron on 05/21/2020 02:32 amQuote from: Jorge on 05/21/2020 01:56 amQuote from: kdhilliard on 05/20/2020 11:42 pmQuote from: Lars-J on 05/20/2020 10:34 pmDo they fly T-38's everyone? No. Would it benefit them on this mission? No.Do we know if post-shuttle NASA astronaut pilots still train and stay current on the T-38, and astronaut non-pilots still pull back seat time? NASA has historically considered the cockpit time a useful discipline.Not just a useful discipline, but a useful predictor of performance in stressful situations.Back in the day where astronauts had to fly an unpowered glider back from space, sure, being a good pilot made sense. I don't think the same skillset translates to this current generation of capsules.Again, based on the T-38 traffic I see every day, NASA does not agree with you.
Get ready folks.....just heard of a possible presidential sendoff. See the press brief today.
Quote from: Jorge on 05/21/2020 02:55 amQuote from: Coastal Ron on 05/21/2020 02:32 amQuote from: Jorge on 05/21/2020 01:56 amQuote from: kdhilliard on 05/20/2020 11:42 pmQuote from: Lars-J on 05/20/2020 10:34 pmDo they fly T-38's everyone? No. Would it benefit them on this mission? No.Do we know if post-shuttle NASA astronaut pilots still train and stay current on the T-38, and astronaut non-pilots still pull back seat time? NASA has historically considered the cockpit time a useful discipline.Not just a useful discipline, but a useful predictor of performance in stressful situations.Back in the day where astronauts had to fly an unpowered glider back from space, sure, being a good pilot made sense. I don't think the same skillset translates to this current generation of capsules.Again, based on the T-38 traffic I see every day, NASA does not agree with you.Actually, IMHO it takes twice as many ground crew to get the t-38s ready as it takes to get the gulfstream, in this era of covid19 it might just be a way to minimize exposure. Considering that there are probably other nasa people that needed to get to florida for launch, this was probably a way to get to florida with the least amount of ground support necessary
Quote from: racevedo88 on 05/21/2020 02:48 pmQuote from: Jorge on 05/21/2020 02:55 amQuote from: Coastal Ron on 05/21/2020 02:32 amQuote from: Jorge on 05/21/2020 01:56 amQuote from: kdhilliard on 05/20/2020 11:42 pmQuote from: Lars-J on 05/20/2020 10:34 pmDo they fly T-38's everyone? No. Would it benefit them on this mission? No.Do we know if post-shuttle NASA astronaut pilots still train and stay current on the T-38, and astronaut non-pilots still pull back seat time? NASA has historically considered the cockpit time a useful discipline.Not just a useful discipline, but a useful predictor of performance in stressful situations.Back in the day where astronauts had to fly an unpowered glider back from space, sure, being a good pilot made sense. I don't think the same skillset translates to this current generation of capsules.Again, based on the T-38 traffic I see every day, NASA does not agree with you.Actually, IMHO it takes twice as many ground crew to get the t-38s ready as it takes to get the gulfstream, in this era of covid19 it might just be a way to minimize exposure. Considering that there are probably other nasa people that needed to get to florida for launch, this was probably a way to get to florida with the least amount of ground support necessaryI believe there was a crackdown at some point of Astro's using T-38s. It is expensive. During shuttle, 4 T-38s for crew of 7 vs one Gulfstream.Not as cool, by any means, but the Gulfstream saves some money.
Was the DM-1 flight the first time solar panels have launched affixed on the exterior of a vehicle (as opposed to inside the fairing or other cover)?I can't think of any.
Quote from: freddo411 on 05/21/2020 04:01 amWas the DM-1 flight the first time solar panels have launched affixed on the exterior of a vehicle (as opposed to inside the fairing or other cover)?I can't think of any.I was curious about this as well. In general the use of conformal solar panels (as opposed to large deployed panels) seems rather rare.
Static fire is going to be with the Dragon attached. Did they do this for DM1 and the pad abort?